Great Exercises in Internet NBA-Related Postings 2.29.08

Posted by Hardwood Paroxysm on Friday, February 29, 2008 1 Comment

In the flurry of new rivalries that have popped up over the past three years, perhaps the most interesting is the Utah versus New Orleans scuff. It continues tonight.
The real MVP of the Lakers.
Shawne Williams won’t be coming along with the Pacers. Possibly because Toronto is afraid of him.
Kleiza wants his dough.
20 Second Timeout does an impressive job of assassinating Dwyane Wade and repping Kobe for MVP in one piece.
I can’t really think of an NBA post I’ve enjoyed more than this.
Oops.
Kobe’s fired up! (Please, please let him get suspended for March 11th. Please God. It would be so sweet.)
T-Ratt’s a Piston! I have no idea why this matters.
In my ongoing quest to push more Blazers’ blogs since they’re all so good, here’s the certainty scale.
MavsCentral is very confused.
ClipsNation is hopeful, but melancholy.
Post-Tramatic Trade Syndrome.
The Spurs realized they may not play Phoenix in the playoffs. So they decided to kick them in the nuts early.
In defense of Vince Carter. Hey, if people can love Kobe as much as they do…
Respect Kobe has no issue with LeBron.
If your team is lottery bound… DREAM.
Who’s running the Spurs? After last night, the answer may still be the same.
More destruction of MJ as an executive.
For love or money?
Deng on the new Bulls.
I almost peed a little bit laughing. Almost.

Oster-Tags: links

About Hardwood Paroxysm:

All Posts by Hardwood Paroxysm | Personal Blog | Twitter | Share By Email

1 comment 0 people listening

Comment help
Get Livefyre

Sort: Newest | Oldest

Josh Tucker (RespectKobe.com)

>>Respect Kobe has no issue with LeBron.
>>He just dismisses him.

Now, that's just low. I responded to your claim that I dismiss LeBron last night. As I said...

I'm not dismissing him if I'm discussing him so much. Dismissal is when, with one completely unsubstantiated statement, and no attempt to prove your point, you simply write a person or idea off.

Kinda like this: "Very well-developed piece on why Kobe's the MVP. He's wrong. In almost every conceivable way, but he award him points for effort. But hey, Stephen A agrees with you!"

That's dismissal. You want to know what's not dismissal? Repeatedly discussing, in depth and with well thought out and well supported arguments, exactly why LeBron isn't better than Kobe, or why LeBron shouldn't be considered a valid MVP candidate at this point.

C'mon man... at least be fair to your fellow bloggers!

share flag

spam
offensive
disagree
off topic