web analytics
<

At World’s End

It’s entirely possible that Don Nelson, in his recent fit of scribbling random rosters on napkins, drawing them out of a hat, and trying them in games, has gone completely insane.

But it’s also possible that he’s more in touch with basketball than any coach we’ve ever seen.

This world consists of not just basketball players and coaches, but front office officials, scouts, dancers, die-hards, casual fans, forum-dwellers, bloggers, and anyone impressionable enough to be affected by a basketball game.  To say that “the world of basketball” is limited simply to wins and losses or even something as trivial as points (You and your simple, primitive ways!) is largely missing the point.  It’s not necessarily a thought process I’ve fully appreciated until now, but Nellie is, more than any coach in the NBA, tapped into basketball’s collective unconscious.

An easy way to think about it is to consider every ridiculous idea that’s ever entered your mind about the game.  These fleeting notions of insanity that we all encounter before we cast them off and discount their credit.

What would happen if you fielded a lineup of entirely shooting guards?

What would happen if you had your center shoot threes all the time?

What would happen if you just stopped playing veterans all together to find minutes for the young’ns?

Nelson has tapped into the unconscious and utilized its most prized weaponry.  Maybe that makes him both a visionary and completely bonkers.  But don’t pretend that the thought hasn’t crossed your mind.  When you see a team with Anthony Randolph, Anthony Morrow, Brandan Wright, and Marco Belinelli sitting around twiddling their thumbs, the natural instinct is to find a way to get them some playing time.  One problem: Stephen Jackson, Jamal Crawford, and Corey Maggette are pretty well-paid and proven, veteran road blocks.

I wouldn’t say that Nelson’s plan is “crazy enough to work,” because what “works” in the conventional sense and what “works” in this type of framework aren’t exactly similar.  Nellie is sitting at the control panel and pressing buttons just to see if one of them causes the planet to explode.  Why would it matter if he accidentally turns the fan on?

I doubt very much that there is some grandiose, progressive goal in mind.  Nelson’s just trying to appraise the assets he has in front of them.  But the uproar over these arbitrary benchings tells me two things: one, that no other coach would do this, and two, that it was something that was on all of our minds anyway.  In Randolph we trust.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I'm going with a completely different angle on this. Nelson is trying to get fired. Before you jump out of your seat, consider how much he has jerked around the younger players over the past few seasons (particularly Brandan Wright) despite the fact that 1. they have at least played decently and 2. they fit within his scheme of what he's trying to do. I understand that the huge contracts of Stephen Jackson and Maggette warrant playing time and that perhaps the younger players aren't putting in the effort during practice Nellie may want but... At some point in time he has to realize that the best way for a team to win his way is for those young players to contribute. Wright has the tools to be the perfect four for the Warriors and Randolph is a great six man to have. Yet their minutes have been inconsistent to say the least. Now Turiaf is good, but the team isn't gonna make it up the ladder towards the Western elite with him or any of the aforementioned "vets" playing the four. You might as well suck it up and let Wright and Randolph learn on the job. So now at the end of the season he decides he's going to randomly bench starters. Not limit their minutes, bench them for full games. What can he gain from this? Nothing except a pile of losses and to take out some frustration he may have with the front office and ownership regarding the roster. On the court it's a lose-lose situation. Off it, it's a win-win.

It's a steady downward spiral and Nellie grasps desperately at a final streak of mad scientist brilliance. If he's not getting attention, he's cranky.

He's already off the bench-a-vet plan.

He got a full news cycle out of it, feels better.
Still can't coach a winner anymore.

Well, no matter how much we believe in magic, the answer to the first two questions you propose is: you would lose. The third one is perfectly valid, though, and a good, low-risk option for a team that doesn't click right now, and has no chance whatsoever of winning the championship.

I applaud Nelson, regardless. He's got marbles. I don't believe he's the only coach that would do something like that, though - case in point, remember when Popovich sat down all Big Three against Denver? Now that was an uproar. Sloan and Jackson _could_ do it, too, but I don't think they would.

And that's it. Sad, innit? Coaches have no stability these days, and this limits their ability to kick the board and try new things. There's pressure from GMs, from fans, from owners, from primadonna players, etc.

Good post, Rob. Very well written.