web analytics
<

The World of What Might Have Been

It’s easy to paint alternate realities after a close game, especially one ripe with the gravitas of the Finals.  This is it, cats and kittens; this is the big show, the real deal, the birthplace of legends, Jordan’s playhouse.  And as such, plays ranging from a lazy entry pass to slightly off game-changing layups carry more weight than any play ever should.  There’s certainly a tendency among fans to revisit those moments, and I wouldn’t dare to deny you, dear reader, that privilege on this noble blog.

Courtney Lee’s missed layup is an obvious starting point.  Regulation finales are rarely more heartbreaking.  At the time, I felt like I was denied simply a miraculous finish on a beautifully drawn play, but the full range of implications really surfaced following the Magic’s overtime loss.  To be honest, I won’t lose any sleep if the Magic lose this series.  Not a wink.  It would just be the way of the world, and whether or not the Lakers or Magic are holding a trophy would hardly affect my mood.  That’s why, when I express my disappointment over Lee’s layup, it’s not in the name of some sudden die-hard fandom or rabid anti-Laker sentiment.  The play that Stan Van Gundy drew up to win the game was not only creative, but it was the antithesis of an end-of-game play.  Courtney Lee was quite literally the last option in my mind.  I figured a Dwight oop could be in the works, as well as a quick look for either ‘Shard or Hedo.  And, in the back of my mind, a surprise corner three for Redick seemed in the realm of possibility.  There is a reason why Courtney Lee, a rookie shooting guard who has not played well in this series, mind you, was taking the last shot on a wide open alley-oop layup despite the fact that I’m sure many, myself included, didn’t even consider that as an option.  When you see something unexpected in the NBA, it’s almost always a display of unearthly athleticism or a circus shot straight out the world’s most epic game of H-O-R-S-E.  Rarely do we have a play so obvious and so isolated that demonstrates not merely the execution of the players, but the genius of a coach and the execution of his concepts.

That last play wasn’t about Courtney Lee winning the game so much as it was about Stan Van Gundy winning it.  It just wasn’t in the cards.  Lee’s uncontested run to the rim, Rashard Lewis’ pick on Kobe, all the interference from the other Magic players, and ultimately Hedo’s lob — those were all well-executed components on a bold, unconventional play call.  Does Phil Jackson make that same call, or do the Lakers inevitably settle for a Kobe turnaround fadeaway?  Being a coach is many things: part babysitter, part mathematician, part chef, and part elementary school teacher.  There are so many roles that a coach is asked to fill, and so many dimensions in which a coach can succeed or fail.  That’s why comparing Phil or Popovich or Red almost always comes down to a jewelry debate; there are so many ways that coaches impact the product on the court that are simply behind closed doors or insulated by poor (or superb) execution.  What I do know is this: if I’m given one play and one clipboard with the fate of the universe hanging in the balance, Stan Van Gundy might get the call.  He’s demanding, he’s sometimes petty or childish, and he’s hardly charismatic, but he may be the most talented in-game coach we have in the league today.  If Lee hits that layup, today would be SVG Appreciation Day, and since he didn’t, I’m here to make it just that anyway.

Changing directions a bit, there was another point of divergence in the game’s destiny, and it happened to take place just moments before Lee’s look at a victory.  Kobe Bryant, ball in hand, had the Magic on the run, pushing up court as the final ticks were almost sure to accompany a classic Kobe finish.  It just seemed like one of those times, to cap off a pretty awesome game from Bryant.  As he attacked and left his defender, Hedo Turkoglu, in his wake, I saw visions of the end.  I saw a series in the balance.  I saw Kobe adding another trophy of a beaten defender to his wall, the pride and joy of a big game hunter.  But as Kobe elevated in the face of the Magic’s help D, a funny thing happened.  He didn’t even have the chance to throw in a rainbow above the outstretched arms in front of him.  Hedo had recovered, storming Bryant from behind and swiping the ball from his hands.  That was a moment of excellence and a moment of renewed hope, and it’s all we can ask from the Magic in the rest of this series.

Some are of the opinion that the title is already won, and they’re entitled.  But Orlando showed in Game 2 that they have the ability to recover after being beaten.  If they can swipe Game 3 from behind, this may yet be a series worth noting.  The Magic still have a lot to work with for a team down 0-2, and some of the credit for that goes to Hedo and his save.  The fact that Orlando drowned in its cess pool of turnovers would be all that remains of a pretty fun Magic team.  But they’re alive (though not well) because of the fight they showed in Game 2.  It would be misguided to say that what we saw last night was the beginning of a real push for the Magic, but it was definitely a step up from the romp in Game 1.  It’s an odd air surrounding a team that almost certainly coughed up a win, which is probably fitting for a Magic team that is nothing if not odd.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

That Lee-Layup was indeed a great play. What I nearly like most about it, though, is that the Magic actually took two timeouts before it. When they set up for the inbounds pass for the first time, Hedo didn't so much as try to make a pass, he just waited and then took the 2nd timeout. It sure seemed like they just wanted to see how the Lakers set up for defense, to counter that in the second timeout. Looked planned to me (although, of course, I might be wrong).

Regarding the PG-discussion: Seems odd to me to blame SVG for the fact that Rafer either a) is just suddenly playing awful for no apparent reason or b) lets the fact that his delusional assesments of his own role on the team are not shared by the coach affect his play.

That was a brilliant play call. SVG deserves huge props to that, and credit to Hedo for being a guy who can actually make that pass. Lee had a tough play and he didn't make it. Those who are crucifying him in the media are being really unfair for a rookie asked to make a seriously difficult play to win a Finals game. I can't see Phil Jackson trying that, and I doubt Kobe would allow it anyway.

I get the thing about the Magic backcourt rotations being weird and undermining confidence, and rhythm, but come on... Alston has been unbelievably, ridiculously open. An NBA guard seriously should not need rhythm to hit those shots. The Lakers simply are waiting for him to hit and therefore have 5 guys to guard 4 players (and really, those 5 are spending the bulk of their time and energy on 3 of them). Alston needs to get his head together. When you have that open of a shot, hit it.

Well, I'd be more upset if Rafer were just pressing the issue and jacking up wild shots, but for the most part the Lakers are leaving him WIDE open, like no one within ten feet open, and he's missing badly. While I don't agree with putting Rafer on the bench, he needs to man up and quit worrying about how many minutes he'll get, last time I checked he was a veteran who's been in the playoffs before. I fully expect the backcourt to pick it up back home, I mean the odds of all 5 being cold at the same time like in the first couple games is highly unlikely.

Rob, while you're right that SVG "can't make the shots fall", the reality is that with distance shooting the shots falling or missing is often due to the confidence of the shooter; and to say the least, SVG has really decimated Alston's confidence with his rotations in this series. It's tough to blame Alston for not just calmly knocking down shots when he's probably got one eye on his own bench, never knowing when he might get yanked in favor of someone else. The Finals really aren't the time for this type of tinkering.

DKH - You're right, my bad. I guess that scenario is maybe more possible than the other two, but I still don't see it. I don't see LA losing 4 of 5 to Orlando. I honestly have a hard time seeing them lose two in a row to the Magic, let alone three (or losing two in a row twice). I could see them getting blown out in a game, but losing 4 of 5? Really doubtful.

Yams,

Just wanted to point out (since I think you made a similar comment over on basketbawful) that the Magic could also win the next 3 games, lose game 6, and win game 7, which falls outside of your two scenarios.

And I mostly agree with your analysis of the PG situation. Alston has been decent, and I think he was above average in the ECF, but he also had some bad games in that series. Main point is, I don't think this is too unexpected out of Alston, but I do agree that SVG and the Magic haven't helped.

Justin N. makes a great point. SVG has, IMO, totally destroyed the confidence of Rafer Alston, and maybe Jameer Nelson as well (who knows what back to back DNP-CDs have done to Anthony Johnson). The Magic PGs are getting outplayed by the Laker PGs, and that is really staggering.

I still think this series is going to go 6, just as I thought before it started. I thought Orlando would essentially concede Game 1 due to inexperience, but Game 2 was more what I expected for the bulk of this series. I expect it to be hard fought back and forth games the rest of the way, although I do think there may be one Orlando blowout win in there if they really get hot in one game. The way LA is playing defense in this series that's probably less likely than I would have thought before it started, but you never know.

Ultimately though, I think down 2-0 the Magic are in too deep a hole to really be starting anything. For Orlando to win this series one of two things has to happen:

1. Sweep the next four games
2. Win Games 6 & 7 in LA

I don't see either of those things happening, so while I do expect the Magic to fight back and make it a series, I think ultimately the damage has been done and it's going to be LA's championship.

In honor of SVG appreciation day, I'd like to know how you feel about the way he's handled his backcourt throughout the series.

Managing the Magic's backcourt is a tough situation. Rafer has played well, but how long can that really last? Jameer is back, but he's clearly not ready to play starter's minutes. Anthony Johnson is Anthony Johnson, and though he has played well, he is clearly third on the totem pole. Given Jameer's recovery, I think it's a given that SVG has to play him at the risk of alienating the team's rightful starting point. But Rafer is clearly affected by splitting minutes at PG, a reality which he'll need to get quite a bit more comfortable with.

I guess the "right" thing to do would be to play Rafer as the starter and just give Johnson's minutes to Jameer, but with how badly Rafer has been shooting, I think SVG is looking for a spark. His rotations haven't been perfect in the backcourt, but he's desperately looking for something. ANYTHING. Hell, Redick was playing some key minutes as the point guard on the floor, even if Hedo was handling most of the responsibilities. Van Gundy can do a lot to prepare his team and though he's certainly not faultless, he also can't make the shots fall.