Sometimes You’re Just Better Than Everyone Else

Yahoo! Sports

Congratulations to the Los Angeles Lakers and their fans on their 15th (!) championship.

The only way the Lakers could atone for their atrocious play in the semifinals was to come out and absolutely blast a very good Magic team. And they did it. They showcased everything you would need to make the argument that this was a great team. Pau Gasol playing terrific defense and hitting shots only he and Dirk can hit. Kobe hitting shots only he and Voltron can hit. Fisher playing the part of the savvy veteran hitting big shots. Ariza being pure energy. And Odom, always Odom, putting it together and playing to and beyond his athletic potential, just playing fantastic basketball.

The Orlando Magic were not frauds, wimps, or shellshocked. They were not shocked by being in the Finals. They were not unprepared, starry-eyed, or overwhelemed. SVG was not outcoached. The Lakers were just the better team. Why must we trash one team who made it to the freaking Finals in order to congratulate the best team? The Lakers were great, as they have been all season. And they were better in this series. Nuff said.

i picked the Magic in seven becasue my heart ran away with my head, and I feel like picking the Lakers was too easy. I hate easy picks. But it would have been the right pick. Not just because they’re now the champs, but becasue I knew they were the best team. I was never convinced, even by Cleveland’s late run, that any team but the Lakers deserved the mantle of “best.”

The Lakers started this season dominating everyone. They then went and destroyed Boston and Cleveland. They took down every challenger, weathered losing Bynum again, and still killed everyone but Charlotte. The Lakers were the best team in the NBA this season, becasuse they are talented, athletic, tall, and, for longer periods than not, focused. And all those things equate why they’re a great team.

Congratulations, Laker Nation. You can crow about your franchise being the best again, and it has all the weight it needs, fifteen times over.

UPDATE: Since Yams pointed out I buried the Lakers last year, it’s only right that I trash the Magic, even though I don’t feel like there was much else they could do outside of a handful of plays to beat this team. I was wrong last year about LA. There was no shame in what they did. There wasn’t a team in the world that was going to stop Boston last year, just as nothing was going to stop LA. But let’s talk about the Magic for a moment.

  • The big question is whether to re-sign Hedo or not. Otis Smith has made noise that they plan on doing just that, and that they’re willing to go into luxury-tax-land for it. But I’m not so certain that’s what this team needs. They need more balance, and a semblance of a traditional lineup. Lewis needs to play as an oversized 3. Turkoglu’s not quick enough to play a traditional 2 role. And they need a rebound and clean-up player (Brandon Bass). Their size should be an advantage for them, but LA murdered them on the boards. And that’s not talent on the Lakers end. That’s drive.
  • SVG deserves as much blame as anyone on the Magic, even though the Master of Panic stuff is ridiculous (they made the freaking Finals!).  He didn’t have his team ready in the closing moments of games, consistently overreacted to elements and adjustments, and most importantly, abandoned the thing that got him here, shutting down support players.
  • Howard’s not there yet.I don’t think he needs to be, because of his age, but he isn’t.
  • Welcome back to earth, Mikael Pietrus. Hope you like the atmosphere while you were up there.
  • There was a point in time when I really thought that Rashard Lewis could give the Magic more than 25 a night consistently if called upon. That was not smart.

Also, just to respond to something else asked in the comments, I think Trevor Ariza is a perfect example of a great Laker player. That is, the guy’s not going to be a star on many other teams, but in the triangle, told to do specific things and fill certain roles, like nailing spot up threes, he was terrific this year. The guy’s no bust. He works his ass off on both ends of the floorand while he can be a little reckless, you need some of that if you want to win a title. That dude’s getting PAID. He and Rick Fox should go bowling together.

And as KD pointed out over at BDL, Pau Gasol has forever shed the soft label. You don’t have to be emphatic if you’re really, really, really freaking good.

Hindsight’s 20-20,and right now, this Lakers team looks better by the minute. Championship shine will do that to you.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

AK Dave - There definitely is a bit of pleasure in going back and reading this quote (which I linked to above) from Mr. Moore back in February: "Watching Lakers fans come to the realization that there’s a reason Trevor Ariza got dumped from Orlando is kind of hilarious." I guess in the same way, watching the doubters come to the realization that there's a reason Laker fans were so high on Ariza is kind of hilarious :D

Nevertheless, I've got a ton of respect for Mr. Moore and his opinions, and I'm frequently blown away by his passion and the quality of his writing. It just irks me that unlike, say, Matt McHale, Moore tends to be fairly incapable of letting go of his hatred of the Lakers to ever give an honest assessment of them. I can't ever recall reading anything even remotely positive about them from him that wasn't fairly liberally tinged with bitterness, and it's a shame. I guess every good story needs a villain.

I appreciate the humor of disliking the Lakers and Kobe, and enjoy that as much as anyone; but eventually I do like to have serious discussions about them, just as I do any other team. It just bugs me that the Lakers carry all this baggage that often prevents a real quality basketball discussion about them from taking place (and that's not just the fault of the "haters" either, the idiots who refuse to acknowledge any faults or flaws with the team are equally irritating, and equally guilty of derailing a good conversation before it starts). Instead discussions about the Lakers to usually devolve into attacks both ways.

DKH - Portland may not have shown a whole lot this year, but IMO they showed enough. Don't be surprised if they're the 2nd seed in the West next year, and don't be surprised if they're in the WCFs. It's really too early to make any real predictions about anyone, because there's far too many good free agents out there who could end up on any number of teams; but even if Portland doesn't do anything this summer and just keeps the same guys and gets a year older, they're going to be a beast. All that team has really been missing is experience, and to their credit they got a lot of it this year. They will no longer be "just happy to be there" when they make the playoffs in April, and I don't think they'll be satisfied with just making it out of the 1st round.

I think a team with similar talent and more experience will upend them next year, but how many teams in the West will be able to compete with Portland talent-wise? LA and maybe Denver? I'm afraid my days of mocking Abbott and his Blazers are probably nearing an end. They're going to be too good to hold back next year, and I really think they'll give the Lakers a hell of a battle.

Wild Yams: why not just point a finger, stick out your tongue and say "I told you so!!"

Come on - You know you want to. Plus it would save you about 650 words. Give in to your anger!

Agreed with Yams regarding the Magic's distance from a title. The Magic will also have a more difficult route to repeat through the Eastern Conference than the Lakers in the West, I think. I'm not sure who will challenge the Lakers in the West. Denver, maybe? With another year together? Portland may also get better, but they didn't really show that they were all that close this year.

In the East, Cleveland and Boston will definitely be challengers to the Magic again. Actually, that could be interesting, in that there should be three really motivated teams in one conference. The Turkoglu/Lewis/Howard trio made for a lot of matchup nightmares (moreso for Cleveland than Boston), but Orlando also needed some pretty hot shooting to get by those teams. (That's not a knock on them, that's just how playoff series are. Brief hot streaks can propel teams pretty far. Small sample size and all that statistical stuff.)

Matt - I wasn't really looking for you to trash the Magic (since I agreed, it wasn't that they failed or something, they just weren't the better team), I was just pointing out that you weren't so charitable when the Lakers were the losing team. I'm really hoping that KG's knee heals up and that everyone from Boston and LA is healthy all next season because I really do want to see a rematch there. I couldn't help but feel last year that if Bynum and Ariza had both been well that it could have made a difference in that series, and I was really looking forward to seeing what happened this year, but it wasn't meant to be.

I know you're fairly consistently down on Bynum, and I can understand why considering the underwhelming playoffs he just had; but the guy is only 21 and still shows flashes of what he can do. Hopefully by the time next season starts he'll have had plenty of time to fully recover and put in some more work and he'll be ready to go right out of the gate, unlike this past year. He has a lot of doubters to prove wrong, and he needs to show everyone why the Lakers signed him to that contract.

Provided LA re-signs Ariza and Odom, these Lakers aren't going anywhere. Not for a while. Fisher will be 35 next year and Kobe will be 31, but everyone else is in their 20s. This championship experience as well as just the experience of playing together for a number of years is going to make them even tougher to beat next year. If the Lakers stay healthy, I like their chances of repeating.

The Magic are much farther away from the title now than the Lakers were a year ago, IMO. The main reason is because a year ago LA had Bynum and Ariza returning. The Magic will get Jameer back (hopefully) at full speed next year, but I don't know that that will be enough to push them over the top. It would have made a huge difference in this series, that's for sure, but I don't know if it would have swung the pendulum completely the other way. Time will tell.

I was going to thank you for the write-up.

Then I read WildYam's links to some of your posts from last year. The Celtics put on one of the "greatest team performances in NBA history"? Okay...against a good, yet injury-ridden and inexperienced ballclub. The Orlando Magic this season were a lot like the Lakers from 2008, except better (an inside defensive presence. Still young and injured). So if the Celtics put together one of the greatest team performances of all-time against an inferior squad, what does that mean for the Lakers this season?

Oh...they just happened to be "better".

Puh-LEASE.

Love your site and your writing style but I have to disagree with you on two things: the Magic were shellshocked, particularly at the end of games, and SVG was completely outcoached by Phil. His handling of the backcourt minutes was a real botch job.

"Why must we trash one team who made it to the freaking Finals in order to congratulate the best team?"

I dunno, but last year you did so anyway. In fact, you held off on praising the champs until you'd thoroughly trashed the challengers, so go figure.

I said this in the comments the other day, but since you never answered I'm still curious: do you now realize why Laker fans were so high on Ariza all year? Much like with Bynum, you practically fell over yourself in the rush to pronounce Ariza an overhyped bust the second he had a mediocre game, and fairly well ignored him the rest of the time. Any updated thoughts on Ariza and his value as a basketball player?

I bring this up not to gloat (well, not ENTIRELY to gloat). I just wanted to point out, once again, that I think your blind Laker hatred does you a disservice when you write about them, as it precludes you from being objective at all. Even worse, it often prevents you from writing objectively about other teams, just because you're so hoping they're all actually better than they are simply because that might mean they could beat LA. Like you basically said above, it's why you picked the Magic in 7.

Hate on though. It's what drives you. Maybe it's better than the alternative. As I wrote you before, I just hope that now that you don't have any real legit reason to bash Kobe as a player, and now that your oft-pointed out shortcomings of the Lakers don't have any real legs to stand on, I hope it's not going to diminish your overall passion for writing about the game, because you really are a fantastic NBA blogger.

When you don't let your bias against the Lakers blind you, that is.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] have written a recap but the rest of the blogosphere was all over that… Hardwood Paroxysm: Sometimes You’re Just Better Than Everyone Else The Baseline: All Things Being Equal, That Happened True Hoop: Nine Things to Remember About the [...]

  2. [...] bout that. But really, what’s left to say? Matt Moore of Hardwood Paroxysm pretty much summed it up. If Odom are Ariza played well the Lakers weren’t going to lose. And that’s what [...]

  3. [...] bout that. But really, what’s left to say? Matt Moore of Hardwood Paroxysm pretty much summed it up. (Although Shaq did it even better.) If Odom are Ariza played well, the Lakers weren’t going [...]