Nichols and Dime: What to Expect From Dwyane Wade, Quarter by Quarter

As a follow-up on my piece on LeBron James, I’ve decided to take a look at another superstar: Dwyane Wade. Like James, Wade is a prolific scorer who makes his living close to the basket. How does Wade change his offensive style as the game goes on? Let’s take a look:

dwyanewadeshotselectionperquarter

As you can see, I made one change from last time. For Wade, I included offensive possessions that resulted in him taking shots from the free throw line. The reason for this is that close shots might be underestimated because of the frequency that forays into the paint lead to fouls.

Like James, as the game goes on, Wade increases his attempts from beyond the arc at the expense of close shots and a bit of midrange. Even if we assume every trip to the line came off a close attempt (which would be very questionable, especially considering non-shooting fouls that occur after the opposing team is over the limit), the trend is still the same. In the fourth quarter, Wade takes almost three times as many three-pointers as he does in the first. Like I suggested with LeBron, fatigue could be a factor, as could adjustments made by the opposing defense.

The bigger question may be: are these adjustments by Wade justified? Let’s take a look at the efficiencies of three’s, midrange, and close shots for Wade:

dwyanewadeshotefficiencyperquarter

Here we see a major difference between Wade and James. While the latter gets worse on three-pointers as the game goes on, the former gets better. Remember, that was the major concern with James. Despite it becoming a less efficient shot for him, James favors the three-pointer more and more as time elapses. Wade gets much more accurate from long range, while his efficiencies in the other two shot types decrease slightly. This means his increase in three-point attempts makes more sense. In fact, Wade is a pretty darn good three-point shooter in the third quarter.

Can we try to optimize the shot selection for an NBA player? Nobody knows how to balance a player’s offensive game better than the player himself, so I don’t think we should try. Still, we see that LeBron’s in-game adjustments don’t seem to make sense like Wade’s do. Whatever the reasons, it appears the Heat do not suffer to the same extent as the Cavaliers (based on the individual performances of Wade and James alone).

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Hi, Jon.

1. Good work on your part.

2. The only aspect which I will take issue with is the following observation:

"Nobody knows how to balance a player’s offensive game better than the player himself, so I don’t think we should try."

IMO, this [part I've bolded] could not possibly be further from the truth.

There can sometimes [frequently? always?] be a massive distinction between:

A. What a player thinks he needs to do in order to "balance" his own offensive game;

vs

B. What that player's coach [coaching staff] thinks he needs to do in order to "balance" his individual game;

and it is by no means guaranteed that what the player thinks is the most accurate.

In some instances the player is 100% correct ... but, in other instances, it's the player's coach who is 100% correct, not the player, himself.

What wondahbap said. This kind of statistical analysis is great. In fact, I love most of the stat reserach that's going on in Basketball these days... but the hubris of a guy like Dave Berri (who truly seems to think that he can sum up a player in a single number - ie WP says Ariza is better than Artest, so for Berri Ariza being better than Artest is an undisputable fact) gets on my nerves more and more every day. I appreciated his work at first, because he often highlights productive players who are sometimes ignored, but I've grown to hate the Wages of Win blog.

I realize this comment doesnt have anything to do with this great blog post.. Im just venting.

Good job. I like reading these segments. I applaud you for using real stats that show concrete trends. Not some questionable formula to start arguments.