<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nichols and Dime: TPS, a New Method for Evaluating Players</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2009/10/02/nichols-and-dime-tps-a-new-method-for-evaluating-players/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2009/10/02/nichols-and-dime-tps-a-new-method-for-evaluating-players/</link>
	<description>Unbiased opinions from extremely biased people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Nichols</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2009/10/02/nichols-and-dime-tps-a-new-method-for-evaluating-players/comment-page-1/#comment-23153</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=3357#comment-23153</guid>
		<description>If I was building a championship team, you know I would start with Ben Wallace at the point.

In all seriousness, Wallace&#039;s high score is due to a number of factors:

1.  His Composite Score is high, so any rating that factors in Composite Score will make him look good.
2. He has a surprisingly high assist rate of 16.8.  To put that into perspective, that&#039;s only slightly lower than Daniel Gibson&#039;s assist rate.  Perhaps it&#039;s because Wallace never does anything on offense except move the ball to someone else.
3.  Similarly, his Pure Point Rating is pretty high, especially for a power forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was building a championship team, you know I would start with Ben Wallace at the point.</p>
<p>In all seriousness, Wallace&#8217;s high score is due to a number of factors:</p>
<p>1.  His Composite Score is high, so any rating that factors in Composite Score will make him look good.<br />
2. He has a surprisingly high assist rate of 16.8.  To put that into perspective, that&#8217;s only slightly lower than Daniel Gibson&#8217;s assist rate.  Perhaps it&#8217;s because Wallace never does anything on offense except move the ball to someone else.<br />
3.  Similarly, his Pure Point Rating is pretty high, especially for a power forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Alsina</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2009/10/02/nichols-and-dime-tps-a-new-method-for-evaluating-players/comment-page-1/#comment-23051</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Alsina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=3357#comment-23051</guid>
		<description>Ben wallace is an 86 playmaker? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben wallace is an 86 playmaker? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

