web analytics
<

Location, Location, Location

Reading McHale’s in-depth look at the Bulls’ shooting woes, I wanted to see where the Bulls rank in terms of where they take their shots. Luckily HoopData has all that info.

Here’s the rundown in terms of ranking for attempts, field goal %, and AS% (percentage of makes that are assisted).

At the rim: 26th attempts, 24th percentage, 21 AS%
<10 feet: 21st attempts, 7th percentage, 5th AS%
10-15 feet: 11th attempts, 5th percentage, 2nd AS%
16-23 feet: 1st attempts, 26th percentage, 7th AS%
three: 27th attempts, 30th percentage,5th AS%
free throws: 25th attempts, 26th percentage, 26th free throw rate

The reason I like this data so much is that it tells something really obvious in more detailed, pragmatic terms. The Bulls take the most attempts in the lowest efficiency areas. The most efficient shots are shots at the rim (proximity), threes (more points, more likely open), and free throws (undefended). The least efficient shots are 10-15 feet and 16-23 jumpers. You’re likely to both be defended there, and they’re harder to hit. The Bulls are bottom 10 in attempts in all the efficient areas and top five in both of the inefficient areas. What’s more, they’re top ten in assisted percentage from the least efficient areas. Translated, the Bulls are throwing a ton of passes that result in mid-range jump shots, and very few that result in layups and dunks.They’ve got high assist rates all over, top five in <10 feet and threes, but since they’re shooting dead last from threes, that’s not helping much. Meanwhile, they’re not getting to the line, and when they’re there, they’re not making them. Saying “work on free throws” seems pretty obvious, but it’s more than that. You can live with shooting a low percentage if you’re getting enough opportunities. The Kings are 15th in free throw percentage, but third in most made free throws. So they’re getting a ton of points off that (23.4 a game), while the Bulls are getting the fourth fewest.

The sum of all this for the Bulls should be “Play smarter, not harder.” They’re working really hard and that’s evident in their defensive stats, but on offense, they’re targeting low percentage shots, not converting anything easy, and not drawing fouls. Part of this can probably be attributed to how they’re using Brad Miller. It’s fine to use Miller as the drift-out three option (fake the clearout for an ISO-Rose drive, then drive and dish to Miller), his percentage on those will improve. It’s another to keep running him at the high post and high screen and roll continuously, meaning you have no one low to get easy baskets, and you’re continually putting him in decision making roles more and more. Rose needs to focus more on getting inside assists as opposed to settling for dishing to the open jump shooter, and those jump shooters need to start attacking more.  Finally, when you’re at the rim, just focus and get the ball in the little circle.  They’re top 15th in %Blocked, but there’s also a huge grouping between 10 and 22 who are all very close in percentage, so they’re not abysmal there. They don’t even have to necessarily improve both. Either create more attempts to make up for your poor shooting, or shoot better to make up for the few opportunities you have low.

Also, if you could reach deep inside Kirk Hinrich’s subconscious and drag his jumper kicking and screaming back to the surface, that would be great, thanks.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

The biggest problem the Bulls have is they really don't have much of a choice with their roster. They're shooting a poor 36.6% FG% from 16-23 feet (compared to league average 38.6), but their eFG% from three is an incredibly, incredibly bad 37.9% (compared to the league average 53.6). The next lowest team from three is over 42%, to give you an idea of how bad they have been. They don't even have anyone on their team who's shooting an eFG% of higher than 41% from three. They only have five players on their team who have even made a three. Sounds like someone is missing Ben Gordon much?

I guess you could force Deng or Miller to take some threes, but neither has really shown much success with it (not sure if either has ever averaged one made three per game in their career, and they definitely haven't recently). You can play Pargo more, but he's inefficient as all hell. Their only real choices are hoping Salmons and Hinrich come around, and actively forcing them to take more three-point attempts, while encouraging the point guards to set them up there. Hinrich and Salmons take a combined 8.1 attempts from 16-23 feet per game when they're basically the team's only competent three-point shooters playing big minutes. That's kind of hard to do, though, as they already take more threes per game than long twos anyway.

Forcing more inside shots should definitely be a priority, and that onus is on Rose in terms of creation both for himself and others, but no matter what this team does with its current roster, it just isn't built to have optimal shot distribution based on average efficiencies. They can definitely do a better job than they're doing (32.8 attempts from 16-23 feet compared to league average 21.1 and 2nd most 25.9 is just insane), but this team is flawed from an offensive standpoint in terms of its makeup, and no coaching can fully rectify that. Their best bet is really killing it inside, which they have a chance to do with Noah and Rose, if Rose ever wakes up and starts getting to the basket more.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Update! Matt Moore of Hardwood Paroxysm saw this post and did a little extra digging for additional information about the Bulls’ ranking for attempts, field goal percentage and assist percentage (percentage of makes that are assisted). Here’s what he found: [...]