Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right. But Three…

In their latest step toward insanity, the Memphis Grizzlies have deemed it sound decision-making to take on the next free agent malcontent in line: Jamaal Tinsley. It’s a logical progression: If you give Michael Heisley a cookie, he’s going to want some milk. And if you give him a useful but oft-cancerous Zach Randolph, he’s going to want an angry, diminished Allen Iverson. And if you give him an angry, dimished Allen Iverson, he’s going to want a destructive point guard who hasn’t played a game in a year and a half. If you squint your eyes and cock your head to the side a bit, it all starts to become very, very clear.

The Grizz should be a young team getting in their reps, but instead they’re spinning sideways. Bad teams have the luxury of playing who they need to play, which should theoretically mean good minutes for developing players. For now, that’s the case. But what happens when Darrell Arthur comes back into the mix? Or Hasheem Thabeet? What happens if A.I. isn’t donezo? Combined with Tinsley, that’s a good bit of minutes for a team that needs to find consistent burn for its youngsters.

And never you mind that Marcus Williams is already on the roster, or that Mike Taylor was nixed from the mix before the season began, or that the younger side of the free agent pool or the D-League could have all kinds of interesting prospects. Signing another young point guard just doesn’t make sense for a franchise that aches for trouble-making vets. It’s one thing if Heisley/Wallace were to bring in a Kevin Ollie type; limited as they may be, you can at least talk up the ‘leadership’ and ‘intangibles’ that every player over 30 apparently has. But that same rationale doesn’t stick when the veteran in question hasn’t provided much in either regard. To make matters worse, there is simply no way that Tinsley is in NBA-shape, meaning any usefulness he could have as a fill-in for Iverson is hedged pretty substantially.

I get the frustration with Mike Conley. He’s had opportunities, but hasn’t exhibited much growth. There have been dozens of articles about how Conley is ready to make the jump, but I see nothing more than a hop (at best). But why turn to such a combustible option so quickly? Why not give a younger, unproven guy a shot, and not push your locker room one step closer to implosion?

In short, because little moves like this are symptomatic of a poorly run franchise. In long, because Michael Heisley and Chris Wallace have proven time and time again that they shouldn’t be trusted with personnel decisions, and that their jobs aren’t finished until they’ve brought home an aneurysm to the few remaining Grizzlies’ fans.

Oster-Tags:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

How about being in the NCAA final game and having the reigning NBA ROY and last years NBA overall #1 draft pick?

But personally, I don't consider a "great basketball town" having anything to do with players playing in Memphis. I consider it a "town" with people who enjoy, love, follow, etc... the game.

Heisley is PROFITING over the Grizzlies "CASH CONSIDERATIONS FRANCHISE". The city of Memphis pays. They have tax supported - publicly financed portions of the FedexForum as you expect. The bandits make money while all the fans and people of Memphis get a Grizzly bear dump in their living room each game.

Memphis is perhaps one of the greatest basketball towns in the world. How many of the elite players right now have come from Memphis or spent time there? Please

Dwight... not sure how you got your info or opinions....

I don't know what you call "deep pockets" and I'm sure Heisley doesn't like losing or giving away millions of dollars... But, he is currently worth about $1.5 BILLION dollars. AND, I'm pretty sure the Grizzlies were not even in the red last year.

Also, you are wrong about Memphis not being a "great basketball town". However, it has proven not to be much of a "pro-sports" town.

It makes one wish West & Brown were still in town, as they were great basketball types.

The business side is a different matter. Heisley does not have deep pockets, they are operating in a recession, and Memphis is not a great basketball town.

In the long run, Heisly will probably sell to someone who can afford to subsidize the losses, and the team will move to a larger more affluent market like Vegas or Anaheim.

They're moving. I mean, if this isn't apparent to absolutely everyone, we need more than universal healthcare in this country.

The way that upper management has made such blatantly ridiculous moves in order to alienate whatever support they've stumbled across in their Memphis tenure is breathtaking. At least the OKC jerk-wads had the common decency to say "yes" to Seattle when they meant "no"; these guys are like the Pinball Wizard... but without the whole pinball thing...

That said, if their intention is *not* specifically to relocate the franchise... My god. The only thing to do is carry them out of their offices, set them on a raft, float them down to New Orleans and set them adrift on the Gulf Stream... Let them be removed from human memory.