<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Ol&#8217; Honkin&#8217; Celtics-Magic Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/01/29/the-big-ol-honkin-celtics-magic-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/01/29/the-big-ol-honkin-celtics-magic-post/</link>
	<description>Unbiased opinions from extremely biased people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Longfield</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/01/29/the-big-ol-honkin-celtics-magic-post/comment-page-1/#comment-39342</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Longfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5593#comment-39342</guid>
		<description>Fascinating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magicfaninTN</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/01/29/the-big-ol-honkin-celtics-magic-post/comment-page-1/#comment-39319</link>
		<dc:creator>magicfaninTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5593#comment-39319</guid>
		<description>@Francis  Stats say you&#039;re wrong about Mickael Pietrus&#039; defense.  In general, swap Pietrus in for Barnes in just about any of the 5-man units on the Magic and the DEF ratings improve.  Barnes is no slouch and having him start at the 3 seems a good move, but don&#039;t knock Mickael and say his defensive rep is a myth.  Some of the best defensive units come with Barnes at the 3 and Pietrus at the 2.

But, I have to agree MP&#039;s [lack of] ball movement and stepping out of bounds on the corner 3pt can be infuriating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Francis  Stats say you&#8217;re wrong about Mickael Pietrus&#8217; defense.  In general, swap Pietrus in for Barnes in just about any of the 5-man units on the Magic and the DEF ratings improve.  Barnes is no slouch and having him start at the 3 seems a good move, but don&#8217;t knock Mickael and say his defensive rep is a myth.  Some of the best defensive units come with Barnes at the 3 and Pietrus at the 2.</p>
<p>But, I have to agree MP&#8217;s [lack of] ball movement and stepping out of bounds on the corner 3pt can be infuriating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/01/29/the-big-ol-honkin-celtics-magic-post/comment-page-1/#comment-39313</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5593#comment-39313</guid>
		<description>Burying Pietrus makes total sense to me.  The belief that Pietrus is a good defender is a terrible lie perpetuated on NBA-dom when he was the only one who even tried to play defense on the Warrior teams.  He&#039;s a good athlete but gambles a lot and exhibits poor footwork.  On offense, he takes tons of ill-advised, poor percentage shots which will probably cause SVG to have a heart attack one of these days.  He&#039;s completely frustrating.  Matt Barnes is much better on both ends.

More Redick would make a lot more sense.  Redick appears to be the most reliable (non-point) post-entry passer for Dwight Howard.  Watching Rasheed rip the ball away on the post entries was infuriating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burying Pietrus makes total sense to me.  The belief that Pietrus is a good defender is a terrible lie perpetuated on NBA-dom when he was the only one who even tried to play defense on the Warrior teams.  He&#8217;s a good athlete but gambles a lot and exhibits poor footwork.  On offense, he takes tons of ill-advised, poor percentage shots which will probably cause SVG to have a heart attack one of these days.  He&#8217;s completely frustrating.  Matt Barnes is much better on both ends.</p>
<p>More Redick would make a lot more sense.  Redick appears to be the most reliable (non-point) post-entry passer for Dwight Howard.  Watching Rasheed rip the ball away on the post entries was infuriating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
