web analytics
<

Juh-Juh-Juh Jerry And The Nets

Incoming Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov doesn’t really strike anyone as the hands-off, let-the-man-do-his-job kind of guy, so how this relationship would work remains to be seen. Plus, the Daily News article goes on to speculate about Colangelo bringing in Mike Krzyzewski from Duke as coach, even though Coach K made jokes about that idea over the weekend.

But with the way the Nets season has unfolded, Coach K is the only real hope New Jersey has to luring one or two of the big three free agents — LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh — to town. The pitch is they would be coming to Brooklyn and have a great roster around them in a couple years.

via Colangelo would consider running the Nets – ProBasketballTalk – Basketball – NBC Sports.

Sorry, been waiting to use that headline since “Kenny and The Nets” popped into my head while watching the TNT crew during HORSE over All-Star Weekend.

(Side note: Being the professional that I am, I was totally cool during the surreality of the weekend, talking with players, coaches, and executives.  The one tough thing? Not immediately running over to Ernie Johnson and tackle-hugging him, screaming “ERNIE!” Also, he got an enormous ovation from the crowd when he showed up at Jam Session.)

Kurt goes into the Colangelo idea and all of this adds more to my fire of “The Nets are one big conspiracy theory that no one sees coming but me” angle. Everyone thinks I’m mad. But I would like to point out that Cleveland miraculously wins the #1 spot with James coming out with only a 25% chance and if there’s one thing you take away from how LeBron, Wade, etc. act, it’s that they are more than basketball players, that they run this game.

Colangelo+Coach K (who knows LeBron and Wade from the Olympics)+LeBron+Wade/Bosh/Amar’e+Lopez+Wall+Yi+CDR+3 first round picks and you think I’m nuts for seeing how this would be an attractive package?

I don’t think K’s in it, though. I just think he’s too smart to think his tactics will carry over to the NBA. There are college guys and pro guys and very rarely, very rarely do they intersect. Larry Brown is a great example, but in the NBA, he’s widely considered an anomaly. K is brilliant, but he’s brilliant through a forced regimen that you can’t force NBA players to adopt. You can try, but there’s too much ego due to too much money. Scheyer has no ego. Because he knows he’s nothing, without K. NBA players? Not the same deal. He and Calipari are two sides of the coin, and neither will turn the NBA video game on.

Colangelo, though, would be in a position to manage the greatest basketball organization of its time if he were to successfully court LeBron. That’s the kind of impact that cements a legacy, and that’s hard to pass up.

This is all going to end with everyone re-signing where they are and I’m going to look like the kid standing in line at the rollercoaster the’ve shut down and no one has told him.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Oh, and LOL at Yi being part of the attractive package. 4million more in cap space if they traded him for a bag of basketballs, on the other hand? That'd be nice.

I agree with your skepticism on the Coach K idea.

When projecting from college to pro, you need to first ascertain how much of a coach's success is recruiting and how much is actual X's and O's. Coach K routinely gets among the highest ranked recruiting classes in the country, and he also hand-picks highly intelligent, blue-collar guys that will buy into his system. Few GM's in the league will be able to routinely add talented players that fit that mold consistently.

Beyond that, one of the biggest aspects of Coach K's system is the balanced and under control guard play. Routinely he recruits guys who are all-world scorers and playmakers in college (Nolan Smith, DeMarcus Nelson), then they come to Duke and suddenly they're super-limited role players. This obviously works for Coach K in his system, and having a top-to-bottom roster of high IQ guys and better talent than the opposition 99 times out of 100 probably has something to do with that.

But in the Iso/Pick-and-Roll driven NBA where playmaking guards are the name of the game and you can't curtail your roster to your liking as easy as you can when you're the powerhouse recruiting college like Duke?

And while I wouldn't call Coach K stubborn, does he strike you as the most flexible guy in the world?

Certainly Coach K can be a super-successful NBA coach, but when I look at the 4 or 5 potential markers that would be a concern for projecting a college coach to an NBA coach, Coach K comes up with red flags in basically every area. And that's before you consider his unfamiliarity with the league's players and teams, relative to those already within the NBA. From my perspective, the potential risks of this move, combined with the projected astronomical costs (I'd guess he'd be at bare minimum one of the five highest paid coaches in the league), I just don't see how this would be considered a good idea.