<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating The Playoff Race At All-Star Break Through Four Factors: Eastern Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/</link>
	<description>Unbiased opinions from extremely biased people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:26:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cdubz</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-41728</link>
		<dc:creator>Cdubz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5835#comment-41728</guid>
		<description>@ FAQ
Graphs are only representative of the underlying data, hence not necessarily quantitative</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ FAQ<br />
Graphs are only representative of the underlying data, hence not necessarily quantitative</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L&#39;Ã©valuation de la course aux sÃ©ries Ã©liminatoires Ã  tous les pause-star grÃ¢ce Ã  quatre facteurs: la confÃ©rence de l&#39;Est</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-41699</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#39;Ã©valuation de la course aux sÃ©ries Ã©liminatoires Ã  tous les pause-star grÃ¢ce Ã  quatre facteurs: la confÃ©rence de l&#39;Est</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5835#comment-41699</guid>
		<description>[...] Nous sommes Ã  la halfwaypoint, et certaines choses que nous savons, et certaines choses que nous pensons savoir. Nous pensons que nous savons Ã  quel point les Cavs, Lakers et les Nuggets sont. Nous savons comment les filets sont mauvais. Nous savons que la course aux sÃ©ries Ã©liminatoires de l&#039;Ouest, qui entrera probablement jusqu&#039;Ã  la fin. Nous savons que les Hawks ont le nombre Celtics et le Magic avoir le numÃ©ro de Hawks, et tout le monde a le numÃ©ro de Golden State. Ce que nous ignorons, c&#039;est Ã  quel point les Ã©quipes de bonnes sÃ©ries Ã©liminatoires sont, et si leur dossier est conforme Ã  leur performance. J&#039;ai donc dÃ©cidÃ© de jeter un oeil. Pour ce petit exercice, je voulais examiner les deux courses Ã©liminatoires en ce qui concerne les quatre facteurs. Le but Ã©tait de voir si l&#039;ordre dans lequel les Ã©quipes se tenait Ã  la All-Star Break Ã©tait rÃ©vÃ©lateur de la faÃ§on dont leur rendement statistique a Ã©tÃ© dans chacun des facteurs Dean Oliver identifiÃ©s comme les plus importantes. J&#039;ai dÃ©cidÃ© d&#039;utiliser diffÃ©rents sur chaque mesure comme un moyen de dire &quot;Si elles sont un gain supÃ©rieur qu&#039;ils perdent, ils devraient alors Ãªtre dÃ©passÃ© celle de leurs adversaires dans les quatre facteurs via diffÃ©rentiel. &quot;... URL article original: http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-fou... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nous sommes Ã  la halfwaypoint, et certaines choses que nous savons, et certaines choses que nous pensons savoir. Nous pensons que nous savons Ã  quel point les Cavs, Lakers et les Nuggets sont. Nous savons comment les filets sont mauvais. Nous savons que la course aux sÃ©ries Ã©liminatoires de l&#39;Ouest, qui entrera probablement jusqu&#39;Ã  la fin. Nous savons que les Hawks ont le nombre Celtics et le Magic avoir le numÃ©ro de Hawks, et tout le monde a le numÃ©ro de Golden State. Ce que nous ignorons, c&#39;est Ã  quel point les Ã©quipes de bonnes sÃ©ries Ã©liminatoires sont, et si leur dossier est conforme Ã  leur performance. J&#39;ai donc dÃ©cidÃ© de jeter un oeil. Pour ce petit exercice, je voulais examiner les deux courses Ã©liminatoires en ce qui concerne les quatre facteurs. Le but Ã©tait de voir si l&#39;ordre dans lequel les Ã©quipes se tenait Ã  la All-Star Break Ã©tait rÃ©vÃ©lateur de la faÃ§on dont leur rendement statistique a Ã©tÃ© dans chacun des facteurs Dean Oliver identifiÃ©s comme les plus importantes. J&#39;ai dÃ©cidÃ© d&#39;utiliser diffÃ©rents sur chaque mesure comme un moyen de dire &quot;Si elles sont un gain supÃ©rieur qu&#39;ils perdent, ils devraient alors Ãªtre dÃ©passÃ© celle de leurs adversaires dans les quatre facteurs via diffÃ©rentiel. &quot;&#8230; URL article original: <a href="http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-fou" rel="nofollow">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-fou</a>&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hardwood Paroxysm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evaluating The Playoff Race At All-Star Break Through Four Factors: Western Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-41627</link>
		<dc:creator>Hardwood Paroxysm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evaluating The Playoff Race At All-Star Break Through Four Factors: Western Conference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5835#comment-41627</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here for the Eastern Conference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here for the Eastern Conference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauro</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-41616</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5835#comment-41616</guid>
		<description>The major issue I have with  this kind of analisys is that they consider the stats from the first game with the same weight as the stat of the last one.
The fallacy of that is clear when you think of a team winning all of their first 40 games and losing the last 12 may be because they lost their best player. Examples being Charlotte after they take Jackson..
Great stat, may be , but meaningless. And meaningless analisys.
So, instead of looking at the picture, I suggest you look at the trend of the four factor of each team and THEN compare them and make the Bball comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major issue I have with  this kind of analisys is that they consider the stats from the first game with the same weight as the stat of the last one.<br />
The fallacy of that is clear when you think of a team winning all of their first 40 games and losing the last 12 may be because they lost their best player. Examples being Charlotte after they take Jackson..<br />
Great stat, may be , but meaningless. And meaningless analisys.<br />
So, instead of looking at the picture, I suggest you look at the trend of the four factor of each team and THEN compare them and make the Bball comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gameday: Raptors vs Grizzlies â€“ Feb 17 &#124; Slam Dunking</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-41601</link>
		<dc:creator>Gameday: Raptors vs Grizzlies â€“ Feb 17 &#124; Slam Dunking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5835#comment-41601</guid>
		<description>[...] getting comfort by looking at websites, our own Tom Liston spent about six hours of his workday on this page which looks at the Eastern Conference playoff race through the Four [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] getting comfort by looking at websites, our own Tom Liston spent about six hours of his workday on this page which looks at the Eastern Conference playoff race through the Four [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAQ</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-41455</link>
		<dc:creator>FAQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5835#comment-41455</guid>
		<description>Graphs are quantitative .. not qualitative ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graphs are quantitative .. not qualitative ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enkidu</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-41365</link>
		<dc:creator>Enkidu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5835#comment-41365</guid>
		<description>While ordering teams by conference rank is easier to look at, the regressions validity would be improved by making your x-axes either win percentage or team +/- per game.

Also, these teams&#039; performances are not uncorrelated, since they play against each other frequently. Your next step in testing the usefulness of the four factors (or any of the above stats) could be to include as many years of results as possible to lessen the cross-correlation effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While ordering teams by conference rank is easier to look at, the regressions validity would be improved by making your x-axes either win percentage or team +/- per game.</p>
<p>Also, these teams&#8217; performances are not uncorrelated, since they play against each other frequently. Your next step in testing the usefulness of the four factors (or any of the above stats) could be to include as many years of results as possible to lessen the cross-correlation effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dickey simpkins</title>
		<link>http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/02/16/evaluating-the-playoff-race-at-all-star-break-through-four-factors-eastern-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-41364</link>
		<dc:creator>dickey simpkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/?p=5835#comment-41364</guid>
		<description>Sweet sassy molassy the Bulls are so pathetic on offense. 

Is there any correlation between excellent offensive rebounding teams and inefficient offenses? It seems like this is the 6th straight season where the Bulls are an excellent rebounding team, but have a terrible offense. You&#039;d think a team that creates extra possessions would be better than 29th in efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet sassy molassy the Bulls are so pathetic on offense. </p>
<p>Is there any correlation between excellent offensive rebounding teams and inefficient offenses? It seems like this is the 6th straight season where the Bulls are an excellent rebounding team, but have a terrible offense. You&#8217;d think a team that creates extra possessions would be better than 29th in efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

