web analytics
<

NBA Lottery: I’m Just Sayin, Keep Your Options Open, Wiz

From a Karmic perspective, there was no better fanbase to root for winning the lottery than the Washington Wizards. Their fans watched as Arenas and Co. teased them with second-round contention, then fell into oblivion. Then they watched as the team came back and said “It’s cool, we’re back!” then once again jumped off the roof. And again. Then they dealt with this season. And really, there hasn’t been a more interesting development of emotion among a fanbase that I’ve seen as the one that evolved in Washington. Arenas was so hammered by the mainstream press that the fans actually rallied around him. Let’s say that again. This fanbase is so screwed up because of their history that they opted to back the dude that brought a gun into the locker room of the building where they all came to see the team play. The guy that commonly released cryptic statements to the press, failed to come back repeatedly from knee injuries, and then when he did, exhibited almost no leadership and had only mediocre play. That’s the guy who ended up with the support out of this trainwreck.

Antawn Jamison? Not a strong enough player and a passive aggressive weakling. Caron Butler? Selfish. Get those bums out of here. I want the 32.00 usage player with the federal gun charges!

I don’t blame them. You react oddly when you watch something you love get blown to smithereens. And Arenas has always been the guy. He’s the one fans attach themselves to. Tuff Juice? A fine sidekick, as long as he’s the sidekick and they’re winning. Jamison? Great teammate, a stellar support guy. But it had to be Zero.  He was the personality, the superstar, and fans are territorial about their superstars.

So you have to feel good for the Wizards fans.

The team? I kind of feel like they didn’t serve the time they deserved. Much like Arenas. It wasn’t their fault. The team construct seemed like a good plan, but it wasn’t. It happens. At the same time, though, when you opt for a course of action in the NBA and it’s a total disaster, there’s typically some period of darkness before you get it together and have another go at it. But instead, the Gods have bestowed the best prospect since Carmelo Anthony (Wade wasn’t considered that high of a prospect at the time, great, but not, you know, DWade). They get a do-over. An immediate second chance.

What’s bizarre is that this is immediately being seen as a second chance for the Gilbert Arenas Wizards.

Which is like bringing Jimmie Hendrix back from the dead and putting him on SmashMouth. Or the Fray.

The wheels are already turning. As Mike Prada outlines in this piece on drafting John Wall, he’s passionate that Wall and Arenas are a perfect fit. Arenas can slide to the 2 just like he did with Larry Hughes in 05, he wants to play off-ball, and all will be well. Kyle’s already bringing the hatchet to my freakout when I discovered Arenas had the eighth highest usage last year.  The sentiment is: keep Arenas! Draft Wall! Wall plus Arenas = DOUBLE SUPER HAPPY WIN!

I’m not sold.

I’m not saying it can’t work. It can. But looking at Synergy for last season? 49.9% of Arenas’ offense came from Isolation and Pick and Roll Ball Handler. Okay, no biggie, he was the point guard. That’s going to happen. But it does tend to fit in with the profile. Arenas wants the ball in his hands, and he’s going to want to score with it. Let’s get past his 40.5% FG percentage on Spot-Up plays, his 18.2% FG percentage on Off-Screen plays, or the moderately disappointing 44.4% on Cut plays (he only had 12 of them after all).  Essentially we’re saying that a player with considerable ego is going to immediately revert to the same player he was five years ago, after two knee surgeries, to be a complimentary player to a rookie.

And let’s be clear, that’s what he is now.

Let’s say Wall fails all expectations. That he’s just not that good. He doesn’t get it, doesn’t make the jump, and doesn’t pan out.  If Arenas is still your primary guy, you’re looking at the same team you expected to have this season, which isn’t good. But Wall’s not going to fail. He’s going to be incredible. His game translates better to the pro game than an prospect I’ve seen since Wade and I had no idea Wade would be that good. He’s a franchise in and of himself. Sticking him on a squad with Arenas is a threat to his potential, could damage his rookie season, provide a bad influence on him, and generally stunt him. He’s your guy now. He’s your second chance.

Prada mentioned that he thinks it’s moot because Arenas simply won’t fetch anything on open market. To which I ask “When have all 30 NBA franchises been smart enough to avoid a bad decision?” And this year more than any other there’s reason to believe teams will take a chance. We have a high-demand, low-supply free agency class, which means someone’s going to get desperate. You have the Grizzlies with Z-Bo giving the impression it’s never too late to change.There’s going to be someone out there willing to give up assets for a “top flight” point guard. Hell, I’d be okay with the Grizzlies doing a sign-and-trade with Rudy Gay for him. I know that sounds insane but at least with Arenas I know he’s really good at one particular thing I can (sort-of) count on. And come on. Z-Bo And Zero? In Memphis? If you’re going to crash, crash spectacularly. But even if it’s not Memphis, it would be someone. And if the best you can get out of it is future picks, that’s fine too.  Build for the future. Be patient. You don’t have to surround Wall with All-Stars right now, in fact, unless it’s a Boston with Rondo situation, I’d argue you shouldn’t. Make an exception for LeBron or a top free agent. But otherwise you’re doing a disservice not only to your franchise’s development of Wall, but to what Wall can be regardless.

That said, it could work. If Gilbert Arenas decides to take a backseat and IF the Wizards can’t get a better offer for complimentary pieces and IF the locker room’s screwed up environment doesn’t completely poison him, then this could work out great. But they should at least keep their options open.

Apparently Grunfeld is keeping all options open, including not drafting Wall at all. And hey, Turner’s a great prospect, been impressed with him since early season, and the comeback-from-breaking-his-back-and-then-killing-everyone thing only boosted that. The risk is that Wall has such a high ceiling this could be one of those things that pains your franchise for years. “We could have had John Wall but we decided to build around Gilbert Arenas who played half a mediocre season after multiple knee surgeries before getting suspended for half a season due to federal gun charges involving bringing a weapon to a locker room and bringing them out in regards to a playful argument with a teammate.” Just say that out loud.

They’re not trading the pick, thank God, since anyone you’d have to get in return is a free agent this summer anyway.  I like keeping your options open, but only between two approaches. Trading Arenas and building around Wall (the surefire, easy, simple approach to franchise rebuilding) or trying to make it work with both of them in the backcourt (makes the fans happiest).

This is a monumental decision, and not an easy one. Two years ago I argued that the Bulls shouldn’t take Rose and should instead take Beasley because they were already set at guard with Kirk Hinrich and Ben Gordon. So it’s not like I haven’t said some remarkably stupid things about situations like this.  But the simplest option, just adding a fantastic player to your best collection of players, is still not always the best move, for your team or for the prospect.

And that’s what a lot of this comes down to. From the first Kentucky game I watched, I was blown away by Wall. I saw him running that college offense with kids that can’t hit open 12 foot baseline jumpers and started freaking out. I started envisioning him with pick and roll (admittedly with Brook Lopez and not Epic Vale) capabilities, with transition systems and good players. His ceiling is so high you need the Hubble. So the idea of him being put in a poisonous situation with a guy I’ve admittedly turned on (but haven’t completely given up on) makes me queasy. I want what’s going to make Wall the best player, which will in turn make the Wizards the best they can. And just going with “add him, no change” seems like a dangerous scenario. It’s not like that roster is chock full of high character guys. You’ve got to put potential in the best situation to succeed. Getting the top pick was a great thing for the Wizards. I’m just concerned that the emotional, confusing situation might not make for the best situation for Wall.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Sample scenario:

Let's say they want to get rid of Arenas (which I think they should). They can offload him to the Bobcats for Boris Diaw (9m next season, 3 more yrs) and Diop (6.5m next season, 3 more yrs). MJ will be looking to make a splash as a new owner and, honestly, Diaw and Diop are pretty useless.

So the Wizards will have:

PG Wall/Foye
SG Young/Ross
SF Thornton/Diaw
PF Blatche/30th pick?
C McGee/Diop

Wall and Blatche will be the main guy to shoulder the team obviously. Just give them all the minutes they can handle and let them grow in their mistakes. McGee and Diop will form the defensive duo not unlike the Ibaka/Collison pair in OKC. Diaw can be a jack-of-all-trades guy to plug into any position that is in need. Foye can be the team's third guard backing up both backcourt position. Guys like Young and Thornton will provide targets for the Wall-led fast breaks.

And don't get me wrong, this team will suck terribly. This is maybe the most clueless collection of players you can put together (just watch Blatche, McGee and Thornton last year). But the thing is, players only grow when they are given minutes and learn through mistakes. Besides, you will never know what you have got until you actually play them. Byron Scott didn't know Collison is that good because he never played him; we wouldn't know Blatche could be a mini-KG (minus the defense) if they didn't trade Jamison and Butler away. Who knows if McGee can be developed into the next K.Perkins?

And by the way, what's the hurry here exactly? Wall will need time to perfect his trades, and there is really no reason to sign a couple of veterans and try to get to 40 wins, become an 8th seed in the playoffs, get bounced in the first round and have a terrible pick next June. OKC sucked last season (that's why they ended up with Harden) but look at them now. With this group another top 5 pick will be in order come June 2011, and if they end up with a good wing guy he will form a good trio with Wall and Blatche.

So just patiently accumulate assets by ripping off other teams desperate to cut costs and through the drafts. Then 3 yrs later they will have a number of promising youngsters, and they will also have Diaw and Diop's 18m expiring contracts to play with, which can possibly bring in a veteran to get them to the next level. This is a three-year plan that should work.

Assuming the Wizards gives Foye the quailifying offer and Ross chooses to exercise his player option, they will have 7 players under contract next season (Arenas 17.7m, Foye 4.8m, Blatche 3.3m, Thornton 2.8m, Young 2.6m, McGee 1.6m, Ross 1.1m). When you include the cap hold for the 1st pick and the 30th which they will own in the coming June draft, they will have committed around 35m in salary for next year, which means they will have about 17~19m of free cap space depending on actual cap number which we won't know until later.

That cap space would allow them to sign one 'max' player. If they can come to agreement with a LBJ/Wade/Bosh, then it's a no brainer that they should go ahead. But it's very unlikely that those three would want to go to a rebuilding situation like the Wizards are in. So if that fails, should the Wizards go after the second tier of FA ala Joe Johnson, Rudy Gay, David Lee or even Amare?

Of course not.

For one, most of these FA are a bit too old to fit their rebuidling plan (Amare, Boozer, Johnson, Salmon). Secondly, with so many teams having cap space this summer, the price of these FA will no doubt be driven up (only the most basic of supply-demand logic). I don't mind giving Lee or Gay a 50m 5yr contract, but I suspect their asking price this summer will be a lot higher than that. Should I overpay (to almost the max money) for a player that is the 3rd best player on a championship level team?

So instead of blowing their cap space, they should be patiently rebuilding like the OKC Thunder has been doing. That is, holding onto your cap space and deal smartly for picks and young, unexpensive talents and build mainly through the draft.

You might notice that the Thunder has had an abundance of cap space available for a couple years, but they never spend it on expensive FA. Not for Ben Gordon. Not for Villianueva. Not even for Milsap and Ariza. Instead they use the cap space to absorb short contracts from teams desperate to cut salary (some try to get below the cap; some try to avoid the tax), and in the process get all sort of goodies from these teams for doing them this favor. For example:

1) The Thunder got 2 first round picks from the Suns for taking Kurt Thomas off their hands.

2) They were able to acquire Eric Maynor from the Jazz for nothing because they are willing to absort Harping's contract.

Not many teams can go this route because it requires you to be under the cap in the first place (and not many teams are). The window of opportunity is also limited because sooner or later, you will have to give big contracts to the talents you have acquired. For instance the Thunder will only have 2 more years to pull this sort of tricks off because Durant's extension will kick in starting 2012.

However, the Wizards are exactly in this sort of situation.

The following are the sort of deals that the Wizards can pull off:

Example one -
Let's say the Spurs don't want to pay the tax anymore, the Wizards can offer to take Jefferson off their hands, but only if they include Blair and their 1st rounder next year.

Example two -
Help the Hornets cut their cost by taking on Peja or even Posey. But of course they will have to surrender Marcus Thornton and multiple 1st rounders.

All in all, the cap space will allow the Wizards to deal from a position of power for at least the next two years. Then after that the Blatche extension will kick in (assuming that he is worth a big contract in the first place) but within these two years they should have accumulated enough assets, and Wall and Blatche should have grown enough to carry the team.

Blatche would have to be included in a Lewis for Arenas deal before Orlando would consider it. If the Wizards could somehow pry away Gortat as well..Lebron might give them a serious look this summer.

I can't believe you spelled Jimi Hendrix's name "Jimmie." For shame.

I think the main problem with Arenas is that no one trusts him to be healthy. He gonna have to play 70+ games in a season before he becomes tradeable. Weird as it is I actually see Orlando doing a panic Lewis-Arenas swap if Boston swept.

Sure, I guess the Wizards fans have been put through a lot but the Wizards as a franchise do not 'deserve' the number one pick. As Net Income of NetsDaily.com put it

"The Wizards deserved the pick after their tough year? Bull. The Wizards front office tried to cover up a crime in their locker room, one with particular relevance to their community. Grunfeld quite obviously has been doing some serious negotiating with Satan."

With extreme bitterness,

A Nets Fan

Trackbacks

  1. [...] NBA Lottery: I’m Just Sayin’, Keep Your Options Open, Wiz – Matt Moore – Hardwood Paroxysm I’m not saying it can’t work. It can. But looking at Synergy for last season? 49.9% of Arenas’ offense came from Isolation and Pick and Roll Ball Handler. Okay, no biggie, he was the point guard. That’s going to happen. But it does tend to fit in with the profile. Arenas wants the ball in his hands, and he’s going to want to score with it. Let’s get past his 40.5% FG percentage on Spot-Up plays, his 18.2% FG percentage on Off-Screen plays, or the moderately disappointing 44.4% on Cut plays (he only had 12 of them after all).  Essentially we’re saying that a player with considerable ego is going to immediately revert to the same player he was five years ago, after two knee surgeries, to be a complimentary player to a rookie. And let’s be clear, that’s what he is now. [...]