Michael Pina is a contributing writer for Hardwood Paroxysm. Here’s his voice joining the chorus of disgust towards LeBron. My own manifesto about James is still percolating and should be ready for publication right when the timeliness has past us by -Ed.

A few nights ago, after the most egomaniacal, self-centered, inconsiderate hour of television ESPN has ever aired mercifully ended, pundits, analysts, and professional journalists (or so they say) spent hours exploring the semi-shocking decision Lebron James had made to leave his hometown team for more silicone prevalent pastures in Miami.  James, Dwyane Wade, and Chris Bosh were each hailed by the network for sacrificing their respective financial incomes to accommodate one another as future teammates.  The three were treated as selfless heroes; as if they’d renounced all their material possessions for the rightful cause of winning a championship.

James, unsurprisingly, received the most praise.  By signing a six-year, $110 million contract (Wade’s contract is six-years for $107 million) Lebron will be leaving roughly $15 million dollars on the table.  $15 million that he could have earned had he re-inked with Cleveland, but lets not be naïve.  James has endorsement deals with McDonalds, Nike, Glaceau (makers of Vitamin Water), Sprite, and State Farm (to name a few).  Five years ago he had earned approximately $135 million from endorsements alone and as of 2008, his worth was speculated to be at least $270 million.  In 2007 he was named number one on Forbes’ 20 under 25 list, beating out movie stars and other athletes alike.

He’s previously stated in interviews that his focus is 80 percent on basketball and 20 percent on business, and with his financial income from endorsements upstaging his NBA contract, a loss of $15 million dollars over six years isn’t the end of his world for him, the most popular athlete on the planet.

Now that financial matters have been covered (consider that point this column’s dead horse), lets now move onto basketball related concerns.

His decision to spend at least five years in Miami is groundbreaking (Wade, Bosh, and James each have player options on the final year of their respective deals).  Looking at the public persona James and his team of managers and agents have created, could anything else really be expected? By replicating what Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, and Ray Allen did in the latter stages of their career in the prime of his, James has made the most grandiose move imaginable, all the while looking like championships are the central source of his motivation, when in fact, his move seems to be most predicated on fear.  By moving onto Miami, a team that already boasts one of the game’s most consistent scorers in Dwyane Wade, James won’t be the only one on the hook should they disappoint in the postseason. The blame will ultimately be shouldered by both Wade and James (Chris Bosh will never have to worry).  Had he gone to Chicago or New York, within two years’ time his team would be one of, if not the best team in basketball.  That’s how talented he is.  But by choosing to join forces with a rival as opposed to salivating over the chance at going head to head against him, James revealed to the world that he simply doesn’t have that inner aura about him to lead a team to a championship.

No superstar has made a move like this, in his prime, for a reason.  It’s selfish, risky, and to be frank, not worth it.  Today James stands alone as the most hated man in his sport. (Somewhere, most likely all by his lonesome, Kobe Bryant is cackling.) He’s trailblazing a path no once-in-a-generation talent should take because it not only demolishes his chances to be the greatest player to ever live, but it does a disservice to the game of basketball.   The titles will come, but not this year.  With the Celtics, Lakers, and Magic all molded, experienced units familiar with each others idiosyncrasies, chances of winning a title are slimmer than Vegas seems to think. (Odds in Vegas have the Heat prohibitive favorites at 9-5.)  But two or three years down the road, when Wade, James, and Bosh are cocooned by a solid, savvy bench, what does the league have to look forward to? The Miami Heat are clear cut favorites to dominate basketball for years to come. Unless, of course, Oklahoma City can play the good guy.

Now that the move was made and this inconceivable team was created, the respect level for Lebron James goes straight to the cellar in the eyes of former players and basketball purists.

Kevin McHale called it a reality show, Charles Barkley questioned why at 25 Lebron didn’t want to be the man, and Reggie Miller accurately speculated that one ring in Cleveland would symbolically equate with two or three in Miami.  It’s almost as if those greats were saying to themselves, “Wait a second. I could have jumped ship, burned bridges, sacrificed millions of fans, and thrown loyalty in the garbage all for a ring, but thank goodness I didn’t.” (As was the case with Reggie Miller.)  Not to take anything away from Steve Kerr or John Paxon, but Michael Jordan wasn’t feeding Miller in crunch time. They went against each other.  It’s the fundamental element that makes the league so wildly popular and intriguing.  Competition.  What do you do when your league’s best player isn’t interested in going to Chicago, where rebounds aren’t an issue and the point guard is an all-star? Instead of facing off against Wade and Bosh with his own troops, Lebron chose the easiest, least stressful alternative.

From a legacy perspective, James is pitiable. In the end, he figuratively can’t win.  Should the Heat go on a dynastic tear over the next four or five seasons (impossible to say with their current makeup) and win ring after ring, doubters will always point to his admittance of help as proof of him being a third-rate competitor.  Isn’t it the role of a superstar to start the party instead of jumping on board like a mercenary once the dust has settled?  Is Lebron not a great player?  That question, to anyone who’s ever watched him play, is obviously hilarious.  Lebron James is going to the Hall of Fame.  But by moving onto Miami with not a single finals victory under his belt, Lebron can never be as great as he’s had us believe these past 10  years.  Truly a shame, because physically there’s no question he has it all for the taking. But mentally something is clearly missing.

Loading image

Click anywhere to cancel

Image unavailable

Loading image

Click anywhere to cancel

Image unavailable


Vote It Down...Vote It Up! Rate this post!
Share: Digg this Add to Technoratie Favorites BallHype: hype it up!

Labels:

5 Comments

  1. JB says…

    “He’s trailblazing a path no once-in-a-generation talent should take because it not only demolishes his chances to be the greatest player to ever live, but it does a disservice to the game of basketball.”

    Seriously? LBJ has damaged a team-oriented game by not emphasizing himself? Did you actually just write that? Yep, he should’ve been more selfish and thought about his own legacy a little bit more, because basketball is a 1-on-1 game where you win a championship by being an outstanding individual.

  2. Caleb says…

    What this article and lots of other folks are basically saying is this – its okay to play with other great players as long as they are traded for or sign to the team you already play for… but god forbid you join them on another team!

    Lebron is still going to be Lebron… as good as Wade is, Lebron will now be the best player on his team. The only thing that has changed is that he will now have incredibly talented teammates. Why is this a bad thing? Why is okay for Kobe to play with Gasol and Bynum and not okay for Lebron to play with Wade and Bosh? Because the Wade/Bosh combo is better? Oh so I see… you can have good teammates, just make sure they aren’t *too* good.

    Would I have respected a decision by Lebron to stay in Cleveland and try and continue to guide that team towards a title? Absolutely I would have. I do think it would have been admirable. But his decision to go to Miami makes sense too and people are being really hypocritical and irrational in their analysis of it.

  3. Jackson says…

    I agree wholeheartedly with your article. One of my favorite aspects of the NBA is the way in which it inspires debate and argument. And at the forefront of these debates are the ones that pit one superstar against another. Russell vs Wilt, Bird vs Magic, Jordan vs any athletic wing that has come after him. Recently people have debated Kobe vs LeBron. I think the real tragedy of LeBron’s decision is that from a legacy/NBA narrative perspective, he has soiled his prospects in any of these future debates. Bird, Magic, Jordan, and Kobe may have been blessed with fantastically talented teammates, but they were loyal to their fanbases and shaped their teams in their own images. LeBron can now lay claim to neither. And so he cannot be in the GOAT debate anymore. This really sucks because one of the most enjoyable aspects of following the NBA is watching the rise of future greats who can someday lay claim to the crown. My father speaks with reverence about Bird and Magic–and it saddens me that I will not be able to hold LeBron in that regard when discussing basketball with my children.

  4. jwill says…

    Charles and everybody else who are criticizing Lebron
    are delusional. First of all, if you had taken
    the great Scottie Pippen from Michael and gave
    him Mo Williams as his second best player, how
    many championships would Michael have? NONE!!! Charles
    tried to win championships as the so-called
    man and how many did he get? NONE!!! Three years ago
    Kobe Bryant without Pau Gasol and then Ron Artest,
    could not win. Lebron took a team in 2007 to the
    NBA Final with who as his second best player, maybe
    Larry Hughes, and they lost to Tim Duncan, Tony Parker,
    and Manu Ginobili, three All-star players. You could
    very well make an argument that Lebron has gone deeper in
    playoffs with less talent than anybody, including Michael.
    This is why Lebron had to make this move, the expectations
    that have been placed on him are unreasonable. His last
    playoff game in Boston, a game that he had 27 Pts,19 Reb,
    10 Ast, 3 Stl, 1 Blk people are saying that he did not
    give his all. If anybody else had put up these kinds of
    numbers everybody would be saying that this was one of
    the greatest games of all times, but not for Lebron, people
    are saying that this was a mediocre game. And this proves
    that Lebron is in the discusion, for the title of greatest
    player of all time. All he needs is championship rings.
    Something that Charles does not have.

  5. David says…

    Oh, give it a rest.

    Reality check – Almost every NBA title team in history has had two or more hall of famers. Look at the rosters.

    If LeBron resigned with the Cavaliers, there was a very real chance that that kind of help would never arrive. Cleveland had neither the trade assets, cap space, or draft picks to make such a move.

    So of course he was going to leave and go play with other hall of famers.

    No one ever said Bird or Magics titles were diminished when they played with multiple hall of famers.

    Why are you going to hold LeBron to a higher standard?

    Stop sipping haterade.

Leave a Comment