web analytics
<

With So Many Light-Years to Go

palms-clock

An underlying theme from my previous post on the workings of NBA leadership was this: The Miami Heat have the potential to re-write the book of basketball convention. Not only is the team talented enough to be tremendously successful according to conventional standards, but their makeup and synthesis are so tremendously unique that they could radically change the unwritten rules of the sport. Everything from the importance and function of the point guard to the means of acquiring talent to the superstar mentality is now up for debate, and those conversations could and should rage on well beyond the day when LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, and Chris Bosh’s time together in Miami comes to an end.

Among Miami’s more interesting potential contributions to the basketball discussion is an organizational change to one of the game’s most storied and emblematic plays: the last-second shot. Henry Abbott has explored the dynamics of the last-second shot on a number of occasions (with others such as Roland Beech and Kevin Pelton as integral parts of those discussions) on TrueHoop, with play-calling as a particular point of emphasis. Abbott explains:

In the big picture, maybe teams should re-think how they handle key possessions, because what’s happening now is less effective than how teams score at other times. A big part of that is that teams are very predictable. Almost every coach goes to their superstar in this situation, and knowing what’s going to happen gives the defense an advantage they don’t normally have.

…I am fascinated to know why defenses are so much more effective with the game on the line than at other times in the game. Half-court heaves are part of it, certainly. And rushed shots. And highly focused defense. And maybe referees tend to be cautious in those parts of the game, which could favor the defense.

But it also seems to me that with the game on the line the play-calling is extremely safe and formulaic. The normal notion of finding the open man is very constrained, and takes a back seat to the idea that stars are supposed to shoot at these times. (Remember the uproar a couple of years ago when LeBron James simply hit the open man?) Analysis would prove, I’m certain, that with the game on the line, teams use far less movement of players and the ball, and there is a lot more star vs. one or even two elite defenders (like Ray Allen last night).

Surely that’s part of it too, right? It’s like there’s some kind ethical code that under no circumstances can you dump it down to Kendrick Perkins with the game on the line. But if he’s wide open, maybe you should.

It’s a point that was well-worth a moment’s consideration before the stars aligned, but it’s an absolutely fascinating idea now that Miami’s roster is in place. If any team is really in a position to deviate from the late-game play-calling norm, wouldn’t it be Miami? They don’t just have a go-to guy. The Heat now have two of the best clutch performers in the game, one versatile power forward who has been a solid late-game option for his own team in the past, a gunner who hit 40% of his clutch (“4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left, neither team ahead by more than 5 points,” as defined by 82games.com) threes last season, a deceptively clutch forward with a reliable spot-up game, a shoot-first guard with a penchant for hitting big shots, and even a PG just two years removed from hitting one of the biggest shots in the history of the NCAA title game. The Heat aren’t just loaded with options. They have a veritable arsenal when it comes to endgame scoring.

Statistically speaking, James is not only Miami’s best player, but also their top performer in the clutch. LeBron averaged more points per minute in clutch situations than any other player last season, thanks to shooting 48.8% from the field while leading the league in free throw attempts per clutch minute. Wade’s ’09-’10 clutch numbers weren’t great, but the man essentially won the 2006 championship with his ability to score, create, and get to the line late in the game (plus, for what it’s worth, he was a much better clutch performer in ’08-’09).

With two remarkable clutch options, who do the Heat go to when they need a last-second bucket? The beauty of that question may be in the fact that there is no consistently correct answer. Opponents will no doubt be aware that James and Wade are the preferred options, but Erik Spoelstra has an opportunity to really push opposing defenses to their limits with the collection of talent laid before him. All it takes is an actual play. Not screening for LeBron so he can catch the ball 25 feet from the basket and go to work. Not just running a counter to get Wade open. I’m talking about a real NBA set, complete with off-ball action, staggered screens, three-point shooters who don’t have their feet nailed to the ground in the corner, and maybe even a slash to the basket. Feel free to gasp. Miami is set for incredible success this season not just because James, Wade, and Bosh are all immensely talented, but because of the way that talent will allow them to play off one another. Giving the ball to LeBron or Wade alone to isolate betrays the team’s most obvious strength, whereas operating in a more structured endgame offense would allow the Heat to be brutally effective down the stretch in close games.

It can work because Spoelstra has a ton of options. It’s not just LeBron and Wade, after all. The rest of the roster is perfectly capable of taking and making the big one.

Chris Bosh, though being a step removed from James and Wade in terms of sheer clutch scoring, is a key to unlocking the Heat’s late-game offensive potential. If Bosh slides over to center, opposing teams have to account for him but will likely be put at a disadvantage when they do. Bosh’s combination of size and shooting is what makes him such an interesting endgame option, as his ability to hit from mid-range and beyond forces opposing bigs to step out of the paint. Not only does that give James or Wade an excellent kick-out candidate, but it reduces the resistance that any penetrator with the ball will encounter at the rim from shot-blockers. Defending James or Wade on an isolation set is difficult enough, but throw in some additional player/ball movement and take away the possibility of help-side shot blocking from the 5, and that task grows exponentially more difficult.

Pan to Udonis Haslem, who is ready and waiting at the free throw line extended. Haslem may not be the most heralded late-game scorer, but last season his per minute clutch scoring (22.7 points per 48 clutch minutes) was right in line with that of Deron Williams and Paul Pierce. He was a top-15 clutch rebounder (15.0 per 48), ranking ahead of Pau Gasol, Chris Bosh, Andrew Bogut, Carlos Boozer, Nene, Marc Gasol, Paul Millsap, Al Jefferson, Brook Lopez, and so many others. And just to sweeten the pot, Haslem shot 52.9% from the field and 83% from the line during such situations while playing for the bundle of offensive misery known as the ’09-’10 Miami Heat. He’ll knock down the open shot — and trust me, with this team he’ll be open — hit the boards when there’s a few seconds to spare, and will give James and Wade all the room they need to run the offense on the strong side.

Chalmers seems to get by on a reputation more than anything, but luckily Eddie House has been a upper-tier clutch option in the past. In House’s last full year with a quality team (’08-’09 with Boston), his clutch scoring put him on par with Kevin Durant, Steve Nash, and Chauncey Billups. House also bested designated Celtic shooter Ray Allen in almost every relevant regard: clutch scoring output, clutch field goal percentage, clutch three-point percentage (57.1% to 37.5%), and even clutch assists. Mike Miller was also very effective from beyond the arc in the Wizards’ close games in ’09-’10, shooting an impressive 40.0% from three. Never is floor balance more essential than when a team needs but a single bucket to win, and the combination of House and Miller (with a dose of Chalmers now and again, if you’d like), along with Bosh and Haslem holding steady from mid-range, should give Miami’s clutch offense all the room it needs to breathe.

In almost every regard, the Miami Heat will not be like other basketball teams. So why should they be when it comes to their play-calling with the game on the line? Erik Spoelstra has all of these incredible scoring options laid out for him. No coach in recent memory has been more empowered to go away from the “Get X the ball and get out of the way,” endgame mantra. If there’s really a place where Spoelstra’s talents can stand out amidst the incredible star power on Miami’s roster, it’s there. If they win 73, it’ll be credited to James, Wade, and Bosh. If they win the title, the significance of free agency and Pat Riley’s savvy will be noted repeatedly, with Spoelstra as a footnote. Spoelstra and his staff will have a number of difficult tasks ahead of them from finding out ways to stay competitive at the 5 to keeping all of Miami’s mouths fed, but this is one arena where Miami’s head coach has the ability to be a bit of a revolutionary.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I'm in agreement with Metalate and Garron. I think that coaches know that they are giving up efficiency in favor of clock management. If you go from a 47% chance of hitting a shot to a 37% chance by going with a late game iso play, it's still better than taking the 47% chance shot, then letting the other team get off a shot that has a 47% chance of going in.

Most NBA teams actually have enough talent to get a quality look from a set play, with Boston and LA being obvious examples. There is also the issue of time left. Obviously, you can't run an actual play if there are 5 seconds left, but you'd also need to have 10 and 15 second plays that might not really be full plays.

In the end, it seems that the coaching staffs around the league have probably thought about this way longer and harder than we can imagine, and it can't just be creative lethargy, because there are a ton of really smart and creative coaches out there more than willing to take a risk on something they think might work. They have all come to a similar conclusion: in late game situations, clock management is more important than FG efficiency.

Fascinating piece. What is most interesting is how stats on role players like Udonis Haslem can compare favorably, even superior, to big name players that get all the press and instant replays. This star power regularly makes the highlight films which breeds reputations, especially among fans, that often exceed the reality. Even for elite talent like James and Wade their reputations are often tilted toward the glamour stats like scoring and last minute heroics while overlooking facts like assists (the top ten average assists-per-game seasons for all NBA players over 6'4" in the past seven years were all held by James and Wade. That is why a post like this one can take on added significance when considering the dynamics of a team like the Heat.

Metalate: exactly.

Further, NBA (and college, for the most part) players have been long trained psychologically for the dribble-it-out late game scenario -- usually running a default pick and roll/double screen towards the goal of a pull up jumper or dribble penetration with the hope for contact.

To think the Heat will seamlessly move to an efficient, selfless, Globetrotter'esque offense that finds the optimal 'clutch' play, seems to be more an laboratory theory than one attuned to the way basketball actually happens on the court at end-game.

Couldn't you have said this about Boston 3 years ago though? Pierce wasn't that great in the clutch (though getting to the line in the clutch was a strong suit), and Ray definitely was. And as for conventional wisdom, at least they ran plays.

1. Moving PNR with a flare for Ray Allen to win the game vs philly (in 08-09)
2. PNP with a flare for Ray which resulted in a open jumper by KG vs Knicks (in 09-10)
3. Out of bounds double screen that resulted in a Paul to Rondo alley-lay up at the buzzer v miami (in 09-10)

Granted, a lot of celtics plays have become a pick and roll with Rondo/Paul or KG/Paul (depending on the team) just to see if there's a switch, and have Paul ISO on the switched man, but at least Boston has called plays with those weapons.

Oddly enough, Rivers end of quarter offense is terrible.

The Heat are unique? Revolutionary? Is poster drunk?

If anything it may get the morons at ESPN and their halfwit army to realise Basketball is a team sport, but... everyone else already knows. Including the hundreds of teams that had/have multiple talented scoring options.

They will use a blueprint that has been there for decades. The Heat won't revolutionize anything however.

Good article - I think a reference to the Spurs should be included, as they are a team which has not simply iso'd for their superstar with the game on the line. Their movement with and without the ball opens up options, and the players a never hesitant to pass it to one of the "role players" for clutch shots... Obviously Miami has potentially better talent on paper, and could take it to another level...

Wow. That was a scary post. Now I see why so many fans of other teams are so worried; and showing it by saying things like "it will never work, they won't make the playoffs. Conveniently forgetting that wade won 47 games with Mike Beas as the second best option (averaging 13 and 6 last year) and Q-Rich as the third best option (averaging less in both categories). Now replace those two with Bosh (24 and 11) and LBJ (29, 7, and 8) and people still swear that this team is going to suck. Okay, sure that sounds like an impartial assessment (I'm talking to you Bill Simmons).

Should be interesting. Redundant all star ballhandlers with suspect range and an undersized big man doesn't exactly scream dominance to me.

Good write up, but you made the Heat in clutch situations seem like the Celtics to me. Ray Allen running around a screen, "The Truth" going iso, Rondo dashing to the basket, KG with the turnaround. Heck, even Big Baby Davis can grab many clutch rebounds. Celtics and lakers are the only ones that can beat the already throned champs.

They won't need to worry about late game clutch situations when they're winning by 15+ points every night.

I think the premise of end-of-game opportunities is wrong here. Teams run isolation-type plays from 25 feet because they want to get a shot off and not leave any time left on the clock, not because there is one player that they want to have shoot.

If giving your best player a chance to score were the main objective, then the Rockets would always feed Yao in game-winning situations, but they rarely do. Running a play or going to the low post, you can't guarantee exactly when a shot will open up, so you run a risk of producing a shot with too much time left on the clock and/or of not finding a good shot before the buzzer.

Running a pick-and-roll or isolation drive at the top pretty much ensures that you can get a shot when you want it.

I do think teams are too eager to go into "use as much clock as possible mode" down the stretch, but that's really a different question.

Hmm. Excellent points. The only issue being it doesn't seem likely that the Heat will be in clutch situations often enough to get a decent sample size any time soon. I'd put money on the Heat spending more time up by 20 points with 5 minutes left in the fourth than within 5 points.

why don't we stop giving bosh so much credit. the dude wasn't even first option on one of the worst teams in the worst conference. there's a reason shaq calls him the RuPaul of big men.

i've literally NEVER heard of an announcer or coach or player saying "what are we going to do to stop bosh?!?" they've said that about wade. they've said that about lebron. with bosh, you just put whoever you want on him and you know they'll be effective. his numbers were incredibly inflated in toronto. the real abilities will come through now....lets stop calling this the big 3 and throwing bosh into the mix of star power that wade/lebron have. bosh is really just another role player on a team with two incredibly talented stars.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] The Dream Shake – ‘Is there any way that Carmelo Anthony could become a Houston Rocket?&…: “So could Anthony sign his extension and just choose to go to New York after his contract is up?  Money is an issue, maybe not for him, but in general.  The collective bargaining agreement is surely going to lower overall contracts, so signing this deal now could be the equivalent of what Kevin Garnett did the last time before max level deals were truly defined.  It would be incredibly intelligent of Anthony to do just that, sign the deal with the agreement that he is traded to one of a few teams, because I can’t see the Nuggets agreeing to take back Eddy Curry, which is the only way a trade can be made there without involving 4 or 5 teams.  If this happens, the Rockets would absolutely be in the mix.  What would they have to trade to get him?  That’s the big question. I’m guessing the Nuggets would start with something like Aaron Brooks, Kevin Martin and one of the Knicks draft picks (or right to the swap pick), which would get them almost all the way to the 17 million that Carmelo is owed this season.  Would you do that?… The answer is, of course you would.  I really, really like Kevin Martin and think, without this trade, he’s going to be awesome as a Rocket this year.  Top 20 player awesome.  That said, you have a backup point guard that is getting paid like a decent starter and who can absolutely run the team.  You also just traded for a guy that Morey believes is a capable starter in this league.  Put that together and that trade would be acceptable.  Look at it another way though, has Morey ever been the guy that traded the most away?  Or settled for an easy deal like that? Nope, and while if it came down to it, I think he would accept the trade, there is no team that can even come close to that deal.  So why should the Rockets have to?  Sadly, the trade machine is not working for me right now, so I can’t put forth an exact trade.  However, I think something more along the lines of Martin and Battier would do it.  Let’s not get that twisted around, I think Morey would do everything he could to keep Martin here, but the Nuggets won’t be looking for salary cap relief.  There is absolutely no point in it.  They aren’t really hurting for money from anything I’ve seen and they have a good team even without Anthony, though clearly not a contender.  So they’d want to stay relatively young as well as be a viable ‘if thing break right’ Finals contender.  So no, Battier and Jefferies with some picks isn’t going to get it done.” [...]