web analytics
<

Five Conversations About One Thing

heads 72

The self-propelling legend of Kevin Durant got a hell of a nudge yesterday, as the league’s favorite son was officially recognized as an all-encompassing basketball entity rather than merely a superstar small forward. Throughout the preseason, the Thunder have been utilizing Durant’s talents in various positional capacities, as noted by Darnell Mayberry of the Oklahoman:

Against Miami on Friday, Durant played all five positions. He started at his customary small forward spot, ran point guard late in the first quarter and slid to power forward midway through the second quarter.

“Kevin’s game is evolving,” said Thunder coach Scott Brooks. “He, like a lot of our guys, is not a finished product. He’s going to keep getting better. And there’s ways that I’m going to challenge him to get better… He has the ability to do a lot of things for us and do them well.”

It was the minutes Durant played at point guard and power forward that stood out most. At 6-10, Durant is by far the league’s tallest provisional point guard. His size allows him to see over the defense and read and react to whatever is thrown his way. And by initiating the offense, Durant nearly becomes unstoppable because of his shooting ability and improving playmaking skills. He had only one assist against the Heat, but Durant beat LeBron James off the dribble on several possessions, working his way into the lane where he created the option to either finish himself or dump off passes to cutting teammates.

The Thunder are a dream model for the positional revolution, and Durant is obviously a big part of that. However, just plugging KD into different conventional roles is like trying to reach uncharted lands by paved road. It’s certainly noteworthy that Brooks and the Thunder are planning the trip in the first place, but the methodology is flawed to say the least.

Durant is far too talented to be used as a tunnel-visioned scorer, and in Mayberry’s piece, KD goes on to mention how he’s been working on his ball-handling skills and playmaking. Awesome. Really. But those skills are better used as a way to accommodate the rest of OKC’s roster, not run an experiment with KD at point guard for the hell of it. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but it’s hardly the way to achieve real progress. The ultimate goal isn’t to have teams run more wonky experiments, but to find ways to let them maximize the talent at their disposal. Allowing Durant positional fluidity is one way to tap into various aspects of his game, but that kind of change can be very superficial. It may demonstrate the Durantula’s ability to defend all types of players, but he’s just as capable of fulfilling the same roles (scoring, playmaking, whatever) regardless of his positional designation. Putting him at point guard doesn’t just transform him into a better passer, an aspect of his game that’s very much a work in progress. Putting him at center also doesn’t transform him into a stereotypical big, and may actually be harmful to his game if he’s pigeon-holed into the responsibilities of a typical 5 as a result.

Is Brooks’ decision to open up the game for his more versatile players a sound one? Of course. But news like this shines as fool’s gold. Evolution is a beautiful thing for Durant, but taking KD out of his most effective spots and roles on the floor for the sake of fluid positionality (or is it desperation?) isn’t likely to be the way toward roster maximization. Not with his handle. Not with his frame. Durant is capable of being a positional wonder, and could very well use his versatile game and do-no-wrong image to turn into one of the revolution’s patron saints. In the meantime though, his ability to create for himself in isolation has been mistaken for a similar proficiency in doing so for his teammates, and his combination of leadership and selflessness mistaken for the credentials of a part-time floor general. In a tough spot, Durant can take care of some of the responsibilities normally attributed to a point guard, but the fact that he’s being pushed into that role (or the center position, or power forward, or whichever) with his current skill set isn’t much more progressive than the status quo.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Was he considered to have played point because he dribbled the ball at the top of the key or brought the ball up? Unless he's doing it for multiple possessions, bringing the ball up and directing everyone, clearing them out for instance to get Ibaka a look in the post at the expense of his own offense, it's a fake label. As for playing the 2 or the 3, they're not different. You're not going to be asked to do something different just because you're now in the "2" position as opposed to the "3." The 4/5 would be a ridiculous offensive mismatch for him but most teams would just go small to counter that.

I have noticed that his assists numbers have been up in the preseason. It looks like he's making a conscious choice to create more for his teammates, even if it means that he dials down his own offense a bit. When I've checked box scores halfway through the second quarter, he might only have 4 shots but 5 assists. On one hand, it's very admirable. He's not resting on his laurels, trying rather to be a complete player, something which Carmelo still hasn't committed to after 7 seasons. But I wonder if he'll ever be a 4 or 5 assist guy. He's been a gunner, a great gunner, from high school on that he looks unnatural not being aggressive for his shot. It's like with Tebow's delivery. Yeah he can change it during predraft workouts, but how it's going to look in the intensity of a game? When the game gets rolling, is Durant going to force the playmaking hat on himself or is he going to attack and attack? Playmaking involves holding onto the ball more, scoping out defenses but Durant quick shoots it a lot in transition and coming off screens that he would have to change the tempo of his game.

Looks like Brooks/Thunder FO were paying attention to FIBA this summer. Coach K successfully played all those guys at all positions, and it was a beautiful thing.

@Shawn: That's my point, Shawn. There's nothing wrong with having him initiate the offense, but plugging him into a lineup in place of a ball-handler/creator is likely to be counterproductive to the team's success. If Durant could fulfill that role as well as Westbrook, then I'd be down. Hell, I'd encourage it.

But he can't. He needs that safety net that you described, and that's the problem with the KD-at-PG experiment.

@Rob - fair enough!

Just because KD has the ball in his hands doesn't mean he's a PG. Think back to summer league -- Jeremy Lin was & is a vastly superior orchestrator than Roddy B.

But as long as a real PG is around to bail them out when needed, putting KD in unusual spots makes for a nice way to disorganize a defense, leading to higher % shots & easier offensive rebounding.

My guess is that they are experimenting in the preseason to see how they may be able to rearrange the parts for more effectiveness. If it ultimately leads to more playmaking for teammates by Durant, even at one or two "positions," then everybody will benefit.

If Kevin Durant is really working on his ball handling abilities - good for him. It's a clear leak in his game. I mean, as much as Kevin Durant has leaks in his game. "Kevin Durant with ball handling and passing ability" is a beautiful and terrifying prospect.

Hey Rob - Just curious -- have you ever coached, at any level?

[ It's a question of perspective -- where are you coming from -- not one of your integrity ]

@Shawn: Sadly, no. No coaching experience whatsoever.