web analytics
<

No Championship for Old Men

Power — intoxicating and addictive — is never easily ceded. Not by nations and rarely by champions. It has to be taken. In sports, it’s often taken from the aging or the infirm. In the case of the Boston Celtics, it was both.

If you took one look at the Celtics sideline late on Wednesday night, you would have seen Rajon Rondo and Jermaine O’Neal lying on their aching backs, straining their necks to see the action on the floor. You would have seen Kevin Garnett expending the same amount of energy to do half the things he used to do. Shaquille O’Neal, the future Hall of Famer the Celtics signed to combat the Lakers in The Finals, spent what may be his final NBA game as the largest Big & Tall model in history. And as good as Paul Pierce and Ray Allen are, LeBron James and Dwyane Wade are younger and have more talent.

The Celtics wanted to play, but their bodies betrayed them. Their time has ended. The Lakers too. Three days prior to LeBron and the Heat ending the Celtics’ successful four-year run in the East, the “new old” Mavs — an oxymoron — swept Phil Jackson and the two-time defending champion Lakers, playing like schoolyard chumps, into next season.

If the Celtics or Lakers had forced their series to seven games, we may be able to believe Doc Rivers’ claim that his Celtics team “isn’t done” or Kobe Bryant’s claim that the Lakers will be back as a legit championship force in 2011-12.

But the Heat and the Mavs channeled their inner Anton Chigurh and used their captive bolt pistols to blow a big hole through any notion that the Celtics and the Lakers can remain at a championship level beyond this season. It’s not necessarily age itself, but the changes that come with it. They are like Tommy Lee Jones’ sheriff, who chases the light in his dreams but eventually wakes up before he can catch up to it. Those days are history. Things are different now.

If the Lakers couldn’t set aside their trust issues during the postseason, what makes anyone think that they’ll grow fonder of each other over an 82-game regular season? If the Lakers couldn’t get Phil his fourth three-peat, who thinks they’ll be able to band together for a new coach? Do you think the Celtics’ core will somehow grow any younger over the summer? As much as I like to believe Rivers, one of my favorite basketball people of all time, will return to Boston because he’s “a Celtic,” there have been rumblings for some time about him wanting to take a break. Changes should be coming to both teams.

But based on the history of those two franchises, you’d be inclined to believe they will bounce back. Between them they have 33 NBA championships and 52 combined Finals appearances. Based on what we saw of the two teams, it’s hard to believe that they will be able to dominate foes as they have the past four seasons. The NBA has too much talent on too many different teams. Not only that, that talent is in or close to reaching its prime.

For only the fifth time when both teams have made the postseason in the same year, neither the Lakers nor the Celtics made their respective conference finals series. By not having these specific Celtics or Lakers teams to cheer or jeer in a conference finals is slams shut the door on the post-Michael Jordan era of the NBA.

This will be the first Finals without Shaquille O’Neal, Kobe Bryant or Tim Duncan since 1998. It’s as clear a demarcation point in NBA history as the introduction of the shot clock in 1954 or Bill Russell retiring in 1969 or when Jordan and a hungry Bulls team destroyed an aging Lakers team in 1991.

Consider, too, the men who led them. It will be the first time since 1995 Phil Jackson, Gregg Popovich and Pat Riley won’t roam the sidelines during The Finals. Though, that stat deserves an asterisk considering Riley is the brains behind this current iteration of the Heat. He has the hardware to prove it.

Riley built the Heat in the Celtics’ image using the lure of a homegrown star to attract other stars. LeBron said as much before and after Game 5. Beating the Celtics was the reason he burned every bridge in Cleveland. For LBJ, getting past the Celtics was like MJ finally getting past the Pistons in ’91.

For LeBron, who at times has a loathsome lack of self-awareness, sounded contrite and humble after the Heat’s win. Whether his overall attitude has changed for the better remains to be seen. But one thing we know: the NBA will never be the same. It’s up to the new power generation to shape it to their liking.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Okay, this is a little awkward. I got all excited today and wrote a piece on the Mavs using a reference to No Country also (in a much more general sense). Then I came over here for to HP for some just before tip off reading and I see you already used it (and better too). I love the piece, and I agree with it wholeheartedly, although I have a hard time viewing the Mavs as Chigurh. They're just not cold hearted enough. They're more like the sheriff who has gone past his father's campfire light and no longer has the past (all the other old teams in the League) to guide him, or if Kobe is the cold blooded assassin of the NBA, then the Mavs are the car that randomly upended him. It's also easy to see them as the sheriff just because the title has eluded them for so long. Anyway, great book. Great film. Enjoyed the article.

Pau Gasol, the Lakers' second best player, was playing arguably the worst basketball he's played in the last 4 years. If he had been playing at his usual level, the Lakers might have taken the series to 7 games, and maybe even won the series. Games 1 and 3 were pretty close, and that was in spite of Gasol's horrible play. If he had been playing at his normal level, LA would have likely won game 1, and might have won game 3. So, they might still be a championship-caliber team.

The Celtics are done, but that is not only because of age or injuries. It's also because of the trade of Perkins. I know he didn't provide offense, and I know that's what Boston lacked in their series, but Perkins was a better defender than JO, and JO didn't provide much offense anyway. Perkins had more experience with the team and the defensive system. Also, his presence made the team tougher and more motivated. Without him, the Celtics didn't play with the same fire. So, while they certainly won't get another chance to win a championship with this team, everything could have been different with Perkins

Jon, you're of course right that many people (myself included) saw the Lakers going back to the Finals. (The Celtics I'm not sure about -- I've had Miami, but I know there was a lot of debate about that, and I'm not sure where the main run of opinion wound up.) But I'm not sure that supports the argument that we've reached a changing-of-the-guard moment. It's certainly possible that from here on out, the world is OKC's oyster in the West (and Miami/Chicago's in the East, though you'll forgive my skepticism about Chicago given that Carlos Boozer is almost certainly on the decline, and there's really only so much better we can expect Derrick Rose to get).

I guess my basic quibble is that I don't think we've seen anything in these playoffs that signaled that the Lakers were done any more than we saw in the regular season, because, again, L.A. didn't get beat by a younger, faster, stronger team that exposed the team's agedness. They got beat by a big, rugged team that is absolutely loaded with shooters, perfectly designed to counteract L.A.'s pack-it-in defensive strengths. If you run L.A.'s key players back five years in age apiece, this Dallas team still probably beats them because L.A., as constructed, cannot adequately defend Dallas's offense and cannot shoot from the outside.

Of course, all of this is moot if L.A. hires Mike Dunleavy. Most talented lottery team ever?

(I'd be interested to hear, by the way, how much Doc Rivers's five-year contract changes his view of the Celtics. I agree that they're still a problematic team, but does his return move the needle enough to keep them in the hunt next year?)

I disagree with you about the thrust of the piece Jason. Look back to last summer and ask yourself if you saw a finals without the Celtics or Lakers. I for one thought at least one of those two teams would wind up representing their conference. While the Mavs aren’t a ‘young’ team compared to the Lakers, they weren’t being paraded around as championship contenders all year. They were considered (outside of their fan base) in the same light as most of the Western playoff field, a very good team that would go down as an also ran this year.

The other historic parallels only serve to reinforce the idea that we are looking at a changing of the guard unfolding before our eyes. Kobe, Shaq, Garnett, and Duncan were playing in the league while Jordan was still a Bull, he may have been inspiration to them, but he was also a real opponent. Lebron was 13 the last time Jordan won a championship, Durant and Rose were 9. Jordan was never more than an idol to that generation of players, and that generation looks to be coming into its own this year. When the star players on 4 of the 5 teams left never played against Jordan that fact points towards the inexorable march of time.

I think the piece does well at capturing a whiff of the history that we are immersed in. Appreciating the moment for what it will mean later is always a dicey proposition but this may well be the year we point back at and say “that was the end of the post-Jordan players’ reign”.

nice prince reference

Since were talking about old men... we should talk about these old refs who make the most horrific calls I've ever seen. Let the players play. These refs r tooo Ollldddd they call every thing except travellng... dwade, lebron, kobe... travel everytime n the refs never call it.. the refs r terrible, they can change the game. We need young good refs who don't show favortism toward the players they like.. how bout that stern!!!!

Even putting aside the ridiculous number of typos, this piece doesn't make sense. The reasoning, such as it is, only holds if the Lakers got beat by a younger team or got beat because they were injured and tired. As you know, they didn't -- Kobe had an ankle injury, but the rest of the team was healthy, and the Mavs' main rotation is a touch older than the Lakers'. So now your "these old teams won't be competitive for championships anymore" hypothesis is down to one data point.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] The Boston Celtics have been eliminated from the 2011 NBA Playoffs. Kevin Garnett and the rest of the Boston Celtics looked kind of old in their playoff series against the Miami Heat. From hardwoodparoxysm [...]