Archive - July, 2011

Yao and Otis

Otis... the elevator. By sun dazed from Flickr

“I salute the big man, I’ll miss him, but the Rockets are very selective in their retired jerseys, Yao should not be hung up in the rafters, but I want them to honor him somehow.”

Via “Should Yao’s Jersey Hang in the Rafters?” The Dream Shake

So, as you may or may not know, I have huge Basketball Jones on Yao Ming. He lifted Rockets fans from the malaise of what BD34 calls The Nightmare, which was the trade of Hakeem to Toronto. Yao also lifted us from the Terror, Stevie Franchise. I know Yao left a lot on the table due to injuries, but he was the most identifiable and best Rockets player for the past decade. And was a positive presence for the team and community to boot!  He absolutely deserves to have his #11 hang from the Toyota Center.

The real furor should be why Otis Thorpe doesn’t have his #33 retired. Ok, maybe not, but he’s better than you think. His merits deserve at least 15 seconds of consideration before you give a “no” answer. Ready? Set. Go!

 

O.T. played 6+ seasons with the Rockets after coming over from Sacramento in a trade for Rodney McCray in 1988. He was the perfect nitty gritty, burly PF compliment to Hakeem’s Dream Shakin’ ways. Otis unwaveringly put up 10 rebounds and 16 points during his time in Houston and never shot less than 54% from the field. Blessed with gargantuan hands, Thorpe also routinely led the league in dunks until Shaq came along in the 1992-93 season. Thorpe made a single All-Star appearance in 1992, helped Houston to the 1994 title, graced us with one of the more endearing bromantical moments for the NBA as he high-fived and hugged Hakeem in title ecstasy, and like the gift that keeps on giving, he was the bait used to secure Clyde Drexler from Portland.

And time!

Still say no? Fair enough. How about spending another 15 seconds  marveling at Otis’s Connie Hawkins-esque grace? I think we all can say yes to that.

Sonic Memories

Photo by adpowers from Flickr

“Five years, it turns out, is a long time. The two painful years the Sonics spent in purgatory as we hoped in vain for a miracle felt like a decade. Now it seems like they’ve been gone for far longer than three years. If not a different lifetime, July 18, 2006 feels like an entirely different chapter in my life. Yet the day’s events still remain vivid.”

Via The Sonics Sold, Five Years Later SSSBDA.com

A haunting recount by Kevin Pelton of the day that the SuperSonics were sold off to Oklahoman oil baron Clay Bennet. This event barely registered on my radar at the time, but two years after it I was genuinely distraught and angry with the NBA as the Sonics moved to Oklahoma City. A good friend of mine was a diehard Sonics fan and in a show of solidarity, I tried my best to ignore the NBA for this dirty deed. Despite my initial vitriol, time passed and I accepted the (sometimes-dirty) business aspect of professional basketball as a necessary evil. I learned team’s can be relocated at a whim, but memories die hard and the Seattle SuperSonics were a team that always fascinated and terrified me.

The Terror: from the misty, forested outer reaches of the continent, the Sonics swept down and inflicted beating after beating upon my beloved Houston Rockets. In 1987, when Hakeem had a monstrous 49 points and 25 rebounds in Game 6 of the Western semis, the Rockets were eliminated. In ‘93, Olajuwon had 23 points, 17 rebounds, 9 assists,  3 blocks and two steals in Game 7, but of course Seattle won in OT. In ’96 when the Rockets were searching for a three-peat, they instead found a buzz saw from Cascadia and were swept in humiliating fashion. Seattle was our always dependable executioner.

The Fascination: despite the beatings, I couldn’t hate the Sonics. Getting beat by the Stockton-Malone Jazz was like getting whopped with a belt, thoroughly utilitarian and no-nonsense. But a Sonics whooping? That had style like getting beat with a Hot Wheels track. Dangerous, exciting and you could enjoy it afterwards too, racing your cars around the loops. Sure Kemp’s thunderous dunks were no fun when it was on Hakeem, but on Alton Lister? More please!

Kemp, however, was just continuing the Sonic tradition of wondrous characters: Slick Watts wearing a headband with a shaved head. Freddie Brown chucking it up from downtown. Jack Sikma’s permed golden afro. The X-Man, Tom Chambers and Dale Ellis scoring 75 points between them every night. Payton jawing and tossing oops to Kemp. Ervin “Not So Magic” Johnson. Jerome James playing an inspired brand of average basketball for two weeks in the 2005 playoffs. The SuperSonics never failed to entertain.

I hope we never fail to remember that.

Lessons from Baron


LOS ANGELES — “What direction is the culture moving in Los Angeles?” the lecturer asks, and from among the various students, including women in open-toed sandals typing away on laptops and a gray-haired man with a wedding ring writing on a yellow legal pad with a Montblanc pen, comes a response from a man with the beard that’s familiar to any NBA fan.

“East!” Baron Davis calls out, correctly.

-via ESPN. Wisening up in Westwood

Baron Davis has always been a little different than your average NBA player. He was the first professional athlete to ink an endorsement deal with Jenny Craig after struggling to keep himself in tip-top shape. He went to school with Kate Hudson and Cash Warren. He’s a member of the Screen Actors Guild and he’s produced a documentary about gang life in America. He’s as active outside of the basketball sphere as he is in it (and sometimes, it seems as though we see more of him off of the court than on it) and he’s got a loud and colorful personality that does indeed speak louder than his game these days.

Despite these things, my first interaction with Davis was less than stellar. It was in Seattle (R.I.P, Sonics), and the Golden State Warriors were in town. It was a game where the scoreboard caught on fire. A game where I spoke with Stephen Jackson about gun shots in Indiana. A game where Kevin Durant was so long and lean that you feared his forearms would snap when he was fouled while driving to the hoop.

Davis was alone in his locker after the game, and I asked him if we could speak. He said yes. I asked him some questions, plural. He elected not to respond, but to stare at me blankly. I repeated my questions. He repeated his stare. I was a rookie reporter, in the locker room for only the second time in my life. I didn’t know what to do. I chose to walk away. I felt my face burn up, not sure if this was normal behavior, feeling foolish because Davis was the player so many of my writer friends had told me to talk to because, “He’s great, you’ll love talking with him.”

After I left the locker room, as I walked down the tunnel, smiling at Don Nelson drinking a beer in the hallway by the team bus and trying not to stare at Robert Swift’s smoking hot girlfriend, I felt someone tap my shoulder. I turned around to face Davis. I tried not to show my fear on my face, but wondered if I was about to be cursed out, to earn the horror story that every writer seems to have about a player flipping out on them for no real reason. I braced myself for what he was going to say. After what seemed like an eternity, Davis asked me what I needed and asked me to repeat the questions I’d asked in the locker room. I told him I’d gotten the answers I needed from his teammates and started to walk away. He then began to apologize profusely, saying he hadn’t meant any disrespect, that he’d been caught up on something, but that wasn’t an excuse. The team had boarded the bus by this time and started yelling for him to get on. He motioned for them to stop before asking me again if I needed anything from him. In short, he was as polite as I’d expected him to be in the first place. He was human. He hadn’t been in the mood to answer anything, but instead of brushing me off as a media member that he didn’t know and had never seen seen before, he treated me with respect once he recognized his actions.

I’m sure Davis doesn’t remember this encounter, but I do because he taught me a lesson: players can be cranky, and sometimes you’ll approach them after a bad loss or performance when they’re angry or bitter or caught up in something. But often times, how someone treats you on that single occasion isn’t a fair representation of who that person is. Plus, people deserve a chance to right their wrongs before being written off. I was so bummed that Davis wasn’t what I had expected him to be, and then in the blink of an eye, he proved himself to be exactly what everyone had told me he was: a normal guy who also happens to get paid an absurd amount of money to play basketball.

Three years later, I stood in the Cleveland Cavaliers’ visiting locker room, waiting for Davis to address the media. My eyes were burning, stinging from an allergic reaction I’d had to the cologne a man sitting on press row was wearing. As Davis was answering a question into the camera for the Cavaliers broadcast team, he caught my eye and noticed the red, swollen eyes staring back at him. Despite being on camera he stopped to ask me if I was alright. After he was done with media, he pulled my aside, cringing while looking at my eyes, then told me to take care of myself and rest up. I wanted to tell him how he’d scared the hell out of me three years ago, but didn’t have the ability to think of anything but getting home so I could take my contacts out and flush my eyes out. Still, it was another little jolt that reminded me of the lesson mentioned above. People, especially famous people, can’t be judged by glimpses of interaction. It’s not fair.

Now, how does any of this link into Davis going back to school? Well, with Davis, we shouldn’t be surprised that he’s returned to UCLA 12 years after leaving for the NBA, because, unlike the unsavory, incomplete glimpse I’d gleaned during our first interaction of that Sonics/Warriors game, Davis has spent 12 years showing us that he isn’t just a basketball player. He’s got interests and passions that extend far beyond sports. This isn’t anything new. One of my favorite quotes is from Maya Angelou who said, “When people show you who they are, believe them.” Davis has shown us. We should have believed him. We should also remember, though, that it often takes more than a glimpse to be shown who someone is.

I’m so glad I didn’t walk away from that first experience with Davis jaded by his initial, blank reaction. If I had, I probably wouldn’t have been able to appreciate the uniqueness that Davis brings to the NBA in the same way that I do now and I really enjoy those things. As writers, there are always lessons to learn. Some of us bloggers (myself included), don’t have a journalism background; we never learned how to deal with attitudes in the locker room, or developing a good rapport with players. It’s trial by error and baptism by fire. My encounter with Davis was one of many lessons I learned in that first year of NBA writing, and three years later, it’s still the first thing I think of whenever Davis’ name is mentioned by a colleague. This time, though, I get to be the one telling the newbie writer that Davis is a sure-thing when looking for someone who will be interesting and engaging with your questions.

Finding players like that is one of the most rewarding parts of this gig. Learning about someone’s family, their friends, hopes, interests, random pieces of real life that tumble out when you ask a particularly good or intriguing question that captures a player’s attention is something you don’t forget. These lessons are also things that I will not forget.

The best part of experience is the lessons that come with it. After three years of covering the NBA, I’m thankful for all I’ve learned (both good and bad, and Lord knows there’s been plenty of not fun lessons to learn), but mostly, I’m excited for more. Now studying history at UCLA, Davis is keeping busy by learning from the experiences of those that came before him. It’s nice to know that getting paid a lot of money to play a game hasn’t killed Davis’s desire for more, either.

NBA Players Playing Basketball: A Reason to Wake Up at 7 a.m. on a Saturday

How did you spend your Saturday morning? If you were like a handful of us blogging types, you spent it straining your eyes looking at a grainy, sometimes jumpy feed of a bunch of NBAers playing against the PBA All-Star team. With highlights like that video above, it was totally worth it, even if I’m a pretty cranky, sleep-deprived girl right now.

With Kobe Bryant, Derrick Rose, Kevin Durant, Chris Paul, James Harden, JaVale McGee, Tyreke Evans, Derek Fisher and rookie Derrick Williams as the SMART All-Star team, the NBA boys won 131-105 in front of some wild fans who showed their love and appreciation for all things NBA.

JaVale McGee provided both the highlight and the lowlight of the game, scoring a team-high 25 points for the SMART All-Stars, then deciding to plank on the court. Seriously.

I love JaVale and it was fun to see him having fun, but can we be done with this planking business soon? At least he’s smiling.

  • Okay, so JaVale had 25 points, Durant scored 22, Derrick Williams had 19 and Tyreke Evans had 17. Those are the numbers you should probably know.
  • Harden had 16, Kobe finished with 12, CP3 added 11, Rose scored nine and Fish went scoreless, if you were wondering.
  • Kobe Bryant was the player-coach. Kinda fun. He also heard his name chanted by the crowd throughout the game.
  • Fans lined up for tickets for more than nine hours prior to the game.
  • Favorite line from an announcer: ”JaVale McGee with 25 points and 1000 slam dunks.”
  • Best description of the planking craze comes from a GMA News recap: “Afterwards, McGee made true of his promise on his Twitter account by doing the plank, a crazed practice being done in public places.”
  • Favorite play from the game: That gorgeous Durant to Harden alley-oop linked above, but this was a close second:

  • Click here for a photo gallery from the game.
  • Best thing about the NBA community: Go to Twitter at 7 a.m. on a Saturday and there will be a crew of devotees awake and tweeting their way through an exhibition game because this is what we love and who we are and what we do.
  • Worst thing about this game: It’s truly deflating to think about the next time we’re going to see these players on a basketball court playing basketball that matters. While I love streetball and pick up games, I love the NBA and I want to see the greatest players in the world playing the world’s most beautiful game.
  • Important to note: There will be another game you can catch online tomorrow at 5 a.m. EST time. If you’d like to watch, I’m sure Twitter will help you with the appropriate linkage.
  • Finally, I’ll leave you with this photo (courtesy of @TheRealVP’s Twitter account) to make you smile. And if this doesn’t make you smile, well, I can’t help you. Wake up tomorrow and watch some basketball. That’ll do the trick.

What’s Eating Russell Westbrook? Nothing, Apparently.

Photo by Valerie Everett on Flickr

Westbrook said his shooting was never an issue with the Thunder.

“My family and teammates had my back,” said Westbrook, who averaged 23.8 points, 6.4 assists and 4.6 turnovers during the playoffs. “That’s all that mattered. I didn’t [discuss it] unless I was asked about it [by the media]. Other than that, we never really discussed it.

“We were winning. As a team we were getting better each round. That’s all I was worrying about.”

via Yahoo! Sports: Westbrook shrugs off criticism

It’s been about two months since the Thunder were eliminated from the playoffs, and yet the questions over Russell Westbrook’s style of play and how it fits with Kevin Durant continue to arise. Why is he shooting so much? Doesn’t he realize that KEVIN DURANT IS ON HIS TEAM?! He can’t shoot jumpers, why does he keep taking them? Doesn’t he know that he’s costing them games? Where’s the nearest Dunkin Donuts? I’m hungry.

It seems Westbrook doesn’t think he should care about those questions. To some extent, he’s right. He needs to be confident as a scorer and player to be effective for his team, but he fails to recognize that most of those who questioned Westbrook’s play weren’t asking him to change his identity as a player. Most asked Westbrook to improve his cognitive skills, to recognize that the Thunder needed slightly less Westbrook, even if just for a playoff series or two.

Obviously, Westbrook was not the sole or even primary reason for the Thunder’s postseason loss at the hands of the Dallas Mavericks. The Mavericks were a veteran, talented team with great depth and more assured play. Westbrook wasn’t the only Thunder player that occasionally seemed to stretch his limits. Kevin Durant showed improvement between his 2010 (16.6 PER) and 2011 (24.1 PER) postseasons, but that doesn’t mean he didn’t have moments like this. By no means did the Thunder underachieve in the 2010 playoffs. A Western Conference Finals berth one season after losing to the Lakers in the first round is nothing to scoff at, especially for such a young team. However, the playoffs were often a clear symbol for the issue with the current player that the young and developing Westbrook is: Confident, heady, brilliant, and often misguided. That can lead to terrific results when his game is on point, but when it isn’t, it can be harmful to his team’s likelihood of succeeding.

The belief that changing Westbrook’s play style slightly at times would be detrimental to the Thunder as a whole is generally incorrect. It is true that a point guard whose primary strength is scoring (like Westbrook) can’t really afford to completely stop attacking on a whim, but that doesn’t mean he can’t eradicate two or three questionable plays a game. He doesn’t need to become primarily a distributor when he’s acting out his role impressively as the Thunder’s secondary scorer, but Westbrook also doesn’t have the ability to sit back and purely distribute when he’s struggling to score. An AST-TO ratio of about 3-2 in the playoffs is certainly nothing to get excited about, and it’s actually quite poor for a player that is frequently referred to as an elite PG. Because of Westbrook’s struggle to pass and score efficiently with frequency, Westbrook’s PER fell significantly during the playoffs, falling from 23.6 during the season to 19.6 for the postseason. He was missing shots and turning the ball over at higher rates during the playoffs, and it had the ability to hurt the team on nights when his struggles became prevalent.

Westbrook mentions the Thunder’s playoff series victories by saying, “We were winning”, but that quote is ultimately hollow for a simple reason: The Thunder stopped winning when they came up against the Dallas Mavericks, and his inability to consistently make the slight changes necessary to improve his play were part of the reason for that decline. Westbrook can still improve various aspects of his game (Note: He’s 22 years old), and some of that improvement will come with added experience. I hope that occasionally making minuscule changes, changes that can alter the outcome of a game, will go hand-in-hand with that experience.

NBA 2K12 Brainstorming: Michael Jordan vs. Larry Bird vs. Magic Johnson

Photo by mvongrue on Flickr

“There haven’t been any details released about NBA 2K12 yet, but based on these covers that were just released, it looks like another winner that’ll make you freak out when you’re playing online. When you consider that 2K11 was awesome and it only had Jordan on the cover, then having three legends on this cover should make this one three times as good. Math.”

Via The Basketball Jones: Jordan, Bird, Magic cover NBA 2k12

When NBA 2k11 was originally released, it was well-received throughout the basketball and video game community. IGN called it the most polished sports game of all time in their review of the XBOX 360 version, and other reviewers were equally generous with positive feedback on the game. Fans flocked to buy the game as well, as the game had already become the fastest selling edition in franchise history, with 4 million copies sold by February, about 5 months after the game’s release. In almost every aspect, the game should be viewed as a success for 2K sports.

Of course, the game also had flaws (as do most games). For instance, Dirk Nowitzki was given an 85 rating and an incredibly slow developing release, making him very difficult to use initially. In comparison to Dirk, Josh Smith boasted an 86 rating. Yeah, I think the developers might have missed the mark in that aspect. Other problems that I have often noticed in my vast time spent playing the game include the passing format (bounce pass or lob pass, anyone?) and issues with the online server. However, NBA 2k11 was still an extremely entertaining game with a set of varying and engage game modes, and the franchise only stands to improve on 2k11′s mark with the release of 2k12 on October 4th of this year.

With Bird, Magic, and Jordan now known to be featured on the cover of NBA 2k12 and very few new aspects of the game released to the public, I decided to come up with some of my own suggestions of new features for the game.

Amazing Ideas For NBA 2K12 Gameplay That Would Probably Never Work

  1. One-on-one-on-one. For centuries, people have yearned to perfect the art of playing basketball with more than two teams. “It’ll be so crazy, y’all!” said the Mesopotamians. Sadly, humans have always failed. And that’s why we have video games. This is our chance to finally have Michael Jordan, Larry Bird, and Magic Johnson play against each other at the same time. I know it sounds crazy, but trust me, it won’t work. (Note: I mean this literally. I don’t mean it in the same sense as the game “21″, which is offered in NBA 2k11.)
  2. BRO FACE-OFF. This would finally be a chance to pit a team entirely built of NBA players that have a brother (who also plays in the NBA) against each other. Unfortunately, there are no NBA brothers that play guard (that I’m aware of), so Joey or Stephen Graham might have to play point guard. That might not go so well. I imagine a game that pits a team of Stephen Graham (the slightly worse Graham bro)-Markieff Morris-Blake Griffin-Robin Lopez-Jarron Collins (the slightly worse Collins bro) against Joey Graham-Marcus Morris-Taylor Griffin-Brook Lopez-Jason Collins. That seems relatively fair, for a hypothetical game.
  3. Lockout Talk, with Jeff Foster and Landry Fields. Being the stalwart veteran that he is, I assume Jeff Foster has some great “in my day” NBA stories, and he and Fields could have a nice young man-old man dynamic. Obviously, this will have to be an un-lockable feature.

 

In the middle of a painful lockout, we might as well dream big. And nothing says “Dream big!” quite like a Jeff Foster-hosted talk show.

 

For further NBA 2k12 reading, check out Zach Harper’s list of possible classic games for the cover’s three legendary players.


Timofey Mozgov And I Are Kindred Spirits

This is horrible news. Timofey Mozgov is signing with a Russian team. We might never see him again. :(
@NickFlynt
Nick Flynt

“Just a day after his agent was shooting down rumors that Nuggets center Timofey Mozgov was headed to Russia, there are multiple reports from European sites that he inked a deal.

Both Sportando and Sports.ru say he will play for BC Khimki, the Russian club where he played for four years before coming to the NBA (links via Hoopshype). This would be a deal that lets him out when the NBA lockout ends.

Because Mozgov is under contract in the NBA, he will need a letter of clearance from FIBA to play for his Russian team. The international basketball oversight body has not said yet if they will grant those letters to players locked out of the NBA.”

via Pro Basketball Talk: Mozgov signs deal to return to Russia during lockout

This news is yet another in a string of reports about NBA players leaving to play in Europe. Realistically, few will remember this report after a couple of weeks have passed. However, Timofey Mozgov is worth remembering, even if not entirely for reasons based on his skill.

After the Knicks signed Mozgov to a 3 year, $9+ million deal before last season, millions of Knicks fans across the globe were given the opportunity to ask themselves, “Who the hell is Timofey Mozgov”? I had recently become a Knicks’ fan due to their selection of All-World Awesome Basketball Player Landry Fields (some might call this “bandwagoning”, I call it “shut up, people who correctly say I’m bandwagoning”), and was just coming into my NBA fandom.

Initially, Mozgov was thrust into a considerable role on a thin Knicks team, a team that would only become thinner during the second half of the season. Mozgov started 14 games (mostly near the beginning of the season), which was probably 14 more games than he should have. Of course, one can’t blame a raw (that word is overused to describe European prospects, but it fits perfectly with Mozgov) 24 year-old rookie for struggling initially in the hard world of the NBA, especially when playing starting minutes. Mozgov was often labeled as “soft” in those early games, as the Knicks struggled to find their identity and decide what role each player would fill. But there were moments when the 7’1 European seemed on the verge of becoming a more than capable NBA center. On a cold (I have no idea if it was actually cold) January 30th night, in a game against the lowly Pistons, Mozgov simply dominated. He scored a career-high 23 pts on 60% FG and 15 rebounds (also a career high) in 40 minutes. For at least one game, Mozgov’s post moves seemed less awkward. Unfortunately, that was not typical Mozgov.

Anyone that watched the 2010, pre-Melo Knicks will tell you how fun they were to watch, though by no means did they have everything figured out. They weren’t a great basketball team, but they ran and shot and ran some more. It was Amar’e Stoudemire’s team, but it was also everyone’s team. Amar’e was the necessary superstar, but everyone else on the team worked as a unit to hold the pieces together. Timofey Mozgov was part of that glue, symbolic of the Knicks. He may not have been particularly skilled, but I didn’t care. The Mozgov train was on a one-way track to Awkward Post Moves-ville (which I presume is a small town somewhere in Iowa), and who was I to stop it?

Why do I care so much about a one-year player who sported a below average 10.8 PER last season and is most famous for being dunked on by Blake Griffin? Because Mozgov seemed human. He would often look lost on the court, unsure of what he was supposed to be doing. I remember a look that Mike D’Antoni would give Mozgov, with his mustache curled and his eyes intense, that reminded me of a parent watching a child learn to ride a bike. For me, Mozgov was the 2010 Knicks in a nutshell, a child learning to ride a bike, scraping his knees but eventually prevailing in his own way.

I will miss Timofey Mozgov, if for nothing less than what he represents to me. As fans, part of the reason we are so enthralled by the game of basketball is our ability to see aspects of ourselves in a seemingly random combination of players. I didn’t particularly admire the clunky and unpolished game of Timofey Mozgov, but I did connect with his sensibility. He dove headfirst (sometimes literally) into a game with which he was not yet fully familiar. To you, Timofey Mozgov may have played a forgettable rookie season and then completely lost relevance during his time with the Nuggets. That’s what history will show. But to me, he was an awkward every man, a Russian with boldness in his heart and confusion in his eyes. And thus, I view Timofey Mozgov and I as forever being kindred spirits. He is me (except over 7 feet tall, Russian, and probably completely different).

Mozgov will be returning to his team back in Europe if FIBA permits it, and few fans will remember his inauspicious NBA career, at least until he returns post-lockout. The Legend of the Mozgov sleeps in the hearts of the few, like a forgotten memory. Players like him aren’t significant in what they do, but rather in their representation of a moment in team history. He didn’t care about the DNPs he began to accrue as his time with the Knicks progressed. Timofey Mozgov cared about the 2010 Knicks, and he should be viewed as a symbol representing why the 2010 Knicks were so worth caring about from a fan perspective.

And so I salute you on your travels back to your home team, Timofey Mozgov. Send me a post card if you can. Come back once the lockout ends, and we can talk about the distant old days of 2010 and what a jerk Blake Griffin is.

 

Interesting Bonus Mozgov Facts!

 

Shout-out to my good Internet friends at Posting and Toasting for their documentation of the Mozgov blog.


 

Escaping The Shadow: Moving Past Michael Jordan

Photo by CMMooney on Flickr

Scott Leedy exists on Twitter in bunches and streams, and is now a contributing writer to Hardwood Paroxysm. His Full Court Framework column premieres in the next few days, but he begins his tenure at HP with a look at the immortal Michael Jordan, the failure of LeBron James, and just exactly who should be on what side of the firing line. I’d ask you to keep things civil, but his opening line pretty much assures that won’t be happening. Enjoy. -Ed.

 

Michael Jordan ruined basketball. Don’t look back, you read that correctly. I just willingly disparaged the G.O.A.T. I know, I know, he’s immortal, the greatest player to ever live, the most ruthless and dominant personality the sport has seen. Yes, I’m aware, six titles each accompanied with a finals MVP and a litany of famous dunks, games, and last second shots that live on in the greatest of all YouTube glory. I’ve seen the Basketball Reference page that includes stats audacious enough to make your entire brain cry. Even though I wasn’t alive, I remember the mind-blowing, perception-altering 63-point performance against the Celtics (a performance so absurd that afterwards Larry Bird rather infamously joked, “that was god disguised as Michael Jordan”). I get it. Michael was more than just a phenomenal player; he became a global icon, created the mold for the modern superstar, and along with Nike developed a brand whose shoes people would eventually kill for (that’s not some kind of poor hyperbole, people were killed over a pair of shoes). No other athlete, save Tiger Woods, can be so directly linked to the rise and success of an entire sport. All this is true, and yet I can’t shake this feeling that somehow Michael is hindering our ability to fully enjoy the sport we love.

Michael’s greatness has warped the way we evaluate and interpret the careers of today’s superstars. No one is allowed to succeed on their own terms: they must succeed on his. Nothing better exemplifies this than the career of one LeBron James. The Chosen One, King James,  6 foot 8 inches and 250 pounds of proof that mass times acceleration does indeed equal force. Outside of possibly Shaquille O’Neal, there has never been a more physically gifted player. At only 26 years old, this built for basketball cyborg has an incredible resume that includes two MVPs, a couple of the greatest statistical seasons ever, an all time WTF performance at Auburn Hills, and a playoff run in 2009 that broke PER with a mark of 37.4, a number so ridiculous that I’m going to repeat it: 37.4(seriously, WHAT?!?!). He’s taken a team that started Eric Snow to the Finals, and never lost a playoff series as a part of the better team (except maybe last year’s series with the Celtics). Yes, LeBron could stand to work on a few things (his ball handling for one), but he’s shaping up to be an all-time great.

Despite LeBron’s accomplishments, most people, even supporters, would probably consider his career to be at least somewhat of a disappointment. Sadly, a lot of the criticism centers around the same tired, unoriginal and uninspired refrain: “Michael Jordan NEVER would have (fill in the blank here)”. Michael never would have left Cleveland. Michael never would have teamed up with Wade. Michael never would have played a couple bad games in the finals. Michael never would have worn a headband. Michael’s hairline never would have receded like that. We are one step away from criticizing LeBron for not sticking his tongue out when he drives to the basket. This is where Michael’s greatness becomes a burden not only to LeBron, but also to us as fans. We so desperately desire to see another Jordan, that we focus on what LeBron isn’t, rather than celebrating him for what he is. LeBron isn’t Michael and hating him for that is a little like refusing to listen to Radiohead because they don’t sound more like the Beatles. I understand that Michael was the best, and thus we use him as a measuring stick. However, that doesn’t mean we have to take that stick and beat everyone else to death with it.

In the macho, testosterone soaked world of sports, logic and explanations often get dismissed as “excuses”. Explaining that LeBron never would have had the necessary help in Cleveland, or that Michael, Magic, and Larry also had great players by their side does nothing to diffuse the feeling that LeBron “took the easy way out”. Michael’s ruthless psyche and maniacally determined nature have only further perpetuated this sentiment. In so many ways he embodies a belief that permeates our society; if you work hard you will succeed, and if success eludes you, work harder. Maybe LeBron doesn’t care as much as Michael, and maybe he doesn’t have the same work ethic. Honestly, it shouldn’t matter. LeBron isn’t MJ, he never will be, nor should we want him to be. If we can’t accept that and celebrate how wonderful it is to watch this man play night in and night out, LeBron hasn’t failed basketball fans. Basketball fans have failed LeBron.

Lawrence Frank Will Coach The Pistons When Games Exist Again

Yahoo! Sports is reporting that the Detroit Pistons have decided Lawrence Frank will be their new head coach, and this is something to be happy about. Take it away, Woj:

Lawrence Frank is Detroit's choice to be its next head coach, and formal offer imminent within next 24-36 hours, league sources tell Y!
@WojYahooNBA
Adrian Wojnarowski

Over the next few days, Frank will be pumped up quite a bit as the lead assistant for last year’s Celtics. And though this is a fair assessment – Lawrence Frank was indeed the lead assistant for last year’s Celtics – this is a man whose coaching acumen runs much deeper than sitting besides Doc Rivers and making sure that the monstrous Boston defense, which often looks like it can run itself without anything resembling a head, doesn’t collapse into Kevin Garnett’s madness.

Unlike the last dude who went from being the right hand man on the Boston bench to being a master of his own domain, Lawrence Frank got his first break in an abrupt and unexpected manner. Where Tom Thibodeau spent got his sea legs by serving as an NBA assistant coach from 1989 to 2010, Frank was thrown head first into the cold, murky waters of the Hudson, becoming the league’s youngest head coach with the New Jersey Nets following Byron Scott’s firing in January of 2004. And it is with these New Jersey Nets where Frank done the great job that should have landed him another head coaching job immediately, and not after nearly 2 years.

With Byron Scott losing his team’s ear (as he is wont to do) after two Finals runs, Frank took over in the middle of the 2003-2004 campaign, somewhat righting the ship for a team that was great in a terrible conference but just good in a bad conference, before losing to the eventual champion Pistons in 7 games. He then proceeded to take a 2004-2005 roster that was pretty bad to begin with and was then decimated by injuries (if you don’t believe me, look here) to a playoff spot they had no business grabbing, bowing out in a somewhat respectable sweep (3 blowouts and a doublt OT loss, but come on, they were starting Brian Scalabrine for the first 3 games because Richard Jefferson was coming off a major injury, and Travis Best was their best bench player, pun not intended) at the hands of the Shaq-Wade Heat. He then got the most possible out of a Kidd-Carter-Jefferson-no frontcourt lineup that was more illustrious than it was effective, before everything fell apart in the form of trades and age.

By the time the 09-10 Nets started their season on an 0-18 run and Frank was shown the door, he had completely lost his team, but there wasn’t much to lose there anyway. It’s hard to argue that Frank did a good job with the squad, but this was a team featuring 2 all-star caliber players the previous year, one of whom was given away for a borderline starter in Courtney Lee, and the other one battling injury and disinterest (amazingly, one of the two was Vince Carter, and not the disinterested one). The 18 game losing streak was a disaster by all accounts, and Frank’s dismissal was well-earned, but he also shouldered much of the blame for a situation that was not all his doing.

All this makes it easy to forget that Frank had a team with a frontcourt rotation of Nenad Krstic, Jason Collins, and a 60 billion year old Clifford Robinson to the 4thranked defensive rating in the league, or that managed to make Devin Harris into an all-star for one year.

Frank is a defensive guru – otherwise he wouldn’t have been Thibsy’s replacement in Boston – which is something that has been lacking from the Pistons persona since the end of their glory days. With his main competition for the role being Mike Woodson, improved over the years but still responsible for the Atlanta Hawks Isolation Program, this hire is both the best available, and good in any circumstances. With a horrible defensive team, a promising young center that glorifies the concept of a moving offense, and several players prone to gunning for their own shots (Rodney Stuckey, Ben Gordon, Charlie Villanueva, the current version of Rip Hamilton, and while we’re reluctant to include his name on this list and hope he proves us wrong we have to be realistic – Brandon Knight), you can see why the defensive Xs and Os guy takes precedent over the Iso-heavy Mr. Potato Head motivator.

Lawrence Frank was a good, young NBA coach with weaknesses several years ago. After a year under Doc Rivers working on those very weaknesses – stuff like one’s ability to communicate with players between explaining what they should do against pick and rolls – and just age doing its thing, this should be a marriage that sticks.

Two Teams Will Be Fined For Mentioning Players; Hilarty, Rage Ensue

The NBA's fined two undisclosed teams for speaking on players in media during lockout, league source says. Kahn's a good bet as one of them.
@WojYahooNBA
Adrian Wojnarowski

Upon first glance, this tweet is blogger gold.

“Of course David Kahn would be the first to break the NBA’s gag order. He’s David Kahn!”, goes the mind of the comedy-directed blogger. “Forget mentioning Brad Miller and Ricky Rubio in his Kurt Rambis dismissal press conference; I bet he spoke to his players directly too, and the NBA just isn’t fining him because it’s too embarrassing. He probably got drunk one night and called Jonny Flynn to say he’s sorry and he wants him back. He probably yelled at Michael Beasley for taking advantage of his trust, once again getting into marijuana-related trouble. He probably tried to sign Joe Smith to an under-the-table contract, just for some good old Timberwolvesy nostalgia. Oh, that David Kahn, what a hoot!”

That’s how the making fun of David Kahn post goes. It’s an easy one to write, and it’s an easy one to sell. Everybody likes making fun of David Kahn, and the lockout-induced lack of actual news only makes it more of a necessity.

But once we get past the tired yet socially necessary Kahn-bashing, the news that the NBA has finally acted upon its justifiably ridiculed gag order is infuriating.

It’s hard to define this lockout in terms of sheer morality. Owners and players have a right to bargain their working terms, as is true for every other employer-employee relationship in the modern world. However, when the specific bargaining session in question is a feud between a bunch of billionaires who want to make more money and a bunch of millionaires who don’t want to make less money, we can’t help but feel that the entire process is morally-questionable at best. These feelings may very well be misguided, but they are impossible to vanquish, unless you yourself belong to either the billionaire or millionaire party.

But this lockout isn’t about the fight for money amongst those who already have it. It’s about the thousands of “other” NBA employees, those who don’t sell tickets and merchandise, but whose livelihoods depend on the game just as much as the players, even if they lack the athletic accumen. It’s about the fans, those who invest emotionally and financially into a group of grown men wearing colorful clothes and playing a game, because it connects with them in a certain way. Those other employees are being casually given a huge middle finger, some of them ignored, some of them already carelessly laid off, with the downright insulting note that “this has nothing to do with the lockout”. And the fans? You’re the fan. You over there, reading me ramble about something that I want no part of, instead of trying to figure out how the free agency market will turn out or who will trade for Monta Ellis.

These people are what the NBA is built around. The players are what the NBA sells, the owners are the middle-man between those players and the conveying mediums, but the NBA can not exist without fans and dark horse workers. Instead, these groups are treated as luxurious appendages that are no longer affordable, and therefore, no longer desirable.

The only way to solve this issue is for the league to sit down, 29 owners and one David Stern, like the grown men that they are, with the players they are currently refusing to pay (despite possessing contracts negotiated in good faith between two willing sides), and getting a deal done. Until this happens, millions of fans and thousands of second-class employees will continue to suffer through nauseating riches-vs-riches disputes. And yet, instead of committing such a simple act as showing up to discuss issues with the other side, Stern not only refuses to talk to players, but fines those who dare do so.

Stern is widely considered the best commissioner the NBA ever had, maybe the best any league has ever had. With nearly 30 years under his belt, it’s hard to argue against his well-earned reputation. But if Stern wants to walk into the sunset with his legacy intact, he sure is doing a bad job of showing it. Petulant rules instead of creative solutions; a stench that reeks of tantrum-induced totalitarianism instead of level-headed, balanced, fair bargaining; these are not the sort of things one expects to see in a commissioning role model. Representing the owners who employ you instead of the players who render those owners meaningful in the first place is a matter of pure capitalism; spitting in the face of everything that makes your business work instead of telling those employers to step back in line for the sake of people beyond themselves is a whole other story.

The fines that will go to Kahn and another unnamed team (presumably Rick Carlisle was the other fine-worthy offender, with his – brace yourselves, for this is truly horrific – mentioning of players’ names on a Portland radio show) will be treated as minor blemishes on an already stained record of lockout-related fallacies. But they represent the issues at stake as good as any. A league desperately clinging to the claim of enormous losses (which are by all accounts true, though not to the degree being publicized) despite the largest boon in talent and interest in 30 years is spending more resources terrorizing their meal tickets than trying to solve their problems. That’s not how you do business. That’s not how you do morals. That’s how you allow 3 decades of impressive progress to go down the drain. That’s how you allow a random punk who just happens to have a keyboard – such as myself – to eviscerate you, the person who has actually done something with his life, and to be completely justified in doing so.

As we silently await to find out if it is indeed the Timberwolves and the Mavericks who will be fined, whether the fines will indeed be the threatened figure of 1 million dollars, knowing fully well that this is a terrible way to fill our time and that our preferred alternative has been taken away by its overlords, one can not help but feel enraged. The fines that will be collected will go to NBA appointed charities, and while the gesture is heart-warming, one nonetheless wonders how charitable a league crying poverty can truly claim to be, or why the NBA can afford to rob its rich – owners, players – but not to give to its poor – concession stand workers, janitors, NBA store salesmen, office-dwellers, and a litany of unheralded figures who will be screwed over many more times before this unfortunate affair is finally buried deep down in the annals of the NBA’s darkest doings.

Until then, we are left with making fun of David Kahn, while shaking our heads at another David. A stronger David, one who built up his name on the strength of his decision making and his ability to steer a group of multiple franchises in the right direction, not in the hilarity of driving a single entity into the ground. A David who should know better.

Page 3 of 5«12345»