web analytics
<

Full Court Framework: Sorry, Dirk

Photo by Manesero from Flickr

Admitting you were wrong is not something that comes easily to most of us. As fans and as people, we like to believe our opinions and viewpoints have merit, that our way of viewing things is both informed and correct. Despite the inherent issues with this line of thinking, subjectivity is what makes analyzing, discussing, and arguing about basketball fun and interesting. It allows us to form and re-form opinions, defend players we love, and re-examine our pre-conceived notions about the game of basketball. Sometimes it also forces us to confront the biases and misconceptions that contribute to a flawed understanding of certain players, coaches, or teams. Over the last year or so, after his incredible playoff run, and eventual Finals MVP, I have reached that point with Dirk Nowitzki.

For as long as I can remember I’ve hated Dirk Nowitzki. I hated that he played for the Mavericks. I hated that he couldn’t get to the rim (ask Chris Bosh and Udonis Haslem about the accuracy of that last opinion.). I hated what I perceived as a completely unnecessary amount of fade on his jump shot. I hated his hair. I hated that he wore a mouth guard. I hated that his team kept bouncing Tracy McGrady out of the first round. I thought he was soft and a team constructed around Dirk would never win a championship. My selective basketball memory chose to characterize the failure against the Warriors and Heat as the epitome of his entire career. I willingly ignored his numerous, dominant performances in other series, while also refusing to recognize the context that dictated many of his team’s frustrating losses.

Dirk’s game so heavily conflicted with my conceptualization of “winning basketball”, that I failed to see how a 7-footer who attempted so few shots at the rim could be effective. I fell victim to the old adage that a series of important games could not be won with mid-range jump shots. I was blind to his uncanny ability to get to the free throw line, dismissive of his unrivaled ability to convert contested jumpers (52% from 16-23 feet – seriously, that shouldn’t be possible), and oblivious to his impressive passing acumen. Instead of appreciating Dirk’s unique skill set and recognizing the many and varied advantages it provided himself and his teammates, I ridiculed and mocked it.

Then came this year’s playoffs. Every night, Dirk was gutting out wins for the Mavericks – converting fall-aways on one foot, sideways floaters, and backbreaking three pointers, pump faking and driving by frustrated defenders, defenders whose will was wilting with every well-defended shot that found the net. His offensive dominance always ranging at the edge of impossibility.

Even if Dirk’s jumper was off-target early, he kept attacking, kept probing, eventually finding a rhythm. His ability to convert difficult shots proved invaluable in the 4th quarter. He never faltered, eventually willing his team to a title. Every clutch bucket, every dominant offensive performance, every gritty 4th quarter comeback; he was re-writing his legacy on the fly. Dirk forced all of us to realize that ‘06 and ‘07 were not going to define him. He eventually achieved the ultimate triumph over his well-documented demons. My perceived understanding of Dirk’s career forever changed.

The idea that “perception is reality” is woven into the fabric of societal discourse. However, our perceptions often twist and contort reality into something that is acceptable to our sensibilities. Previous experience, pedagogy, and intellectual as well as emotional prejudices prevent us from attaining objectivity; no matter how hard we try we will never completely rid ourselves of bias. Still, we’d be doing ourselves a disservice if we didn’t at least try. Confronting, challenging, and questioning our conception of reality can only further enhance our knowledge and understanding of the world around us.

With Dirk, I allowed myself to believe that my perception was the truth. I used my own distorted notion of Dirk as a player to discredit his accomplishments. For that I’d like to say: Dirk, I’m sorry. I’m sorry I didn’t appreciate you for the incredible player you were. I’m sorry I thought you were a choker. I’m sorry I blamed the 2007 loss to the Warriors entirely on you. I’m sorry I let your failures dictate how I viewed your career. I’m sorry I couldn’t allow myself to see the beauty in your complete mastery of the midrange. I’m sorry I failed to extend to you the same understanding and empathy I gave to other players in the NBA.  I’m sorry that I dismissed you, that I called you soft, that I proclaimed, “You’ll never win a title with Dirk Nowitzki”. Clearly, I was wrong.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

wow! what a relief for us dirk fans! thanks! i can describe dirk nowitzki with all adjectives from A to Z, believe me, he's such an inspiration to all of us basketball fanatics all over the world. See what a single championship has done to his entire basketball career. His popularity zoomed from an unknown all time-50 to top 5. Amazing! While all these things is happening, he remains the cool dude who always find time for his fans. I wonder how many people line up after each game to seek his autograph and his picture? You think he walks around with a marker/sign pen? In a recent article it was said his MVP now means - most viewed player, for people who come to the games just to see dirk. You can see from the pictures on any court, fans took his picture simultaneously, all the cameras are focused on him. I'm extremely happy for my idol, of course, he deserve it!

great post scott, well-written. i agree with pretty much everything you said about perceptions, realities, biases, preconceived notions, etc. so let me just give my two cents on dirk. I was never as down on him as you were (i never bought into the soft label, or the idea that dirk's particular skill set could not possibly lead a team to a title) but i have been extremely tough on him for his past failures. in 2006 i feel he allowed udonis haslem's physical play to take him out of his element, and he didn't step up the way he showed he was capable of during the spurs and suns series in that same year's playoffs. In 2007 I feel he tried to do too much against the warriors and abandoned the beautiful ball-movement and passing game that had made them so great during the regular season. his efficiency numbers from that series are appalling by dirk's lofty standards, because i think he focused too much on his own offense, but also failed to do so in an appropriate way and channeled that aggressiveness into long jumpers instead of punishing smaller defenders in the post.

fast forward to 2011 - i know Dirk's stats weren't up, but i do feel there was something different about his game. he had a certain composure, a certain stoicism, a certain sense of the moment that he didn't have (at least to the same degree) in previous years. he always knew when to pass and when to look to take over, and even if you pressed him you could not take him out of his game. therefore i don't blame scott for taking some time to come around on dirk, because i do think he managed to find an extra gear in recent years that he didn't necessarily always have even during his finest hours in previous years. While scott was probably a little too critical of him in the past, i can totally understand why this particular year would lead to a change of heart, because i think 2011 dirk really is significantly different from 2005-07 dirk.