
Photo by Connor Huchton (me)
This article is a two-part post profiling young players and the circumstances that shaped them. If the profiles seem biased, that’s because they probably are.
The Winding Path of Landry Fields
by Connor Huchton
I’m not here to tell you that Landry Fields is the perfect player. He has his faults. He’s not a great dribbler, an impeccable finisher, or an unstoppable athletic force. What’s interesting about Landry Fields goes beyond the surface of playing style. It lies in a matter of identity.
Most people thought there would never be a start to the NBA story of Landry Fields, and who could blame them? Chad Ford and the majority of other draft websites hadn’t even mentioned him in passing. Sure, he had some skills, but he wasn’t a top 100 prospect. What position did he play? He was too slow to play guard or small forward at the NBA level, and not physical enough to play power forward. He couldn’t shoot the three, could he? He was versatile, but he wasn’t ‘NBA versatile’. The twenty-two points and nine rebounds he had averaged while shooting 49% at Stanford had been the product of a weak league. He had carried the burden of almost everything for his team, but how far had that got them? No, he couldn’t be an NBA player. It wasn’t happening. For NBA fans, he would soon fade into the obscurity of the D-League or Europe.
I remember combing through articles (as a lifelong Stanford fan), desperately searching for some indication he could be drafted. I could hardly find a thing, so I gave up on the notion almost entirely. I was confused why a player with the wide range and size of Fields couldn’t be drafted, but I decided it was a useless exercise to continue searching, though some small hope still remained.
When the New York Knicks drafted Fields with the 39th pick, people were shocked. Madison Square Garden was less than enthused. “Who the hell is Landry Fields?” most Knicks’ fans seemed to wonder, along with the majority of experts.
But by the middle of Summer League 2010, people were starting to figure out exactly who Fields was. He was one of the best players throughout summer league, averaging 15.6 PPG and 4.8 RPG. And the NBA world started noticing. Regarding Fields, David Thorpe believed “When considering talent plus fit, I think this may be the best overall draft selection of all 60 picks.” Knicks’ fans, who had originally decried the pick as mindless, began to tout Fields as a “steal”. His quick cuts, improved three-pointer, and large frame won many over immediately. Others said the praise for Fields was premature. After all, it was just summer league.
After summer league, Mike D’Antoni told reporters that both Fields and his bro/fellow 2nd round draft pick Andy Rautins would almost certainly be on the Knicks’ roster when the season began, so little question of making the team existed. The Mike D’Antoni system usually creates a deep rotation, and the Knicks lacked the depth to keep Fields from having a strong likelihood of breaking the rotation. Only where Fields would fit into that rotation was in question.
The shooting guard position was a question for the Knicks as the season neared. Other than Fields, only Toney Douglas and Bill Walker seemed like viable options at shooting guard, but D’Antoni surprised many by choosing Fields to begin the season as the Knicks starting shooting guard.
Fields hit the ground running. In his first game, he acquitted himself well, scoring eleven points and recording four rebounds (a number which would pale in comparison to his average output), but it wasn’t a fluke. He recorded a double-double in the only the second game of his career, and the Fall of Landry Fields was only just beginning. His high rebounding, low-usage skill set became the trademark of his play. Fields could often be seen sprinting past an uninvolved opposing guard and grabbing an offensive rebounding and scoring with a quiet intensity. He made the open three-pointers often offered him at a high rate. He did exactly what he could do well, and he rarely disappointed at providing his strength to a ridiculously fun team. On November 16th, in a road game against the Denver Nuggets, the talents of Fields culminated to result in a performance that was distinctly and beautifully Fields-ian. He scored 21 points on 10-15 shooting and recorded 17 rebounds, five of them offensive. It was beautiful basketball to watch, no matter who you were. Legions of Knicks’ fans began to love him if they already hadn’t. Fields finished his first month in the NBA with a 56.2% FG.
Things progressed well for Fields as the season continued. There were games where he struggled. The NBA is not transitioned to easily. It was a faster, stronger, meaner world that Fields entered, and teams began to game plan for the cuts and dashes and hustle of Fields. As it is for any player, there were games where Fields couldn’t make a shot. On December 6th against Minnesota, he shot 1-7 from the field, but he provided 10 rebounds. When one part of his game wasn’t working, Fields never allowed the other aspects of his game to suffer. He was a vital cog to what the Amar’e-centered 2010 Knicks team needed. It was a team where Wilson Chandler or Danillo Gallinari (or even Toney Douglas) often had to shoulder the scoring load, and Fields was always there to fill in around them.
The media soon started noticing the play of Fields on a more widespread scale, and Fields’ personality started to reveal itself more and more. He was funny and more outgoing than many expected an unassuming second-round draft pick from Stanford to be. He starred in a hilarious video in which he tried to sell his own jersey at Modell’s. He won two Rookie of the Month awards. The New York media sang. Donnie Walsh, the Knicks’ GM, was praised for his savvy pick.
Fields continued playing well as the trade deadline neared, adjusting to the NBA three-point line and improving his percentage in that area. He was an essential component of a blossoming team, and the Knicks had no interest in losing a young commodity like Fields.The team outlook was thoroughly positive, and retaining Fields seemed essential to that positivity.
Soon, the scope of that outlook would change significantly. Rumors abided (as they had all season) that the Knicks sought to make a blockbuster deal for Carmelo Anthony, and those rumors eventually became reality. The Knicks wanted another superstar to join Amar’e Stoudemire, and dealt Gallinari, Chandler, Raymond Felton and Timofey Mozgov, for Carmelo Anthony and Chauncey Billups. ‘Melo and Billups played their first game for the Knicks on February 23rd , and suddenly the circumstances surrounding Fields were vastly different.
Yes, the Melo-led Knicks were a different team than the previous 2010 Knicks. Removing four rotation players from a team structure and replacing them with a high-volume scorer (one of the best in the league) and an aging, formerly elite point guard is bound to have its effects. The role of every player on the team was forced to change, and that included Landry Fields.
On the surface, the decline in Fields effectiveness after the ‘Melo trade seems slighter than many Knicks’ fans will tell you it was. He averaged 10.0 points and 7.1 rebounds per game on 51% shooting before the trade, and a line of 9.1 points and 4.8 rebounds per game on 45.3% shooting after the trade. His rebounding suffered considerably more than his scoring did, especially his offensive rebounding (he recorded OREBs at virtually half the rate before the trade). What suffered the most in Fields’ game seemed to be his level of comfort in a Knicks’ offense.
But why did the decrease in Fields’ production happen virtually instantly after the ‘Melo trade occur? Was it the addition of a high-volume scorer who demanded the ball and never seemed to establish good chemistry with Fields? Was it the presence of a new point guard in Billups (who also demanded a higher usage rate than Felton) who was less comfortable in hitting a cutting Fields with a pass? Did Fields finally hit the proverbial rookie wall as defenses began to control his capabilities? Did Fields’ efficiency suffer in a new-look Knicks’ offense that relied on him largely as a spot-up shooter?
The answer lies somewhere in the combination of these questions. The addition of Anthony, an excellent rebounder at the small forward position, certainly may have affected Fields’ ability to function as the central backcourt rebounder. Billups seemed less able or willing to locate Fields as he rushed towards the basket, but Fields maintained virtually the same field-goal attempts per game as he had before the trade. While it’s impossible to definably attribute something to “The Rookie Wall” or the new Knicks’ personnel, Fields was a different player during the last two months of the season (25 games total), culminating in a seven-game stretch in April where Fields shot 43% from the field and averaged 7.6 PPG and 4.3 RPG (on only 24.5 MPG; Fields averaged 31.0 MPG game for the entire season). Fields seemed less confident than earlier during the year, and his minutes decreased as the playoffs neared, though Mike D’Antoni continued to start the now quasi-struggling Fields. The Knicks needed Fields at full strength as they returned to the playoffs for the first time in years and faced the Boston Celtics.
For the rookie Fields, the playoffs only heightened and extended his struggles. His confidence seemed to recede and his movements became forced, and his play seemed to exemplify the underwhelming performance from the Knicks’ team as a whole. Fields averaged 1.8 PPG and 1.3 RPG on 20% shooting and 17.8 MPG. The effort was clearly there from Fields, but he simply couldn’t shake the funk that had imbued his play for the last month. The Knicks were swept before the team, and Fields, could right the ship.
So why is the 2010-2011 season of Landry Fields worth remembering? Sure, it was a success story. Second-round draft pick makes All-Rookie first team, wins two Rookie of the Month awards, and gains a plethora of fans along the way? Great headline. But for a year (and hopefully many more), Fields was a representative of identity and perseverance and struggle in the NBA. His relentless movements may have led to jaw-dropping plays like this, but it also led to creating a player that exemplified the rejuvenation of basketball in New York, and it’s ultimate fall back to Earth. Basketball is forever a game of ebbs and flows that can turn with an instant, and the players that are paid to play the game are no different. And no player represented the maximization of a skill set to the level that Fields did.
But attempting to maximize skill level isn’t always enough in the NBA. Circumstance plays as heavy a role as anything else, and it shaped the rookie year of Fields to a significant degree. The Knicks were the perfect fit for a rookie like Fields when he first began his career. The fast pace and the reliance on three-pointers that made up the team’s offense allowed Fields to expand on the most effective aspects of his game and immediately play a major role on the team. But as the season continued, the double-edged sword of circumstance turned against Fields. He was thrust into a new role as the season came to a climax, and he was never truly able to adjust adequately. As Fields continues to develop as a player, how he responds to the external situation he’s faced with will be vital to determining his future in the NBA. Circumstance waits for no one.
He played to his strengths always, but even they dissipated for stretches because of indeterminable factors. We often can’t control our surroundings as people. We can’t change the course of others to suit ours as a whim. The best we can do is capitalize on our traits as best we can when the opportunity arises, and Landry Fields often represented the effort within all of us that can shine when placed in the right situation. My only hope is that we’ll be able to see him (and the rest of the NBA) continue to do so very soon.
James Johnson: Basketball Player, Kick-Boxer, and Enigma
The author of this James Johnson profile is Brian Schroeder. Brian contributes to Ridiculous Upside and maintains his own personal blog, Tyrus Thomas Forever. You can also find him on Twitter as @Cosmis and at various other places on the Internet. His interests inside basketball (aside from James Johnson) include Reggie Williams being exciting, Joakim Noah being crazy, and Tyrus Thomas being awesome. His favorite team is the Chicago Bulls, for some reason.
James Johnson was born on February 20, 1987, in Cheyenne, Wyoming. He attended East Cheyenne High and eventually Wake Forest University on a basketball scholarship. He was born to a family of kick boxers, and holds both a black belt in the sport and an undefeated 20-0 mark.
He is, at his essence, what LeBron James would be if you replaced his mind with the mind of an overly excitable puppy. And then taught that puppy how to be a kick boxer. The Bulls, perhaps seeing the rabid karate puppy waiting to be freed that I do, drafted Johnson 16th overall in the 2009 Draft, directly ahead of a string of approximately 347 point guards.
Soon afterwards, with the 22nd pick, they selected Taj Gibson, resulting in a draft that left most Bulls fans (including yours truly) disappointed. Most Bulls fans had been expected to end up with some combination of Terrence Williams, Earl Clark, and DeJuan Blair, an arrangement that, in retrospect, I’m happy didn’t come to fruition. My first real exposure to JJ’s career as a Bull came with his awesome set of rookie photographs, best exhibited here and here.
2009-2010
In only his second game as a Bull, a preseason outing in London against the Jazz on October 7, 2009, Johnson buried a game winning buzzer beater. He continued to show a high level of activity and defensive effort all throughout the 09-10 preseason, playing well enough that most Bulls fans considered him a better prospect than Taj Gibson, who was still in the “if this guy isn’t horrible, I’ll be satisfied” phase of his Bulls career.
Johnson’s playing time, while never steady, improved at a rate consistent with the improvement in his game, a pleasing outcome for a coach such as Vinny Del Negro, who has a reputation for quite the opposite (just ask Tyrus Thomas). During the Bulls’ ten game losing streak (which was played without the services of Luol Deng, Joakim Noah, and, for a few games, Derrick Rose), James Johnson was thrust into the starting role, and was, along with Acie Law, the “best” player on the team. This culminated in a 20 point, 6 rebound performance in a loss against Miami. He ended the season posting averages of 3.9/2.0/0.7/0.3/0.7, in 11.6 minutes per game, with a 20.5% turnover rate and .532 TS%. Not blowing anyone’s mind (to put it lightly), but there were signs of promise. Johnson briefly reached national “prominence” when LeBron James dunked on him during Game of the 2010 Eastern Conference Quarterfinals. Fun times, indeed.
2010-2011 (Bulls)
The Bulls’ addition of touted defensive mastermind Tom Thibodeau seemed to be a good omen for a fast, active, relentless young defender like Johnson, who seemed like a safe bet to blossom under Thibs tutelage. In early August 2010, stories surfaced of Johnson dropping from his recorded 2009 weight of 245 pounds down to around 225, with the expressed intent of defending at least three positions in Thibodeau’s new defensive system. This promise seemed to be fulfilled on October 30, 2010, the Bulls’ second game of the regular season, when Johnson came off the bench in the 4thquarter and helped key a 34-9 quarter and a Bulls win with his activity and defensive intensity. He finished with 8 points, 9 rebounds, 4 assists, 2 steals, 3 blocks, 3 fouls, only one turnover in almost 19 minutes, by far his most effective game as a Bull. For some reason, after this game, Thibodeau seemed to lose faith in Johnson, playing him less and less as the season went on.
2010-2011 (Energy)
Surely some of this can be attributed to early season rotations being trimmed down, but Johnson seemed to have earned at least some consistent playing time, especially when Luol Deng was playing the entirety of the fourth quarter in 20 point victories. This was nearly infuriating to me, so you can imagine how James himself felt about it, and on January 27th, 2011, he was sent to the Iowa Energy, Chicago’s D-League affiliate (apparently at his own request). During his stint, he showed off all of his varied strengths and weaknesses, averaging 19.3 points, 8.9 rebounds, 4.3 assists, 1 steal, 2.5 blocks and 3 turnovers a game in eight contests, all of them starts. The fact that James Johnson seemed to be too fast, strong and big for forwards in the D-League, a league known for its faster tempo and athletic forwards (sup, Latavious Williams) bodes well for his future as a possible defensive stopper in the NBA. All he needed was a place to get some burn, and a coach willing to give it to him.
2010-2011 (Raptors)
On February 22, 2011, James Johnson was traded to the Toronto Raptors for a first round pick, one the team received in the Chris Bosh sign and trade with the Miami Heat. He was immediately inserted into the starting lineup by Raptors Head Coach Jay Triano, a position Johnson would hold for the remaining 25 games of the regular season. His first game, coincidentally, came against his former team, a Raptors victory in which he scored 9 points and added 5 rebounds and 3 blocks in nearly 27 minutes of play. Over the course of the rest of the season, Johnson endeared himself to Raptors fans with his chicken-minus head level of activity, and managed to turn in some fairly decent performances, including a Raptors career-high 18 point, 6 rebound, 6 assist, 3 steal game against New Jersey on April 10, 2011.
The Future?
One of the few plausible benefits of the NBA Lockout is the possibility of James returning to his kick boxing career in the downtime, a possibility he’s already mentioned as an alternative to his NBA career. Johnson’s future with the Raptors, while seemingly solid for next season (whenever that is), is still very much in doubt. It remains to be seen what new Raptors coach Dwane Casey (James’ fourth coach in the NBA) has in store for the Ninja Raptor, but rest assured, it will be awesome (this story from March should explain it nicely).