web analytics
<
Archive by Author

Film Don’t Lie: The Denver Nuggets and “Gattaca”

Teambuilding is merely an exercise in collective eugenics; a geneticist of sorts hand picks desired traits and abilities, and engineers a finished product to incorporate them. The logistical realities of operating with entire human beings rather than sequences of genetic code require more imprecise maneuvers, but the underlying goal is the same: perfection, in all of its pragmatic glory.

There are, however, those teams that come to exist as a matter of random chance rather than designed formula. Their point guards don’t have perfect vision. Their bigs don’t have the ideal height and hops. Their wings have imperfect jumpers. They consist of the same guanine, adenine, cytosine, and thymine that constitutes those perfectly engineered specimens, but the sequence is subtly different. In the world of Gattaca, they are the in-valids, those made — and made imperfect — by nature itself, in stark contrast to the orchestrated makeup of all that surround them.

The Denver Nuggets as we knew them — the wonderful, inspired, and deeply flawed team left in the wake of the Carmelo Anthony trade — were unquestionably in-valid. The limitations ingrained in their very code were supposed to keep them from ever entering Gattaca’s gates; without Anthony and without Chauncey Billups, the collection of supporting pieces in Denver was supposed be rebuffed at the playoff threshold altogether. No team can fully fake their way into a playoff-worthy record, and the players on the Nuggets roster were destined to be something inferior.

The Nuggets found their way in. There were tests of blood and vision and resolve, but none could turn away a capable team that knew it belonged. Obviously Denver would have been better off with a perfect profile, but chance’s creation was good enough to pass as legitimate perfection. They weren’t, however, good enough to win. The fact that the Thunder — a team of two stars, a deliberate model, and all the trappings of a valid contender — took the series and eliminated the Nuggets from the playoffs is no surprise, but then again, it’s also not the point. 

Vincent (voiceover): We used to swim as far out as we dared — it was about who would get scared and turn back first. Of course, it was always me. Anton was by far the stronger swimmer, and he had no excuse to fail.

It should have been expected that the “genetically superior” team would win out in any measure of competitive worth, but those rare exceptions beg for us to look at something beyond mere expectation. In the film, Vincent “always” lost to his biologically perfect brother in their battle of wills. The system was built for him to fail, and fail he did — many times, we’re led to believe.

Yet twice in the film, we see Vincent win in a race against his brother. First as a young adult:

Vincent (voiceover): It was the last time we swam together out into the open sea. Like always knowing each stroke to the horizon was one we’d have to make back to the shore. But something was very different about that day. Every time Anton tried to pull away, he found me right beside him. Until finally, the impossible happened. It was the one moment in our lives when my brother was not as strong as he believed, and I was not as weak. It was the moment that made everything else possible.

And finally, in the analogous representation of Vincent’s journey to the elusive “other side” of the world that had been denied him for so long on the basis of his makeup:

 

The Nuggets, in-valids though they were, haven’t yet won. They failed, just as so many other in-valid playoff teams have failed before them. Anton still swims harder and farther, leaving the Nuggets behind to face their own limitations.

Gattaca may be, in part, a story of the triumph of human spirit, but that resilience is hardly the lesson here. Sure, the Nuggets went hard and believed, but there’s no revelation in the fact that a playoff team trusts in its potential. Instead, it would do us all good to reflect on one of Gattaca‘s other themes: makeup can tell us all kinds of practical information, but internal sequence and structure alone don’t offer sufficient basis to discriminate. Denver didn’t follow the model of other championship contenders, but it wasn’t the oft-diagnosed lack of a star player that damned the Nuggets to their first round exit. It was their struggles to contain Kevin Durant, the failure to create shots against pressure, and the inability to utilize all of their available assets effectively.

Denver would have been better off with a star, but that privilege isn’t the only way to achieve success. Vincent, for example, was able to do brilliant work once given the opportunity, despite all of his flaws:

Director Josef: Godliness. I reviewed your flight plan. Not one error in a million keystrokes. Phenomenal. It’s right that someone like you is taking us to Titan.

It was somehow right that Vincent, with his likelihood for heart failure, his myopic vision, and his various other limitations, was to lead the human race to a brave new world. Just like someday, it will be right for a new breed of championship contender — not at all unlike these Nuggets — to bring home the title, and debunk a generation of critics who claimed that “no team could ever win a title by doing X.” Certain skills and production are mandatory for success in this game and this league, but the formation — the very makeup — of a team is fully flexible. Star power isn’t important, so long as that aforementioned production comes from somewhere on the roster in a reliable fashion.

The Nuggets don’t need one star, nor two; after all, every atom in our bodies was once part of a star, which makes the Nuggets already glow with their own star power. Moving forward, they need a composite fix to either address their team weaknesses or bolster their strengths. In this series, Denver simply failed to break through. That event, whether through these Nuggets or some other in-valid team either known or unknown to us now, is coming. Those teams will swim out together into the open sea time and time again, until finally, inevitably, they experience the kind of moment that makes everything else possible.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Andre Iguodala

In this installment of Have Ball, Will Travel, we’ll take a closer look at the legality of one quarter-ending sequence from Thursday’s first-round game between the Miami Heat and the Philadelphia Sixers. On this particular play, Andre Iguodala receives an inbound pass outside the three-point line, faces up against LeBron James, and makes a move to attack the basket:

Unlike many of the other plays featured in this series, Iguodala’s infraction of the traveling rule actually comes before he even takes his dribble. Prior to releasing the ball to initiate his drive, Iguodala actually takes two steps: first by planting his right foot while lifting his pivot, and the second by returning his pivot foot to the ground. The relevant section of the traveling rule reads as follows:

In starting a dribble after (1) receiving the ball while standing still, or (2) coming to a legal stop, the ball must be out of the player’s hand before the pivot foot is raised off the floor.

NBA officials are typically able to catch this type of violation, but the crew in this game dropped the ball on a pretty blatant walk. Iguodala didn’t merely attempt to explode toward the basket while releasing his pivot too early, but planted two separate times before his dribble even began. Even at full speed Iguodala’s move seems a bit fishy (if not illegal), but I suppose that while watching for contact and keeping an eye on the clock’s countdown, the officials overlooked this fairly obvious violation.

Video: Eve of the Playoffs

We’re a single day away from real, live playoff basketball — mere hours from fantastic play, incomparable competitive fire, and compelling narrative. The regular season brings all of those, but lacks in density; we’re about to experience a whirlwind of all of the greatest things about this game in a condensed time frame, starting with a beautiful eight-game sprint and ending with a clash between the NBA’s finest.

Get ready.

Streaming

Screen shot 2011-04-11 at 12.47.10 PM

FreeDarko is a blog, but also a book (or two, really); it’s a force of nature somehow distilled from the endlessness of the internet into bound paper. It’s a collective and a mindset; FD is a group of like-minded basketball enthusiasts, but whether “FreeDarko” is a descriptor for all of those who subscribe to a particular way of thinking or merely the fantastic collection of writers who led the conversation is beyond me. FreeDarko will clothe you, and then revel in its own endearing impracticality. It will cover your walls in the most vivid NBA artwork money can buy, and fill your head with ideas that will change the way you look at basketball forever, so long as you throw convention to the wind and sip on the Kool-Aid for a while. It is both criticism and appreciation, for no teams and all teams, for some players and all players.

I have no idea what FreeDarko means. I thought I did once, but I was probably wrong. The same is undoubtedly true regarding my comprehension of some of the fine, lofty works of Bethlehem Shoals, Brown Recluse, Esq., Dr. Lawyer IndianChief, and FD’s many other incredible contributors, as well as the visual stylings of Big Baby Belafonte and Silverbird5000; I wouldn’t dare claim to have properly processed the lot of FreeDarko’s exports over my years as a reader, partially due to my own faults, but also because FD simply loves to teeter on the edge of the rails.

Or at least FreeDarko loved to teeter on the edge of the rails. The FD site as we’ve known it is no more, and though this is hardly the time to pen epitaphs for FreeDarko’s authors, it’s as worthy of an occasion as any to reminisce over what was, what was learned, and what was gained from the most unforgettable cornerstone of the contemporary basketball blogosphere. I know blogdeath is not the end, but only a transition; FreeDarko is survived by the numerous authors who made it great — many of whom still hover around the game — and years’ worth of amazing works. Still, this is an event of reflection, if not one of mourning.

No other written basketball entity could ever match FD’s luxuriance, and I’m not sure any ever will. The longform prose, the heavy concepts, the esoterica — FreeDarko’s allure was always based in its indulgence. This particular internet nook offered something rich that no other outlet could imitate, even as FreeDarko’s prevalence inspired and influenced a new wave of online scribes (myself most definitely included) to embrace that which they had been taught to reject. There’s just nothing quite like the FD brand, and though the thematic influence of Shoals and co. can be traced to the ends of our basketball realm, every FreeDarkolite bears roads leading to Rome. Other blogs or writings may be proximal in theme, but FreeDarko had — and has — no NBA peer in style, intellect, and audacity.

Yet what I loved about FreeDarko most of all was its refreshing self-awareness. By the time I finally stumbled upon FD, the site had already covered a lot of its theoretical bases, the comment section had come alive, and the authors were working magic. There was this insanely intricate and self-referential body of work to explore, as threads carried through FreeDarko’s archives in spiraling patterns alternating in intellectual seriousness and bits of tantalizing whimsy. The balance of gravity and levity that FreeDarko was able to strike wasn’t just commendable and awesome, but damn noble. Inspiring on its own merit, really. FD will largely be remembered for its conceptual taglines and general ethos, but I think it’s crucial that those of us who knew FreeDarko well never let ourselves forget how tonally brilliant this entire endeavor was. From blog to book and back, FD’s authors were able to dive headfirst into basketball theory and emerge spewing magnificent and insightful prose, but somehow those under the FreeDarko flag never lost touch with the game’s all-important sense of fun.

Those at FreeDarko’s helm knew what they were doing, even when they didn’t; FD may have missed the point at times, but for most of its natural life, it never missed a beat. The blog and its authors grew into a sense of what they were and what they provided, and once they reached that point, the FreeDarko collective offered the closest thing I’ve ever seen to a self-actualized blog. It was beautiful to watch, to read, and to revel in.

So to Nathaniel Friedman, Todd Ito, Adam Waytz, Jacob Weinstein, and Jesse Einhorn, among so many others: thank you. FreeDarko was a blast, and we’ll never, ever be the same.

Tidal Patterns

Screen shot 2011-03-22 at 12.37.17 PM

The Knicks’ second-half breakdown in Monday night’s game against the Celtics was at once both predictable and startling. New York is, by style, a team incapable of enduring runs; unless their offense is operating at a high level at all times, the Knicks are vulnerable to flurries of points and stops from more effective teams. When the consistent scoring goes, so too does the game. The Celtics, on the other hand, are the picture of in-game and in-season fortitude. No loss is back-breaking and no quarter damning. Boston simply hovers, cool and confident, waiting for the moment when the shots finally do start falling. Their defense allows them that much, and though the Celtics’ poor execution during the first 24 minutes of Monday’s game imbued them with a 14-point halftime deficit, their recovery was imminent.

Imminent and yet shocking, still. There’s an awesome quality in seeing an offensive outfit as capable as the Knicks – who put up 51 points in the first half despite playing in a pretty slow game – be completely shut down, even if it falls right in line with the expected narrative structure. Boston’s defense is just so completely smothering when it’s on point, and on Monday New York looked absolutely impotent by comparison. It wasn’t just Boston’s D vs. New York’s O; the offense-defense distinction too often creates an artificial separation that doesn’t actually exist. Defense feeds into offense and vice versa, and the Celtics thoroughly dominated both ends of the court by using each as a conduit to the other. Every made bucket allowed the defense an opportunity to get set, and every stop provided an offensive opportunity.

The Knicks, on the other hand, seemed incapable of grasping the concept that basketball is a transitional game. Oddly enough, New York rarely pushed the pace in the second half (particularly in the fourth quarter), and in the instances when they did make an attempt to do so, Boston was in position to defend. The results weren’t pretty, as the Knicks’ offense completely stopped functioning in a half-court setting during the final frame. Shot selection was a huge issue, as each of New York’s stars took turns committing offensive blunders down the stretch:

Worse yet: the Knicks haven’t quite grasped getting back on defense as an imperative. The scene was particularly heinous in the fourth quarter, as a 23-2 Celtics run fueled by fast break points destroyed what was left of the Knicks’ advantage and propelled the better team toward a convincing win:

As far as the Knicks have come in the last year, there’s still a gulf separating them from the league’s elite. It’s the defense. It’s the offense. It’s the poor attention to detail and a conceptual disregard for the system in place. Every squad will have their losses and letdowns, but New York shows their relative worth in a loss like this one.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Dwyane Wade (III)

In this installment of Have Ball, Will Travel, we’ll take a closer look at Dwyane Wade’s soul-crushing dunk on Kendrick Perkins from Wednesday night’s game between the Heat and Thunder.

Wade’s slam could very well be the play of the year, but unfortunately it’s something less than legal according to NBA rules. There’s a reason why Wade has been featured in more videos for this series than any other player: he simply has a way of navigating space that tests the limits of what we perceive as a travel. In some cases Wade’s footwork is merely unique, and in others his maneuvers inspire a mere raised eyebrow when they should warrant a quick whistle.

Regardless, this incredible highlight is in violation of two separate clauses in the traveling rule, much like Blake Griffin’s transition spin-move/dunk against the Knicks earlier in the season. At the crux of Wade’s misstep is the spin move; like far too many NBA players, Wade’s spin doesn’t use a pivot foot as its anchor, but actually utilizes two separate steps as the foundation of its advantage. By sneaking in an extra step (or really, by subtly lifting his pivot and then replanting it), Wade is able to cover a lot of ground on his path to the basket, but in doing so he hops consecutively on the same foot — an easy travel call. For reference, here is the exact wording of this particular part of the traveling rule:

“Upon ending his dribble or gaining control of the ball, a player may not touch the floor consecutively with the same foot (hop).”

Also, Wade takes a total of three steps following his gather: the re-setting of his spin pivot and each of his plants immediately prior to his jump. Again, here’s the relevant passage from the NBA rulebook, in case you hadn’t committed it to memory:

“A player who receives the ball…upon completion of a dribble, may take two steps in coming to a stop, passing or shooting the ball.”

With his speed, body control, sneaky footwork, driving ability, and tendency to exaggerate contact, Wade may be the toughest player to officiate in today’s NBA. I’m sure this isn’t the last time we’ll see Wade as the subject in this series, and even more certain that this isn’t the last time he’ll dupe NBA officials.

Hat tip to Royce Young for the play selection.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Goran Dragic

In this installment of Have Ball, Will Travel, we’ll take a closer look at a sequence from Saturday night’s game between the Rockets and Spurs, in which Goran Dragic was whistled for a travel.

Dragic has incredibly unique footwork, but in this case his creativity gets the best of him. Rather than use a basic maneuver to create a bit of space for his layup attempt, he ends up taking two consecutive steps off the same foot, which any Have Ball, Will Travel veteran should easily identify as a no-no. Here’s the relevant passage from the NBA’s video rulebook:

“An offensive player with the ball may not hop consecutively on the same foot upon ending his dribble.”

We’ve seen Andray Blatche called for a walk on a similar sequence in the past, and sadly seen this rule invalidate one of Blake Griffin’s highlight-reel slams. Good on the officiating crew for spotting this one: Dragic’s play is otherwise legal, but the fact that he hops on his left foot for his gather step and the first step in his two-step count makes this one an obvious travel.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Devin Harris

In this installment of Have Ball, Will Travel, we’ll take a closer look at Devin Harris’ dribble-drive on the last possession of Wednesday night’s game between the Jazz and Raptors. Harris ultimately misses the shot, but the legality of this play has definite import; had Harris been called for a walk (he wasn’t), then Al Jefferson’s ensuing game-winning tip-in wouldn’t have counted. Take a look:

At full speed, there’s definitely something fishy about Harris’ footwork. However, as mentioned in the dissection of a potential Deron Williams travel, there are some who see taking another step out of a pivot as a legal play. I still don’t agree, and if we were only looking at that specific action, I’d still call it a walk.

That’s all moot. In his efforts to free up space for a shot prior to his step-through move, Harris ends up establishing his left foot as his pivot foot, lifting that pivot, and then re-planting it only to leave it again. That is a travel, and there should be no point in debate. At the 41-second mark in the video, it was a bit unclear exactly how much Harris had moved or shifted his pivot, so I included a picture-in-picture clip from another angle that shows him lift his pivot off the floor completely.

For the sake of consistency, here’s the relevant section of the traveling rule from the NBA rulebook:

“If a player, with the ball in his possession, raises his pivot foot off the floor, he must pass or shoot before his pivot foot returns to the floor.”

Case closed.

Mirage in a Menagerie

Screen shot 2011-02-15 at 11.15.45 PM

The long and winding N.B.A. season creates more than its fair share of mirages. With so many games and an infinite number of ways in which to split and separate data, there always exists the potential to mistake some fleeting streak for a meaningful assertion. A majority of games will fall somewhere near the mean; there are only so many “statement games” and “turning points” to go around, which makes the mass of the regular season schedule an exercise in affirmation. They’ll surge and fall back, but for the most part, N.B.A. teams hover around the same anchoring marks they established earlier in the season.

With that in mind, it now appears that – perhaps out of desire to find Blake Griffin a suitable throne – some may have rushed to their conclusion that the Clippers were immediately on the up-and-up. Los Angeles is a talented team and has a bright future, but let’s not forget: young teams that suddenly vault their way into the playoffs are the exception, not the rule.

Griffin’s Clippers went 9-4 to finish out the month of January, which is quite a bit better than their .364 season win percentage. Plus, despite scoring dynamo Eric Gordon being sidelined for the final four games of that stretch, the Clippers still won a pair of home games to close out their January schedule. Griffin amazes nightly, but his team’s performance last month was about as remarkable as any of his highlight-reel slams. That the underdeveloped and undermanned Clips managed such a record over a 13-game stretch (which included wins over the Heat, Lakers, Nuggets, and Pacers) is nothing short of astonishing.

Los Angeles then played four consecutive games against Chicago, Atlanta, Miami, and Orlando, and promptly fell back down to Earth. That much is to be expected; all of those teams are substantially better than the Clippers, which means that four consecutive losses merely represent the most probable outcome.

What’s a bit more disconcerting is the next stretch of games. After a solid win against the Knicks, the Clippers rattled off a series of embarrassing losses, each demoralizing in their own way. First, the Clips had the decency to be the Cavaliers’ first win in 27 games. Two days later, they could barely score against the Raptors, who have the second-worst defense in the entire league. L.A. managed just 97.9 points per 100 possessions in that game; for comparison’s sake, the Bucks are the league’s worst offensive team, and average 98.2 points per 100 possessions.

Most recently, the Clips extended their trip through the gutter by notching a 24-point loss to the Bucks on Monday night. That stagnant Milwaukee offense, which so conveniently served as a benchmark for ineptitude? It managed 114.6 points per 100 possessions against Los Angeles.

The Clippers played well for a time, and that performance received deserved notoriety. Now things have swung to the other extreme, and though Eric Gordon’s absence admittedly serves as a significant caveat to any honest assessment of Los Angeles’ current performance, there’s no use trying to explain away those three heinous losses. One dropped game to the Cavs would be an understandable slip, and two straight losses a bad weekend. But to lose three in a row in such humbling fashion speaks to the considerable limitations of this team. The elastic regular season was bound to swing the other way, as L.A.’s previous triumphs were anything but sustainable.

Peaks, valleys, and all, this isn’t a team that’s ready to make the jump into playoff contention, even with Gordon fully healthy. The Clippers still have a ways to go before reaching solvency. The scoring – outside of Gordon and Griffin – will have to come from somewhere, and do so reliably. The defense will need to improve in every possible dimension. Right now, individual elements are in place, but there’s no collective foundation.

Consider it this way: that 9-4 stretch which so briefly ignited the Clippers’ long-shot playoff hopes showed what this team is capable of as currently constructed, rather than show the anchor from which the team’s performance could be stabilized. Their actual baseline isn’t quite so high. Take a look at the team’s performance over the course of the season by efficiency differential:

clippersfinal

The red line represents the Clippers’ season average in efficiency differential, a pretty crummy -4.1 points per 100 possessions. Were the Clippers markedly better than that average over those 13 glorious games (as noted by the blue highlighted portion of the graph)? Of course. However, this sample is most accurately assessed as a counterbalance for the Clips’ early season struggles (seen in the red highlighted portion) rather than some season-saving improvement. Los Angeles wasn’t gaining momentum during their hot streak, merely evening out the scales.

As is usually the case, the real measure of the Clippers’ performance lies somewhere in the middle; that -4.1 efficiency differential might be a bit depressed by the team’s recent struggles (which can be linked, though not wholly attributed, to Gordon’s absence), but it’s a fairly accurate indicator of how the Clippers have performed this season on the whole.

N.B.A. teams are erratic. Even the most consistent clubs jump in efficiency from game to game and week to week, and though the Clippers seem to have these isolated runs of success and failure, they’re merely making their way through an arduous N.B.A. season just like every other team in the league.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Carmelo Anthony

In this installment of Have Ball, Will Travel, we’ll take a closer look at a Carmelo Anthony spin move from last night’s game between the Nuggets and Rockets, which ended up sending Anthony to the line for two of his 50 points:

It’s not an easy sequence to dissect; the angle on Anthony’s spin and the positions of the other players in the lane at the conclusion of Anthony’s move make it difficult to assess the its legality with 100% certainty. Based on the available evidence however, Anthony’s quick spin toward the rim looks like a well-executed play that is perfectly legal according to the NBA’s traveling rules.

The key to the move’s legality is the initial dribble, and luckily that’s one of the sequence’s less debatable points. Anthony releases the ball from his hands to dribble before lifting his pivot foot, and gathers the ball while taking a step. By rule, Anthony is allowed two more full steps upon the completion of his dribble, which he takes. The only possible snag would be the spin, but Anthony’s rotating pivot appears stable, and the move itself is quick enough to not disrupt any interpretations of the traveling rule based on the “two-count” method.

Spin moves are a breeding ground for traveling violations; they can give such a ridiculous advantage when executed (and called) incorrectly, that players naturally try to emulate those moves in order to gain that same advantage. The result is a lot of pivot sliding and lifting, a lot of which goes uncalled due to the speed at which those moves occur. Anthony’s in the clear on this particular play, though. Once he establishes his spin pivot, he holds it beautifully until planting his other foot for his next step.

H/T on this play selection to Patrick Harrel.

Page 2 of 32«12345»102030...Last »