web analytics
<
Archive by Author

Have Ball, Will Travel: Deron Williams

In this installment of Have Ball, Will Travel, we’ll take a closer look at Deron Williams’ half-court heave from last night’s game between the Jazz and Blazers, and wreck some dreams long the way. Roll the tape:

Sadly, Deron William’s buzzer-beater seems to be a clear-cut travel. He establishes his right foot as a pivot foot, pivots through two defenders, and then lifts his pivot foot to give him an illegal step-through. What’s odd is that the rulebook doesn’t explicitly say that this is a violation. Here’s the relevant passage:

If a player, with the ball in his possession, raises his pivot foot off the floor, he must pass or shoot before his pivot foot returns to the floor.

Deron technically shoots before his pivot returns to the floor, considering he’s stepping out of his pivot rather than jumping off of it. There really isn’t any clear language in the rulebook on this type of step-through, which takes us on a fun trip down the way of writer’s intent. Reading a rulebook shouldn’t be like constitutional law, but in this case, we have little choice. Technically, a player could go up for a jumper out of a pivot, and come back down with the ball so long as he lands on his non-pivot foot. However, such a play is — and should be — an obvious travel. It’s just not specifically outlined in the rulebook, and the wording used doesn’t expressly forbid it.

However, given the nature of this play and the specific advantage Deron gained by lifting his pivot and taking an additional step (Ed. note: gained advantage is how the rulebook determines traveling in other cases), it’s a violation of the intent of the rule, if not the rule itself.

EDIT: The esteemed John Schuhmann of NBA.com disagrees wholeheartedly with my assessment. If for some reason you’re not already following him on Twitter, you can read his comments @johnschuhmann (search @robmahoney for comments specific to this call). Schuhmann definitely has a valid point, but I still have a hard time letting go of this as walk. Let’s open the phones; I’m sticking by this one as a travel, but what do you think?

Have Ball, Will Travel: Hedo Turkoglu

In this installment of Have Ball, Will Travel, we’ll re-run a play that wasn’t whistled for a violation during last night’s game between the Orlando Magic and the Atlanta Hawks.

It’s common — in social circles consisting of entirely 10 year-olds, anyway — to insist that in the dictionary next to the definition for whatever negative word is most fitting lies a picture of so-and-so. Zing. But seriously: in the NBA’s rulebook under how not to execute a jump stop at the end of a dribble is a video of Hedo Turkoglu. This is pretty much Hedo’s move, and it’s 100% travel.

As far as I can tell, Turkoglu doesn’t really understand the concept of a jump stop. Most notably, he pivots and steps-through following his stop with no regard for traveling rules, and in far too many cases, he gets away with it. The jump stop is among the most poorly officiated areas of the modern NBA game, and Turk is but one player that gets away with violations on jump stops regularly.

H/T to @Smooth_Operatah for the play selection.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Kobe Bryant

In today’s edition of Have Ball, Will Travel, we’ll take a look at one of Kobe Bryant’s highlight-reel plays from yesterday’s game between the Lakers and Raptors:

I don’t know that there’s too much to say here other than that this kind of stuff happens all the time. This exact traveling sequence — the pivot step-back — has been a point of emphasis for officials over the last few seasons, but they can’t catch them all. The shift is too subtle, the players too quick, and the movement too natural. Dig through top play countdowns and game recap videos and you’re sure to find plenty of plays just like this one, fallen through the cracks of the officiating system and yet commemorated as if it were completely legal.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Manu Ginobili

In today’s Have Ball, Will Travel, we’ll take a closer look at a pretty controversial play: Manu Ginobili’s game-winning jumper from Wednesday night’s game between the San Antonio Spurs and the Milwaukee Bucks.

Strange things are afoot at the AT&T Center. Ginobili has always had a certain awkwardness to his game, and his unorthodox style is part of what makes him such a difficult cover. It also has led to more than a few missed calls and false traveling positives; Ginobili’s bizarre rhythm makes him a referee’s worst nightmare.

Understandably, this particular play led to widespread declarations across the Twitterverse that Ginobili had duped the officiating crew, committed what many considered to be an obvious traveling violation, and stolen a win in the process. Among them was Brett Pollakoff of NBA FanHouse:

As Ginobili drove left — which he always does, you know, considering the fact he’s left-handed — he planted both feet, then lifted both feet to step back to take the game-winning jumper, and landed before elevating to do so. There’s no way that isn’t a travel.

At first glance, I agreed with Brett. Ginobili seems to take two steps before going into his  jump stop, which would certainly constitute a travel. However, a closer look at the clip reveals that Manu’s play was actually a completely legal maneuver.

The errors in judgment primarily seem to stem from a plant of Ginobili’s right foot just prior to his step-back and jump stop. While viewing the play from the original broadcast angle at full speed, it indeed appears that Ginobili picks up his dribble before planting that right foot. But if we view the play from another angle, it’s clear that when Manu plants his right foot in what many are counting as his “first” step, the ball isn’t even in his hand. This step isn’t a step at all, at least not for the purposes of any kind of violation. Instead, Ginobili’s step count triggers as soon as he’s gathered and gained control of the ball, which occurs after the right foot has already been planted.

According to the NBA Rulebook, “The first step occurs when a foot, or both feet, touch the floor after gaining control of the ball.” Thus, Ginobili’s step-back (with his left foot, prior to the jump stop) is his actual first step. The rulebook also states that “a progressing player who jumps off one foot on the first step may land with both feet simultaneously for the second step.” Ginobili does just that, and gives us a fine example of a perfectly legal jump stop. He jumps immediately afterward to fire up the game-winner, which means for those counting at home, the entire sequence consisted of a rulebook-entitled two steps.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Steve Nash

In today’s Have Ball, Will Travel, we have the elusive double-whammy. Two demonstrations of the enforcement of the traveling rule, one correct and one incorrect, coming from Tuesday night’s game between the Phoenix Suns and the Portland Trailblazers.

This first clip is an easy non-call, and the officiating crew judged it correctly. In most casual basketball circles, this would surely be called a travel; the “can’t stand up with the ball” rule is a pretty popular, but in this case incorrect, interpretation of the traveling rule. I’m not exactly sure if this particular rule has evolved over time or if it’s always been misunderstood, but in today’s NBA (and at least as far back as a few years ago, based on the clips used for the NBA Video Rulebook), it’s perfectly legitimate to stand up with the ball, establish a pivot foot, and go about your business.

Now, here’s where things get tricky. Players receiving the ball on the move frequently get a ridiculous free pass on traveling calls, but here the official calls the play tightly…and incorrectly. Here’s the language used in the rulebook:

A player who receives the ball while he is progressing must release the ball to start his dribble before his second step.

The first step occurs when a foot, or both feet, touch the floor after gaining control of the ball. The second step occurs after the first step when the other foot touches the floor, or both feet touch the floor simultaneously.

Alright, pretty straightforward there. Nash clearly receives the ball on the move, though in his usual side gallop rather than a full sprint. If you look carefully, both of Nash’s feet are planted when he gains possession of the ball; it’s hard to see because of his shuffle, but if you watch the movement and angle of his feet, it’s clear that neither one should count as an established step. That makes the plant of Nash’s right foot his “first step” as defined by the rule.

Nash’s “second step” is an insanely close call, but he does indeed release the ball before his second step occurs, as the rule demands. I’ve freeze-framed the video where the ball is out of Nash’s hands while his other foot (which will eventually take that second step) is still in the air. Hard to blame the official for not being able to see that insane bit of detail, but in this case that level of precision would have been necessary to make the correct non-call.

Thanks to Monsieurs Sebastian Pruiti and Henry Abbott for recommending these plays.

A Man Wronged


Video via Gian Casimiro.

I’ll leave you with one simple question: Is it possible not to like Ronny Turiaf?

Have Ball, Will Travel: Dirk Nowitzki

In this installment, we’ll take a look at a wide-open transition opportunity for Dirk Nowitzki during the Dallas Mavericks’ game against the Utah Jazz.

In full disclosure: I originally pulled this clip as an example of a blatant travel that the officiating crew missed. Dirk’s break to the bucket looks like a four-step move, a laughably missed violation. However, slow down the film and things get a bit murkier. How you read this play likely depends on how you interpret the collect/gather rule in the NBA, but if we’re going by the book, Nowitzki actually skirts free of a travel.

I think the rulebook is actually rather explicit on this point: “The first step occurs when a foot, or both feet, touch the floor after gaining control of the ball.” (Ed. note: Emphasis mine.) Gaining control of the ball is the textual equivalent of a gather, which means that steps taken during the gather are not a part of the traveling count. Every player is entitled two steps after gaining control of the ball, and in this clip you can see that Dirk really only takes two steps after his gather.

The first of what I originally perceived as four steps isn’t a step at all; the ball isn’t even in Nowitzki’s hands. The second would be the common interpretation of a gather step, seeing as he doesn’t seem to have control of the ball in his hands before planting that particular foot. Then, the final two paces are those allotted by NBA rules for any player on the move with the ball.

It’s awkward as hell, and at full speed, I’m not sure how anyone could have made that determination; I’m more inclined to think that the refs just let this one go as an uncontested fast break than believe that they made this kind of read on the play. Still, if we entitle players to a collect step (hint: we do) by way of video precedent and the rulebook, this is — somehow — a perfectly legal sequence.

1,000 Words: Chalk

62679770
You can see a larger version of the photo here.

The are signs, scowls, a hundred guffaws, crossed arms, furrowed brows, fingers, phones, cameras, stares, a cloud of powder and a single smile. One man drowns in all of it. His outstretched arms welcome the entire scene, but make no mistake: this is more than anyone was meant to comprehend, more than any individual was ever meant to handle.

All because he didn’t understand, and they misunderstood.

His mistakes have been written and re-written a thousand times, etched in the closest thing this medium has to stone. All we have to do is trace the lines. He’s selfish. He’s immature. He’s a narcissist, enamored with his own reflection in the teleprompter and on a cable broadcast. He’s a king, a prince, a pauper, and a pariah.

But you knew all of that, even if he didn’t.

This lasting image of his outstretched arms, though, is where things seem to get misconstrued. Sometime during his stay with the Cavaliers – or perhaps during the minute-long run time of a cleverly conceived commercial – this image, this grand gesture of commencement and celebration of self, was thought to be something more. It was seen as a point of connection, a momentary interaction between him and all who adored him. If only.

Is it his fault for occasionally taking such magnetic joy in the ceremony? For performing it so emphatically that it became a necessary part of his career’s lore? Is it his fault that he made this seem like a genuine link between phenom and faithful? The trouble with rituals is that despite their constants and rigidity, they demand we read into them. Their purpose is to serve as structure for some deeper message, and in this case the text said very different things to very different people.

In retrospect, though, how did they ever think that an individual emblem could qualify as interaction? It’s not as if each Jordan slam was intended to benefit the general population, or each Iverson crossover was designed to cross the fourth wall. Or, if those in-game icons aren’t congruent: it’s not as if Garnett whispers to the world with his head against the stanchion, or Wade uses his pre-game pull-up through the basket as some kind of bridge. He just engages in the same pregame routine night after night, and because he’s oriented toward the audience it’s supposed to mean something?

The basketball court is a rectangle, not a box. There is nowhere on the hardwood for him to hide, nowhere for him to ritualize his powder but in the public view. Did he want them to see? Of course he did. He’s a showman, and he’s still selfish, a narcissist, enamored with his own reflection, and still somehow disconnected from the world he helped build.

Their enjoyment of – and in this case, connection with – his showmanship is a mere byproduct. It never brought them closer to him. Even when they joined in the act, they were just the mirror at which he could gawk. The ritual was never about you, and never about them. It’s just about him, forever and ever, amen.

I understand the more universal displays of rage, but specific anger directed at one ceremonial showing? It’s odd. Very odd. Obviously this kind of performance is more tolerable when the player in question is wearing a less abrasive uniform, but hadn’t he transcended beyond simply being a Cavalier? He was the hometown hero turned MVP turned greatest player in the league. That kind of talent has a team in the literal sense, but isn’t bound by a jersey of any color bearing any name. He doesn’t belong to Miami, just as in the last few years, he didn’t belong to Cleveland. He’s a basketball player whose skill has grown beyond one fan base and one market, and with that elevation should come some relief from this bile, but it didn’t.

The chalk met air, and it’s a wonder it could be seen at all amidst the fumes.

Some of them seemed to have the right idea, though. Their only appropriate response to his ritual is to ignore it. A perfect, complacent stare would have been ideal, but they opted for more emphatically turning their backs on the chalk toss, a decision I can’t fault under these circumstances. They feel the need to be overt. But even those who understand the self-indulgence of his pregame demonstration are drawn to it. They form a line, face away, turn over their right shoulders, and are a set of matching suits away from being immortalized as the album cover for some 60s rock group. Even with those committed to paying him no mind in this particular moment, it’s still all about him.

The cameras don’t stop with media row, and it’s interesting to see that even those jawing at him are centering the frame and putting him in focus. No matter how many insults they throw his way, they only serve to prove the point. This is an event best observed with a closing shutter between him and them. This is an instance in which they try to ignore his display, but are clearly drawn in by it. He has both feet on the hardwood, safely within the confines of the field of play, but is still distant as he covers his mitts with powder and hurls them upward.

There is no connection. They’re finally getting it, and they’re so angry that they raised their fingers and organized chants and booed and watched nonetheless, because that’s what angry people do. I don’t blame them for being angry. I blame them for never knowing.

They’re not only angry because he is who he is and did what he did. This is less than that. This is about carrying those emotions into a pettier concept, and long refusing to acknowledge that maybe, just maybe, when he engaged in his ritual, it was for him and him alone.

LeBron Is Trying to Break Your Heart.

The story itself needs neither introduction nor explanation: in a little more than 24 hours, LeBron James will return to Cleveland for the first time since his still-wise decision to team up with two superstars, since his still-unwise Decision broadcast on national TV, and since everything surrounding both events made him into a villain. That said, the emotional dynamic on all sides — with LeBron, Cavaliers fans, with the Cavs organization, with everything local to Cleveland and those still supportive of LeBron from outside the city — is far more complicated than it may seem.

The song used in the video is a cover of Wilco’s “I Am Trying to Break Your Heart” by JC Brooks & the Uptown Sound. You can view their original music video here, and hear more of their music here.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Dwyane Wade (II)

In this installment, we’ll take a look at a nice move from the fourth quarter of last night’s game between the Miami Heat and the Washington Wizards, in which Dwyane Wade split the defenders with an inside-out dribble before breaking toward the rim.

For those who have been following this series, the travel here should be obvious…yet it isn’t called. The NBA’s video rulebook is quite clear on this move: “an offensive player with the ball may not hop consecutively on the same foot upon ending his dribble.” Andray Blatche has pulled the same maneuver before and was whistled for a violation, whereas Blake Griffin (by virtue of a quicker move, just as Wade does here) does not. It’s not an issue of the number of steps, but of the nature of those steps. Wade couldn’t be more obvious or deliberate about his hop toward the basket, but the officiating crew dropped the ball on this one. No violation was called, and Wade skirts free with a nice bucket.

Hat tip to Henry Abbott for recommending this play.

Page 3 of 32«12345»102030...Last »