web analytics
<

James Harden And The Language Of Brain Trauma

We’ve all spent the last few days raising our voices and cutting people off, citing numbers, facts, past instances and personal biases to gain leverage in our debates over Metta World Peace and his elbow to James Harden’s head. We all have an opinion, and we all know where we stand on the punishment announced yesterday. It’s easy to debate about the perpetrator and the motives behind the act. It’s a lot harder to talk about the victim, which is at least partially due to the language we’re given.

James Harden surely has a concussion. That much seems evident. Taking a sharp elbow to the temple at point blank range from one of the league’s most tank-like athletes will inevitably cause some sort of cerebral damage. But what kind of damage are we talking about, exactly?

Oklahoman columnist Barry Thamel’s opening graf of his postgame/suspension reaction article states that World Peace’s elbow gave Harden a brain bruise. This is important. A brain bruise (or a cerebral contusion) is not the same as a concussion. Could it have been an innocuous turn of phrase? Absolutely. Columnists are allowed that sort of creative license. But also judging from the apparent impact of the elbow, a cerebral contusion definitely seems likely.

What’s the difference between a contusion and a concussion? After an hour of scouring different medical sources, contusions occur when a blow to the head forces the brain to collide with ridges in the inner skull, causing small blood leakage into the brain. The affected area is limited; either the area right where the impact occurred is damaged, or the polar opposite of the area (meaning the brain had slammed against the opposite side of the skull). A severe contusion can cause intracranial pressure to rise, and brain tissue to swell with fluid build-up, requiring surgery to clear. Thankfully, Harden’s injury—whatever it is—isn’t nearly that severe, as evidenced by the training staff clearing a second half appearance against the Lakers, and his teammates noting his good condition after the Tuesday win against the Kings.

Thamel’s article later states that Harden has a concussion. However, a brain bruise and a concussion are not synonymous; a person with a contusion can also be concussed. So what is a concussion? It’s tough to say. There is no standardized definition, and the language gets even vaguer in the realm of sports. Generally, it refers to mild traumatic brain injury that briefly impairs brain functions. Unlike contusions, concussions don’t occur in one specific area nor is there discernible bleeding in brain tissues.  So while all cerebral contusions will technically feel the effects of concussion, not all concussions can be considered contusions.

The NBA unveiled a concussion policy this season, and it is vital for the wellbeing of the players involved in this league. It explains the tests that the league runs on players with potential concussions to both diagnose and check for clearance. What specifically constitutes as a concussion is still unclear, but then again, so are the complexities of the human brain. Slapping a concrete definition on concussions belies the singularity of each individual case. We’re still learning about how the brain works and recuperates. As basketball fans, we’re lucky—concussions don’t happen often. But a basic education of the implications and a sensible policy can play a significant role in keeping concussions as far away from the game as possible.

You Don’t Always Get What You Pay For

Photo by Tulane Public Relations via Flickr

In case you missed it, the Boston Celtics and Miami Heat played a game last night that carried the intensity of a early NBA summer league or NFL preseason game. With the playoffs tipping off this weekend, both Doc Rivers and Erik Spoelstra determined that it was in their best interests to rest their stars. Fans arriving at the arena got to their seats to find that LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh, Rajon Rondo, Kevin Garnett, and Ray Allen would be getting as many minutes as they were last night. The result, as expected, was basically an affront to fans, media, and James Naismith himself. After three quarters, the score was 50-50 as the two teams combined for as many points as the Pistons hung on the Cavs in the same amount of time in a game last week. Boston  managed to finally pull away in the fourth as Sasha Pavlovic caught fire and finished with 16 points giving the Celtics a 78-66 victory. The hometown fans in Boston went home happy with the win, but I can imagine more than a few people were disappointed that they shelled out serious cash for the game. To give you an idea of ticket prices last night, see the following tweet from Adam Reisinger:

A month ago, I came very close to pulling the trigger on a pair of courtside seats for this game for about $2K. SO GLAD I DIDN'T.
@AdamReisinger
Adam Reisinger

Now, I have absolutely no problem with Rivers and Spoelstra’s decisions. It is their job to ensure that their teams are properly rested and prepared for a deep playoff run. After all, they will be judged infinitely more on the outcomes of games in May and June than one that occurs on April 24. However, given that this was a nationally televised game that should have had playoff seeding implications (Miami essentially gave up their chance of having home court throughout the Eastern Conference playoffs last night as they conceded the one seed to Chicago), fans certainly did not get what they paid for. Since this is not the first time this has happened and certainly won’t be the last, I am proposing a new idea which should be able to satisfy all parties in similar situations going forward:

  • In regular season games that occur in April (i.e. the last month of the season), home teams who do not play their top three players (based on minutes played during the season) more than 15 minutes each should compensate all fans in attendance by allowing them to select one (1) of the following choices:
    • Option A: Receive a free ticket to a game of their choice the following season provided that the game occurs before the last month of the year. The ticket must be located in a section equal to or less than the face value of the ticket that they used for the game they attended. Example: Fans that paid $80 for a ticket to last night’s game can receive a ticket valued at $80 or less for free for a game next year played between October 2012-March 2013.
    • Option B: Receive 50% off a ticket to a game of their choice the following season provided that the game occurs before the last month of the year. The ticket must be located in a section greater than the face value of the ticket that they used for the game they attended (courtside seats excluded from this option). Example: Fans that paid $80 for a ticket to last night’s game can receive a ticket currently valued at $100 for $50 for a game next year played between October 2012-March 2013.
    • Option C: Be refunded 50% of the face value of their ticket redeemable as a gift card as the official team shop or NBA.com. Example: Fans that paid $80 for a ticket to last night’s game can receive a $40 gift card to be used at the Celtics official shop or NBA.com

With this idea, a number of issues can be addressed. First and foremost, this helps to more accurately value the ticket vìs a vìs the product on the court. Multiple teams in the NBA have embraced dynamic pricing strategies in the past few years which classify games into tiers where the same seat will be more expensive for games when the Heat, Bulls, Thunder, or other top teams come to town and are cheaper when the Bobcats, Wizards, Nets, etc. roll in. With both teams essentially fielding the equivalent of a lottery team last night, at its core, this is a creative idea with its roots based in dynamic pricing.

Second, this idea would help to retain young fans. Parents who made Heat-Celtics the first NBA game that their son or daughter attended last night should rightfully be embarrassed by what they saw on the court. If I was a kid, you would have a hard time convincing me to go back to a game of that magnitude if it was going to be that excruciating to watch. Taking them to a midseason Heat-Celtics game though where the intensity is cranked up and it’s actually worthy of  nationally televised game? A matchup where the game is played at its highest level? That’s the kind of thing that hooks young people on this great sport.

Third, the team shop option is included primarily for those fans who either made a rare trip to the arena because they live out of town or they simply do not want to wait until next season to be compensated. For instance, a business person who just flew into Boston for work last night may have decided on a whim to attend the game. Since he is not planning on being back in Boston anytime soon, he can pick up some swag on the way out at the team shop or choose to wait until he gets home to redeem it online and get some gear from his favorite NBA team.

Lastly, it’s a creative approach which does not exist in any other sport. Just off the top of my head, the Indianapolis Indians minor league baseball team has come the closest with their “60 Degree Weather Guarantee” where for six straight seasons, they have guaranteed fans that the weather will be 60 degrees at the time of the first pitch for Opening Day. If it’s 59 or lower, every fan in attendance gets a free ticket to another game held in the month of April. However, even this has nothing to do with the actual on court performance making the idea proposed above something interesting and unique in sports today.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I have a Bulls v. Pacers game to attend tonight, a game featuring two teams which playoff seeding locked up. Any way we can expedite this idea by 7:00 PM?

Podcast Paroxysm: First-Round Playoff Preview

In this edition of Podcast Paroxysm, I talk with Scott Leedy about possible playoffs’ series, playoff difference makers, and which teams are likely to advance to the second round.

(Note: The podcast player can be found under the “This post was written by…” box.)

Metta World Peace And The Dark Half

Photo by Omar Eduardo on Flickr

So all anybody seems to be able to talk about around the NBA today is the Elbow Heard Round the World. Discussions are taking any number of angles, from how long the apparently sardonically-named Metta World Peace will be suspended to how long James Harden will be out to whether the elbow was intentional or unintentional and how much worse the replay may have made it look. But in a basketball climate currently fixated on the means just as much as the ends when it comes to practices like tanking or flopping, it’s worth asking whether there’s a double standard applied to emotion in the NBA.

Intention is, ultimately, not something that can be determined by slow motion replay. We can attempt to intuit intention based on body language, but there’s simply no way to tell whether the-Artest-currently-known-as-World-Peace was trying to hurt Harden. After the game, World Peace said, “[I]t was unfortunate that James had to get hit with the unintentional elbow.” You can parse that any way you want, but it’s not going to get you closer to the truth of what happened.

It’s worth asking the question whether there is in fact any truth to get to when it comes to incidents like this. As it was when Kevin Love stepped on Luis Scola, the reprobation was quick in coming, but what’s more telling is the approbation layered onto the offending players directly before these incidents. Here’s video of the Love incident, including the play immediately preceding it:

Love fights tooth and nail for several offensive rebounds on the play preceding the incident before putting it in and the commentators (who are Rockets commentators, by the way) applaud him. “I’ll tell you: that’s the toughest customer in the league right there.” Thirty seconds later, though, watching the replay, their tone has changed dramatically: “Oh man! That is a dirty play.” “That’s dirty.”

Likewise, immediately before the elbow happens in the first video, Mike Breen’s professional excitement is palpable—it is, after all, his job to bring the game to life. “Artest DRIVES and finishes,” he says. “And the LAKER crowd FIRED up.” Quickly, though, his tone turns measured: “Oh no, let’s take a peek … oh, that’s disgraceful.”

Let’s be clear: I’m not calling out commentators for hypocrisy or any such thing. My desire is actually to tone down the moral aspect of this whole debate. The commentators are just reflecting the fundamental culture of competition, where emotion is prized, where a sort of unthinking state of being is praised as being “unconscious” or being “in the zone” when it comes to shooting, but vilified when it comes to “unintentional” elbows or stomps. This isn’t specific to basketball or even current sports—by some accounts, the Mesoamerican precursor to basketball involved human sacrifice and was used in place of open warfare for settling conflicts between factions. LeBron James is regularly chastised for thinking too much on the court at moments when he should just take over the ballgame, for making the right basketball play that’s the wrong one for winning the game.

Consider Michael Jordan’s shrug after hitting six threes in the first half against Portland in the 1992 NBA Finals. That shrug said, according to Marv Albert, “What can I do?” In a way, he was acknowledging the unintentionality of his play that night, that sense that he couldn’t have stopped hitting threes if he had tried. At some primal level, the intention behind Artest’s elbow and a particularly nasty, but legal, dunk is the same: to stoke the emotional fires higher in an effort to elevate play. One crosses the line into violence and injury while the other doesn’t, but this is maybe why asking about the elbow’s intentionality is the wrong question to ask. We demand that athletes walk a knife edge, praising them for playing with their hearts and not their heads and condemning them for letting their emotions get the better of them.

Was whatever drove Love to scrap and fight for those rebounds so different, deep down, from what boiled over into stepping on Scola? Is it even possible to extricate what makes Metta World Peace a tough, gritty player who will plow down the court for an emphatic dunk from what makes him a guy who will unintentionally clock a player as he celebrates? Both incidents deserve punishment, but if we can recognize that what is unacceptable can grow from the same root as what is glorified, we can better understand how inadequate intentionality is in describing action on the court, how one player playing “unconscious” can result in another one being knocked unconscious.

Keep Arms and Legs Inside the Ride at All Times

Andrew Kamenetzky: …I don’t think Metta really meant to “hurt” Harden as much as he meant to elbow him, if that makes any sense….

Chris Palmer: The biggest problem with incidents like these is the inevitable overreaction from the officials because of some directive handed down by the league to “clean up” play. They start handing techs and flagrants out like candy. That hurts the game. This was an isolated incident. Treat it as such. The league does a good job of keeping players safe, particularly on the break and when it comes to contact above the shoulders….

-ESPN’s 5-on-5 roundtable, “Terrible Impact of a Terrifying Elbow

If you frequent ESPN’s main NBA page, you’ve probably noticed the recurring 5-on-5 series, wherein 5 takes on 5 related questions are compiled, compared, and contrasted against one another.  Not only does it often provide a place to showcase TrueHoop Network writers, but readers get a glimpse of the depth and breadth of all the differing viewpoints across the Network. I don’t agree with about 50% of what I read in this series, but that’s what makes me a huge fan of it. It gives me a great forum to read opinions with which I sometimes don’t agree so that I can make sure I know that lots of writers have lots of different opinions on the same subjects.

The Metta World Peace-elbow-to-James Harden’s-head incident is a great example of this. If you’ve logged onto Twitter in the past 24 hours, you’ve no doubt seen a quadrillion takes on who’s right, who’s wrong, how many games MWP will be suspended, how long Harden will be out, dirty plays, playoff implications, and the list goes on and on.

The two snippets above (read the whole piece for context) from Andrew Kamenetzky and Chris Palmer were really interesting to me, because I hadn’t thought about the play along those lines up until this point.

Andrew Kamenetzky’s point is particularly poignant, because developing an argument for this on Twitter (in just 140 characters) is pretty difficult. It’s clear from watching the replay that Artest was, at one point after scoring the basket, celebrating. It’s also clear that he meant to swing his elbow. There is a very large gray area here, and I think AK hits it on the head. Artest had an emphatic dunk and was jumping around like a mad man, beating his chest, swinging his arms, and running backwards. At that point, though, the ball was back in play, and Harden was behind Artest getting in position to continue on offense. It just so happens that where Harden needed to be was where Artest was still parading. Artest felt someone body up against him, and it looks, to me, like he threw a “get up off me, man!” shoulder, not aiming for his head, but trying to clear space. He didn’t control his body well or target anything, and not knowing his strength was problematic. So Artest knew someone was there and was trying to shake them off, but he didn’t mean to clock Harden in the head. There’s no reason he should have been jumping around like that, and there’s definitely no excuse for using your gigantic super-human elbow to create space against another person. Elbows hurt no matter where they hit, but when they’re coming with that much force against one of the softer spots of a human skull… well, let’s just say, Harden can stay out for as long as he wants, and I’ll be OK with that. Get well soon.

I also really like Palmer’s take here. The context of this incident needs to be as narrow as possible. However, the NBA has a tendency to overreact (as all businesses who want to control their PR rightfully do) when incidents similar to this occur. The NBA has long had image issues, and any sign of violence (premeditated or otherwise) fit into the oft-espoused narrative linking together Kermit Washington’s punch, Kevin McHale’s clothesline, and the Malice at the Palace. Almost all violent occurrences in the NBA are independent from one another (retaliatory hits against opposing players occur far less than in other pro sports), but the “violent” and “thuggish” theme will inevitably pervade (there’s a much, much larger racialized argument here that I won’t get into). As a result, the league’s hand will be forced to put the kibosh on any hard fouls so as to not create the atmosphere where a hard elbow like MWP’s could somehow occur. That means, unfortunately, that for the last week of the season and, more importantly, for the playoffs, we’ll more than likely see LOTS of fouls called. Slower games, more foul shooting, more superstar calls.

Who would have thought that one emphatic dunk from Metta World Peace, in one fell swoop, jeopardize the health of James Harden, the title hopes of the Thunder, and the pace and cadence of the playoffs. That’s one hell of a butterfly effect.

How Western Conference Playoff Teams Perform Across Quarters

San Antonio Spurs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Being that the Spurs sport the NBA’s best offensive efficiency, it should come as no surprise that they are a well above average offensive team in each of the four quarters. Even in their worst offensive quarters, San Antonio still scores at a rate that would rank among the league’s top five in points per possession. They are especially effective in the first and second quarters, scoring at 8.39 and 8.96 points per 100 possessions better than league average, respectively. In the first quarter, San Antonio has had 10 players play at least 200 minutes this season, and eight of them are shooting at least 45% from the field. Of the two who are not shooting above 45%, one is no longer with the team – Richard Jefferson – and the other is shooting 43.6% from 3-point land in the first quarter – Matt Bonner.

The Spurs also defend at an above average level for three of the four quarters, with the second quarter being the only one where they allow more points per 100 possessions than the league average. San Antonio really clamps down on defense when the game enters clutch time; their 95.3 points per 100 possessions allowed in the clutch ranks fourth in the NBA and would lead the league over the course of a full season. San Antonio does seem to be a much better team in the first half than the second; in the third and fourth quarters, they outscore their opponents by 3.9 and 4.5 points per 100 possessions, respectively, as opposed to 11.9 and 8.3 points per 100 possessions in the first and second quarters.

Oklahoma City Thunder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oklahoma City is the only NBA team that sports both an above average offensive efficiency and an above average defensive efficiency in all four quarters, though they cut it extremely close in the second quarter with their 102.5 defensive efficiency. OKC scores 114.8 points per 100 possessions in the second quarter, 12.26 points per 100 possessions better than the league average. How are they doing it? Their top six players in second quarter minutes played – Kevin Durant, James Harden, Russell Westbrook, Kendrick Perkins, Nick Collison and Serge Ibaka – are each shooting above 47% from the field in the quarter, led by Collison at 63.6%. As a team, OKC shoots 50.5% from the field, 38.1% from 3 and 80.2% from the line in the second quarter. They also attempt 26.8 free throws per 48 minutes in the second quarter, a mark which would lead the league over the course of a full season.

The Thunder, like the Spurs, are better in the first half than the second. They outscore opponents by 7.9 points per 100 possessions in the 1st quarter and 12.3 points per 100 possessions in the second quarter, but that drops to 5.4 and 3.5 points per 100 possessions in the third and fourth quarters. However, Durant and Westbrook – their best players and the most likely ones to sit in a blowout – have sat out the entire fourth quarter in 10 and 11 games, respectively, so it is possible that OKC’s reserves are throwing off the balance in the second half. Harden has sat the whole fourth quarter just three times.

Los Angeles Lakers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tracking the Lakers’ performance across quarters is perhaps best done by by also tracking Kobe Bryant. When healthy, Bryant usually plays the entire first quarter; he averages 11.22 first quarter minutes per game. When Bryant is on the floor, the Lakers outscore their opponents by 9.9 points per 100 possessions, score at a rate which would rank seventh in the NBA over a full season and defend at a rate that would lead the league. In the 129 first quarter minutes Bryant hasn’t played, LA has outscored opponents by just 1.3 points per 100 possessions.

Bryant takes his first rest of the game at the beginning of the second quarter, usually for about 5-6 minutes. We can see here that LA’s offense drops slightly in the second quarter and that their defense falls way off. They go from the best defense in the NBA to one that would rank tied for 27th with the Golden State Warriors. Presumably, Los Angeles’ bench is playing poor defense and poor offense, and then Kobe comes in and rights the ship, right? Wrong. In the 5-6 minutes that Kobe spends off the floor in the second quarter, the Lakers score 106.4 points per 100 possessions and allow 101.3 points per 100 possessions, outscoring their opponents by 5.1.

When Kobe re-enters the game though, the Lakers fall apart. With Bryant on the floor in the second quarter, LA is outscored by an average of 9.0 points per 100 possessions; 101.8 to 110.8. That’s 3-full-points-per-100-possessions-worse-than-the-Bobcats level defense for the six second quarter minutes Kobe averages per game. On offense, Kobe turns it over 4.0 times per-36 minutes and his shots are turned into offensive rebounds about 13% less of the time than on average.

In the third quarter, Bryant again usually plays all twelve minutes barring injury or foul trouble. The Lakers are pretty much a league average team on both ends in the third quarter. They score 100.9 points per 100 possessions (would rank 19th) and allow 101.1 (would rank 12th).

In the fourth quarter, Bryant again usually rests for the first 5-6 minutes. The Lakers’ offense rebounds and averages 104.3 points per 100 possessions overall in the fourth and their defense allows 102.8, slightly worse than in the third quarter. Last time, we assumed the poor defense and slightly worse offense was due to the Lakers’ bench unit being in and we were wrong. This time, however, that’s spot on. When Bryant is on the bench in the fourth quarter, LA scores at a rate of 94.4 points per 100 possessions and allows 104.1. That offense would rank 29th in the league and the defense would be 24th. But when Kobe comes back in for the last 6-7 minutes, the whole offense shifts. The Lakers score 110.9 points per 100 possessions with Bryant on the floor in the fourth quarter, an increase of 16.5 points per 100 possessions from when he’s not on the floor and a mark that would lead the league over a full season. Bryant’s turnovers drop way down, his shots are offensive rebounded more often (as a percentage of missed shots) and his assist/turnover ratio jumps by 17.5%.

Los Angeles Clippers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Clippers are pretty schizophrenic across quarters. In the first, they have an elite level offense and a below average defense, and outscore their opponents by 7.0 points per 100 possessions. In the second quarter, their offense collapses, their defense gets even worse and they get outscored by 4.6 points per 100 possessions. The beginning of the second quarter usually coincides with Chris Paul’s first stint on the bench of the game, and when he’s out, LA’s offense suffers greatly, scoring just 94.0 points per 100 possessions. Caron Butler and Randy Foye are each shooting under 40% in the second quarter.

In the third quarter the Clippers sport an offense that would be among the top five in the league and a much improved defense over the rest of the game. They allow just 99.7 points per 100 possessions in the fourth quarter, 3.1 points better than their next best defensive quarter. That mark would tie them for ninth in the league with Oklahoma City, while their full-season rank is 17th. The third is the only quarter where the Clippers have an above average offense and an above average defense.

In the fourth quarter, their offense takes another dip when Paul rests, as it does during the second quarter. Their defense regresses as well, though it’s not quite as bad as in the first half. In clutch situations, the Clippers’ offensive efficiency is just the 18th best in the league, surprising for a Chris Paul-led team. Their defense sits 12th in efficiency in crunch time.

Memphis Grizzlies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The second quarter is a nightmare for the Grizzlies. A top ten-level defense in every other quarter, Memphis surrenders 105.7 points per 100 possessions in the second, a mark that would place them 26th in the NBA, tied with the Cavaliers. They played a bunch of lineups earlier in the season that featured O.J. Mayo, Marreese Speights and either Jeremy Pargo or Josh Selby, and that’ll throw your defense off a bit. But the Grizzlies’ D has been really bad in the second quarter even when their better defenders like Tony Allen are on the court. The Grizzlies also play their best offense of the game in the second, largely when Mike Conley, Rudy Gay and/or Zach Randolph is on the floor. Conley has a particularly strong effect; when he’s on the court Memphis scores 109.2 points per 100 possessions and when he leaves they score just 96.6 points per 100.

Memphis’ offense is below average in every other quarter, but their defense is well above average, especially in the first and third. The 94.9 and 95.5 points per 100 possessions Memphis allows in the first and third quarters best and equal Chicago’s league-leading mark. Their defense is mostly very good, but Memphis struggles to score. They don’t shoot very many 3′s and they make them at a below average rate. They only get to the free throw line a league average amount, and they only shoot about the league average from the stripe.

Denver Nuggets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Nuggets’ are the bizarro version of the Grizzlies. Consistently below average on defense for three quarters of the game, Denver locks down in the second quarter, allowing just 100.1 points per 100 possessions. Their solidly above average offense goes bonkers at the same time. Their 110.2 points per 100 possessions scored in the second quarter would be the best in the league over the course of the season. The defense is best with Danilo Gallinari out there, as they surrender just 88.1 points per 100 possessions when he’s on the court in the second quarter. Gallo also has considerable impact on their offense, which scores 112.1 points per 100 possessions in the 7.5 minutes per game he gets in the second quarter.

Other than that one quarter though, the Nuggets are a pretty ordinary bunch. They have an above average offense and below average defense in each of the first, third and fourth quarters. They get outscored by 0.3 points per 100 possessions in the first quarter and by 1.7 points per 100 possessions in the fourth. They barely squeak by their opponents by 0.9 points per 100 possessions in the third. Denver suffers from a similar problem to the Philadelphia 76ers in that their offense falters in the fourth quarter because they don’t have a true go-to guy to get them a bucket when the defense clamps down. Denver’s spread-it-around approach works for much of the game, but fails them late. Gallinari, often an option down the stretch, shoots just 30.3% in the fourth quarter this year.

Dallas Mavericks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The only quarter where the Mavericks are above average on both offense and defense is the first quarter, though their offense is just 0.5 points per 100 possessions better than average. In what is their best quarter of the game, Dallas outscores their opponents by just 4.3 points per 100 possessions, about a Hawks or Sixers level scoring margin. Again, this is the Mavs’ best quarter.

In what seems to be a pattern, Dallas also has a quarter where their offense completely falls off a cliff. After scoring 106 points per 100 possessions in the second quarter (where every Mav who has played at least 100 minutes in the period is shooting at least 44.1% from the field), a mark that would place them fourth in the NBA, that number drops all the way to 96.6 in the third quarter, which would rank 29th in the NBA over the full season. Though they play their best defense of the game in the third, they manage to outscore their opponents by just 0.3 points per 100 possessions in the period. Dirk Nowitzki shoots just 43.1% in the third quarter of games and Jason Terry’s field goal percentage drops under 40. Every Mav who has played at least 100 third quarter minutes is shooting under 44% from the field in the period. In the fourth quarter, Dallas actually gets outscored by an average of 0.7 points per 100 possessions on average.

Utah Jazz*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Jazz are a pretty average team in the first half of games. They score at a slightly below average rate in the first quarter and a slightly above average rate in the second. They also defend at a slightly below average rate in the first quarter and a slightly above average rate in the second. Those net ratings would place them somewhere between the Mavericks (+1.5) and the Timberwolves (-1.7) over the course of a full season.

But everything goes haywire in the second half. Their previously league average offense takes a significant jump all the way to 106.6 points per 100 possessions scored in the third quarter. With Gordon Hayward on the court, as he has been for 583 of the Jazz’s 768 third quarter minutes, the Jazz have scored 110.4 points per 100 possessions, which would lead the league by a good margin. However, they also allow 109.2 points per 100 possessions in Hayward’s time on the floor in the third, a mark that would place Utah second-to-last in the NBA, just ahead of the Charlotte Bobcats. Despite playing elite level offense in the third, Utah is actually outscored by 0.5 points per 100 possessions in the period.

In the fourth quarter, the Jazz also score at an elite level and defend like one of the worst teams in the league. So the average on offense, average on defense first half Jazz are still pretty average in the second half of games, but it’s because they sport an excellent offense and a terrible defense.

Phoenix Suns*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Suns are an above average team for three quarters of the game, but they completely fall apart when Steve Nash takes his first rest of the game in the second quarter. With Nash on the bench for usually about the first 5-6 minutes of the second, Phoenix scores just 98.5 points per 100 possessions and allows 106.6 Each of these marks would place the Suns in the bottom five in the NBA over the course of a full season. The -5.8 points per 100 possessions scoring margin puts them in the range of the Kings and Nets.

After halftime, their offense bounces back and averages 107.3 points per 100 possessions, which would rank just behind the Spurs for first in the NBA and just ahead of the Thunder for second. Nash, when healthy, usually plays just about all of the third quarter, and when he is on the floor, Phoenix scores 110.4 points per 100 possessions in the period. He’s aided by especially hot shooting from Marcin Gortat (60.8%), Jared Dudley (50.0% from the field, 42.0% from 3) and Shannon Brown (41.9% from 3). Phoenix’s positive scoring margin of 4.3 points per 100 possessions in the third would be top five in the NBA over the course of a full season.

*Signifies team fighting for 8th seed
Statistical support for this story from NBA.com – All charts also created with data supplied by NBA.com

How Eastern Conference Playoff Teams Perform Across Quarters

Chicago Bulls

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Bulls are at their best in the second and fourth quarters, where they outscore their opponents by 12.1 and 11.7 points per 100 possessions, respectively. In the first quarter, they are also quite good, outscoring opponents by 7.9 points per 100 possessions. In the third quarter, however, their offense takes a precipitous drop and they outscore their opponents by just 3.0 points per 100 possessions.

It’s interesting to note that Chicago’s best offensive quarters tend to come when their reserves play big minutes; their bench is probably the best in the league. Being that Derrick Rose usually takes his rest at the beginning of the second and fourth quarters, this may lead you to draw some conclusions, but closer examination reveals that Chicago’s offensive efficiency with Derrick Rose on the court in the fourth quarter is a ridiculous 118.9 and that number drops to 100.5 when he’s not on the court. Similarly, in the second quarter, Chicago’s offensive efficiency with Rose on the court is 110.2 and when he’s off the court it’s 104.2. Chicago’s defense is above average in the first quarter at 98.0 points per 100 possessions allowed, but for the rest of the game they defend at an elite level that would lead the league.

Miami Heat

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Miami destroys teams in the first half of games. They outscore their opponents by 9.3 points per 100 possessions in the first quarter of games and 14.5 points per 100 possessions in the second quarter. But after halftime, their offense falls off a cliff during Erik Spoelstra’s halftime speeches, to the point that the Heat become simply an average team on offense in the second half of games. The score at just 0.28 points per 100 possessions above the league average in the third quarter and actually score .14 points below league average in the fourth quarter.

Now, before you think about how this just feeds into LeBron not being a clutch player, consider that he usually sits the first 5-6 minutes of the quarter and that while he does, the Heat score at a rate of just 94.2 points per 100 possessions, but when he comes back in for the last 6-7 minutes of the game, that number jumps all the way to 108.4 points per 100 possessions, a mark which would lead the league over the course of the season.

With Dwyane Wade on and off the court, the change is not as drastic. With Wade on the court in fourth quarters, the Heat score 104.1 points per 100 possessions compared to 100.1 when he’s out. The biggest culprit in the Heat’s fourth quarter offensive woes appears to be Udonis Haslem. He’s played just about two thirds of Miami’s fourth quarter minutes, and they score at a rate of just 100.4 points per 100 possessions when he’s out there. That mark would place 21st in the league over a full season.

Indiana Pacers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The only quarter during which the Pacers are above average on both offense and defense is the third quarter, where they score at a rate that would place them 2nd in the league over the course of a full season and their defense would be the 5th best in the league. They outscore opponents by 9.1 points per 100 possessions in third quarters. In every other quarter, however, the Pacers seem like an exceedingly average basketball team.

They are 2.2 points per 100 possessions worse than their opponents in first quarters (with an above average offense and below average defense), 3.2 better in second quarters (with a below average offense and an above average defense) and 2.0 better in fourth quarters (with an above average offense and below average defense). That would put them in the Knicks-Clippers-Nuggets range of efficiency differential, as opposed to the Spurs-Thunder-Heat-Bulls range they play in during the third quarter. A big reason for their jump in third quarter offensive efficiency is the play of Darren Collison, who shoots 52.5% from the field and 46.4% from 3 in the quarter (in 561 minutes played) as opposed to his usual low-40′s, mid-30′s percentages.

Boston Celtics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Boston defends at elite levels in every quarter of the game. Their defensive efficiency ranks third, sixth, second and third in the league from the first to the fourth quarter, respectively. The only quarter where they don’t defense at a rate of at least 5.0 points per 100 possessions better than league average is the second quarter, where they’ve given extended minutes to below average defenders like Brandon Bass, Keyon Dooling and Mickael Pietrus.

Their third quarter defensive efficiency reaches historic levels, especially when Avery Bradley is on the floor. In Bradley’s 283 third quarter minutes, the Celtics have allowed just 85.0 points per 100 possessions, which would obviously lead the league. The third quarter is also the only one in which the Celtics offense creeps above the league average offensive efficiency for the quarter. So whatever Doc Rivers is telling his team at halftime, it’s working. In Ray Allen’s time on the court in the third quarter, Boston scores at a rate of 106.2 points per 100 possessions, a mark that would be third in the NBA over the full season. Once they get to the fourth quarter, however, they stop scoring at an above average rate, likely because they struggle to create their own looks off the dribble and in isolation. They depend on Rajon Rondo to manufacture open looks for other players, and when the defenses start keying on that, it becomes more difficult for Boston to score.

Atlanta Hawks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Hawks, on both offense and defense, perform like the typical league average team. Their offense is best in the second and fourth quarters, while their defense is best in the first and third. As you can see, their efficiency follows the league average in terms of fluctuation. Their best quarter appears to be the fourth, where they outscore opponents by 6.6 points per 100 possessions, while they are at their worst in the third quarter, getting outscored by 1.3 points per 100 possessions.

Their offense, like Miami’s, completely falls off a cliff in the third quarter. Their 103.9 offensive efficiency in the second quarter would place seventh in the league over a full season, while their 96.0 mark in third quarters would be 29th in the NBA. Marvin Williams has played just over half of Atlanta’s third quarter minutes and has shot 34.9% from the field. In second quarters, he’s shot 48.9% from the field. Maybe it’s as simple as Marvin playing to his capabilities.

Orlando Magic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Magic are world beaters in the first quarter, but for the rest of the game they lie somewhere between average and below average. Both their offense and their defense are well above average in the first quarter, and they fluctuate between slightly above and slightly below average for the rest of the game. In first quarters, Orlando outscores opponents by 9.6 points per 100 possessions, scores at a rate of the fifth best offense in the league and defends at a rate of the fourth best defense.

In the second quarter, the Magic are outscored by 3.2 points per 100 possessions and in the fourth they get outscored by 0.7 points per 100. Their defense is below average in both quarters while their offense is slightly below average in the second and slightly above average in the fourth. Of course, none of these numbers really mean anything without Dwight Howard on the floor. In the 979 minutes the Magic have played without Howard this season, they’ve scored 102.5 and allowed 106.2 points per 100 possessions. The offense stays at about the same level as when Dwight is on the floor (102.9) but the defense is 6.9 points per 100 possessions worse without Dwight.

New York Knicks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Knicks appear to be one team (above average) in the first and second quarters, another team in the fourth quarter (elite) and a completely different team in the third quarter (Bobcats-esque). In the first and second quarters, they outscore opponents by 4.1 and 5.9 points per 100 possessions, respectively, which would put them in the tier just below the elite level teams like the Bulls, Heat, Thunder and Spurs but still above teams like the Sixers, Hawks and Pacers.

Their post-halftime woes have been well-chronicled this season, but seeing it in visual form makes it even more striking. Their offense is virtually non-existent in the third quarter; their 94.8 points per 100 possessions would be 29th in the NBA over the course of a full season. Their normally stout defense is merely average in the third quarter as well. The third is the only quarter where the Knicks don’t defend at a rate at least 5.0 points per 100 possessions better than league average. They also get outscored by an average of 6.4 points per 100 possessions in the third quarter. Tyson Chandler, the league leader in FG%, has made just 41.7% of his shots in the third quarter. Steve Novak, the league leader in 3PT%, has made just 35.4% of his 3′s. Knick opponents have shot 37.9% from 3 in third quarters. The third quarter is really, really ugly for New York.

The Knicks are at their best on offense in the fourth quarter, scoring 105.2 points per 100 possessions; the fourth best mark in the NBA and a mark which would be fifth best in the NBA over the course of the season. With Jeremy Lin on the court in fourth quarters, they scored 115.6 points per 100, but without him they’ve scored just 99.6. Still, the Knicks have outscored opponents by 8.0 points per 100 possessions in the fourth quarter this season.

Philadelphia 76ers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The fourth quarter is not kind to the Sixers. After defending at an elite level for three quarters, and being historically great on defense in the third quarter, their defensive efficiency drops to just 1.34 points per 100 possessions better than league average in the fourth quarter. This would be okay if Philly could generate any offense in the fourth, but they struggle to do that as well. The result is that they get outscored by 1.4 points per 100 possessions in the fourth quarter this season. Louis Williams has been their go-to guy for much of the season, and they’ve scored just 99.3 points per 100 possessions with him on the floor in the fourth quarter this season, and that accounts for over two-thirds of their total fourth quarter minutes played.

They’ve also had Jodie Meeks on the floor for nearly half their fourth quarter minutes, and he’s been a drag on both their offense (97.6 points per 100) and defense (102.2). By contrast, with Meeks on the floor for over half their third quarter minutes, Philly has scored very well (106.0 points per 100, which would be third best in the NBA) and defended very well too (90.3 points per 100, which would lead the league).

Statistical support for this story from NBA.com – All charts also made with data supplied by NBA.com

The Lowdown Hall of Fame Snubs: George McGinnis

Indianapolis Star

Years Active: 1972-1982

Regular Season Stats: 20.2 ppg, 11.0 rpg, 3.7 apg, 1.88 spg, 0.48 bpg, 45.8% FG, 66.4% FT, 20.0 PER

Postseason Stats: 20.7 ppg, 11.8 rpg, 3.9 apg, 1.41 spg, 0.41 bpg, 43.5% FG, 68.2% FT, 19.7 PER

Accolades: 2x ABA Champion (1972-73) 1975 ABA MVP, 2x All-ABA 1st Team (1974-75), All-ABA 2nd Team (1973), 3x ABA All-Star (1973-75), All-ABA Rookie 1st Team (1972)

All-NBA 1st Team (1976), All-NBA 2nd Team (1977), 3x NBA All-Star (1976-77, ’79)

New York coach Lou Carnesecca was quoted as saying that Indiana’s muscular 6-foot-8, 235 pound rookie George McGinnis looked like a heavy weight contender. Carnesecca amended his evaluation following the third game [of the ABA Finals] Friday night.

“Now, you can say he’s the champion,” said the diminutive Nets’ coach, who barely would reach McGinnis’ elbow.

Carnesecca made his reevaluation after the burly McGinnis wrecked the Nets, scoring 30 points and grabbing a game high 20 rebounds…

- Via The Evening Independent, May 13, 1972

Burly is indeed the most accurate description for the body and physique of George McGinnis. Just an absolute mammoth of a power forward who, aside from Artis Gilmore, was probably the strongest man in the ABA. Unsurprisingly, he was an absolute beast on the boards trampling and demolishing opponents, particularly on the offensive glass. His career average of 3.7 is 10th all-time amongst players who have appeared in at least 240 games (equivalent to about 3 seasons).

This steady stream of offensive boards and subsequent putbacks partially fed his healthy point production. Also of aid were his sweet mid-range jumpesr and his cunning-but-not-quite-graceful drives to the hoop. For 7 straight seasons he averaged above 20 points a game culminating in 1975 when he topped off at 29.8 per game.

And as if this wasn’t enough of an offensive threat, he could pass the ball extremely well.  6 straight seasons he held an assist per game average above 3.5., including 3 seasons above 4.5 in that stretch. Big George also had quick, strong hands which led to a career steals per game average of 1.9. That’s an incredibly high total for anyone let alone a power forward. In fact, that 1.9 is 4th all time amongst forwards and 26th overall.

McGinnis, however, surly had pitfalls to his game. For starters, he turned the ball over with a galling frequency: 4 a game over the course of his career. Also his free throw shooting was always poor. It showed signs of improvement until 1975 (74%) and thereafter it plummeted to embarrassing levels by his retirement (45.3%).

The Indiana Pacers, though, weren’t complaining of these deficiencies in 1971 when they acquired the homegrown talent. McGinnis was from Indianapolis and was attending Indiana University when the allure of big time professional dollars led him to leave college after his freshman season. A very unusual move at the time, but given his 30 ppg and 15 rpg averages that one season, he was ready for tougher competition.

Continue Reading…

Amare Stoudemire has Cornrows, Needs to Get Rid of Cornrows

crazybarefootpoet (flickr)

Amare Stoudemire has not been good this year. He hasn’t been as horrible as people say, yikes, has he not been good.

Casting aside his rookie season, he is at career-lows in points per game, FG%, rebounds per game, and player efficiency rating. He’s obviously struggled to co-habitate on the same court with Carmelo Anthony and Tyson Chandler. So, in a move to perhaps regain his 2005 mojo, Amare has taken on a 2005 hairstyle: the cornrow.

Now, I wasn’t a fan of cornrows then and I’m certainly not a fan of them now. The only good thing to arise from the cornrow era was Brad Miller donning them while with the Sacramento Kings. If Amare really wants to get his 2005 groove back he needs to either a) retain the services of Steve Nash as Knicks point guard or b) select some of the following hair styles…

Darnell Hillman’s Afro

When in doubt, always grow a fro to improve basketball performance. Even when you actually perform horribly, people will be so entranced by your magnificent blowout, they’ll hardly bother to note your putrid game. Exception to this rule is Josh Childress.

Kenny Walker’s Pencil Eraser High Top Fade

What better way to show you’re on your way back to the top than getting a flat top? None, I tells ya. Kenny Walker was never much of a player, but I’m convinced this hairstyle gave him super powers in the 1989 dunk contest.

Walt Frazier’s Chops

Even Dave Cowens is “oohing” in aww at these chops of delight. Pro-tip: anything Walt Frazier is doing, it’s best for you to emulate that. Sure you won’t do it quite as well as Clyde does, but even being 1% Clyde is 100% better than your current state.

Jason Kidd’s Bleached Hair

Now, I don’t recommend bleached hair for just anyone. It’s a stylistic choice wrought with pitfalls and terror, but Amare is in such a funk he may need to go down this unsavory road to truly find himself. Jason Kidd was good but not truly great until he went through his bleached-hair, soul-searching quest through the Valley of the Desert. When he emerged he was leading the Nets to back-to-back NBA Finals. I’m not saying it’s a great look, but it may be what Stoudemire needs.

Somehow, The Season’s Almost Over. Welp, The Kings Were Fun

Tough loss tonight. 3 games left this season we need to stay together an finish strong! #TMC
@Isaiah_Thomas2
Isaiah Thomas

It just hit me. And I’m not ready.

Three games left? How? Didn’t we just get started? You saw that awesome pass from Rondo the other day, right?

…right, that was Christmas Day. And in the four months since then, we’ve had a season. A flawed season that shouldn’t have been shortened, fine, but a season. We’ve had the highs, the lows, the spectacular slams and stories, and in less than a week we’ll have to say goodbye to 14 teams for a while. In some cases, I’m fine with that. But I’ll miss the Sacramento Kings.

It’s funny; I had serious doubts about the Kings four months ago. I hated their draft day trade to move down and take Jimmer Fredette and bring back John Salmons. I thought they failed to address their glaring need for a distributor. I thought they had too many scorers, too many question marks and they desperately needed a plan. And early in the season, the team looked like a disaster. So much has happened since then.

Coach Paul Westphal pushed for DeMarcus Cousins to be traded, smeared Cousins’ name, and lost his job for it. New coach Keith Smart gradually turned things around, moving Tyreke Evans to small forward, putting rookie Isaiah Thomas in the starting lineup and freeing Cousins to put up big numbers and quiet his critics. It feels like Sacramento’s season only really started in February.

Two memories will endure from me this Kings season. One is from February 2. It’s my favorite play of the year:

Yeah. Isaiah Thomas stopped a Wesley Matthews-Gerald Wallace-Jamal Crawford three-on-one. A block like this shouldn’t be possible at 5’9 but it was clean and it was stunning. I love Grant Napear freaking out, I love the crowd and the Sacramento bench rising to their feet. I love Jamal Crawford, Thomas’ mentor and summer workout partner, stopping dead in his tracks and processing what just happened from the other side of the lane. I love Thomas’ confidence to even try something like that and how pumped he was afterward. If all you see of his rookie season is this play, you miss how he’s reorganized the team offensively but it’s obvious how he’s reenergized it with his effort and enthusiasm.

Memory No. 2? March 20.

This makes the Westphal nightmare seem like years rather than months ago. Cousins had fouled out of a win with 23 points in 25 minutes and his coach, who’s referred to Cousins as his oldest son, indulged his goofy side. The side we knew was there, but was too often obscured by talk of his temper, his poor body language, his low shooting percentage or any other “red flag” we probably shouldn’t have been too worried about with a guy born in 1990. Cousins’ second season has seen him come into his own — after arriving in better shape, he’s been more consistent, he’s become one of the league’s best rebounders, and he’s cut his turnovers down. More importantly, he’s established himself as a franchise cornerstone.

Cousins and Thomas made the Kings a go-to League Pass team for me over the past couple of months. They’re emotional players, they have personality, they belong on a FreeDarko print and that hypothetical FreeDarko print belongs on my wall. I hate that I’m soon going to miss watching their team, as soon I’ll only hear about it with regards to a reneged-upon arena deal.

Three more games. And one of them is against the Bobcats. Dammit.

Page 7 of 363« First...«56789»102030...Last »