web analytics
<

Paul Pierce: The Truth Is Here

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmW43Q5Gu2M w=640 h=390]

(Warning: The above video mix features loads of Paul Pierce and-1′s and a few naughty words. NSFW if your workplace doesn’t appreciate Brother Ali or four-letter words.)


When I see Paul Pierce get one of his and-1’s, I have to laugh. Almost always, he initiates the contact. After the play, the defender looks disgusted — a combination of “pissed off at the ref” and “disappointed in myself.” As Pierce poses, high-fives somebody, or pounds his chest before he steps to the line, I get a little annoyed. Then I think, “that MF’er again” and laugh.

Pierce is like that college professor who’s been around forever and likes the sound of his own voice too much. The guy who will lecture you forever, refer to his own work constantly, and go right back at anyone who challenges one of his opinions. And you won’t challenge his opinion because you know he’ll probably make you look stupid. You’ll resent him at first, but you’ll come to respect the hell out of his knowledge and the amount of work he put into forming those still kind of annoyingly strong opinions.

If I was writing a book about Paul Pierce, it would center on how he evolved from a young, stubborn kid from LA to a legitimate Hall of Famer and NBA Finals MVP. Of all the athletes I’ve covered, I’m not sure I’ve ever seen anyone turn it around the way Paul did.
Via Q&A With Jackie McMullan | CelticsBlog, 10/31/2010

You don’t have to cheer for Pierce or his team. You don’t have to love his cockiness or his veteran tricks. But you have to respect the man’s journey. You have to admire the way he changed his game. He’s too damn effective, deceptive, and fundamentally sound to hate. Sure, you’d absolutely loathe having to guard anyone like him, but you may as well appreciate the savvy old MF’er.

Exercises In Futility:The 50 Worst NBA Rotation Players, 30-21

Photo by iLikeSpoons on Flickr

A Danny Chau and James Herbert collaboration

 

It’s been a summer of lists — or at least that’s how it has seemed. Over the past few weeks the NBA blogosphere has been inundated with them. Some see them as a pointless exercise in futility (you see what I did there), but no matter where you stand on the idea of ranking players, it makes for conversation. And this has been an offseason starved of honest-to-goodness basketball-related talking points.Inspired by Top 100 lists created by Zach Lowe over at Sports Illustrated’s The Point Forward and the trio running CBSSports’ Eye-On-Basketball, we decided to run in the opposite direction. What if we ranked the worst players?So we set some guidelines and shortened the list down to 50. For one, all players had to have averaged 15 minutes of playing time last season. An arbitrary number, yes, but it kept things consistent.

And it’ll soon be evident (at least it was for us) that when ranking the worst, there really isn’t much of a formula. Arguments can be made for most of these players as the worst. We did our best to take context and potential into consideration, but this list is completely open-ended — that same open-endedness fuels the chaos, riles up emotion, and makes things fun.

Here are 50-41 and 40-31. Let’s continue with 30-21.

 

30. Louis Amundson
PF, Golden State Warriors

Louis Amundson is a solid energy guy who can make your defense better. At his best, for a good team he’s worth a two-year, $4.6 million contract. Unfortunately, last year’s Warriors were not a good team and they never saw his best. Amundson appeared in only 46 games as a result of a broken finger, sprained ankle, and back spasms.

When he played, he was even worse than usual offensively. Never one to exhibit any semblance of touch around the basket, Amundson’s FG% dropped to .454. Unless he was dunking or shooting an uncontested layup, you pretty much knew he’d miss. And with his FT% slipping to .391 (seriously), he became a huge liability. If we attribute this drop-off to injuries alone, then there’s reason to be optimistic about next season. It’s hard to be too positive about an unskilled veteran, though.

Turning 29 in December, Lou could still be useful if he can get those percentages back up. With David Lee, Ekpe Udoh, Andris Biedrins, and now Jeremy Tyler in the Bay Area, he might need a chance to do so elsewhere. -JH

29. Travis Outlaw
F, New Jersey Nets

It annoys me that Travis Outlaw is on this list. While he’s not going to shed the “overpaid” label or become the star we wanted him to be, he should be a fine rotation piece. His game isn’t exactly well-rounded and he gets lost on defense, but there’s plenty of value in a 6’9 guy who can create a decent shot whenever he wants to. The guy we saw in Portland, when healthy, was far from one of the 50-worst rotation players in the league. His two-point jumpers off the dribble weren’t advisable for most players, but Outlaw hit them.

Last year, though… Ugh. His numbers. They were disgusting:

28.8 MPG, 9.2 PPG, 4.0 RPG, 1.0 APG, .375 FG%, .302 3P%.

The man’s PER was 8.8. I like Travis Outlaw, but do you want me to try to justify these figures? I can’t. No one can. Outlaw was just about the worst rotation player in the league in 2010-2011. If you’re a Nets fan, you can only pray that it was an aberration. A terrible, terrible aberration. -JH

28. Derek Fisher
PG, Los Angeles Lakers

Putting a label on what Derek Fisher does on the court isn’t very fun. He is a liability in most areas of the game, and his point production has steadily dropped over the last four years. This isn’t necessarily an indictment on his abilities as a player — after all, the Lakers boast one of the most talented and versatile rosters in the league — but shows a natural decline, which tends to happen when you’re 37 and have played all 82 regular season games (not even counting the postseason games) for the last six years.

So with every argument that places Fisher among the worst players in the league, there is a caveat. Add all the caveats up, and it’s pretty clear that he isn’t the worst player (though he isn’t that far off). Let’s take a few things into consideration: He’s one of the smartest players in the league. He’s a natural leader, and a shoo-in as a future coach. He’s beyond durable and he’s consistent. From that perspective, his slowness, ability to blow every single layup he takes whether guarded or not, inability to do ANYTHING against quicker guards doesn’t seem that awful, right?

All of these gripes have existed for years, and it’s only gotten worse. Last I checked, Fisher was supposed to be replaced about 15 years ago. And yet, Ol’ Reliable is still firmly planted in the Lakers’ starting lineup. But at this point in his career, he really, really shouldn’t be. And we all know this. -DC

27. Quentin Richardson
G/F, Orlando Magic

Outside of Dwight Howard, Quentin Richardson was arguably the best individual defender on the Orlando Magic. Injury and conditioning issues have chipped away at his athleticism, but he is still a tall and physical defender that isn’t afraid to take on challenges. Richardson has grown out of the flash that defined his earlier seasons, which has done wonders for his defense.

“Then why is he on this list?”, you ask.

Because he shot 34.1% from the field, and a blinding 28.8% from three. Q was never known for his efficiency (he’s a career sub-40% shooter), but last year was nuclear fallout bad.
 
This, of course, came after his season with Miami in which he boasted a career-high three-point percentage. Richardson still has what it takes to be one of the better role players in the league, but it all hinges on his shot, and whether its abandonment is permanent. Teams won’t be able to justify playing on a solid defender if there is zero utility elsewhere. -DC

26. Vladimir Radmanovic
F, Golden State Warriors (FA)

The above play surprised pretty much nobody who has seen Vladimir Radmanovic play basketball. He can be an excellent spot-up three-point shooter, but you just can’t trust him. The Warriors would go on to lose the game in overtime.

You could argue that we’re being harsh on Vlad Rad with this ranking. After shooting miserably for the Warriors in 2009-2010, he returned to a level of efficiency he hadn’t achieved since his Laker days. The problem is that efficiency is just about his only positive attribute. Radmanovic won’t help his team on defense or on the boards, despite being 6’10 and kind of mobile. If you absolutely need a floor-spacer, he can play, but he’ll hurt you in other areas and test your sanity a little. If you’re like me, when you hear “Radmanovic” you think of poor effort and decision-making before you think of sweet shooting. -JH

25. Carlos Arroyo
PG, Boston Celtics (FA)

I’d like Carlos Arroyo to write a book. He could teach us about basketball in Puerto Rico. He could tell us how a 39-year-old Hakeem Olajuwon got along with a 25-year-old Vince Carter. He could share stories about Stockton and Malone, LeBron and Wade, KG and Ray, and both Supermen. Don’t you want to know what it’s like to go from a star on the international stage in summertime to being a second- or third-string guy in the winter? I do.

…but I don’t want him playing many minutes on my team anymore. Unlike young, flashy Carlos, he won’t hurt you out there, but he’s not contributing much beyond spot-up shooting. If the Heat release you to make room for Mike f’ing Bibby, you belong on this list. -JH

24. Al Thornton
SF, Golden State Warriors (FA)

Al Thornton is a terrific athlete.

Okay, now onto the bad news. Al Thornton is not very good. He is your least favorite offensive dynamo without any of the redeeming qualities that player might possess. He is Al Harrington without the three-point range. He is Corey Maggette without the overbearing strength and nose for contact. He is Josh Howard, except he’s Josh Howard strapped to a malfunctioning jetpack. Unfortunately, he lost the device that controls the thrusters, so he flies and crashes intermittently, and he can’t do anything about it. -DC

23. Mo Evans
SF, Washington Wizards (FA)

-JH

22. Keyon Dooling
PG, Milwaukee Bucks

I like Keyon Dooling. I really do. But between last season and his prospects looking forward, there is little reason why he shouldn’t be on this list.

Dooling joined the Bucks as a stopgap at the reserve point guard position. He replaced Luke Ridnour, who had his most effective season ever backing up and playing alongside Brandon Jennings. Dooling embraced his role as a mentor at the get-go. But as a point guard, Dooling’s first year as a Buck was lukewarm at the very best. With the team’s lack of consistent shooting options, the Bucks needed someone like Ridnour, who was both an excellent distributor and a reliable spot-up shooter. With Jennings’ erratic season, the Bucks needed a stabilizer like Ridnour. Dooling was a willing player, but he just didn’t have the skills to compensate for what Jennings in his current state lacks.

With Shaun Livingston joining the team next season, Dooling will have his hands full trying to stay relevant on a revamped roster. He’s developed into a solid distributor, but his defense, which had always been a plus, began to slip. Next year will determine whether or not Dooling is in the midst of a major decline, or whether it was more of a systemic issue. Either way, Dooling is teetering on the edge of irrelevance. -DC

21. A.J. Price
PG, Indiana Pacers

There is very little that separates A.J. Price’s rookie season with last season statistically — unless you notice (which you should) that his shooting percentages in all areas took a nosedive. This could partially be explained by former Pacers coach Jim O’Brien’s awfully inconsistent rotations, or because Price just isn’t that great of a shooter.

His performance in the five-game playoff series against the Bulls was admirable, and does speak reasonably well for his future, but with the addition of George Hill, Price’s primary backup point guard role might be tinkered with a bit.

Ultimately, Price wasn’t very good last year, and his shooting numbers (which were on par with fellow stinker Quentin Richardson) serve as evidence. But there’s still time. Price has more than a decade to reach his ultimate destiny of being a poor man’s Derek Fisher. I make that comparison with the most positive of intentions, hopefully. -DC

Dwight Howard, Meet Perception.

Photo by Horia Varlan on Flickr

There are moments — crucial end-of-close-game moments — when Stan Van Gundy has to sit his best player, Dwight Howard. Or they can’t trust giving him the ball.

Because Howard will get fouled, and he shot only 59.6 percent from the free throw line last year (which is pretty much right at his career average of 59.8 percent). It’s a liability.

So Howard is working with free throw guru Ed Palubinskas this summer to change his game,reports the Orlando Sentinel. Palubinskas, an Australian national and Olympian, hit 87.5 percent of his free throws while at LSU and has become a coach to many big names.

via Pro Basketball Talk: Dwight Howard has hired free throw shooting guru 

It’s still summer, so Dwight Howard is back to hiring various basketball geniuses to help work on his game. Last year he was improving his post game with Hakeem Olajuwon, and this year he’s looking to work on his proverbial “I made 1 out of 2, right?” free throw problem. It’s a problem that’s hindered him in the past, and one that’s led to countless “Dwight Howard isn’t clutch because he can’t be a go-to-guy in the fourth quarter, ok?” arguments from fans. More power to Howard, I say. He should have plenty of time to improve during the endless Lockout Rabbit Hole we’ve all been slowly transported into, against our will.

Personally, I’ve never had a problem with Howard’s free throw struggles. Shooting free throws from the mountainous height of 10 seven feet isn’t the easiest thing to do, and no star’s game is ever complete in the eyes of the basketball world. It’s undeniable that Howard’s free throws struggles have seriously hurt him during the 4th quarter (and every quarter), but it’s interesting to see how stars working on their games can both shift perception and reality. LeBron James has an inadequate post game. Dirk Nowitzki isn’t an elite rebounder. Chris Paul is injury-prone. Kevin Durant can’t create his own shot easily. Dwyane Wade is aging quickly. Kobe Bryant should focus on higher-percentage shots.

These perceptions aren’t necessarily entirely wrong, but they become negative stigmas individually attached to the stars of the NBA. By trying to iron out on the negative stigmas attached to his game, Howard stands to shift fan perception along with his actual skill. It worked for his post game last season (at least to some extent), but this kind of a technical problem might be more difficult to differentiate from its original course.

How stars are viewed is always changing in the NBA. The way the typical NBA fan views the Kobe Bryant of today is considerably different than how they would have talked about 2007 Kobe Bryant, and his legacy. Even more so, 2011 LeBron is perceived vastly different than 2010 LeBron. A seemingly slight action in the grand scheme of a career can shift the perceived quality of a player. Dwight Howard trying to improve his free-throw shooting means very little to fans right now, but if he achieves success, as a “newfound” player with the ability to make free throws and muster up a considerable post game, perception can begin to shift. But perceptions don’t shift easily. Before this season’s playoffs, the casual fan would have told you that Dirk Nowtizki isn’t “clutch” because of what happened in the 2006 Finals, despite evidence that’s pointed to the contrary throughout his career.

Dwight Howard might not be able to significantly improve his free-throw shooting or his overall game, but at least he’s setting himself up for the chance to make a change of some kind. He’ll probably toil away in Orlando next season (an asterisk should probably be placed on “next season” these days), dealing with the constant fallout that will come with any sign he may leave Orlando or any failure by the team. He may be better as a player, but his team will likely be underwhelming, and that’ll take precedence over any changes in his game. Some fans will appreciate the changes if they’re combined with noticeable effort, but the focus of the media will remain on a possibly fracturing team and the future of Howard. Eventually, however, Howard will find himself on a team with the chance to be great, whether that’s a mysteriously revitalized Magic team, the Lakers, the Mavericks, or some other franchise. When that success comes to, so will general recognition of the player Howard has evolved into and will continue to evolve into and become.

If things work out favorably for him in the future, fans will begin to notice. What they may not realize, however, is that the changes in Howard’s game will have been gradually occurring for a long time. General perception doesn’t always shift along with actuality.

In A World Of Chaos And Jaywalking, Paul Pierce Is A Hero.

Photo by nicolasnova on Flickr

Note: This work is entirely fiction, though I wish it wasn’t. 

In this crazy, messed-up town, a good cop fights for justice. The seething underbelly of the criminal underworld rises up as a grim collective, but one man is always there to knock them back down to earth, with the wind at his back and charisma surging through him. His name? Detective Paul Pierce. 

Detective Pierce sat in a deliberately uncomfortable chair across from legendary police chief, Ray Allen. Allen had first made a name for himself as a brash, gunslinging cop in the cloudy Seattle Police Department, but he had accepted the promotion to become Boston Police Chief without hesitation. Rumor had it that old Chief Allen kept a picture of every arrest he ever made in his desk. Pierce didn’t buy it, but you could never tell with Allen. The guy was unflappable, calm, resolute. He was in control.

“It won’t happen again.” Pierce claimed.

“You bet it won’t, Pierce. One more screw-up and I’m sending you to the Cleveland precinct? You want that?” Allen asked.

“No.”

“Good. Send Garnett in here.”

Detective Pierce walked slowly outside off the office and noticed Garnett sitting outside, arms folded. Garnett’s eyes pierced the wall in front of him as if he was slowly trying to erode the plaster with his gaze. He gave Pierce a cursory nod as he noticed his presence. Pierce motioned to Detective Garnett.

“Captain wants to see you, Garnett.”

“But we didn’t do anything!” Garnett gruffly responded.

“Just go in there and tell him what he wants to hear.”

Garnett shrugged defiantly and opened the captain’s door confidently.

Pierce had come to expect this kind of behavior from Garnett, his imposing partner. Garnett was bold, quick to anger, and expectant. But he was also a dependable partner, a true veteran, and people like that were hard to find. When Garnett entered a room, he emanated an instant intensity that drew the gaze of its occupants. Pierce would take Garnett for who he was, because it was worth it.

Garnett exited the Cap’s office with the grimace he so often wore on his intimidating visage and nodded towards Pierce.

“Captain wants to go check out this new case that came in. Said to bring that young cop with us too.”

“Officer Rondo?”

“Officer Rondo.”

“Fine. What’s the beat?” Pierce leaned forward.

“Classic jaywalking case. Guy think he’s better than using sidewalks,” Garnett explained.

“We can’t let this happen in the undeniably greatest city in the world, Boston. Let’s go.”

Detective Pierce walked past the rows of cubicles with a quiet confidence that came from comfortable surroundings, searching for Officer Rondo’s desk. He finally found him sitting behind a loudly laughing Private G. Davis.

“Hey, Rondo,” Pierce barked, “you’re coming with us.”

Rondo jumped up and briskly followed Pierce and Garnett into the police garage and to the squad car.

“You drive, Rondo. I want to see those handles I’ve heard so much about.”

Rondo nodded silently and caught the keys behind his back nonchalantly.

The trip to the jaywalking incident was uneventful, other than Garnett’s periodic screaming from the back of the squad car. It was an old habit, and Pierce had no interest in asking Garnett about it. Garnett always had his reasons.

They arrived at the incident. Yellow-tape surrounded a seemingly unharmed sidewalk. Pierce knew better.

“Where’s the perp?” Pierce asked the street cop.

“Which one?” The street cop answered, seemingly confused by Pierce’s question.

“There’s more than one? This town’s going straight to the birds.”

“What type of birds we talkin’ here?”

“What?”

“I haven’t seen any birds around lately.”

“It’s an expression. Is that the perp over there?” Pierce questioned.

“Yeah. He still hasn’t told us anything.”

“I’ll give it a shot. Hey, Garnett. Come on. You too, Rondo. You need to see what a true criminal looks like.” Pierce gestured to follow him.

Pierce made sure to make eye contact with the perp as he walked towards him. Criminals, especially jaywalkers, don’t like to be looked in the eye. Pierce didn’t back down to anyone. He reached the suspect and stood before him calmly, his words pulsing with assuredness as he began his line of questioning.

“What’s your name, son?” Pierce asked the now-shaking perp.

“Jake.”

“Why’d you do it?”

“Do what?”

“You know what I’m talking about. You aren’t making this any easier on yourself.”

“I was in a hurry, OK? I didn’t do anything wrong!”

“I understand, Jake. Now my partner, over there?” At this Pierce motioned to Garnett, who had his best angry-face in tow, “he’s going to be a lot less understanding.”

Pierce heard a car skate up to the curb behind him, followed by doors flinging open and shut. Within a few moments, he heard lumbering footsteps commanding the ground behind him. He knew who it was before he turned around.

“Perk! Seems like every time I see you you’re beaming.”

A large man approached Pierce with what would seem like a frown to most who saw him. His friends, and Pierce, knew Perk was smiling.

“How have you been?” Pierce followed.

“Pretty ok,” Perk’s booming voice responded briefly. His movements seemed somewhat nervous and unsure.

“Ever since you moved down to that new precinct you’ve been acting differently, Perk.”

Detective Perkins offered nothing in response.

“What are you doing down here? This is our precinct.” Pierce continued.

“This is right on precinct lines. Thought we’d come down and give it a look.”

“Well, we got the guy.”

“Good luck. See you two later,” Perk turned to walk away before pausing, “You too, Rondo,” he added quietly, his face showing almost a hint of not-frowniness for an instant.

“You too,” Rondo quietly returned, “You too.” A hint of a smile played across his face.

On the ride back to the precinct, with the perp in tow, not a word was said by anyone in the car (Well, except the occasional yell from Detective Garnett).

Pierce, Garnett, and Rondo headed into the break area while they waited for the perp to get processed and placed into the interrogation room. Pierce mulled over his interrogation options as they waited. Pierce usually had two main interrogation techniques: Positive elbow body language, and demanding “The Truth” from criminals incessantly. Thus far in his career, they had both been pretty effective.

“He’s in the interrogation room whenever you’re ready,” a voice shouted out to the trio.

“You ready?” Pierce asked Garnett expectantly.

“Do you even need to ask?” Garnett said with a grin.

“Yes, how else would I know if you were ready?”

“Let’s just go.”

“You stay here, Rondo. You’re not ready for this step yet. When we retire, you’ll have to take over this precinct. I think you can handle it. But not today,” said Pierce. Rondo gave a slight nod.

They strode into the hallway towards Interrogation Room 1. The room was reserved for only the worst criminal cases, specifically jaywalking and loitering.

As they opened the door, the suspect looked worried. Good, thought Pierce. Time for some classic Pierce and Garnett Good Cop/Yelling Cop.

“Oh, it’s you again, isn’t it?” Garnett asked the perp.

“If you’re asking, yes, it is me. Again. Remember? You arrested me for jaywalking earlier?”

“Yeah, I remember. With good reason. You were jaywalking, weren’t you?” Pierce asked politely.

“WEREN’T YOU?” Garnett shouted as he circled the suspect’s chair.

“We just want you to tell us the truth. What was your name again?” Pierce was back in the interrogation control room.

“Jake.”

“Well Jake, it’s time for you to stop running from your mistakes.”

“I was walking!”

“SO YOU ADMIT IT!” Garnett yelled gleefully.

“Fine. I was jaywalking. You got me.”

Pierce and Garnett took a moment for their customary high-five, and then returned to the interrogating at hand.

“Well, we’re going to let you go this time with a warning. Just remember to walk safely and use crosswalks,” Pierce advised James.

Garnett gave Jake the thumbs-up in corroboration.

“Oh..Ok. I’ll remember that,” Jake looked confused yet relieved as he was freed from his cuffs and walked towards the lobby.

“Well, looks like another job well done, partner,” Pierce smiled at Garnett.

“Can’t argue with that,” Garnett returned Pierce’s smile.

“Couldn’t agree more,” a familiar voice sounded about behind Pierce and Garnett.

Detective Pierce turned around to see a smiling Captain Allen strolling up behind them.

“I wasn’t sure about you two, but you got the job done once again. Another jaywalker off the streets. Well, now he’s back on the streets, but with a better understanding of the importance of pedestrian safety.”

“Thanks, Cap.” Pierce and Garnett happily said in unison.

“Don’t mention it. Now get back to work! This city isn’t going to police itself.” Captain Allen turned and walked back towards his office.

“WE DID IT!” Garnett gleefully celebrated.

“You bet we did, partner,” Pierce smiled off into the distance (which was actually just the end of the hallway) as the two moved, “You bet we did.”

The Lost Season: The New York Knicks, November 2010-February 2011

Photo from pratanti via Flickr

With the threat of a shortened or even cancelled season upon us, there is very little we can do to restore a shred of basketball into our lives. What we can do, though, is reminisce over other “lost” seasons. Seasons which saw players or teams achieve extraordinary things that go beyond titles or awards, only to fade back into the background one year later. Here we will bring the tale of these lost seasons, the ones that touched us on a personal level, the ones we will never forget, though history itself might.

Previously on The Lost Season: Boris Diaw, 05-06, Bobby Simmons, 04-05, Seattle Supersonics, 04-05, Spencer Haywood 69-70, and Tracy McGrady, 02-03. 

This edition focuses on the short-lived version of the New York Knicks, that spanned from the summer of 2010 to the trade deadline of 2011.

In previous Lost Seasons, we had players or teams that rose above the expected and the known to the realms of the magnificent, shortly tantalizing our imaginations with potential for varying levels of greatness, only to regress back shortly thereafter.

This is going to be different.

This squad was not a great squad. It was arguably not even a good squad. It displayed no meteoric rise, because it had no past, and its demise saw no tragic fall, because its future was abruptly pulled out beneath it. This was a squad hastily put together and hastily disassembled, just another phase in a never ending building process. A squad held together by poorly fitting stopgaps and inadequate patchwork, with a long term plan centered around hoping for a long term plan, and a short term plan centered around just plain hoping.

And yet, for 54 games before the inevitable clearing of the cupboard, this unintentional mess of a team somehow did… something. Probably. What that was, exactly, will probably remain a footnote in the history of a powerhouse-turned-laughingstock-turned-hopeful-powerhouse. Nothing more, nothing less. After all, transitional periods rarely get their own nostalgic retrospectives.

This transitional period does.

Irregular Building

NBA all-stars stand out above their brethren in many respects. They are, by definition, the very best at their craft. Consequently, they are usually the most marketed and most generously compensated practitioners of their profession. When you are the best, and the people who pay you know you’re the best, you have quite a lot of leverage.

This is why all-stars rarely switch teams in free agency. The current NBA system – or rather, what was current until 2 months ago – was designed with handicaps to help teams keep their key players as opposed to just watching them leave. As such, staying put usually results in a financial boon that even the most well paid NBA players find hard to ignore. There are exceptions, of course – if a free agent asks to leave, sign-and-trades enabling them to get their max money and their old teams to get compensation are frequently agreed upon, and some are just plain content with taking a pay cut to get out of their current situations. But more often than not, an all-star will stay with the club whose jerseys he made marketable, and if he wants out, he’ll do so by demanding a trade and keeping his max money.

Or so said the logic before the Summer of 2010.

July of last year saw no less than 10 current NBA all-stars enter free agency. Many of them indeed stayed put – with Dirk Nowitzki and Paul Pierce there was never really any doubt that this will be the case, while Ray Allen, Joe Johnson and Dwyane Wade did so after sagas of varying length. But no less than 5 players with all-star appearances to their name decided to change the city in which they work their craft (if you want to reduce this to 3 and exclude David Lee and Carlos Boozer, by all means, go ahead).

Teams generally aren’t built this way. It’s odd, it’s unnatural. Building blocks don’t just appear, they are drafted and nurtured and groomed. And so it was from the very get go that the 2010-2011New York Knicks were awkward. Bring in a franchise player via the seldom used route of free agency – especially if the player is one with injury concerns, has never been an all-star without the steady guiding hand of Steve Nash, and the franchise is the league’s marquee squad – and you’re bound to raise more than a few eyebrows.

But Amar’e Stoudemire was hardly the only part of New York that was abnormally assembled. After years of clearing cap space and shooting for Lebron, very few Knicks remained on the roster – of projected rotation players, only youngsters Toney Douglas, Danilo Gallinari, Wilson Chandler and Bill Walker were holdovers from previous years, as was the dead weight contract of Eddy Curry. The rest of the rotation came from wherever it could be scraped: Raymond Felton was the second “big” free agency acquisition, except he was only signed for two years, so he wouldn’t ruin the chances at yet another delusional free agency run in 2012; Landry Fields and Andy Rautins were brought in from the depths of anonymity via the second round of the draft; the star of the 09-10 horror show, the aforementioned Lee, chose the Bay Area as his new home, and the Knicks were compensated for his decision with the Energizer bunny that is Ronny Turiaf, the intriguingly disastrous Anthony Randolph, and an injured Kelenna Auzubuike; Timofey Mozgov was imported from Russia; the entire ordeal was a who’s who of “What? How?”.

This random collection of NBA players was as problematic as it was peculiar. The shooting guard position was in such dire straits that I actually predicted Bill Walker would take over it, and meant it said when I said it. The center position was manned only by the energetic yet limited Turiaf and the unknown Mozgov. Stoudemire had no experience as the only focal point of a team made mostly of role players. Worse, he had questionable knees and no backup to speak of. And the team as a whole had nothing resembling a good defender. Behind the angry headlines reserved for the Miami project that was being assembled at the same time, the summer’s main headlines spoke of New York being back – but back to where, nobody really knew.

Amidst the Uncertainty

Coach Mike D’Antoni, starting the 3rd year of his New York tenure but only the first year that mattered, was spared a major headache when Landry Fields burst onto the scene in summer league, and maintained his strong play in training camp. The unknown rookie who drew boos from Knick fans at the draft (is there any other sort of rookie?) provided surprisingly stellar play, new NBA 3-point range, and a knack for rebounding that proved indispensable on a team of such limited size and defensive ability, pretty much sealing the hole that was the shooting guard position.

But despite Fields’ rapid ascension from potential rookie sleeper to token starter to legitimate NBA player, the Knicks struggled out of the gate. Amar’e seemed to wilt without Steve Nash, recording a whopping 25 turnovers in his first 4 games as a Knicks, struggling to hit shots anywhere near his normal efficiency. Gallinari’s shot came and went as it pleased, as he alternated between all-around offensive weapon and a downright liability. The lack of a starting caliber center proved even worse than imagined – though he was named starter on opening night, Mozgov proved to be completely incapable of adjusting to NBA speed, fouling whenever possible, giving nothing of the supposed offensive polish he brought with him. Sadly, beyond the 25-ish minutes a night that Turiaf was capable of providing, there were no alternatives. D’Antoni was forced to yank Mozgov from the rotation entirely, find out he needs him, bring him back in, find out he can’t produce, and repeat the whole ordeal again and again.

But more than anything, the D’Antoni show relies on point guard play. While Raymond Felton was clearly an upgrade in every which way after years of various Duhons and Houses and Nate Robinsons, he was also being asked to play a different role than those long-gone Knickerbockers – that of a team’s second best player. And Felton, finally free of the reigns of Larry Brown, couldn’t seem to figure out if the freedom he had been given was good or bad. He found open teammates at an alarming rate, scored the ball better than ever, and showed that the improved shooting touch from his final Bobcat season wasn’t a fluke; but at the same time, the constant green light sent him into rushed shots and crowded areas of the floor. The pick and roll, specifically – a D’Antoni staple, a Larry Brown non-entity – baffled Felton, as he constantly missed a rolling Stoudemire or an available crease for a drive. After starting the season 3-2, the Knicks quickly lost 6 straight, and tensions in the Big Apple were once again abound.

Luckily, 11 games was exactly the amount of time needed before the Knicks got an important boost from what is, every single season, an underrated X factor for all 30 teams – the schedule.

The Lottery Feast

Between November 17th and December 12th, the Knicks played 14 games. In 13 of them, they managed to score more points than the other teams. While only 3 of those games saw the Knicks play opponents approaching respectability, the effect was profound. The team developed confidence, no longer a disjointed group that came together by happenstance. Beating lottery teams may not be championship material, but the Knicks were never supposed to be that. The first step was always creating a winning environment from the ashes of Gardens past, and beating up on the likes of the Kings and the Bobcats and the Raptors did just that.

The media, as is often the case with the Knicks, went crazy. The fact that the 13-1 stretch happened to coincide with major winning streaks for both the Miami Heat and the Boston Celtics, the East’s two presumed powerhouses, served as extra fuel. Suddenly, the East had three big teams – because, in case you haven’t heard yet, the Knicks are back!!! Rational observers continuously pointed out how the Knicks’ near unbeatable run was more the result of good luck and scheduling quirks than a cosmic power deciding to redirect the spotlight New York’s way, and were subsequently ignored. The Garden’s menacing glow was restored to the once tired venue. Basketball’s Mecca? Perhaps that was going a bit far, but after years of being basketball’s De Moines, everything was a welcome development.

Stoudemire, who in a very short time developed such a comfort with being the first, second and third options on his team that he was now thriving instead of faltering, started hearing M-V-P chants from the Garden faithful. Similar voices from media members followed shortly. While the entire premise of Stoudemire as an MVP was off base at best – his numbers were more or less identical to his Suns’ days except for the higher usage rate, and he showed no improvement defensively on a team that desperately needed him to – his play was nonetheless impressive.

With the masterful Nash replaced by the improving yet flawed Felton, expectations dictated a much harder time for Amar’e scoring. The effect would be especially prevalent in the pick and roll, where Nash was seemingly omniscient as to whether Amar’e was diving to the basket or popping outside for midrange jumpers. And indeed, Stoudemire’s offense became much more isolation oriented – and while his efficiency saw dropped accordingly (his TS% more than a slight one – 61.5% in his final season in Phoenix, while he never climbed above 59.3% in a single month as a Knick), the effect wasn’t nearly as severe as one would expect.

Synergy numbers include the games Amar’e played alongside Carmelo Anthony, so they are far from perfect as a descriptive tool, but just to get a grip on things – in Phoenix, 19.2% of Amar’e’s possessions were post-ups, 17.8% as the roll man in pick and rolls, and only 14.8% in isolations. In New York, those numbers were 12%, 9.6%, and a frightening 32.3%, respectively. The pick and roll devil was still among the best at the craft, but it was no longer his primary source of scoring.

Most Improved Ensemble

While Stoudemire got the headlines and the bright lights, his rise was hardly the most impressive on the team, mostly since it was more of a stagnation under harder terms. The major leaps in production came from other Knicks, each more joyous than the other.

Fields’ emergence, already extensively covered on this very cyberspace, was the draft equivalent of a godsend. He made threes for an offense that was hypothetically built around shooters it didn’t have. He was the team’s second best rebounder on a per game basis, and its best defender. His +/- numbers were off the charts. For the first two months of the season, he was widely regarded as the 3rd best rookie in the league behind Blake Griffin and John Wall. Unlike Stoudemire’s MVP “campaign”, this was not a result of the market he played in, but of plain old, down-to-earth fantastic basketball.

If the shooting guard spot was a concern that was eased, the small forward position went from a strength to an even greater strength. Gallo’s shooting was still far too inconsistent for a player billed first and foremost as a sniper, but he developed a mean streak getting to the foul line, averaging 6 freebies a night on 89% shooting, including nights of 16 for 17 and 13 for 13. Meanwhile, he continued to display a solid passing game for a forward, and his inconsistency behind the arc did nothing to alleviate opponents’ concerns about leaving him there. As a scorer, as a decoy, as the passer, and as the guy who ruins the defense’s rotations, Gallo made the offense run smoothly like his hair gel did to his locks.

If Gallo improved a single facet of his offensive game to complement existing attributes, Wilson Chandler took the entire ensemble and upped it one notch. The former tweener flipped the script on his unusual 6’8”, 220 frame, using it for versatile play on both ends of the floor. Chandler filled in everywhere from the 2 to the 4 while doing a good job defensively on a wide array of opponents. Furthermore, he started making baskets at an alarming rate, from all around the court. He shot around 80% at the rim, flaunted a newly developed 3 point shot, and destroyed JaVale McGee, violently throwing himself into Most Improved Player discussions.

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnAdWDvwHEk]

But the biggest story, by far, was at point guard, where Raymond Felton was finally getting it. After a first month in which Felton seemed uneasy with how little his coach was meddling with his game, the entire ordeal came together, and it was magnificent. Suddenly, Raymond Felton was everything a point guard needed to be. He would get the ball off a rebound, and start a run down the court that combined the joy of a frolicking deer and the force of a boulder chasing Indiana Jones. The seemingly bulky frame did nothing to hinder the agility and purposiveness with which New York fast breaks were now run. Felton would get to the rim, stop for PUJITs, find teammates either cutting to the basket or spotting up in the corner. It was Raymond unleashed, finally in his true form, after years of potential being held back by a Charlotte Bobcats uniform. Felton became a legitimate all-star candidate – after all, who among East guards could compete with 18 and 9 a night with decent if unspectacular shooting numbers? Wade, Rondo, and? Exactly.

Rivalry Renewed

It was December 15th, in the Garden, on the heels of this 14 game stretch that the Knicks met the Boston Celtics. While the presentation of the match as the return of a long-dormant rivalry may have been overblown, it was impossible to overhype the actual game. Stoudemire was a beast, going off for 39 and 10 on one of the best frontcourt defenders ever. Felton flanked him with 26 and 14. Gallinari threw in 20, Chandler 18 and 12. But though New York were ahead most of the game, the mighty Celtics would not relent. Rajon Rondo controlled every aspect of the half court offense with 14 assists of his own, Ray Allen did his Ray-Allen-doesn’t-miss-shots routine, and above all, there was Paul Pierce.

With the game tied at 116, the ball naturally in Pierce’s hands, the same hands that had already scored 30 points in the match, Kevin Garnett came to set a screen. Pierce saw that the Knicks decided to switch, took Amar’e into the hoop. Amar’e lost balance just long enough to enable Pierce’s trademark step back, and the wide open jumper went in. Down went the Knicks’ winning streak. Down went Nate Robinson.

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIoi31IqcII]

As if to tease, within the 0.4 seconds that remained, Amar’e made a three pointer to win the game, but replays clearly showed he released the ball after time expired. But while the Knicks lost the match, they won the PR war. The Garden rocked so hard that night, and the Knicks played so well against such stiff competition, that nothing else was needed. The team of miscreants somehow connected with the city, with the fans, with the media, and with everybody else at home.

The Boston game ended the concept of large Knicks win streaks for good – they would no longer win more than 3 straight games before this core would eventually be broken up – and as January crept by, slowly but surely, the main cast of the New York resurgence started regressing to the mean. Stoudemire and Felton collapsed under the heavy minutes they were playing, their shooting percentages plummeting seemingly by the game, respective MVP and all-star talk going down the drain. Chandler’s extraterrestrial field goal percentage at the rim went back down to human-range numbers, as did his improved 3 point stroke. Ronny Turiaf’s bouncy brand of energy continued to be hilarious, but inadequate as a full-time center.

But even as the steady stream of wins stopped flowing and the Knicks were relegated to keeping their heads 2-3 games above .500, the team never lost its charm. Be it the random yet all-encompassing power of Toney Douglas going for 30in a November win against Chicago, or the shame in handing an overtime loss to Cleveland in December, the Knicks were fast, they were explosive, and they were naïve in allowing almost every opponent to match those very qualities. The defensive ineptitude was too strong a hindrance to allow true dominance, and true dominance wasn’t available on the roster anyway. But the attempted reincarnation of those D’Antoni Suns team with a team so inherently flawed created a rare vibe, one that was strong enough to resonate despite the best efforts of the sickening overhyping from every corner and the hoards of bandwagon Knick fans who described themselves as lifers but couldn’t recognize Jamal Crawford on the street.

Melo and Out

While the Knicks were more or less losing one game for every win in delightful fashion, the franchise was involved in a very different kind of match: one behind the scenes, against the Denver Nuggets and New Jersey Nets, for Carmelo Anthony. New York had already long before won Melo’s heart and signature, now they just needed a third side to play ball with. As the weeks drew on and the team’s bottom line win total failed match the sheer fun that was watching the team play basketball, upper management became more and more impatient. Eventually, the methodical, calculated hand of general manager Donnie Walsh couldn’t match the rash impulse of owner James Dolan. Melo had finally arrived, but at very grave a cost.

Three of New York’s most important players – Felton, Gallinari, and Chandler – together with the lovably useless Mozgov were sent to Denver, who packaged veteran point guard Chauncey Billups together with the high scoring Anthony. More minor parts were swerved around, but aside for admitting their own mistake with Randolph (who was now Minnesota bound), they were inconsequential to the Knicks from start to finish. As Melo took to the MSG parquet as a home player for the first time, the speakers loudly proclaiming “I’m coming home”, a new era for the Knicks had begun, sealing forever the fate of the team that tantalized fans for almost 4 months without actually being much above average.

Only time will tell if New York made the right move. Maybe Chris Paul or Deron Williams will join in 2012, as promised. Maybe Melo and Amar’e will learn to co-exist, and to play defense. After all, if you get the best player in the trade, you do the trade – and Melo is far better than Felton, Gallinari and Chandler, no matter how you twist the picture. But even though the Knicks might be better off, we were robbed. Because this was a team that should have grown together, should have learned actual basketball while under the same roof, and shouldn’t have dissipated behind the caprices of this owner or that superstar. This was a team that brought back basketball to New York City. The city kindly said thank you, and asked for more.

Perhaps its for the best. I doubt that having Carmelo Anthony and Amar’e Stoudemire on the same team will create disappointment entertainment-wise, and though the Felton-Chandler-Gallo-Amar’e core only existed for 54 games, it may have already ran its course after that 14 week run in December. We can never truly know in sports. Sometimes there is a future, sometimes its best to bail out early, conserving the memories. After all, regardless of how far the new-new-Knicks go, those will always remain.

The Undisputed Guide To Guarding Paul Pierce

Photo by @Francis from Flickr

If you are a fan of any NBA team other than the Celtics, chances are at one point or another you’ve been on the other side of a brilliant offensive performance by Paul Pierce. Maybe he’s hit a step back game winning jumper, or killed your team with a barrage of three pointers. It could be that he’s dunked all over your team’s big men or abused your best defender with a litany of dribble moves, jab stabs, and dexterous finishes. Whatever the case may be, you have undoubtedly cursed uncontrollably at your television as Pierce tore apart your team’s seemingly helpless defense. Disgruntled fan, curse no more! Because here comes The Undisputed Guide to Guarding Paul “The Mothereffin’ Truth” Pierce.

Tip #1: Don’t Give Him The Elbow Jumper.

Pierce loves the elbow. I’m pretty sure he owns a nice upscale penthouse apartment there (ooo, I bet it has a rooftop infinity edge pool!). If he catches the ball at the top of the key late in games, the following is going to occur: He’ll size you up with a few calculated jabs and dribbles. He’ll then take off right, towards the rim as if he wants to drive (DON’T BELIEVE IT). Then, just at the most opportune moment, he’ll launch off his inside foot, leap back away from the basket, and create just enough space to get off a shot that will inevitably rip through the net. So whatever you do, force him away from that right elbow. Take him out of his comfort zone. It’s crucial to defending Pierce. Besides, giving him that elbow jumper is a lot like listening to Drake: There’s just no excuse for it.

Tip #2: Don’t Fall for The Fakes

A huge part of Pierce’s effectiveness on the offensive side of the ball comes from his uncanny deceptiveness. He’s a master of the fake: shot-fakes, dribble-fakes, head-fakes, spin-fakes, injury fakes (calm down Boston fans; it’s a joke). You name the fake. He has it. He even fabricates fouls, flopping both physically and verbally to draw a whistle. Don’t let all this gamesmanship get in your head. Stay down, focus on his chest, and don’t bite on anything (I know, easier said than done).

Tip #3: He Will Dunk on Your Face.

Exhibits A, B, and C. So yeah, try not to let that happen.

Tip #4: Don’t Let The Lack of Muscle Definition Fool You He’s Strong.

Pierce does not have your stereotypical NBA body. He’s not blessed with the chiseled frame of Lebron James or Dwight Howard, nor does he have the lean wiry look of Kobe Bryant. Instead, Pierce gives the appearance of someone who doesn’t hit the weights all that often (though that’s likely not the case). His wide body and shoulders give him a slightly doughy apprearance (again, that’s probably not the case). Don’t judge this book by it’s cover. Pierce is one strong dude. If you find yourself asking, “Wow, Pierce doesn’t seem all that quick or athletic, yet he consistently gets to the basket on me. How is this happening?”, the answer is most likely strength. Only a small separation is needed before Pierce employs a slow deliberate combination of body control and force to keep you at bay. He’ll use that same strength to create favorable off-ball position, or finish after contact at the rim. Bottom-line: He’s very strong, act accordingly.

Tip #5: Be LeBron James.

“What? You mean to tell me that being a 6’8” 250 pound freak of nature, with unbelievable strength and quickness makes it easier to guard Paul Pierce? NO WAY!” – Someone reading this, probably.

Tip #6: If All Else Fails, Don’t Pants Him.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FD796H08J7w&w=420&h=345]

If you’re midway through the game and Pierce has been killing you, beating you with every little fake, hitting threes in your face, getting to the rim with ease (etc.), you may get the urge to pants him. Don’t. He’ll end up hitting a three. Plus, you’ll have to write a song apologizing to Pierce, and no one wants to do that.

So there you have it: The Undisputed Guide To Guarding Paul “The Mothereffin’ Truth” Pierce. Instead of staying awake at night hurling expletives at Pierce and The Celtics, you can now re-direct all of your anger and frustration towards the owners, David Stern, the players’ union, Billy Hunter, and anyone else responsible for jeopardizing the upcoming NBA season. You’re welcome.

Elbow Grease

Photo from Wombatunderground1 via Flickr

At a certain point in basketball history, it was decided that every player worth being a player has himself a go-to move.

Why is this? Well, who knows? Perhaps it’s the relatively new video game culture, one that necessitates bundling basketball players into a series of pre-determined motions represented by colourful pixels. From this limited arsenal of movements, one must aptly construct hundreds of players from every end of every spectrum known to man. And what better way to distinguish a certain lump of pixels from a nearby, different lump of pixels than by making our selected lump move in a way that’s unique to a player?

There are bundles of go-to moves, and more often than not, it is a perfect microcosm of the player that perfected it. The quirkiness of Dirk’s one footed whatever-that-is. The fundamentally flawless yet glamour-less Duncan bank shot. The recklessness, yet masterfully crafted originality of Rondo’s behind-the-back fake. The impossible combination of speed, quickness, size and coordination of Hakeem’s Dream Shake. The sheer invincibility of Jordan’s fadeaway.

One player, though, has a go-to move that has seemingly no association at all with the attributes he displays.

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRnpHgyzQoA&feature=related]

Paul Pierce, from the elbow. For the game, or in the middle of the second quarter. Every single time.

How did Paul Pierce make the elbow shot such a defining go-to move? Pierce has steered his way to fame by power of infinite swagger and unpredictability, brashly stating his case to rise above the relatively uninteresting background. How can it be that such a player expresses himself to the fullest by getting to a rather inconspicuous spot on the floor and releasing a jump shot that to the naked eye seems so incredibly normal, ostentatious only in how rarely it misses?

To answer this fascinating question, we went to the experts. The following is a collection of people who have played major roles in Paul Pierce’s life, to go with experts in various fields, with explanations as to what causes this peculiarly frequent phenomenon of Paul Pierce dribbling to where the free throw line finishes its sideways journey, rising in the air, releasing an orange ball and awarding the group of men wearing green shirts 2 points.

Disclaimer: this is, in its entirety, a work of fiction. Most of these figures do not exist, and those who do exist have never said anything resembling what is written here, certainly not to us.

Laura McDermott, Paul Pierce’s 7th Grade Home Ec Teacher:

“Paul never really liked home ec. He would always talk about how he wouldn’t need to do anything at home because he’ll be living an athlete’s life on the road, how if he ever needed something he’ll just ask Doc Rivers, which I found really weird at the time because Doc was playing for the Hawks and didn’t seem to know a lot about maintaining a positive living environment. In fact, I remember this quite vividly, Paul would always say ‘I hate homes, and I hate houses, and if I ever play ball with a dude named House, I’ll make sure he gets humiliated really badly, like being traded for a 5’8” guy or something’.

Anyway, Paul would usually sleep through classes, but this one day, something caught his attention. We were having a cooking contest, and Paul, being the competitive spirit that he was, declared that he will destroy everybody. Sadly, he didn’t know the first thing about cooking, so he had to resort to the only thing he knew how to make: his favorite food, macaroni and cheese.

Paul worked very hard to cook the elbow macaroni, constantly bragging to his classmates how elbow macaroni is the only macaroni worth anything, and how he’s the only one who knows just the right texture for such noodles. But the careful cooking of the macaroni took him so long, that by the time he was ready to add the cheese, our classes entire stocks were empty. See, Bobby Trenton decided he would make nachos for the cooking contest, and he used up the entire cupboard, more or less. Paul was furious – he blamed me for rigging the contest in Bobby’s favor, and stomped out of the classroom. It was that day that he vowed to no longer need cheese, or any other sort of accessory, to make his macaroni the best – his exact words were ‘you just wait, some day, all I’ll ever need will be elbows’. And the rest is history.”

Paul Pierce: Mac & Cheese enthusiast

Antoine Walker, Former Boston Teammate:

“Why does Pierce shoot from the elbow? If I say it’s because there are no fours, will you pay me?”

Harold, Paul Pierce’s Imaginary Friend:

“I wasn’t like many other imaginary friends. Most kids and their imaginary friends play imaginary games. That wasn’t the case for Paul and myself. I never knew the taste of being a cowboy, or an alien. Nope. Every afternoon, after Paul would come back from school, it was straight to the basketball court for the two of us.

I’ve never been much of a one-on-one player, so most of the time, Paul would just shoot and I would get him rebounds. Believe me, if you thought Dennis Rodman was impressive on the boards, wait until you see me – I would get after everything, and I don’t even exist!

That was our daily routine, until one day, the Johnson family got a new television set. This wouldn’t be news, except the Johnsons lived right near the basketball court, with their living room window looking straight at the hoop Paul would usually shoot at. Their new TV was so big (by 1980s standards), that it was easily visible from the court if you stood at the perfect angle. What was that perfect angle? You guessed it – standing at the right elbow. Now we still went to the court to shoot hoops almost every day, but over time, Paul started shooting more and more from the right elbow, and less from everywhere else, so he could watch TV. In fact, he learned lip reading, just so he could understand the shows without hoping the Johnsons just happened to up the volume and leave their window open.

This went on every day, for most of Paul’s childhood. Paul would rise from the right elbow, send the ball towards the rim, and while I brought it back to him, there was that TV, providing him with alternate entertainment. By the time Paul was recruited to Kansas, the elbow shot was virtually automatic, and Paul had watch every single episode of Cheers.” 

Sigmund Freud, Father of Psychoanalysis:

“I have no idea who Paul Pierce is, or what an elbow shot even means, but I assume it’s caused by something disturbing and Oedipean.”

Gregory Trochowski, University of Kansas Physics Department:

“Paul Pierce first entered my office in December of 1996. He had just started his sophomore season with the Jayhawks, and it was the first time I’d seen him anywhere near our Physics department. Clearly, something was on his mind.

He told me he had just seen the recent hit film Space Jam, and to his eyes, something didn’t add up. ‘I just don’t get it’, he said, ‘how could aliens not know anything about basketball? I mean, they’ve been monitoring the Earth enough to know about the Looney Toons, and basketball started way before Merry Melodies, right? Is there any way to check this with real aliens?’

Well, I didn’t know what to tell him, but the man was stubborn. We started working on ways to communicate with extraterrestrial life forms. Paul spent hours creating crop circles in the Kansas prairies. I talked to a friend of mine who specified in astrophysics and claimed to have a contact at NASA, but that seemed like a dead end before we even tried it. We even broke into the university’s radio station a few times to transmit recordings of Paul challenging aliens to basketball games. I saw no reason to believe the transmissions would get anywhere outside the Lawrence area, but I didn’t have the heart to tell that to Paul.

Until one day, near the end of the semester, Paul walks into my office, his right elbow swollen at least three times its normal size. I asked him what happened. ‘This weird green dude walked into our gym last night’, he says, ‘said he heard my challenge and he wants to play. I check him the ball, and I see he has 4 arms. Didn’t even know that’s legal, but we agreed to call our own fouls, so I let him play. I’m up 10-9, game till 11, when I drive to the basket and the idiot just smacks my elbow. Left it full of green goo. Pretty sure he was radioactive or something.’

Paul never told me who won that game, or what happened to the supposed alien, but the next fall he came back to Kansas and wouldn’t miss from the elbow. When I asked him about it, he said ‘Special alien elbow powers’. I couldn’t get another answer from him, no matter how hard I tried. My guess? He probably hurt his elbow badly, needed a cover story, and decided to tell me he met an alien just so I wouldn’t feel we wasted our time. Then he had to create the illusion of a superpowered elbow to maintain his cover, which forced him to develop the elbow shot. But who knows, man? Who knows?”

Paul Pierce and an alien during happier times

You’re Right, Blake Griffin’s Not Stupid

Photo by Karith on Flickr

There’s nothing factually incorrect about what Pincus wrote above – if, under a CBA similar to the current one, Blake Griffin were to sign a Qualifying Offer when he’s a restricted free agent in the summer of 2013, then he would be an unrestricted free agent in 2014. Of course, why not just say that the Clippers could trade Griffin to the Lakers for Luke Walton the day the lockout ends? It’s a technically possible trade, but it won’t happen. Writers seem to think they have a better chance of getting away with this sort of 2014 scenario as it involves a deeper understanding of the current CBA than most people have, and is less obviously ridiculous. But no player has ever turned down a maximum extension for a QO, and the odds that Griffin will be the first (in the process leaving tens of millions of dollars on the table) are minuscule. About the same as the odds that the Clippers will trade Griffin for Luke Walton.

via It’s difficult to look that far ahead but if a player like Blake Griffin decides not to extend past… – Clips Nation.

Preface: 

That’s right, I just blockquoted a fanshot on an SBNation site which of course is nothing more than a blockquote and reference of another post. In this case, an Eric Pincus post on Life After Kobe. At some point this is going to get so meta that we’re just going to be writing about ourselves and we won’t really even need basketball. Which is convenient, since we don’t have it anyway. 

I think Steve Perrin over at ClipsNation does a fantastic job. It’s honestly one of my favorite sites on SBNation’s NBA collective, which is saying something since I adore just about all of them. Perrin’s a genuinely nice guy who I’ve talked with over the years and the site he runs is superb. In fact, his site is so good that I often find myself lamenting the fact that he covers the Clippers. Imagine if he covered a team that wasn’t the Clips, how good would that be? “But Matt,” you didn’t seem to say, “you love those teams that are perpetually terrible and can’t catch a break. Are you really going to take the traditional ‘man, the Clippers suck’ angle? Because that’s lame. Lame lame lame lame lame. Lame.” See, the thing is, most every terrible team I have some level of hope for, whether it’s a young player, a new management, or just the idea that eventually an owner will catch a break (shout out to Herb Kohl). But the Clippers? I don’t feel bad for Steve because his team sucks. Lots of teams suck. I feel bad for Steve because his owner is a cancer on this league, and I firmly believe (big notice, believe, not know, since lots of scumbags win championships) that he will always be the pothole that derails any success the Clippers may have.

Questioning the idea of Griffin accepting the max extension has become taboo, especially in the blogosphere. Consider Ziller who rightfully sliced and diced a columnist for bad logic earlier this year:

First of all, while Griffin can become a free agent at the end of the 2012-13 season, he would be a restricted free agent, which means that the Clippers could match any offer sheet he signs with another team. Obviously, barring injury, Griffin is on track to draw a maximum-value extension. Obviously, barring injury, the Clippers will match. Not even Donald T. Sterling, who is a great idiot, is that big an idiot.

Because of that restricted free agency reality, top-flight players on first-round rookie scale deals rarely get to restricted free agency. LeBron James? He signed an early extension and avoided RFA. Dwyane Wade? Yep. Carmelo Anthony? Uh huh. Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Dwight Howard, Kevin Durant? Yes, yes, yes, yes. Derrick Rose will do the same in a few months. It’s a reality in the NBA: Superstars sign their second contract after their third year, and stay with their first team for at least seven years.

via Blake Griffin Now The Subject Of Unnervingly Stupid Columns – From Our Editors – SBNation.com.

So case closed, right? Blake’s going to be in L.A. for at least seven years, or however long a player’s first non-rookie-max is under the new CBA. (It could be year by year for all we know, which is why this column largely is irrelevant as is any discussion about contracts or basketball at all. That’s right, the lockout is now making me into a nihilist. I don’t know if it’s the players or owners at this point, all I know is I hate all of them and I hope they all get permanent migraines until it’s over.) But here’s my problem, why I keep finding myself aligning myself with those that are skeptical that Griffin’s going to be a Clipper in 2015. All those other teams Ziller mentions? There are bad things said about Arison, Dolan, DeVos, the Miller family, and especially Clay Bennett and George Shinn. None of them compare to Donald Sterling. Treating Griffin’s situation with Sterling like any other player under a rookie deal is ignoring a game-changing variable. Sterling and everyone’s awareness of what Sterling means.

Let’s go ahead and assume restricted free agency exists under the new CBA or at least will be grandfathered in. Griffin’s choices are:

A. Sign the max extension, committing to Sterling and all that means for the foreseeable future, risking being put in the same scenario as so many stars, trapped as a phenomenal player on a team handcuffed by bad ownership. For reference, he can call Kevin Garnett and ask him how that worked out, and hear Garnett say “Well, I mean, it wasn’t that bad, I wasn’t playing for Sterling or anyth….oh. Sorry, Blake.” He can pursue the money, which is a smart play, but limits his ability to contend and drives him insane as he watches Sterling be Sterling. Let’s put this one away for a minute and we’ll come back.

B. Sign the QO, hold off for one year, losing all that money (while raking in his endorsement money from Kia, Nike, and Subway – I’m sure he’s just scraping by during this year), and then enter free agency where not only does he get the biggest deal he can earn under the new system, but he gets to choose who he plays for. I mean, who would want that? (Say hi to every member of free agency over the past year. The goal is no longer to have the cake, it’s to have it, eat it, and get to order what color the frosting is and how long the fork is.) He can go contend. He can team up with a superstar or a good team. He can stay in a huge market. He can go to play for a coach he believes in.  (Random, unsubstantiated hypothetical that I just really think is a fun idea: Imagine Durant doesn’t get a ring the next two seasons and Westbrook snaps and pushes his way out of town. Presti calmly asks Griffin to meet him at his folks’ house. Shudder in fear, mortals. Again, this is science fiction, but there’s a reason “Starship Troopers” is talked about so much (and tweeted about by Zach)). And he doesn’t have to deal with Sterling. Imagine looking at James Dolan and go “wow, an owner who isn’t quite so… Sterling.” That’s what we’re talking about here.

But let’s go back to Scenario A. for a minute. A few of the myriad reasons that A is still incredibly likely to happen;

  1. Steve’s right. NBA players don’t turn down the money. I happen to believe this is because agents are short-sighted with poor vision, but it’s true. After all, they don’t have to work for Sterling. They just have to take their cut.
  2. The injury. It’s not expected to be a problem, it was a freak injury, was a bone injury, and shouldn’t affect anything going forward. But injuries spook players, agents, teams, families, everything. And Griffin’s got a big one on his chart.
  3. The Clippers organization? Honestly is a lot better. Olshey has done a downright decent job there. You can be a fan of the Mo Williams trade or not be a fan of the Mo Williams trade, but in general, the plan hasn’t been awful. If Griffin can be convinced Sterling’s really not going to screw with things, it’s a pretty easy choice.
And that’s where we get back into hypotheticals. I understand wanting to only look at what is and not dabble in what could be, but it’s not like Sterling doesn’t have a longtime reputation of making terrible decisions and screwing up good things. It comes down to whether you believe that not even Sterling could mess this up… or if you believe there is nothing Donald Sterling can not find a way to infect.
There’s another element here, naturally, as long as we’re dreaming up starships driven by unicorns. The new CBA has a 50/50 chance at having some modified version of the franchise tag. If he can’t make nearly as much money somewhere else, it becomes one of those “I’d work for the devil for an extra $5 million per year.” I’m just not convinced that if all things are equal, Griffin won’t be the first player to say that money’s important, but it’s not freedom, and it’s not worth years of contention.
The best way to neutralize Sterling and get him out of the league, considering Stern won’t, or can’t do anything about it, and neither will the rest of the owners out of some sort of mutated, nightmare version of the social contract, is for the players to prove that money isn’t worth sticking with a system that’s rotten at its core.
Oh, yeah, and Vinny Del Negro’s their coach. That, too.

The Downside Of Good Memory

Photo by bunnyboy67 on Flickr.

There’s that moment in every child’s life when they realize everything they ever knew about anything was all just a carefully constructed house of cards. It’s not the end of innocence. Children are too fickle and stupid to undergo that kind of major paradigm shift. But that first tinge of doubt, that first taste of cynicism and crushed expectation — you never forget that. For some kids, it was finding out that Santa Claus doesn’t exist.

For me, it happened when Paul Pierce ruined USA Basketball forever — or at least in 2002.

September 5, 2002: A Recap

Up until the last 43 seconds of the game between Argentina and USA in the octo-final of the 2002 FIBA World Championship held in Indianapolis, USA Basketball (in my naive little mind) was encased in a fortress (bubble) of invincibility. Cracks had begun to show in 2000, but as a kid, I was unaware. Team USA went undefeated at the Olympics, even amid a vastly improved (and growing) talent base in other countries. Relinquishing the crown at that point seemed inconceivable. My uneducated and unwavering faith in the team was just asking for a rude awakening.

It was the fourth quarter, and the faithful Argentines were chanting and embracing in Indianapolis. Not a good sign. Argentina was up 83-74 with less than a minute left. If there was any team capable of mounting a comeback, it was Team USA, right?

Forty-five seconds flat. The ball is inbounded to Michael Finley at the top of the key. Finley swings it to Pierce, Team USA’s leading scorer in the tournament. 45… 44… 43.4. Fumble. Pierce loses sight of the ball, and Argentina gains possession. Pierce, on his knees at this point, wraps his arms around a young Manu Ginobili in a foul that consisted of equal parts frustration and bewilderment.

There was no coming back from that. Ginobili converts one of two free throws. The lead is 10. Stranger things have happened. And they do, but not before Ginobili calmly puts the game out of reach with another split at the line after Baron Davis predictably clanks a three-point attempt. An Argentinian fan spasms in laughter and tears. Disbelief has made way for impending reality. Argentina is going to win this.

Things get strange when Pierce effortlessly drains a three-pointer from about 30 feet away with a hand in his face. Then, after a quick foul, Pierce drains another from the right wing even further than the first. Effortless. Great. But where was this when it mattered? USA loses 87-80. This would be the first loss in what would become six years of international misery.

Pierce’s outing at the World Championship is my lasting memory of him as a player, which is unfortunate considering it’s one that reflects everything that he’s since distanced himself from. To be labelled as “selfish” on a national team is a significant dishonor, especially when you’re the mantle piece. It was a tournament run marred by weakness and immaturity.

Granted, it’s foolish to make indicting judgments on a player who was only 24 at the time, but for me, it was more than just Paul Pierce making childish mistakes. He didn’t just fumble away the ball. It was more than that. I put my carefree childhood on the line. As a 10-year-old, I raised the stakes, fully expecting that somehow through the screen, so would Pierce. He didn’t, and at that time, it wasn’t fair. But fandom seldom is.

And that perception — especially since it was established in childhood — has been cemented in my mind. Pierce has added several tacks to his résumé since 2002, but his legacy (through my own lens) hasn’t changed much in nine years.

Zach Harper spoke to a related point on our trust as fans on TrueHoop in the context of “clutchness”:

Sports are always such a personal, internal catalyst for how we feel about the things we see. We look for an animalistic satisfaction in the way things happen on the field. We want to see overpowering moments of success. We want to see domination. But we also want to see someone come down to the final shot and come through during the most pressure-packed moments. We want to feel the drama of what’s happening, trust that our guy will come through when it counts the most, and feel that validation of knowing he would succeed.

via Trust and perception rule the legacy | ESPN TrueHoop (7/26/11)

There was a desperation during that Argentina/USA game. Everything I knew about Pierce at that point signaled to me that victory was still possible. But during his final three possessions of the game, something about him soured. I didn’t understand the concept of “clutch” back then, but I knew that something was off.

I can’t draw out every detail of the game, but my pent up childhood rage nestled in just a few moments of that octo-final game. I still have vivid memory of Pierce’s futile threes at the end of the game. I still remember the fumble. But most of all, for some reason, I remember his awful free throw shooting. He shot 3/7 from the line against Argentina, and shot a putrid 2/6 against New Zealand a game before. Pierce never had the most perfect, textbook free throw release, but I remember a distinct hitch that was never there in Boston. It was troubling. I can’t explain why those events have resonated with me for so long, but they have. Pierce’s uncharacteristic play aligned with the first notable loss in international play since 1998. In his moment of weakness, I cast my judgment. In retrospect, it was childish for obvious reasons, but it’s still not so distant from what we choose to do as fans everyday.

Rob Mahoney, in trying to debunk the mythos of clutch, touches on an important point:

Hit a game-winning shot in a big playoff game, and your reputation is made. Miss a crucial free throw with the game on the line, and that same rep is sunk…so long as the adoring public is willing to let the visions of clutch greatness go. The memory of the basketball fan collective is astoundingly selective, and whatever evidence is deemed admissible is twisted and spun in a way that simultaneously creates a clutch résumé and amends the very fluid definition of the term itself.

via On “clutch,” “choking,” and ships passing quietly in the night | ProBasketballTalk (7/25/11)

“Visions of greatness.”  Zach and Rob make great points in this seemingly inescapable clutch debate, but the scope of the ideas can expand much broader. There are moments when we are compelled to take snapshots of a player. And depending on the context, these mental images we hold have a profound effect on our perception of players throughout their careers. And these images are powerful. We relive glory and grief more easily than anything falling in between polarities.

It’s not that I’ve been unaware of Pierce’s career since 2002, and it’s not that I’ve deemed him an “unclutch” player. But just the thought of Pierce conjures images of my childhood disappointment. He’s had inspiring playoff performances, a not-so-inspiring wheelchair incident, and an emotional outpouring during the ring ceremony in 2008. And yet, due to strange forces I’ll never suss out, all of these events were met with lukewarm ambivalence. Paul Pierce is one of the most prolific offensive players of this era, and has evolved into one of the best two-way players in the league. But I’ll never be able to watch him with the doe-eyed optimism of my past. For better or worse, the summer of 2002 defined who Paul Pierce was to me. I’m chained to my memory, and it’s unfair. Fandom is inherently so.

& Consequences

Photo via Caribb on Flickr

 

Paul Pierce is the NBA.

Kobe’s not. LeBron’s not. Kareem, Wilt, Russell, Cousy, West, Magic, Bird Jordan, none of them are. They stand out and above, they’re how we define the league through example. It’s defining the collective by the exception.You can’t represent a league that’s seen hundreds of great basketball players come and go through the lens of the very best. You miss the forest for the tallest standing trees. The league’s not defined by the no-names either. The bench players, the garbage men, the end-of-the-bench, they’re part of the tapestry, but that’s like describing a piece of art only by the canvas. Or the wall it hangs on. You’re missing what you remember. And Pierce is the NBA. He’s the kind of player that really makes up the story of the NBA, what it’s been about, it’s best and worst.

His career narrative is more representative of the complexities of how the league holds the majority of its players in retrospect than any auto-play legend. Pierce came out of Inglewood, immersed in Lakers culture and wound up in Boston. A Kansas Jayhawk, member of a high-exposure, strong-legacy school program. It’s a perfect example of the bizarre contrast between the world of high school basketball and college. Why would an Inglewood kid choose to go to Lawrence, Kansas for college? (For that matter, why would anyone? Signed, Missouri graduate of 2004 full of envious hate.) Because that’s how the machine works. He was drafted to the polar opposite team, and slipped five spots, for the prototypical “motivated by falling in the draft” angle.

Years of stellar play on a team that could never get past it. But those really were the hero years for Pierce. Check out the :40 second mark here.

 

Pierce did his time in the ditch. And that’s key here. If you want to come out smelling well, it’s key to toil on a losing team. And Pierce toiled on a team that walked the perfect balance. He had his share of epic runs in the postseason to get the exposure, but never reached the promised land. The blueprint says toil on a losing team, stick with them, don’t pout, then either be rewarded by being traded (despite your love for the city-yank, yank) or having a legit superstar traded to you. In reality, the parallels between Pierce and Garnett are something to catch and take a gander at. The real difference? Pierce wound up on Legend Celtics, Garnett wound up on Lowly Timberwolves. If Kevin McHale had turned around and switched the deal, landing Pierce to play with KG, how different is the narrative, except for the places switched? (Let’s all take a minute to laugh at the prospect of McHale pulling off that deal — Rockets fans, you don’t get to laugh, that guy gives personnel input for your team now. ) But both are spared the harsh light of examination. No LeBron James treatment for them. Garnett because he did everything possible to win with Minnesota and just couldn’t do it, to the point where he lost his prime. Pierce because he stuck with his team for the duration of his career, bought into the team culture. It should be noted that the summer of 2007 saw a fair number of “could Pierce be traded to the Lakers?” stories percolating from outlets with Celtic ties. The thought being, Pierce was getting tired of the wait, and why not go home and win a title with Kobe?

But that’s not what wound up. And he reached the championship, the career validator with defense, sacrifice, team commitment, and a realization of what has always made the Celtics teams good in the minds of the simplified media, a confused sense of dedication and family. (In reality, it was the realization of Celtics values, but those are actually the idea that you let players do what they do and get out of their way. Auerbach talked about that all the time, it’s how he got through to Russell. Similarly, most of the Celtics coaching was done that season by the Big 3 while Doc tied it together with a pretty ribbon that read “Ubuntu” and didn’t have to worry about managing rotations. This was before he came out of nowhere to wallop Phil Jackson in the Finals which pretty much changed our opinion of him forever, and from that point on became a coach worthy of his acclaim.)

The point to all this? Pierce’s story could have been much different, but it wasn’t, and what’s more NBA than that tale?

***********************************************************

Pierce’s game is authentic. I mean that it’s not riddled with athleticism or brute force. It’s not pure shooting stroke, but it’s also not built entirely on savvy. It’s the synthesis. Kobe Bryant’s game is so complex and charged that it’s barely human. It’s more like watching electricity fly between conductors. But Pierce is brick and mortar. It’s jab and check, move, cajole, then burst, and release.  He drives through the layup, and touches it off like he’s terrified the wind’s going to blow the layup back the other direction. And the spot-up three is territory that falls somewhere between an LOLCat and Edward Hopper. That catch off the curl screen on the perimeter, where the defense catches up,  just two steps back because of the screen spacing, ready for the drive, only to recognize one second too late that Pierce has continued the motion of the catch into a shot, after a half-second delay to freeze the defender? That’s both comic and cruel. You can watch it a dozen times and it’ll still get you.

It’s bizarre what moments antagonists choose to remember. For Pierce it’s the wheelchair incident in the Finals. For Bryant, it’s glares at teammates. Both show a superhuman ability to find terrible shots in key moments and shoot them anyway, then curse and shake their head as if to say “Man, can’t believe THAT 45-foot fadeaway didn’t fall. Sometimes the rim just gets you.” Even better, their supporters immediately say “I don’t care, that’s the shot I want them taking.” Pierce, like Bryant, does have the spot, though. The elbow, naturally. When you have teams jumping to that spot to cut it off like the Heat did in their playoff series, you know you have a rep. But Pierce’s moves are so varied, he could hit them elsewhere. His efficiency at the post is something that gets overlooked. He wound up in the 95th percentile last season. One of my favorite moves is the right block spin and drift shot. He never goes to  his fadeaway from the right block (versus 18 of 35 times he went left shoulder jumper from the left block) and still opponents get dragged into it. If insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result, Pierce is Willy Wonka driving opponents onto the boat. “Just a short ride!”

It’s this combination of touch, shot, form, explosion, conditioning, savvy and skill that makes Pierces such a one-man amalgam for the NBA. He’s iconic in that he’s not iconic in any specific way. His silhouette isn’t a skyhook or a fadeaway. It’s probably just a fist pump.

*****************************************************

Pierce’s ego is also perfectly NBA. Humble by those who came before him but certain there’s none better, day in and day out. He talks about Europe, he’s active in community works. He loves Boston, his home’s in California. He can mock himself for the camera and still believes firmly that there isn’t a badder man out there. Pierce is defined by the NBA, but the NBA’s also defined by Pierce.

He’ll enter the Hall quietly, I’d bet beside a few other Celtics. He’ll be given his moment but probably have to share the spotlight with a bigger star. He’ll be a cult figure kind of name among blogs and analysts as time goes on, but will still flash that championship ring every chance he gets. He’s got his own legend with how he got his nickname, and he’s left his mark on the league.

It’s just important that we stop and notice as he continues to make this league’s history, a workman artist in an artist workman’s world.