web analytics
<
Tag Archive - ahalffortnightofpaulpierce

Paul Pierce: The Truth Is Here

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmW43Q5Gu2M w=640 h=390]

(Warning: The above video mix features loads of Paul Pierce and-1′s and a few naughty words. NSFW if your workplace doesn’t appreciate Brother Ali or four-letter words.)


When I see Paul Pierce get one of his and-1’s, I have to laugh. Almost always, he initiates the contact. After the play, the defender looks disgusted — a combination of “pissed off at the ref” and “disappointed in myself.” As Pierce poses, high-fives somebody, or pounds his chest before he steps to the line, I get a little annoyed. Then I think, “that MF’er again” and laugh.

Pierce is like that college professor who’s been around forever and likes the sound of his own voice too much. The guy who will lecture you forever, refer to his own work constantly, and go right back at anyone who challenges one of his opinions. And you won’t challenge his opinion because you know he’ll probably make you look stupid. You’ll resent him at first, but you’ll come to respect the hell out of his knowledge and the amount of work he put into forming those still kind of annoyingly strong opinions.

If I was writing a book about Paul Pierce, it would center on how he evolved from a young, stubborn kid from LA to a legitimate Hall of Famer and NBA Finals MVP. Of all the athletes I’ve covered, I’m not sure I’ve ever seen anyone turn it around the way Paul did.
Via Q&A With Jackie McMullan | CelticsBlog, 10/31/2010

You don’t have to cheer for Pierce or his team. You don’t have to love his cockiness or his veteran tricks. But you have to respect the man’s journey. You have to admire the way he changed his game. He’s too damn effective, deceptive, and fundamentally sound to hate. Sure, you’d absolutely loathe having to guard anyone like him, but you may as well appreciate the savvy old MF’er.

Elbow Grease

Photo from Wombatunderground1 via Flickr

At a certain point in basketball history, it was decided that every player worth being a player has himself a go-to move.

Why is this? Well, who knows? Perhaps it’s the relatively new video game culture, one that necessitates bundling basketball players into a series of pre-determined motions represented by colourful pixels. From this limited arsenal of movements, one must aptly construct hundreds of players from every end of every spectrum known to man. And what better way to distinguish a certain lump of pixels from a nearby, different lump of pixels than by making our selected lump move in a way that’s unique to a player?

There are bundles of go-to moves, and more often than not, it is a perfect microcosm of the player that perfected it. The quirkiness of Dirk’s one footed whatever-that-is. The fundamentally flawless yet glamour-less Duncan bank shot. The recklessness, yet masterfully crafted originality of Rondo’s behind-the-back fake. The impossible combination of speed, quickness, size and coordination of Hakeem’s Dream Shake. The sheer invincibility of Jordan’s fadeaway.

One player, though, has a go-to move that has seemingly no association at all with the attributes he displays.

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRnpHgyzQoA&feature=related]

Paul Pierce, from the elbow. For the game, or in the middle of the second quarter. Every single time.

How did Paul Pierce make the elbow shot such a defining go-to move? Pierce has steered his way to fame by power of infinite swagger and unpredictability, brashly stating his case to rise above the relatively uninteresting background. How can it be that such a player expresses himself to the fullest by getting to a rather inconspicuous spot on the floor and releasing a jump shot that to the naked eye seems so incredibly normal, ostentatious only in how rarely it misses?

To answer this fascinating question, we went to the experts. The following is a collection of people who have played major roles in Paul Pierce’s life, to go with experts in various fields, with explanations as to what causes this peculiarly frequent phenomenon of Paul Pierce dribbling to where the free throw line finishes its sideways journey, rising in the air, releasing an orange ball and awarding the group of men wearing green shirts 2 points.

Disclaimer: this is, in its entirety, a work of fiction. Most of these figures do not exist, and those who do exist have never said anything resembling what is written here, certainly not to us.

Laura McDermott, Paul Pierce’s 7th Grade Home Ec Teacher:

“Paul never really liked home ec. He would always talk about how he wouldn’t need to do anything at home because he’ll be living an athlete’s life on the road, how if he ever needed something he’ll just ask Doc Rivers, which I found really weird at the time because Doc was playing for the Hawks and didn’t seem to know a lot about maintaining a positive living environment. In fact, I remember this quite vividly, Paul would always say ‘I hate homes, and I hate houses, and if I ever play ball with a dude named House, I’ll make sure he gets humiliated really badly, like being traded for a 5’8” guy or something’.

Anyway, Paul would usually sleep through classes, but this one day, something caught his attention. We were having a cooking contest, and Paul, being the competitive spirit that he was, declared that he will destroy everybody. Sadly, he didn’t know the first thing about cooking, so he had to resort to the only thing he knew how to make: his favorite food, macaroni and cheese.

Paul worked very hard to cook the elbow macaroni, constantly bragging to his classmates how elbow macaroni is the only macaroni worth anything, and how he’s the only one who knows just the right texture for such noodles. But the careful cooking of the macaroni took him so long, that by the time he was ready to add the cheese, our classes entire stocks were empty. See, Bobby Trenton decided he would make nachos for the cooking contest, and he used up the entire cupboard, more or less. Paul was furious – he blamed me for rigging the contest in Bobby’s favor, and stomped out of the classroom. It was that day that he vowed to no longer need cheese, or any other sort of accessory, to make his macaroni the best – his exact words were ‘you just wait, some day, all I’ll ever need will be elbows’. And the rest is history.”

Paul Pierce: Mac & Cheese enthusiast

Antoine Walker, Former Boston Teammate:

“Why does Pierce shoot from the elbow? If I say it’s because there are no fours, will you pay me?”

Harold, Paul Pierce’s Imaginary Friend:

“I wasn’t like many other imaginary friends. Most kids and their imaginary friends play imaginary games. That wasn’t the case for Paul and myself. I never knew the taste of being a cowboy, or an alien. Nope. Every afternoon, after Paul would come back from school, it was straight to the basketball court for the two of us.

I’ve never been much of a one-on-one player, so most of the time, Paul would just shoot and I would get him rebounds. Believe me, if you thought Dennis Rodman was impressive on the boards, wait until you see me – I would get after everything, and I don’t even exist!

That was our daily routine, until one day, the Johnson family got a new television set. This wouldn’t be news, except the Johnsons lived right near the basketball court, with their living room window looking straight at the hoop Paul would usually shoot at. Their new TV was so big (by 1980s standards), that it was easily visible from the court if you stood at the perfect angle. What was that perfect angle? You guessed it – standing at the right elbow. Now we still went to the court to shoot hoops almost every day, but over time, Paul started shooting more and more from the right elbow, and less from everywhere else, so he could watch TV. In fact, he learned lip reading, just so he could understand the shows without hoping the Johnsons just happened to up the volume and leave their window open.

This went on every day, for most of Paul’s childhood. Paul would rise from the right elbow, send the ball towards the rim, and while I brought it back to him, there was that TV, providing him with alternate entertainment. By the time Paul was recruited to Kansas, the elbow shot was virtually automatic, and Paul had watch every single episode of Cheers.” 

Sigmund Freud, Father of Psychoanalysis:

“I have no idea who Paul Pierce is, or what an elbow shot even means, but I assume it’s caused by something disturbing and Oedipean.”

Gregory Trochowski, University of Kansas Physics Department:

“Paul Pierce first entered my office in December of 1996. He had just started his sophomore season with the Jayhawks, and it was the first time I’d seen him anywhere near our Physics department. Clearly, something was on his mind.

He told me he had just seen the recent hit film Space Jam, and to his eyes, something didn’t add up. ‘I just don’t get it’, he said, ‘how could aliens not know anything about basketball? I mean, they’ve been monitoring the Earth enough to know about the Looney Toons, and basketball started way before Merry Melodies, right? Is there any way to check this with real aliens?’

Well, I didn’t know what to tell him, but the man was stubborn. We started working on ways to communicate with extraterrestrial life forms. Paul spent hours creating crop circles in the Kansas prairies. I talked to a friend of mine who specified in astrophysics and claimed to have a contact at NASA, but that seemed like a dead end before we even tried it. We even broke into the university’s radio station a few times to transmit recordings of Paul challenging aliens to basketball games. I saw no reason to believe the transmissions would get anywhere outside the Lawrence area, but I didn’t have the heart to tell that to Paul.

Until one day, near the end of the semester, Paul walks into my office, his right elbow swollen at least three times its normal size. I asked him what happened. ‘This weird green dude walked into our gym last night’, he says, ‘said he heard my challenge and he wants to play. I check him the ball, and I see he has 4 arms. Didn’t even know that’s legal, but we agreed to call our own fouls, so I let him play. I’m up 10-9, game till 11, when I drive to the basket and the idiot just smacks my elbow. Left it full of green goo. Pretty sure he was radioactive or something.’

Paul never told me who won that game, or what happened to the supposed alien, but the next fall he came back to Kansas and wouldn’t miss from the elbow. When I asked him about it, he said ‘Special alien elbow powers’. I couldn’t get another answer from him, no matter how hard I tried. My guess? He probably hurt his elbow badly, needed a cover story, and decided to tell me he met an alien just so I wouldn’t feel we wasted our time. Then he had to create the illusion of a superpowered elbow to maintain his cover, which forced him to develop the elbow shot. But who knows, man? Who knows?”

Paul Pierce and an alien during happier times

The Downside Of Good Memory

Photo by bunnyboy67 on Flickr.

There’s that moment in every child’s life when they realize everything they ever knew about anything was all just a carefully constructed house of cards. It’s not the end of innocence. Children are too fickle and stupid to undergo that kind of major paradigm shift. But that first tinge of doubt, that first taste of cynicism and crushed expectation — you never forget that. For some kids, it was finding out that Santa Claus doesn’t exist.

For me, it happened when Paul Pierce ruined USA Basketball forever — or at least in 2002.

September 5, 2002: A Recap

Up until the last 43 seconds of the game between Argentina and USA in the octo-final of the 2002 FIBA World Championship held in Indianapolis, USA Basketball (in my naive little mind) was encased in a fortress (bubble) of invincibility. Cracks had begun to show in 2000, but as a kid, I was unaware. Team USA went undefeated at the Olympics, even amid a vastly improved (and growing) talent base in other countries. Relinquishing the crown at that point seemed inconceivable. My uneducated and unwavering faith in the team was just asking for a rude awakening.

It was the fourth quarter, and the faithful Argentines were chanting and embracing in Indianapolis. Not a good sign. Argentina was up 83-74 with less than a minute left. If there was any team capable of mounting a comeback, it was Team USA, right?

Forty-five seconds flat. The ball is inbounded to Michael Finley at the top of the key. Finley swings it to Pierce, Team USA’s leading scorer in the tournament. 45… 44… 43.4. Fumble. Pierce loses sight of the ball, and Argentina gains possession. Pierce, on his knees at this point, wraps his arms around a young Manu Ginobili in a foul that consisted of equal parts frustration and bewilderment.

There was no coming back from that. Ginobili converts one of two free throws. The lead is 10. Stranger things have happened. And they do, but not before Ginobili calmly puts the game out of reach with another split at the line after Baron Davis predictably clanks a three-point attempt. An Argentinian fan spasms in laughter and tears. Disbelief has made way for impending reality. Argentina is going to win this.

Things get strange when Pierce effortlessly drains a three-pointer from about 30 feet away with a hand in his face. Then, after a quick foul, Pierce drains another from the right wing even further than the first. Effortless. Great. But where was this when it mattered? USA loses 87-80. This would be the first loss in what would become six years of international misery.

Pierce’s outing at the World Championship is my lasting memory of him as a player, which is unfortunate considering it’s one that reflects everything that he’s since distanced himself from. To be labelled as “selfish” on a national team is a significant dishonor, especially when you’re the mantle piece. It was a tournament run marred by weakness and immaturity.

Granted, it’s foolish to make indicting judgments on a player who was only 24 at the time, but for me, it was more than just Paul Pierce making childish mistakes. He didn’t just fumble away the ball. It was more than that. I put my carefree childhood on the line. As a 10-year-old, I raised the stakes, fully expecting that somehow through the screen, so would Pierce. He didn’t, and at that time, it wasn’t fair. But fandom seldom is.

And that perception — especially since it was established in childhood — has been cemented in my mind. Pierce has added several tacks to his résumé since 2002, but his legacy (through my own lens) hasn’t changed much in nine years.

Zach Harper spoke to a related point on our trust as fans on TrueHoop in the context of “clutchness”:

Sports are always such a personal, internal catalyst for how we feel about the things we see. We look for an animalistic satisfaction in the way things happen on the field. We want to see overpowering moments of success. We want to see domination. But we also want to see someone come down to the final shot and come through during the most pressure-packed moments. We want to feel the drama of what’s happening, trust that our guy will come through when it counts the most, and feel that validation of knowing he would succeed.

via Trust and perception rule the legacy | ESPN TrueHoop (7/26/11)

There was a desperation during that Argentina/USA game. Everything I knew about Pierce at that point signaled to me that victory was still possible. But during his final three possessions of the game, something about him soured. I didn’t understand the concept of “clutch” back then, but I knew that something was off.

I can’t draw out every detail of the game, but my pent up childhood rage nestled in just a few moments of that octo-final game. I still have vivid memory of Pierce’s futile threes at the end of the game. I still remember the fumble. But most of all, for some reason, I remember his awful free throw shooting. He shot 3/7 from the line against Argentina, and shot a putrid 2/6 against New Zealand a game before. Pierce never had the most perfect, textbook free throw release, but I remember a distinct hitch that was never there in Boston. It was troubling. I can’t explain why those events have resonated with me for so long, but they have. Pierce’s uncharacteristic play aligned with the first notable loss in international play since 1998. In his moment of weakness, I cast my judgment. In retrospect, it was childish for obvious reasons, but it’s still not so distant from what we choose to do as fans everyday.

Rob Mahoney, in trying to debunk the mythos of clutch, touches on an important point:

Hit a game-winning shot in a big playoff game, and your reputation is made. Miss a crucial free throw with the game on the line, and that same rep is sunk…so long as the adoring public is willing to let the visions of clutch greatness go. The memory of the basketball fan collective is astoundingly selective, and whatever evidence is deemed admissible is twisted and spun in a way that simultaneously creates a clutch résumé and amends the very fluid definition of the term itself.

via On “clutch,” “choking,” and ships passing quietly in the night | ProBasketballTalk (7/25/11)

“Visions of greatness.”  Zach and Rob make great points in this seemingly inescapable clutch debate, but the scope of the ideas can expand much broader. There are moments when we are compelled to take snapshots of a player. And depending on the context, these mental images we hold have a profound effect on our perception of players throughout their careers. And these images are powerful. We relive glory and grief more easily than anything falling in between polarities.

It’s not that I’ve been unaware of Pierce’s career since 2002, and it’s not that I’ve deemed him an “unclutch” player. But just the thought of Pierce conjures images of my childhood disappointment. He’s had inspiring playoff performances, a not-so-inspiring wheelchair incident, and an emotional outpouring during the ring ceremony in 2008. And yet, due to strange forces I’ll never suss out, all of these events were met with lukewarm ambivalence. Paul Pierce is one of the most prolific offensive players of this era, and has evolved into one of the best two-way players in the league. But I’ll never be able to watch him with the doe-eyed optimism of my past. For better or worse, the summer of 2002 defined who Paul Pierce was to me. I’m chained to my memory, and it’s unfair. Fandom is inherently so.

& Consequences

Photo via Caribb on Flickr

 

Paul Pierce is the NBA.

Kobe’s not. LeBron’s not. Kareem, Wilt, Russell, Cousy, West, Magic, Bird Jordan, none of them are. They stand out and above, they’re how we define the league through example. It’s defining the collective by the exception.You can’t represent a league that’s seen hundreds of great basketball players come and go through the lens of the very best. You miss the forest for the tallest standing trees. The league’s not defined by the no-names either. The bench players, the garbage men, the end-of-the-bench, they’re part of the tapestry, but that’s like describing a piece of art only by the canvas. Or the wall it hangs on. You’re missing what you remember. And Pierce is the NBA. He’s the kind of player that really makes up the story of the NBA, what it’s been about, it’s best and worst.

His career narrative is more representative of the complexities of how the league holds the majority of its players in retrospect than any auto-play legend. Pierce came out of Inglewood, immersed in Lakers culture and wound up in Boston. A Kansas Jayhawk, member of a high-exposure, strong-legacy school program. It’s a perfect example of the bizarre contrast between the world of high school basketball and college. Why would an Inglewood kid choose to go to Lawrence, Kansas for college? (For that matter, why would anyone? Signed, Missouri graduate of 2004 full of envious hate.) Because that’s how the machine works. He was drafted to the polar opposite team, and slipped five spots, for the prototypical “motivated by falling in the draft” angle.

Years of stellar play on a team that could never get past it. But those really were the hero years for Pierce. Check out the :40 second mark here.

 

Pierce did his time in the ditch. And that’s key here. If you want to come out smelling well, it’s key to toil on a losing team. And Pierce toiled on a team that walked the perfect balance. He had his share of epic runs in the postseason to get the exposure, but never reached the promised land. The blueprint says toil on a losing team, stick with them, don’t pout, then either be rewarded by being traded (despite your love for the city-yank, yank) or having a legit superstar traded to you. In reality, the parallels between Pierce and Garnett are something to catch and take a gander at. The real difference? Pierce wound up on Legend Celtics, Garnett wound up on Lowly Timberwolves. If Kevin McHale had turned around and switched the deal, landing Pierce to play with KG, how different is the narrative, except for the places switched? (Let’s all take a minute to laugh at the prospect of McHale pulling off that deal — Rockets fans, you don’t get to laugh, that guy gives personnel input for your team now. ) But both are spared the harsh light of examination. No LeBron James treatment for them. Garnett because he did everything possible to win with Minnesota and just couldn’t do it, to the point where he lost his prime. Pierce because he stuck with his team for the duration of his career, bought into the team culture. It should be noted that the summer of 2007 saw a fair number of “could Pierce be traded to the Lakers?” stories percolating from outlets with Celtic ties. The thought being, Pierce was getting tired of the wait, and why not go home and win a title with Kobe?

But that’s not what wound up. And he reached the championship, the career validator with defense, sacrifice, team commitment, and a realization of what has always made the Celtics teams good in the minds of the simplified media, a confused sense of dedication and family. (In reality, it was the realization of Celtics values, but those are actually the idea that you let players do what they do and get out of their way. Auerbach talked about that all the time, it’s how he got through to Russell. Similarly, most of the Celtics coaching was done that season by the Big 3 while Doc tied it together with a pretty ribbon that read “Ubuntu” and didn’t have to worry about managing rotations. This was before he came out of nowhere to wallop Phil Jackson in the Finals which pretty much changed our opinion of him forever, and from that point on became a coach worthy of his acclaim.)

The point to all this? Pierce’s story could have been much different, but it wasn’t, and what’s more NBA than that tale?

***********************************************************

Pierce’s game is authentic. I mean that it’s not riddled with athleticism or brute force. It’s not pure shooting stroke, but it’s also not built entirely on savvy. It’s the synthesis. Kobe Bryant’s game is so complex and charged that it’s barely human. It’s more like watching electricity fly between conductors. But Pierce is brick and mortar. It’s jab and check, move, cajole, then burst, and release.  He drives through the layup, and touches it off like he’s terrified the wind’s going to blow the layup back the other direction. And the spot-up three is territory that falls somewhere between an LOLCat and Edward Hopper. That catch off the curl screen on the perimeter, where the defense catches up,  just two steps back because of the screen spacing, ready for the drive, only to recognize one second too late that Pierce has continued the motion of the catch into a shot, after a half-second delay to freeze the defender? That’s both comic and cruel. You can watch it a dozen times and it’ll still get you.

It’s bizarre what moments antagonists choose to remember. For Pierce it’s the wheelchair incident in the Finals. For Bryant, it’s glares at teammates. Both show a superhuman ability to find terrible shots in key moments and shoot them anyway, then curse and shake their head as if to say “Man, can’t believe THAT 45-foot fadeaway didn’t fall. Sometimes the rim just gets you.” Even better, their supporters immediately say “I don’t care, that’s the shot I want them taking.” Pierce, like Bryant, does have the spot, though. The elbow, naturally. When you have teams jumping to that spot to cut it off like the Heat did in their playoff series, you know you have a rep. But Pierce’s moves are so varied, he could hit them elsewhere. His efficiency at the post is something that gets overlooked. He wound up in the 95th percentile last season. One of my favorite moves is the right block spin and drift shot. He never goes to  his fadeaway from the right block (versus 18 of 35 times he went left shoulder jumper from the left block) and still opponents get dragged into it. If insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result, Pierce is Willy Wonka driving opponents onto the boat. “Just a short ride!”

It’s this combination of touch, shot, form, explosion, conditioning, savvy and skill that makes Pierces such a one-man amalgam for the NBA. He’s iconic in that he’s not iconic in any specific way. His silhouette isn’t a skyhook or a fadeaway. It’s probably just a fist pump.

*****************************************************

Pierce’s ego is also perfectly NBA. Humble by those who came before him but certain there’s none better, day in and day out. He talks about Europe, he’s active in community works. He loves Boston, his home’s in California. He can mock himself for the camera and still believes firmly that there isn’t a badder man out there. Pierce is defined by the NBA, but the NBA’s also defined by Pierce.

He’ll enter the Hall quietly, I’d bet beside a few other Celtics. He’ll be given his moment but probably have to share the spotlight with a bigger star. He’ll be a cult figure kind of name among blogs and analysts as time goes on, but will still flash that championship ring every chance he gets. He’s got his own legend with how he got his nickname, and he’s left his mark on the league.

It’s just important that we stop and notice as he continues to make this league’s history, a workman artist in an artist workman’s world.