web analytics
<
Tag Archive - Dirk Nowitzki

Film Don’t Lie: The Dallas Mavericks and Being John Malkovich

Attempting to explain Being John Malkovich — like attempting to explain this year’s NBA playoffs — would be a farce. Anything resembling a plot summary would be a disservice to one of the strangest movies you’ll ever see. It’s dark — at times, positively horrific. Its most hilarious moments are some of its most twisted, and the most poignant would be downright silly in any other context. It’s constantly shifting, forcing the audience to keep up with right and wrong and every intersection between. It’s about portals and puppetry. It’s about learning who you are through someone else’s perspective. It’s about suspending everything you know about anything for 72 minutes and allowing yourself to embrace the absurdity of a reality far removed from your own — and coming away affected all the same.

Because let’s face it. We didn’t expect the Dallas Mavericks to make it this far. The unbearable monotony of the past three seasons only solidified our perception of the team’s stagnation. How were we to know that this team would be decimating its opponents with an unparalleled veteran savvy on both ends of the floor? We were never afforded the possibility. We applauded the introduction of Tyson Chandler, a defensive fulcrum, and the often beautiful offensive movement. But we are also creatures of habit, writing off a team that our eyes deemed dull and ordinary. Like Craig (played by John Cusack), a failing puppeteer, and Lotte (played by an almost unrecognizable Cameron Diaz), a pet shop owner, the Mavericks were unfortunately shrouded in a veil of anonymity, clouding the artistry and emotion of an unheralded collective.

Dallas’ shocking sweep of the Los Angeles Lakers in the second round was the first foray into John Malkovich, an actor that everyone in the movie seemed to recognize, yet none could pinpoint any specific movie roles. Still, for Craig, Lotte, and the lot of other nameless faces in a crowd that wanted 15 minutes away from their existence, Malkovich’s identity was a marked improvement over their own. For the first time since 2007, the Mavericks weren’t an afterthought. It was a moment of triumph, to be sure. But, of course, 15 minutes is never enough time.

The series against the Oklahoma City Thunder would prove to be a lesson in puppetry and mastery. In Dirk Nowitzki’s virtuosic performances throughout the series, we see Craig’s mastery of Malkovich’s body and mind, not only effectively creating the world’s greatest puppet, but also a conduit for the hopes and dreams that never materialized. With the exposure, Craig finds appreciation that wasn’t there before. Malkovich’s influence and celebrity meant the freedom to exhibit a skill that society had prior deemed to be a dying artform. Suddenly with a great playoff run, the labels that clung to Nowitzki’s career became archaic. It’s not that Craig reinvented puppetry, and it’s not that Dirk redefined being ‘soft’. But a larger audience, one without dismissive preconceived notions, helps restructure persona. But most importantly, through Malkovich — err, this Mavericks team, Nowitzki finds himself as close as he’s ever been to being a champion. It’s a dream that’s as close as it’ll ever be to reaching fruition. But he’s not the only one with dreams.

We learn in the movie that there are vessels of immortality. It’s been a long time coming, but the Mavericks vessel has ripened, and those on board know they won’t be long for this league. By mid-March, Dallas’ roster eerily resembled an All-Star team from the mid ’00s, except without the legs. We know the stories. Jason Kidd, Jason Terry, and Nowitzki have all tasted the NBA Finals before. Shawn Marion and Peja Stojakovic are relics of earlier offensive revolutions, both millimeters away from tasting the championship round. Significantly older this time around, it’s absolutely stunning that all of these men have played crucial roles in getting the team where it is now. Terry and Stojakovic were lights out in the dismantling of the Lakers, while Marion and Kidd were invaluable defenders against the endlessly athletic Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook.  They all carry their own baggage when it comes to failed dreams, but they climb aboard this vessel as a unit in hopes of basketball immortality; in hopes that a championship will absolve a decade of struggle, and validate a lifetime of commitment to this wonderful sport.

It’s a dark tunnel to the championship. It’s scary, and probably squishy. For Dallas, entering the mind of Malkovich means knowing what it means to be a champion. Nowitzki, his aging brethren, and the rest of the Mavericks are surely hoping that redemption can be achieved in the time it takes to be sucked in and spit out.

Dirk Nowitzki: A Softy We Can Get Behind

There’s such a stigma about softness in the NBA. It’s commonplace to idolize those players who embody toughness, who sweat blood, who play through pain, who seek out contact like Eddy Curry seeks out all-you-can-eat buffets, who fear no opponent. Now it’s just as normal to belittle the finesse players — the ones who spare viewers the macho routine, who don’t need to feel dominant to play basketball.

Basketball is a sport of grace, that requires the utmost focus and skill — the greatest player will be a meticulous tactician, a heady player who knows what he’s doing. Basketball is a game of grace and fluidity, but it seems that those qualities can only be appreciated if there’s a ferocity underscoring them.

It’s really not surprising that the embrace of manliness has come to the fore. As the NBA has evolved, the game has become decreasingly physical, metamorphosing from a game primarily defined by bruisers to a game appreciably defined by skill. Many feel a need for sports to be contests of strength and hatred for one’s opponents, so it makes sense that these fans would cling to those aspects of classic basketball and long for more of that style.

In the same way, these same people can’t help but berate those who act counter to their desires. Deviation from that course of aggression and physicality is inherently wrong, and those players who choose that alternate route must be ridiculed relentlessly for their decision. After all, they’re a bunch of sissies, obviously.

Not even getting in to the social concerns with some of these softness labels (words like “woman” and “pussy” come to mind), a trend has developed over the years in which the players coming over from Europe are necessarily soft, for it has to be a product of nationality, not training regiment, amateur-basketball factors, or anything else. (Or maybe it’s just that Americans are intolerant of other cultures and want to flaunt their “superiority.” Either way.) That is why there’s always a slight preoccupation with drafting foreign prospects or giving them a chance on an NBA roster.

It is true that this dubious nature has not just surfaced as a result of neanderthals’ preconceived notions, as European players have not had the greatest track record in the NBA. But the change in the physical nature of the game is only one cause of failure for international prospects. Rule differences, season length, cultural boundaries, and many other adjustments have a hand in the development or lack of development for these players.

Along with the clear division between the tough guys and the “wusses,” let’s say, there’s another duality that develops: the guys who live to hurt and get hurt are the icons of basketball — that is, they’re good. The ninnies? They’re just bad at basketball. There’s no better illustration for this phenomenon than Laker Nation’s treatment of Pau Gasol over the last four seasons.

In 2008, when the Lakers lost, he was a creampuff (an efficient one, at that, but damn me to hell if that matters — they lost!) who was helpless to succeed because he couldn’t handle the grind of the game. In 2009 and 2010, when the Lakers won, he broke free and somehow instantly became tough. This year, they lost again, and Pau was back to playing for the London Silly Nannies.

There’s a statistical correlation between Gasol’s success and the Lakers’ success in those four postseasons, and there’s no way that other factors could’ve possibly had an impact on his vacillating play. There’s no way Bynum’s absence in 2008 hindered him at all. There’s no way the team’s abandonment of the triangle offense limited Gasol’s play in 2011. He’s just too much of a pansy to handle it all.

This is interesting, though: it seems as if choosing whether to call a player soft or not is a matter of convenience. When it helps to excuse a player’s performance as a product of his cotton-candy nature, that’s just fine. When his performance need not be excused, though, his softness is no longer a topic of discussion. So …

What if the NBA had someone who exemplified the qualities of these players that are routinely labeled softies — but managed to use that softness to his advantage to dominate in the NBA? These playoffs have solidified one guy’s nomination for this role. That guy would be Dirk Nowitzki.

When you think soft, Nowitzki isn’t typically someone who comes to mind. After all, he screams, growls at his opponents, and likes to pump up the crowd. But take a look at his game.

This is a guy who has developed his jumper to have a natural fade on it, such that he falls away from opponents when he shoots. He had nine dunks all year. He attempted fewer shots per game at the rim than Tyler Hansbrough. He doesn’t really jump to contest shots. He shoots a lot of free throws, but many of the fouls he takes are slight taps on his arms, not Andrew Bynum-style maulings. You’ll often see him getting knocked off balance by smaller defenders in the post. And you don’t seem him intimidating other teams with hard fouls himself on defense.

You would attribute a lot of those characteristics to the wuss category, so perhaps it’s not the way that these guys play the game that makes people call them soft. Maybe a player has to be bad in order to be considered soft. Maybe we’re willing to look past finesse play so long as it results in wins.

There is no doubt people looked at Dirk in a different light just five years ago, when Dwyane Wade went off in the 2006 Finals, and the Mavericks crumbled after a confidence-building 2-0 lead in the series. Dirk was seen as soft then. The next year, after the Mavericks embarrassingly bowed out to the Warriors in a 1-8 upset in the first round, Dirk was still soft like ice cream. Now, though, no one’s saying that, even while his game has barely changed.

All this talk has surfaced lately about where Nowitzki ranks among all players in the league’s history, with some endeavoring to contend that he belongs in the all-time top 10. Whether or not that’s accurate, it might make some people realize that one of the greatest players to ever touch the hardwood is someone who has been called a weakling.

Maybe Nowitzki is the guy who can make it cool to be soft, who can break that mold of needing to be tough, who can be that graceful tactician without any underlying support of a grizzly nature.

Here’s to changing the culture of basketball for the better, Dirk.

The MVP, LeBron, and Media Oppression

The MVP race is all but sewn up. Derrick Rose is the apparent beneficiary of the media’s consensus, overcoming concerns he doesn’t merit the award. Without question, Rose is putting together an impressive season by any standards, but there’s a case to be made for players like Dwight Howard, Dirk Nowitzki and LeBron James.

That said, despite his league-leading PER, his highest career field-goal percentage, and the stature of the Miami Heat at the top of the league, James can’t seem to get within sniffing distance of the crown. It’s not worth debating to whom the award should go at the end of the season, but the point here is that James is getting jobbed of due consideration.

Doubters will point to a couple of main reasons for writing off James: (1) The Heat would be fine without him (even though, as of a week ago, the Heat were about 10.5 points per 100 possessions worse without James and the Bulls just 1.5 points per 100 possessions worse without Rose); and (2) He doesn’t deserve a threepeat in MVP voting (this is just an irrational appeal to tradition in the sport).

It’s clear, however, that the reason that James isn’t getting any credit in the voting process — driven by journalists — is that the media hates him. James garnered plenty of hatred this summer with The Decision, and to be fair to LeBron, that disdain isn’t warranted.

When LeBron James came into this league (in fact, even a year before he came into the NBA), the community at large (hereafter referred to as “we”) had very egotistical representations of him. We constructed a narrative in which he became the “Chosen One.” He was supposed to come into the league and be the absolute savior for whatever franchise drafted him. After the Cavaliers selected him, no one cared about that team. Everyone cared only about LeBron.

And he was very selfish about it, solidifying his role as an icon and not merely a basketball player. We were all completely okay with it back then. This summer, LeBron exercised a right that Curt Flood and others mercilessly fought for in the 1970s to separate athletes from effective indentured servants. He went to Miami. Suddenly we had a problem with LeBron.

But most people will claim that the move itself was not what they had an issue with — it was the circumstances of the move that irked them. They viewed The Decision as an overblown, self-interested way to announce a change of team.

Even ignoring the charitable consequences of The Decision, how was LeBron’s egoism this past summer at all different from the rest of his career? We loved him for being an individualist when he came into the league, and we loathed him for not being a collectivist when he went to Miami. Isn’t that a double standard?

For now, however, assume instead that the contempt that NBA observers have held for LeBron is rational and justifiable. Why should that rule him out of the MVP race? The award is about achievement and excellence on the basketball court, not about selflessness and altruism. Isn’t it a problem that members of the media, who are supposed to be fierce protectors of objectivity and fairness, are playing favorites and taking sides?

To hope for pure objectivity in sports media is a useless exercise. That is, the sports world will never see a day in which every team and player benefits from the same amount of unbiased coverage. The logistics of markets and the nature of fan bases demand more coverage for the bigger teams.

Nevertheless, it’s quite reasonable to not only hope but also expect that the media approach any and all coverage with an open mind unpolluted by preconceived notions and uninhibited by personal grudges. The media bears the burden of honoring the trust that the public places in it. When influential figures start to lead the masses astray based on extraneous factors legitimized by subjective attitudes, that’s a notable issue.

LeBron took a divisive course of action last summer, but it is important for viewers and fans to decide on their own how they want to view him as a result. Instead, the media is peddling a dominating narrative that more or less makes the choice for the masses. Anyone interested in someone else for MVP either is a devout supporter of a particular player regardless of the race or has done the research to find the rare commentary that challenges the Rose testimony.

Rose might very well be the right selection for the MVP this season, however one really defines the award. It’s no crime against LeBron should he fall short of the award, but everyone deserves a fair shake regardless of his history. There’s no reason The Decision should be James’ scarlet letter.

The media gets to decide the MVP. If they’re going to have that kind of responsibility in determining a winner based on basketball achievements, they should at least try to be objective about it. Failing that, there are serious questions about the integrity of sports journalism.

Have Ball, Will Travel: Dirk Nowitzki

In this installment, we’ll take a look at a wide-open transition opportunity for Dirk Nowitzki during the Dallas Mavericks’ game against the Utah Jazz.

In full disclosure: I originally pulled this clip as an example of a blatant travel that the officiating crew missed. Dirk’s break to the bucket looks like a four-step move, a laughably missed violation. However, slow down the film and things get a bit murkier. How you read this play likely depends on how you interpret the collect/gather rule in the NBA, but if we’re going by the book, Nowitzki actually skirts free of a travel.

I think the rulebook is actually rather explicit on this point: “The first step occurs when a foot, or both feet, touch the floor after gaining control of the ball.” (Ed. note: Emphasis mine.) Gaining control of the ball is the textual equivalent of a gather, which means that steps taken during the gather are not a part of the traveling count. Every player is entitled two steps after gaining control of the ball, and in this clip you can see that Dirk really only takes two steps after his gather.

The first of what I originally perceived as four steps isn’t a step at all; the ball isn’t even in Nowitzki’s hands. The second would be the common interpretation of a gather step, seeing as he doesn’t seem to have control of the ball in his hands before planting that particular foot. Then, the final two paces are those allotted by NBA rules for any player on the move with the ball.

It’s awkward as hell, and at full speed, I’m not sure how anyone could have made that determination; I’m more inclined to think that the refs just let this one go as an uncontested fast break than believe that they made this kind of read on the play. Still, if we entitle players to a collect step (hint: we do) by way of video precedent and the rulebook, this is — somehow — a perfectly legal sequence.

NBA Playoffs: Be They Horsemen Or Mere Messengers?

First off: ROTFLMAO.

Okay, now that we’ve got late 90′s AIM chat words out of the way, let’s talk Dallas.

Did you know the Mavs are 14-11 against the top ten teams in Net Points? That’s a pretty good number. Of course, Utah and Blazer fans are pointing to their individual records against the Mavs (a combined 1-5), saying they BEG for a seven game series with Dallas. You know what I say? Be careful what you wish for.

There are three types of Western playoff teams this year. One team with considerable confidence that they will be playing in the Finals, because they are the best of their conference, and arguably the best in the league. You know them. There are teams just trying to find answers to some things. This includes Utah, who looked terrific in 2007, horrible in 08 and 09, and amazing this year, but still need to be able to knock off a big time opponent in the playoffs. It includes OKC obviously, trying to get a feel of their ceiling, since they haven’t hit it yet. It includes Portland, who, geez, what are they trying to do? Validate KP’s moves? Just not have the injuries render this a complete disaster? Make some sort of Kamikaze run to the Finals? I have no idea. And honestly, I don’t think they do either. And the Suns fall into this group, simply from a “Who knows?” perspective. The Suns are fascinating in that they know they’re a good team, know they can be a great team, but know full well the odds are not with them to win a championship.

Then there’s the last group, obviously San Antonio, Denver, and Dallas. Each have expectations. Denver legitimately expects to be in a Game Seven with the Lakers in the Western Conference Finals. They think they are that good. They’re in coast mode right now, and you can tell, they’re just not tuned like they have been. It’s a theme common to this category of teams, but one which the Spurs cannot afford the luxury of. They have to try and make a run, to catch fire at the right time and salvage this configuration. They’re like a rocket which keeps having its booster go out.

And then, of course, there’s Dallas. Not thought to be a contender in preseason. Generally speaking, this team has been considered out of it since the Warriors loss in 07. That series fractured the franchise’s legitimacy for a lot of people. But take a moment and recognize the talent on this team. Jason Kidd is shooting well from the arc, for God’s sake. Shawn Marion is arguably their fourth best player, and he’s been fantastic at both ends! They have two huge, veteran centers they can throw at people! They have worlds and worlds of playoff experience, a cool and steady point guard, a former MVP, a sixth man of the year award winner, and a rookie who dropped 40 points the other night! You say they can’t play defense? That’s a myth. They play a style which creates opportunities for the opponent, agreed. But in the west, only LA, San Antonio, Utah, and OKC have been better defensively. But then, those same statistics also say several teams have been better than Dallas offensively.

Every contender looks at its shortcomings and plays the “we’ll be ready for the playoffs” card. And I’m certainly there with the Mavs. I’ve seen Nowitzki step up too many times, see the roster which is more diverse and has higher central points, and recognize that this team was pretty damn good last year. That Denver series was closer than it appeared to the naked eye.

A Utah-Dallas series I think will probably say a lot, and in all honesty, I think it’s a toss-up. I like Dallas’ centers versus Okur and Millsap, but I like Deron Williams and Wesley Matthews and Price versus Kidd, Butler, and Jub-Jub/Roddy Buckets. I like AK versus Shawn Marion in all sorts of ways for both sides. So then it’ll come down to Carlos Boozer versus Dirk Nowitzki.

That should be entertaining as all get out. Now if only no one comes in and crashes the party…

A Compendium Of Sorts: 2/25/10

What’s that? Trade Deadline’s past? March Malaise is setting in? Playoffs are on the horizon? Must be time for me start mailing in quick thoughts instead of fully developed ideas! Come on everybody! Everyone on board the bullets train! Whee! Next time I’m going to name it “Things I Think I Think!” Get it?!

  • So Z’s bought “out” of DC. Can you be bought out of somewhere you never went to? I mean, he never left his house. That’s like saying I checked out of the grocery store because I looked at the pants I would wear if I were to go to the store, which of course I’m not going to. Anyway, I do have a cooky conspiracy theory to share with you (shocking, I know). I really feel like the whole “we’re not going to play you on the night you’re supposed to break the record, even though your family and friends are all here and it’s a really big deal to you” thing is getting underplayed. You’re telling me Z has zero feelings about a franchise burning him like that in front of his family and friends, then trading him to Washington for an upgrade, and then wanting him back? Here’s another thing. I asked Kurt if I was right in my opinion that Mike Brown runs essentially the most basic offensive sets on the planet. He agreed.  So you have Z, who’s been spurned by his home team, the team he’s bled for, on multiple occasions. Then you have other teams, who are willing to pay more money for him. And he can provide info like “when they run this place, Delonte will be in that corner. Yes, right there. Trust me.” Does this not have some Counte of Monte Cristo shiz going on?!
  • Haha, just kidding, Z will be back in Cleveland in a month.
  • Why ISN’T Shelden Williams playing?
  • Jason Kidd, Caron Butler, Shawn Marion, Dirk Nowitzki, Brendan Haywood. Are you serious? With Terry, Beaubois, and Dampier off the bench? Are you serious? Why is this not a bigger deal? The Mavericks have to be the most under-the-radar made-the-playoffs-every-year-for-a-decade, loaded-with-All-Stars, holy-crap-they-match-up-with-anyone, division-leading team in the league. The fact that they won that game tonight without Butler is phenomenal to me. Butler is exactly the kind of guy you want to guard Bryant. He’s not going to shut him down, no one can. But it would allow Marion to guard Odom, Dirk to guard Pau, and so on. On Twitter, someone commented that Odom would kill Marion with the length, but I’m not entirely convinced of that given Odom’s um, problems with maintaining focus (though he’s been much better this year). But they won anyway! Kobe missed two dagger threes down the stretch and Nowitzki is having such a brilliant season that no one is noticing. Kidd’s also so good at running against LA. He pushes the ball to probe for a weakness in transition, but instead of forcing it into three talented transition defenders, he just backs it out and calmly sets the offense. They’ve got something considerable there. The Western Conference playoffs are going to brutal, and good. Even if LA still comes out on top, the field looks much tougher than it did at the start of the season.
  • Anybody else notice Al Thornton is trying to do more than just shoot in Washington? No? Just me then? Okay.
  • If you wanted to know what it was like watching O.J. Mayo play brilliantly for 45 minutes and then miss two clinching free throws and then the game winner, with Kobe nailing a three to win in-between, here’s the only comparison I could make, as I told Harper. I was fine after the game. A little shaken, but grabbed Paroxi-Wife and settled in to be thoroughly confused by LOST for the zillionth time. I went to the kitchen to fix a snack, and the thought just crossed my mind, the free throws, and I just doubled over. It wasn’t like a punch to the gut. It was like something devouring me from within. Later I got into bed, sat down to take off my reading glasses, paused, and then just facepalmed. Paroxi-Wife was concerned I was thinking about some sort of deep sadness. Then I just turned and said “OJAM missed.” So there you go, there’s some schadenfreude for you.
  • By the way, the March Malaise is a very real thing. NBA Bloggers LOATHE the next month. You can’t start playoff previews because you have no idea what the seedings will look like. The games start to matter, but not like they do in April. The mediocre teams that were doing pretty well start to tail off as their opponents figure things out and the young guys get tired. Injuries take their toll. The luster of new rotations wear off. It’s horrendous. There will be about seven great, great games in the month of March and the rest is a damn death march. Pre-deadline, there’s the constant “Is this working? Should they trade?” lines. But now, you’re stuck. You are who you are. And for a lot of teams, that doesn’t amount to very much. It’s the death of hope.
  • Everyone needs to chill out with all this “This preposterous trade sutff has to go!” in regards to Z. Every major team has or would do something like this. It harms no one. Everyone wins in this situation except Cleveland’s competitors. And that’s not a reason to say it’s not fair.

In related news, I’ve decided to rank the top five fanbases based on their own loathing of a starter.

1. Chicago Bulls- Taj Gibson

2. Atlanta Hawks- Joe Johnson

3. Indiana Pacers- Troy Murphy

4. San Antonio Spurs- Richard Jefferson

5. Memphis Grizzlies- Mike Conley (this is mostly just me. What makes it more impressive is the small size of the fanbase in relation to my unending disgust that Mike Conley is paid to play professional basketball.)

Oh, I Believe In Yesterday

The Greatest Stranger In A Strange Land

So after establishing himself as a consistent and dominant force, Dirk Nowitzki makes quite the convincing case as the best European player ever to play NBA basketball.

And yet. Two essential components are missing from Nowitzki’s true Hall of Fame career: Top-rate defensive ability and an NBA championship title.

via Ball in Europe – European Basketball Blog » Blog Archive » Is Dirk Nowitzki really the greatest European NBA player ever?.

Ball in Europe does a pretty complete rundown of Dirkalicious in pursuit of the validity of him being the greatest Euro player ever.

The defensive questions that hounded him earlier in his career have largely faded away as he’s become savvier. He’ll never be considered great because he’s tall and not ferocious defensively. If you’re big you’re supposed to foul people like it’s assault and battery. If you’re small, no worries, just don’t be Nash.

And certainly Dirk did have defensive issues, but the offense…it’s unreal. Even as it happened we were lost in Kobe’s theatrics, Nash’s run and gun, Iverson. The MVP discussion only caused resentment against him when honestly, he’s been a top player in the league for most of the decade.

Ball in Europe supposes Gasol might overtake him. It becomes harder to stave off talk of Gasol, and he certainly is terrific, but I still don’t feel you can compare the two. When Gasol was put as the primary scorer, the elite guy, the go-to man, his team floundered in first round exithood at their peak and then fell apart completely. Dallas has made the playoffs a bajillion times in the row and gotten to the semifinals at the very least more often than not.

I’m open to this changing as the years go by, but for now, I can’t think of anyone better than Nowitzki from the Continent. That’s what they call it, right?

Too Much Blow, Not Enough Out

I think it’s safe to say that losing by 35 points to the Lakers is an aberration. Los Angeles is undoubtedly the class of the West and one of the best squads in the league, but to be so completely and utterly embarrassed requires a very special level of futility. So special a level that we haven’t seen anything close from the Mavs all season, and hopefully won’t again. This game was absolutely a statement for the Lakers, but the Mavs have the benefit of moving on, trying to forget, and preparing for next week’s rematch.

via Los Angeles Lakers 131, Dallas Mavericks 96 » The Two Man Game.

Rubber match will be huge. Why?

Mavs took down LA in their second game of the season. It blindsided Lakers fans. Their fans were looking for 72. To be taken down that soon, that thoroughly, was a bit unsettling. But, of course, it was only the second game of the season and they didn’t have Pau (nor did they have him for much of the night after a hammy tweak, nor Artest). So while the loss was unsettling, it didn’t mean a whole lot. It was a huge win for the Mavs to announce that they were going to be a force this season.

Last night’s game? The opposite, a nice way for LA to get back on track after looking like suck for five games. But it was almost TOO much of a win.  This wasn’t just a 12 point solid victory over the Mavs like they usually pull. This was a(nother) Sunday night win over a team coming off a back-to-back in which DJ MFREAKINGBenga was nailing 10 foot jumpers. It was an absurd win. I’m not taking anything away from LA, but these games happen. This is not a specific intent to take away from the Lakers. The same could be said if Boston were to blowout Orlando, or how Orlando dismantled Cleveland late in the season last year by 30 some odd at one point. Orlando ended up being the better team, just like the Lakers will. But games which feature margins this large do not present an accurate representation of either team, unless LA’s on one side and the Nets are on the other.

So that last game should be really fascinating. Teams tend to bounce back from getting destroyed. But LA is good enough to roll this team by 15-20 if they’re feeling it that night. They’ve both got an impressive win that was too impressive. Maybe we can get a fair fight next game if the fates allow.

Should JET Cool It?

As of late, Terry’s usually lethal jumper has not only been off the mark, but consuming a disproportionate amount of the Mavs’ total offense. In a typical Maverick win, Terry’s field goal attempts comprise 14.1% of the total team FGAs. But in a typical Maverick loss, that number jumps to a whopping 20.3%. That number itself doesn’t quite displace Terry in the team hierarchy Dirk’s FGA numbers are similarly slanted upward in losses, but it’s an interesting tidbit to weigh in light of the Mavs’ first losing streak of the season.

via Consider the Following » The Two Man Game.

I’ve long been a fan of Jason Terry’s game, but with the vast buffet of options the Mavericks have to choose from, JET taking over is no longer as solid of an option as it used to be. When the Mavericks are clicking and using each other to push themselves and the team, offensively, they’re very difficult to stop. Yet there they are, at 11th in offensive efficiency by HoopData’s measure. This team has the depth to function at such a high level, but Terry needs to be feeding off of holes created by the other players. In short, they need Josh Howard back healthy in a hurry. Funny considering how maligned he was last season.

Page 1 of 212»