web analytics
<
Tag Archive - Los Angeles Lakers

The 1962 Season: the Celtics-Lakers Rivalry Begins

 

NBA

The Eastern Division Finals had seen the most pitched confrontation yet between the Russell-Chamberlain, Celtics-Warriors rivalry. As great as those two rivalries were, there was a temporal quality. Russell and Chamberlain were mortal and although their stories would go on, their battles would eventuality come to a close. The Celtics-Warriors clashes could have sustained, but the Philadelphia franchise headed west to California’s Bay Area, putting an end to that heated dispute.

However, in the 1962 NBA Finals, the Celtics would find an eternal enemy, one that has stood the test of the time and continued to add new chapters nearly 50 years later: the Los Angeles Lakers.

The Celtics had already played the Minneapolis Lakers in the finals before (1959) as the Celtics, unknowingly, were on their way to surpassing the dynastic excellence of the Minnesota club’s early years. The 1959 Lakers were far-removed from their glory days. Leading the way was rookie Elgin Baylor and last holdover from the Mikan years Vern Mikkelsen, but they were swept unceremoniously by Boston.

Although they came within one game of reaching the finals again in the 1959-60 season, the Lakers were struggling financially. The summer of 1960 proved to be one of remarkable change for the Lakers: they moved to California and drafted Jerry West setting up an return to glory and a windfall of financial success.

For the National Basketball Association, this was truly its first national finals. For the first time a team beyond the banks of the Mississippi River would contend for the championship. And the contest between Boston and Los Angeles would prove to be just as mighty as the Mississippi.

WARM UP

The accepted storyline of the Lakers vs. Celtics in the 1960s was a great one-two punch of Los Angeles constantly faltering to a more balanced Boston team. There is certainly much truth to this. Jerry West and Elgin Baylor averaged nearly 70 points between them in the 1962 season, becoming the 1st and only pair of teammates to average over 30 points in the same season. But there was more to the Lakers than West’s fearless drives and Baylor’s acrobatic finishes.

First and foremost was Rudy LaRusso. At 6’7” and 220 lbs, LaRusso usually played forward but could do spot duty at center. The 4x all-star averaged 17 points by virtue of a sweet jump shot and 10 rebounds to go along with staunch defense. 29-year old Frank Selvy was nearing the end of his career, but had put together perhaps his finest season since his rookie campaign with 15, 5 and 5 at the point guard position. At center, Los Angeles rotated Ray Felix, the 1st black player to win Rookie of the Year back in 1954, and Jim Krebs.

Where things fell apart was the bench. Mimicking the problems faced by the Philadelphia Warriors, the Lakers would have a hell of a time surviving a bad night from any starter. The Celtics on the other hand knew they could do with a bad game from Sam Jones, Bob Cousy or Tom Heinsohn because of their 3 reliable bench players (Jim Loscutoff, K.C. Jones and Frank Ramsey).

GAME TIME

The series opened on April 7 in Boston with a rare and coveted national TV appearance for the NBA. The Celtics were only slightly favored. On the one hand, they had won 4 titles in the previous 5 years. But on the other, Los Angeles had defeated Boston 3 out of 4 times in the regular season when they had Elgin Baylor in uniform (he missed half the season with military service). Uncle Sam wouldn’t be a problem Elgin was available for the entire series.

Boston came out with a thunderous 122-108 drubbing of Los Angeles  in Game 1. After taking a 60-52 halftime lead, the Celtics opened the 2nd half with a 35-22 advantage in the 3rd quarter. In true Celtics form, Boston had eight players nest between 8 and 24 points. The Lakers were led by Elgin Baylor’s 35 points.

The very next day Game 2 was played and the Lakers showed Boston they would not be intimidated by the Game 1 blowout. Jerry West came out blazing scoring the Lakers’ first 11 points and LA outscored Boston 43-23 in the 2nd quarter to take a 73-59 lead at the half. Boston mounted a furious comeback, even taking the lead briefly at 112-111, but ultimately Los Angeles won 129-122.

Baylor, West and LaRusso combined for 98 points in the contest.

Knotted at one game apiece, the teams flew out west to California for Game 3. Again, West and Baylor were magnificent combining for 75 points, but little aid was given by their teammates. Boston meanwhile was up to their usual balanced tricks with seven players in the 7 to 26 points range.

With Boston leading 113-108 with under 2 minutes left, Jerry West assumed the title of Mr. Clutch and gave the 1st-ever finals crowd in LA something to remember. Knocking down a jumper and then connecting on three free throws, West was able to tie the game at 115. After a Boston timeout with 3 seconds left, Sam Jones attempted an inbounds pass that was picked off by West and taken down court for a game-winning layup.

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn4H_zMFm7A w=400 h=300]

After that devastating loss, the Celtics were down 2 games to 1 and Red Auerbach knew they had to head back to Boston tied 2-2 for a legitimate chance to win the series. The C’s responded with an inspired 115-103 road victory leaving Red relieved, if only for the moment:

“We just had to have this one. I’m tremendously proud of the way they bounced back from that heartbreaking loss Tuesday night. The fellows had a lot of life and our shooting was just about at capacity. This was the time for them to be on. Otherwise we would have been down 3-1.”

Back in Boston for Game 5, Elgin Baylor delivered a performance for the ages.

Elgin wasted no time in his thrashing of the Boston defense with 18 points in the 1st quarter. By halftime he had 33 points. But perhaps this was part of the Boston game plan. After 3 quarters, Boston was leading 99 to 93.  As the fourth quarter chugged along, the Celtics still clung to 116-114 lead. Baylor proceeded to score 6 straight points and put Los Angeles ahead.

Sam Jones and Lakers big man Jim Krebs traded baskets and now the score stood 122-121 in favor of LA. With just 16 seconds left, Jerry West caught an inbounds pass and was hacked on a drive to the basket. He hit both free throws icing the game for the Lakers.

Baylor finished Game 5 with 61 points and 22 rebounds. The 61 points was a playoff record and wouldn’t be broken until Michael Jordan scored 63 against Boston in 1986, but that came in double overtime. Baylor also set the playoff record for most points in a half (33), which would be broken by Sleepy Floyd in 1987.

Trailing again in the series, but this time facing elimination, Boston again responded favorably. Sam Jones was the man of the hour for Boston hitting 17 of his 27 shots for 35 points. 5 other Celtics hit double figures while the Lakers got 34 from both, Elgin and West, but little else. The final score was 119-105.

This 1st finals meeting between Boston and Los Angeles was now headed to a Game 7 and it would be an absolute slugfest.

Always appropriate for such occasions was the drunken and rowdy Boston Garden crowd lusting for Laker blood and a fourth straight title. Things started well enough with the Celtics taking a 53-47 halftime lead. As the 3rd quarter progressed, Boston saw their 73-67 lead evaporate in moments as Jerry West reeled off 7 points to ultimately tie the game by the quarter’s end.

Bill Russell, West and Baylor exchanged baskets as the game remained tight. Sam Jones got a key block and recovered from a woeful 1st half (1-10 shooting) to finish the game with 27 points. Although he scored only 10 points for the game, Frank Selvy came up big in the fourth: two steals and two baskets to tie the game at 100 in the final minute.

With the score still tied and 5 seconds left, the Lakers had recovered a Frank Ramsey miss and were now set up for a final shot to end the Celtics dynasty. As West and Baylor drew the lion’s share of the Celtics’ attention, Selvy found himself open on the baseline and Hot Rod Hundley hit him with the pass. Selvy took the jumper, but it was a tad too hard and hit the far side of the rim. Russell secured the rebound and the game went to overtime. The drained Lakers couldn’t overcome Boston in the extra period as Sam Jones dropped 5 points to seal the 110 to 107 victory.

The Celtics had won their 4 straight title and 5th in 6 years. They’d survived by 2 points in Game 7 against Philadelphia in the Eastern Division Finals and now by 3 points in overtime in Game 7 to Los Angeles. And the difference had come down to two shots at the end of regulation in both. Boston’s Sam Jones had hit his last-second shot to defeat Philly, while Los Angeles’ Frank Selvy had missed his chance at eternal glory.

And by the way, Bill Russell had 30 points and 40 rebounds to finish off the Lakers. Now that’s how you close out a series and the marvelous 1962 season.

 

PS – You can  watch Game 7 here

The Lowdown: Kermit Washington

via Los Angeles Times

“Is that Kermit Washington? Oh my God, it’s Kermit Washington!”

Via Nathan Dolezal, wide-eyed basketball fan, former co-host of Ain’t it Funky Now!

Years Active: 1974 – 1982; 1988

Career Stats: 9.2 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 1.1 bpg, 0.8 spg, 52.6% FG, 65.6% FT

Accolades: 1980 NBA All-Star, 2x NBA All-Defensive 2nd Team (1980-81)

So, there I was exiting American University’s radio station after another funky good time on Ain’t it Funky Now! with my good friend and c0-host Nathan Dolezal. As we’re strolling down the hallway, a gargantuan man with a friend of his own is walking a little aimlessly, clearly a bit lost. Instantly, we recognize this as legendary American University Eagle, Kermit Washington. He spots us and very politely asks where the student television station is. We point him in the right direction and he leave us with a simple, soft-spoken “thanks fellas.”

Continue Reading…

The Lowdown: Swen Nater

via nba.com/clippers

“I was going to America to be a cowboy,” [Nater] recalled. “I wanted to be just like Roy Rogers. I thought everybody in the U.S. was a cowboy. I went from an orphanage to a Beverly Hills hotel in 22 hours. I had room service. I didn’t see any cowboys, though.”

Via “Where Are They Now? Swen Nater, former college and NBA center” by Dan Raley

Years Active: 1974 – 1984

Career Stats: 12.4 ppg, 11.6 rpg, 2.0 apg, 0.6 bpg, 0.5 spg,, 53.5% FG, 74.8% FT

Accolades: 1974 ABA Rookie of the Year, 2x All-ABA 2nd Team (1974-75), 1974 ABA Rookie 1st Team, 2x ABA All-Star (1974-75); 1975 ABA RPG Leader, 1980 NBA RPG Leader, 3rd All-Time in RB%

The journey of center Swen Nater to professional basketball is unlike any other. Born in the Netherlands, his mother departed Holland for the United States when he was 3-years old with Swen’s stepfather and one son. Swen, along with a sister, was left behind at an orphanage, waiting for the day their parents saved enough money to send for them. 6 years passed until finally an American television show, It Could Be You, organized the reunion of the Nater family.

Continue Reading…

The Lowdown: Jim McMillian

Jim McMillian

Jim McMillian (#5) between Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Wilt Chamberlain (#13) and Bob Dandridge (#10) / Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Photo via Sports Illustrated for Kids

“An 18 point forward, he is as unnoticed as the butler in a mystery… It’s also unnerving to play someone who looks as if he’s just playing solitaire on the kitchen table all night. Is it put-on? McMillian shakes his head. ‘I have to keep my composure or I can’t be effective. I can’t play if I’m upset.’”

Via “McMillian Out of Character in Laker Basketball Uniform” by Jim Murray

Years Active: 1971 – 1979

Career Stats: 13.8 ppg, 5.3 rpg, 2.5 apg, 1.1 spg, 48.2% FG, 83.2% FT

Accolades: 1972 NBA Champion (Lakers)

Selected 13th overall by the Los Angeles Lakers in 1970, Ivy League standout Jim McMillian had an inauspicious start as he rode the bench behind Jerry West and Elgin Baylor. Also on the team were PG Gail Goodrich and mammoth center Wilt Chamberlain. With 4 future hall of famers, Jim’s services weren’t much needed until Jerry West was lost to injury midway through the season.

The 6’5″ McMillian slid into the starting lineup and was a refreshing revelation, especially as the playoffs began and the stout Chicago Bulls awaited in a titanic 1st round struggle. “I felt all year that once Jimmy got a chance to play, he’d show what a fine basketball player he is.” Well, Gail Goodrich was right. Jimmy showed the world to the tune of 26 points in Game 1, as LA won a nail-biter 100-99 after being down by as much as 17 points. The Bulls were stunned:

Continue Reading…

The Lowdown: Don Nelson

Nellie

Photo via Fan Base

“It’s important to start off good, especially in the other guy’s building,” said Boston forward Don Nelson. “We Need to get the momentum going.” Nelson scored the first six points of the game to give the Celtics all the momentum they needed Thursday night…

Via “Celts Lead All The Way To Defeat Knicks, 94 to 84″ by Howard Smith

Years Active: 1963 – 1976

Career Stats: 10.3 ppg, 4.9 rpg, 1.4 apg, 48% FG, 76.5% FT

Accolades: 5x Champion (1966, ’68-’69, ’74, ’76 Celtics)

Don Nelson is an integral part of the story of the NBA. In some way, shape or form he’s been in the Association for 5 decades. He’s the unorthodox coach who brought us the 80s Milwaukee Bucks that ran off Central Division title after Central Division title. In the Bay Area, he delivered Run-TMC. (Brusquely ignoring his tenure with the Knicks). He resurrected the moribund Dallas Mavericks into perennial contenders. For a final encore he returned to Oakland and slayed the Mavericks in perhaps the most thrilling upset in playoff history. Finally, his eccentrics just turned into plain crazy, but not before becoming the all-time leader in coaching wins.

However, we’re gathered here today to talk about Don Nelson, one of the most winning players in NBA history. As you can see above, his statistics are not eye-popping. He was never tabbed for an all-star game or received an award. But you’ll notice he was a member of 5 NBA champions. Along with John Havlicek, he’s the only member of the Boston Celtics to transition from the 60s dynasty over to the 70s run of glory.

Continue Reading…

It’s A Numbers Thing

Photo courtesy of therapup.net

Artest told Yahoo! Sports he plans to wear No. 70 next season, but the NBA has rules that prevent players from switching their uniform number from year to year. The deadline for a player to change his number is in early March to have it go into effect for the next season and once a number is changed, it has to be worn for five seasons with that team before a player is allowed to change it (unless he is traded to a new team or leaves as a free agent).

Artest wore No. 37 after signing on as a free agent with the Lakers in 2009-10 and did switch to No. 15 last season. It’s not clear what he had to do to accomplish that.

The uniform rule does not come with any stipulations for a name change, however.

If there is a request or circumstance that calls for a number change within the five-year period is approved, it may come with a cost of some kind, according to a league source.

via Los Angeles Lakers’ Ron Artest’s name now officially Metta World Peace – ESPN Los Angeles.

Look, I can’t say I care too much that Ron Artest is changing his name to Metta World Peace. As amusing as it’ll be to see “World Peace” on the back of a dude’s jersey during actual NBA games, I probably won’t start calling him that. Unlike Chad Johnson, who introduced the “Ocho Cinco” nickname informally a couple of years before making it official, Artest is expecting the entire sports world to start calling him by a new, esoteric name over a decade into a career that hasn’t exactly been low-profile.

No, what interested me most from Dave McMenamin’s report on Artest’s name change was the explanation of the process for jersey-number changes, something I’ve always wondered about and been fascinated by. Why does the NBA make players wear the same number for five years? Is it just so they don’t have to print new jerseys to sell? Major League Baseball doesn’t seem to have any rules about this whatsoever. When the Giants acquired Carlos Beltran at this year’s trading deadline, manager Bruce Bochy switched his number from 15 to 16 so that his new power hitter could keep the number he had worn for six years with the Mets. They made the decision at Beltran’s introductory press conference, and both his and Bochy’s new uniforms were ready for the game that night. Considering the NBA’s willingness to bend this rule for its stars (more on LeBron James and Mario Chalmers in a minute), its very existence seems somewhat archaic and unnecessary.

This got me thinking about other noteworthy number changes in recent NBA history, and the reasoning behind them.
Continue Reading…

SHOT FICTION: Dwight Howard Plays Charades

We’re a little worried about this lockout. We want basketball. But in case we don’t get basketball, we’re going to give ourselves a season.

The following is a work of fiction and no one was harmed in the writing of this story. These works will be based on how we think the 2011-12 season would play out if the lockout ended and the NBA is able to play all 82 games. Did you get a chance to read the first installment: Ray Allen’s Last Shot? As with that piece of fiction, we hope the lockout will be over soon and this piece of fiction will be the last.

LOS ANGELES Dec. 11 – It was a typical late-autumn Sunday morning in the Westwood area of Los Angeles. To visitors, the air was crisp and cool. To Los Angelenos, it was cold. The early morning mist from the Pacific still hung in the air, but the late-morning sun had started to burn through. It looked as if it were going to be a day worth enjoying. Many would go for a jog or enjoy brunch al fresco with friends. The most sensible people would sit back and let the day unfold, unplanned, before them. The people gathered here at Pauley Pavilion on UCLA’s campus were not sensible people.

We are sportswriters.

We were at Pauley for the Orlando Magic shootaround, which had been moved there because the NBA was staging one of those Clippers-Lakers day-night Sunday doubleheaders at STAPLES Center that try to make people in Los Angeles forget they don’t have an NFL team. The people who care about that sort of thing, that is.

Reporters from Orlando, Los Angeles and a couple of national scribes milled around, chatting and waiting for the Magic to finish going over defensive assignments to cover the Lakers’ new, non-triangle offense. The writers talked with the faint sound of bouncing basketballs, squeaking sneakers and the tornado-siren-like voice of Stan Van Gundy in the background. The audible activity on the court was muffled by a curtain which kept the observers separate from the performers.

Many of the writers hadn’t seen each other in a while. The complimented each other on each others’ recent articles, asked about each others’ families back home, mentioned Marriott points and reviewed Los Angeles restaurants. Having been in Utah and Phoenix, one Orlando writer said he was glad to be in L.A. so he could have his first decent meal of the trip.

“Where’d you go?” one writer asked.

“In-N-Out,” the Magic reporter said with a smile and both men nodded their heads.

Of course, this revelation initiated a discussion about the merits of In-N-Out vs. Five Guys, which had just opened its first franchise in Central Florida earlier this year. The conversation had just started to get good when a Magic PR flack poked his head around the curtain and motioned the media toward the court.

“To be continued …” one national writer said over his shoulder as the media marched in.

On first glance, what they saw was typical post-shootaround disorganization. A few players worked on free throws. End-of-the-bench big men worked on post moves with assistant coaches. Trainers wrapped knees in ice. The most curious sight, though, was Magic center Dwight Howard, sitting courtside with a towel wrapped around his neck and tucked into his long-sleeved shooting shirt. He was pointing at his throat, mouthing the word “No” and shaking his head whe Magic PR asked him a question.

Magic coach Stan Van Gundy, the coaching lifer, stood on the sideline at midcourt, with a bottle of water, half-gone, in his right hand. Van Gundy, whose salt-and-pepper mustache makes him look far more comic and far less glum than his brother, ESPN NBA analyst Jeff, prepared himself for the media crush. He folded his arms across his chest as if he were a disapproving father waiting at the door to greet the boy coming over to take out daddy’s little girl.

Van Gundy played the part perfectly. He harrumphed and scolded his way through his press conference as only he could. SVG knew why everyone in L.A. was rubbernecking his team. It wasn’t the Magic’s 9-10 record. This was the L.A. media’s first chance to ask about Howard, who has a player option at the end of the season. All signs point to Howard opting out of his deal and seeking employment elsewhere. One of those elsewheres could be with the Lakers, the Magic’s opponent that evening. Would the Magic trade Dwight, as the Nuggets did Carmelo Anthony to the Knicks the year before, to the Lakers in order to get something, anything in return for the three-time defending Defensive Player of the Year? It was only December and nearly every article about the Magic wondered whether Howard wasn’t long for Central Florida.

“Look, we haven’t had discussions about trading Dwight,” Van Gundy said, and reiterated many times during the 10-minute session. “We don’t want to trade Dwight. I know everyone would love to have Dwight on their team. But he plays for the Orlando Magic and as long as I’m coach of the Magic, I want Dwight Howard on our side.

“You can’t replace what he does for us. You just can’t. Why do you think everyone wants him on their team? He’s a unique talent in this league.”

Van Gundy wiped a bead of sweat with the back of his sleeve.

“You guys are the ones speculating in every article,” Van Gundy said as he looked down and shook his head. He shifted his weight from his right foot to his left and then back again as if he were playing defense. “‘Where’s he gonna go?’ ‘Who will we get in return.’”

One Los Angeles writer asked Van Gundy if he and Howard had conversations about Howard wanting out of Orlando.

“We … we don’t talk about that kind of stuff,” Van Gundy said. “I know a lot of you L.A. guys would like Dwight to play for the Lakers. He’s great to coach and fun to cover and he’s good for a good sound bite and a laugh, but he’s with us and will be with us hopefully for a long time.

“I know you have jobs to do and that’s the nature of the business these days is the business of basketball. You guys can have fun with that. You can play your games on TV and in the papers and on the blogs, Twitter or whatever.”

Van Gundy paused, then delivered the blow.

“Hell, you have to have something to write about or else you’d actually have to write about basketball.”

That comment stopped everything cold. The Magic beat writers were accustomed to such barbs about their knowledge of the game itself. They shook it off. But a couple of L.A. writers looked stunned as if Van Gundy reached out and smacked them across the face. One even ran his tongue gingerly over his lip as if he was searching for blood.

It was then a Magic media relations person stepped in. He had some news, bad news for the media. He said Howard wouldn’t speak at shootaround or before the game. Howard had, the PR guy offered, laryngitis.

The media looked at Van Gundy as if he needed to give an explanation. Layrngitis? Van Gundy looked back and shrugged his shoulders.

“All right,” Van Gundy sighed. “Anything else, guys?”

No one had anything else for Van Gundy, but Howard hadn’t moved from his spot on the sideline across the court. To his right, sat Magic point guard and friend, Jameer Nelson. On Howard’s left, another member of the Magic PR department. One brave media member started to make his way across the court. The rest of us followed and Nelson, Howard and the PR flack all looked at the mass moving toward them. The media manager’s eyes narrowed as if he were in a showdown on a dusty Western outpost and he was already at 10 paces. He started to rise off his seat, but Howard reached over and gently patted his arm. Howard nodded and Nelson covered his mouth to stifle a laugh.

“Uh, Dwight …” said the pioneer who started the media migration toward the Magic center.

Howard smiled, pointed to the towel around his neck and threw his hands, palms up, in a silent apology. The media guy glared.

We stood silently, uncomfortably in front of them. Then, Howard held up a finger and asked us for a moment. He leaned over and whispered something to Nelson, who shook his head yes.

“If you want to ask questions,” Nelson offered, “Dwight will answer, and I’ll translate.”

So this was a game. One Orlando writer rolled his eyes. One L.A. writer grunted. Were we game? Seems as if one of us was.

“Will you play tonight?”

Howard nodded his head. “Yes,” Nelson cheerfully responded.

“Are you disappointed with how the season has started for you guys?” was the question.

Howard pouted. Nelson said, “He’s sad.”

“Does it make you want to leave Orlando?”

Howard put two hands over his heart and swooned.

“He loves Orlando,” Nelson said. “Plus, he’d hate leaving me. We were rookies together.”

“How are you and Stan getting along?”

Howard gave two thumbs up and smiled. “Great!” Nelson chirped.

“Have you asked for a trade?”

Howard tilted his head and furrowed his brow.

“C’mon, man,” Nelson said in a tone that implied that not only was Howard not going to dignify the answer with a response, but that it was a stupid question.

Howard then held up two fingers. Nelson said, “Two words.” Howard tugged at Nelson’s sleeve and glared, but smiled while he did it.

“Sorry,” Nelson said. “Two questions.”

“If the Magic continues to slide this season, will you ask for a trade?”

Howard scowled and shook his head. He flexed his biceps and then held out his hand like a traffic cop.

“We’re not going to keep losing,” Nelson said as Howard’s proxy. “We’re going to get it together. I’m going to stay strong and stop this nonsense.”

Howard held up one finger and then made the cut sign. It’s lucky that he did. The last questioner seemed emboldened by the finality of the media session. The last question was a doozy.

“Are you worried that if you come to the Lakers, you’ll be compared to Shaquille O’Neal, that you’ll be following in his footsteps and that you could be seen as being in his shadow if you don’t win a title here? Shaq has been highly critical of you in the past.”

Howard’s jaw dropped and his smile faded. Nelson started to speak, but Howard clamped his hand around Nelson’s wrist. He turned and put up both hands as if to say, “I got this.” Howard cleared his throat and spoke his only words of the interview.

“I’m not answering the L.A. question,” Howard mumbled, “but I love Shaq.”

Moments after the Magic suffered a 110-104 loss to the Lakers — Howard had 21 points, 14 boards and five blocked shots — to drop their record to 9-11, the whole Howard pre-game interview (he did not speak postgame) ran on NBA TV. Shaq, who was making a rare Sunday night appearance in the studio, was asked to comment.

“He doesn’t even mumble as good as me,” Shaq mumbled.

The Lowdown: Lou Hudson

Lou Hudson

Photo from bandofballers.com

…Sweet Lou, sweet as in cool jazz put down by a lightly plucked bass and the hushed swirling of brushes around a drumhead. His skin is the color of light coffee, his features regular and smooth, his temperament equable. His game is heavy on the sugar: there is a gentle rhythm to his constant motion on offense and a classic softness in his jump shot, of which there is none prettier.

Via “He’s Shooting the Works” by Peter Carry

Years Active: 1967-1979

Career Stats: 20.2 ppg, 2.7 apg, 4.4 rpg, 1.4 spg, 49% FG, 80% FT

Accolades: All-NBA 2nd Team (1970), 6x All-Star (1969-74), All-Rookie 1st Team (1967)

Cool Jazz: Lou Hudson was indeed a cool character on the court. His seeming lack of flair is probably to blame for his footnote status in NBA history. To boot, he spent the bulk of his playing days in the cold outer reaches of the basketball universe. First was his collegiate stint at the University of Minnesota under coach John Kundla, who won several titles as coach of the Minneapolis Lakers in the NBA, but achieved little with the Golden Gophers. Second, Hudson was drafted a lofty #4 by the St. Louis Hawks in 1966 after averaging a 20-and-8 with a broken wrist during his senior year at Minnesota.

As you may know, the Hawks are no longer in St. Louis, so any potential myth/narrative/memory of Hudson carrying on the torch lit by Bob Pettit, Ed Macauley & co. was squashed. Third, those Hawks moved to Atlanta in 1968, a city notorious for its fair-weather attitude toward professional sports. However, like a cool, swinging jazz bass, you may not consciously notice Hudson was expertly plying his craft, but just like that bass once you are awakened to Lou’s presence, you deeply dig the groove.

Regular, Smooth, Equable: “Super Lou” spent 13 seasons in the NBA, 11 of which came with the Hawks. Along with Pettit and Dominique Wilkins, he forms the troika of legendary Hawks. Indeed, they are the only ones to have their jerseys retired by the franchise and they all hold the franchise record for points in a single game (57). Hudson also scored the 1st points in Atlanta Hawks history, truly a harbinger of his stay in Georgia. For 7 straight seasons, Hudson averaged at least 22 points a game including five in a row of 25+. The only blips in his steady play came from Uncle Sam drafting him into the army in 1967 allowing Hudson to play in only 48 games that season and then an elbow injury suffered in 1974-75 limiting him to 11 games.

Heavy on the Sugar: “Sweet Lou” got to those prodigious scoring numbers by relying on a jump shot as saccharine as any before or since. He was not a high-flyer, a wizard with the ball, or a bruiser down low. He would just kill you softly with that jumper while his cohorts, Walt Bellamy, Paul Silas and Bill Bridges would punish you down low. The 1st phase of Hudson’s Hawkdom culminated in 1970 when he averaged a healthy 25 points on a blistering 53% shooting. He was named an All-Star starter and to the All-NBA 2nd Team that season. The Hawks as a team also reached its apex losing to the Lakers in the Western Conference Finals. This was the true death of the Hawks’ St. Louis character. The roster would be overhauled, coaches changed and conferences switched during the next two seasons.

Constant Motion: In 1971, on board came Pete Maravich and in 1972 coach Cotton Fitzsimmons. The Hawks made the playoffs both years with a mediocre 36 wins each time, but Cotton was on to an offensive scheme from heaven. “Pistol Pete” was given free reign to wheel and deal, so long as he sought out “Super Lou” who was to ceaselessly move without the ball: cutting to the hoop, dashing around screens, being Reggie Miller before there was Reggie Miller. Their synchronicity was ridiculously productive. In 1973, they became only the 2nd pair of teammates to score 2,000 points a piece for a season. That ’73 season, with Walt Bellamy the only interior holdover, the Hawks put together a strong season of 46 wins and were finally legit playoff participants. Such was their luck that they faced off with the Boston Celtics (the most forgotten about 68-win team ever) that postseason.

Hudson played his heart out averaging nearly 30 points and 8 rebounds but Boston triumphed in 6 games. This proved to be the highlight of the Hawks sudden resurgence. The team regressed to 35 wins in 1974, Maravich was traded in ’75 and Lou went down with his elbow injury that same year. As the Hawks sank ever deeper, Sweet Lou at the age of 32 was traded to the Lakers for the 1977-78 season. Two relatively productive seasons as a reserve were followed by retirement in 1979. Maybe hanging around for one more season and getting a ring with the 1980 Lakers would have salvaged a bit more of a popular legacy for Hudson, but really, what else was left for Sweet Lou to prove?

 

Dirk Nowitzki: A Softy We Can Get Behind

There’s such a stigma about softness in the NBA. It’s commonplace to idolize those players who embody toughness, who sweat blood, who play through pain, who seek out contact like Eddy Curry seeks out all-you-can-eat buffets, who fear no opponent. Now it’s just as normal to belittle the finesse players — the ones who spare viewers the macho routine, who don’t need to feel dominant to play basketball.

Basketball is a sport of grace, that requires the utmost focus and skill — the greatest player will be a meticulous tactician, a heady player who knows what he’s doing. Basketball is a game of grace and fluidity, but it seems that those qualities can only be appreciated if there’s a ferocity underscoring them.

It’s really not surprising that the embrace of manliness has come to the fore. As the NBA has evolved, the game has become decreasingly physical, metamorphosing from a game primarily defined by bruisers to a game appreciably defined by skill. Many feel a need for sports to be contests of strength and hatred for one’s opponents, so it makes sense that these fans would cling to those aspects of classic basketball and long for more of that style.

In the same way, these same people can’t help but berate those who act counter to their desires. Deviation from that course of aggression and physicality is inherently wrong, and those players who choose that alternate route must be ridiculed relentlessly for their decision. After all, they’re a bunch of sissies, obviously.

Not even getting in to the social concerns with some of these softness labels (words like “woman” and “pussy” come to mind), a trend has developed over the years in which the players coming over from Europe are necessarily soft, for it has to be a product of nationality, not training regiment, amateur-basketball factors, or anything else. (Or maybe it’s just that Americans are intolerant of other cultures and want to flaunt their “superiority.” Either way.) That is why there’s always a slight preoccupation with drafting foreign prospects or giving them a chance on an NBA roster.

It is true that this dubious nature has not just surfaced as a result of neanderthals’ preconceived notions, as European players have not had the greatest track record in the NBA. But the change in the physical nature of the game is only one cause of failure for international prospects. Rule differences, season length, cultural boundaries, and many other adjustments have a hand in the development or lack of development for these players.

Along with the clear division between the tough guys and the “wusses,” let’s say, there’s another duality that develops: the guys who live to hurt and get hurt are the icons of basketball — that is, they’re good. The ninnies? They’re just bad at basketball. There’s no better illustration for this phenomenon than Laker Nation’s treatment of Pau Gasol over the last four seasons.

In 2008, when the Lakers lost, he was a creampuff (an efficient one, at that, but damn me to hell if that matters — they lost!) who was helpless to succeed because he couldn’t handle the grind of the game. In 2009 and 2010, when the Lakers won, he broke free and somehow instantly became tough. This year, they lost again, and Pau was back to playing for the London Silly Nannies.

There’s a statistical correlation between Gasol’s success and the Lakers’ success in those four postseasons, and there’s no way that other factors could’ve possibly had an impact on his vacillating play. There’s no way Bynum’s absence in 2008 hindered him at all. There’s no way the team’s abandonment of the triangle offense limited Gasol’s play in 2011. He’s just too much of a pansy to handle it all.

This is interesting, though: it seems as if choosing whether to call a player soft or not is a matter of convenience. When it helps to excuse a player’s performance as a product of his cotton-candy nature, that’s just fine. When his performance need not be excused, though, his softness is no longer a topic of discussion. So …

What if the NBA had someone who exemplified the qualities of these players that are routinely labeled softies — but managed to use that softness to his advantage to dominate in the NBA? These playoffs have solidified one guy’s nomination for this role. That guy would be Dirk Nowitzki.

When you think soft, Nowitzki isn’t typically someone who comes to mind. After all, he screams, growls at his opponents, and likes to pump up the crowd. But take a look at his game.

This is a guy who has developed his jumper to have a natural fade on it, such that he falls away from opponents when he shoots. He had nine dunks all year. He attempted fewer shots per game at the rim than Tyler Hansbrough. He doesn’t really jump to contest shots. He shoots a lot of free throws, but many of the fouls he takes are slight taps on his arms, not Andrew Bynum-style maulings. You’ll often see him getting knocked off balance by smaller defenders in the post. And you don’t seem him intimidating other teams with hard fouls himself on defense.

You would attribute a lot of those characteristics to the wuss category, so perhaps it’s not the way that these guys play the game that makes people call them soft. Maybe a player has to be bad in order to be considered soft. Maybe we’re willing to look past finesse play so long as it results in wins.

There is no doubt people looked at Dirk in a different light just five years ago, when Dwyane Wade went off in the 2006 Finals, and the Mavericks crumbled after a confidence-building 2-0 lead in the series. Dirk was seen as soft then. The next year, after the Mavericks embarrassingly bowed out to the Warriors in a 1-8 upset in the first round, Dirk was still soft like ice cream. Now, though, no one’s saying that, even while his game has barely changed.

All this talk has surfaced lately about where Nowitzki ranks among all players in the league’s history, with some endeavoring to contend that he belongs in the all-time top 10. Whether or not that’s accurate, it might make some people realize that one of the greatest players to ever touch the hardwood is someone who has been called a weakling.

Maybe Nowitzki is the guy who can make it cool to be soft, who can break that mold of needing to be tough, who can be that graceful tactician without any underlying support of a grizzly nature.

Here’s to changing the culture of basketball for the better, Dirk.

Coping With Powerful Distractions

Photo Courtesy of Nuzz on Flickr

*                      *                    *

Clutch performance has been a touchy subject this season. There are the typical statistical arguments, eye-test arguments, and those based on everything imaginable in between. But it is really worth debating the best pressure performers?

The recent end-of-game shots by a pair of the league’s star players have foregrounded this question. Derrick Rose shot 4-of-18 from the field in Game 3 against the Pacers, but he hit a game-winning layup. LeBron James scored 31 points on 55 percent shooting in Game 4 vs. the Sixers but missed a key floater late in an eventual Heat loss.

It’s natural, then, to call Rose the success and LeBron the failure in these cases, as the Bulls won and the Heat did not, consistent with those final shots. Fundamentally, that’s fair. But the full-game execution of these players seems to suggest that the boundary between triumph and futility is maybe not so lucid.

The final minutes of games draw the most attention as they often noticeably influence results, and that is why top players’ execution down the stretch is so frequently subject to scrutiny. With that said, the appeal of these late-game scenarios distracts most viewers from the truth of clutch production: it’s totally overemphasized.

An oft-ignored basic principle of basketball is that the value of shots does not vary with respect to the progress of the game. Two points is two points, whether they come five seconds after the tipoff or find the net with just seconds left to play. The perceived significance of missed shots in the early going is usually negligible, as those flubs are often forgotten by the time of the game at which it is possible to process their negative impact — especially if the consequences of those misses are neutralized by late-game makes. But in many cases, if a player had passed up an ill-advised shot that did not fall in favor of a high-percentage look during a low-pressure moment, the make-up basket in the clutch would not have been necessary.

In other words, if the goal of basketball is to win games, maximizing output and efficiency at the end of games should not be the goal, for in an ideal situation the preceding portion of the game should preclude the necessity of “big” shots. When a particular team plays well in the first 46 minutes of its games, its only task in the final two minutes is to protect a lead rather than to escape a deficit with heroics.

Here’s a rudimentary illustration to demonstrate this.

(Owing to the divisive nature of this topic, bringing up specific names here would only be counterproductive — as loyalty-driven commentary would do nothing more than muddy the dialectic — so it’s wise to deal only in generalities.)

Take two players, X and Y, in two separate games with entirely equivalent final box scores, who each notch 30 points. Player X scores all 30 of his points before the one-minute mark of the fourth quarter, at which point his team is up three points. Player Y, however, only scores 24 of his 30 points before that one-minute mark, at which point his team is down three points. Player X doesn’t shoot in the final minute, but his team still wins by three. Player Y hits two three-pointers, including a tiebreaking buzzer beater, and his team also wins by three.

Player Y is the one you’re going to see in the highlights, the one whose crunch-time accomplishments will be the talk of the NBA community at large for the next day. But Player Y didn’t put his team in the best position to win. It was Player X who hit his shots early, avoiding a predicament that required an “exciting” shot; the situation merely required holding a lead. Maybe Player X is the better winner, then, however counterintuitive that realization is. After all, his performance increased the likelihood of a win for this team compared to Player Y’s, as it’s certainly easier to hold a lead than to recover from trailing.

With all that said, it’s easy to make a claim that is entirely dependent on inference and conjecture. Bolstering the case further, though, is the argument’s practical traction.

Consider the following teams: the Miami Heat, the Los Angeles Lakers, the Chicago Bulls, the San Antonio Spurs, the Boston Celtics, and the Orlando Magic. Arguably the six best teams in the NBA this season, right? They were also the top six teams in the league in scoring differential after three quarters (Thanks to @snghoops for pointing this out) at the end of the regular campaign. Meanwhile, those same squads were 12th, 15th, 17th, 5th, 28th, and 14th, respectively, in fourth-quarter output. Put simply, the NBA’s elite teams do their work early on in games such that they can put scoring on the back burner: all they are tasked with late is protecting a lead. Indisputably, taking care of business early in contests has more than just a theoretical association with success.

Of course, any team, irrespective of its performance, will invariably find itself down by a slim margin late in some games. In those cases, someone to hit key shots would, in fact, be valuable given short-term considerations. (In the playoffs, this excellence might take on extra importance in accordance with the greater gravity of each contest.)

But nothing in basketball is free of exception. It’s about swaying the odds as far as possible in one’s favor. No team is going to hold its opponents to 0 percent shooting, but it would much rather have them shooting 40 percent than 50 percent. Similarly, no team will completely avoid scenarios in which it needs a final shot to win, but minimizing that reliance is optimal. The team that performed the best during standard, “non-clutch time” would have a leg up in that regard and simply let clutch situations take care of themselves.

It would be challenging, probably impossible, to find a coach in the NBA that would prefer to win every game on a last-second shot than to win comfortably, especially in the long term — assuming, again, the coach’s principal goal is to win.

So the apparent discrepancy that allows the clutch movement to gain momentum is this: the interest of fans is not always compatible with the most efficient, reliable way to win a basketball game.

Sports ethicist Edwin DeLattre is one that believes there is an inherent need for excitement in successful competition. He writes:

“Whether amidst the soft lights and the sparkling balls against the blaize of a billiard table, on the rolling terrain of a lush fairway or in the violent and crashing pit where linemen struggle, it is the moments when no let-up is possible, when there is virtually no tolerance for error, which make the game. The best and most satisfying contests maximize these moments and minimize respite from pressure. When competition achieves this intensity it frequently renders the outcome of the contest anticlimactic, and it inevitably reduces victory celebration to pallor by contrast … Exclusive emphasis on winning has particularly tended to obscure the importance of the quality of the opposition and the thrill of competition itself” (From William Morgan’s Ethics in Sport, Second Edition).

At their most basic, professional sports are meant to entertain fans, to inspire awe with spectacular athletic feats. For DeLattre, the power and frequency of the entertainment is enough to belittle the end result of the game. As it happens, the plays in close games tend to amplify the greatness of players’ actions, as fans identify with the struggle of their teams. Clutch shots provide a feeling of release that enhances the sports-viewing experience for most. Accordingly, many people find it necessary to dissect particular players’ success in these situations. After all, who wouldn’t want to watch the most dramatic actors in the league?

Just remember this: these clutch performances are great for the league and the viewer, but that’s about it. Tense late-game scenarios certainly aren’t sought out with winning in mind. Before anointing your player of choice the King of Clutch, it might be worth it to revisit how meaningful that title really is and what your view of success in sport really reduces to.

Page 1 of 812345»...Last »