Four points guards on the roster. Who do the Clippers think they are, the Minnesota Timberwolves? Not to mention three of which are All-Stars. How do you get that many potentially fragile egos on the court successfully?
The obvious place to start is with Chauncey Billups at the 2-spot, which actually makes complete sense, as outlined by also-traded-(back)-to-the Clippers-from-the-Heat Kevin Arnovitz. Chauncey at the starting SG was my immediate reaction as well, so it was nice to see some additional supportive numbers to what the eyeball test had indicated. Billups has always been a shoot-first point anyhow — an approach that’s served he and his teams well throughout his career.
But, what about Mo?
My initial reaction was that Williams is also a shoot-first PG-type, so where does he fit into this all? HP’s own Amin Vafa took a look into the potential of this blowing up in the Clips’ faces, but Mo insists he isn’t going anywhere anytime soon (well, unless he was hacked. Again). We all realize Vinny D isn’t exactly the brightest boat on the bay, and the current Clippers backcourt depth chart reads thus…
…which isn’t helping anyone, especially the development factor of Bledsoe. Let’s slide Mo over as the primary backup at shooting guard and see if his history compares favorably to such a switch as it has in Billups’ case.
First stop was 82 Games, which has breakdowns of players’ Production by Position, where we find Mo actually played better as a 2 than a 1 for both the Clippers and Cavaliers. But, small sample-sized? How do the numbers hold up over a larger sample size?
From 2008-09 to present (Mo was traded last year from Cleveland to Los Angeles)
Mo Williams as a SG
PER 18.7, Per-48 Min PPGÂ 27.4, Per-48 Min APG 7.3, % Team Minutes 11.5%, Win% 48%
Mo Williams as a PG
PER 15.7, Per-48 Min PPG 21.8, Per-48 Min APG 8.1, % Team Minutes 32.0%, Win% 53%
• PER has been better as a SG than a PG every team, every year
• Played a higher % of team’s positional minutes at the SG than PG in Cleveland before traded to the LAC in 2010-11 season
• Number of assists at either position is negligible, and in fact has posted more dimes as a SG two times
• His team’s Win% is not largely affected by which backcourt position he’s played, overall
• Has twice posted a higher Win% as a SG than as a PG
• Best PER posted as a SG for CLE in 08-09, 22.0
• Most PPG per-48 posted as a SG for LAC in 10-11, 30.6
• Most assists posted per-48 as a SG for CLE in 10-11, 12.1
• 08-09 Mo played 23% of the Cavs SG minutes. That Cleveland team went 66-16 and went to the Eastern Conference Finals
Whenever Chris Paul needs a breather the Clippers can rest assured that they have a plethora of capable points to spell him — indeed, the ClipShow easily boasts the deepest backcourt in the NBA, with four fellas that can feed Blake Griffin at any given time, a formidable threat. Should they have need, the Clips could throw out a different All-Star point guard for 120 consecutive minutes.
And both Billups and Williams are more-than-capable shooting guards. No need to squabble.




