web analytics
<
Tag Archive - Taj Gibson

Stinkface Chronicles: Kiss My Tail Lights

Taj Gibson and Kirk Gibson are, as far as I can tell, of no relation. Gibson (Taj) is a black 6-foot-9 power forward who plays for the Bulls while Gibson (Kirk) is a white 6-3 former major league baseball player who now manages an MLB team in Arizona that plays in a park with a pool in it.

The only connections the two share are their last name and, either through choice or genetics or a combination of the two, both men are bald.

But after Game 1 of the Eastern Conference finals, the two Gibsons have become connected in another way. Each man proved that people leave games early at their peril. You may miss something spectacular.

Something as spectacular as Gibson’s (Taj) one-handed putback slam.

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOOeMg7eqYM&feature=relmfu w=640 h=390]

Now, wasn’t that a thing of athletic beauty? Gibson (Taj) grabs the ball as it is about six inches below the rim and about four feet from the hoop. I’m no sports scientist, but the physics involved with this thunderous slam are exceptional. So is the reaction of the TNT crew of Marv Albert, Steve Kerr and Reggie Miller. From Albert’s simple, “TAJ … GIB-SON!” to Kerr’s “Ohhhhhh!” to Miller laughing, there wasn’t much to say in real time.

(Of course Miller couldn’t resist going over the top with his “I’ve been to the mountaintop,” “analysis” during the replay. I can’t give NBA.com credit for much, but thankfully they excised that from the above highlight.)

Beside the dunk itself and that LeBron James, on the Heat bench, had to stop biting his nails so that his jaw could drop, what’s most interesting to me in the highlight is the gentleman in the gray along the baseline behind the photographers. In real time, he’s walking away just as Gibson (Taj) hammers it home. He turns his head around as soon as Gibson and Bulls fans blow the roof off the barn.

He just missed the most electrifying dunk of the game. (Some, including Dwyane Wade’s own son, would disagree with that assessment.)

You can also feel for the two team attendants who were folding towels next to the Heat bench. They missed it too, but at least they were doing their job, unlike the man in the gray.

Upon further viewing, you can see the man in the gray was more than likely supposed to be watching. He’s a photographer who leaves his position just as C.J. Watson launches the three that Gibson slams home. Instead of capturing Gibson in mid-flight, he’s been caught in mid-flight. Now, he may have been finished for the night or had a specific assignment that didn’t require him to stay put for the whole 48. Let’s just hope that was the case and that his editor didn’t ask the following: “Did you get Gibson’s putback slam? It symbolizes everything the Bulls did in the second half: offensive rebounds, distinct advantage in the paint, exceptional effort for the whole game. I’d like to use that on A1. You got that, right?”

That’d be tough to explain.

Gibson’s (Taj) putback slam and the photog’s early escape reminded me of another “wish I had been there for that Gibson moment” moment. That would be Kirk Gibson’s game-winning homer off Dennis Eckersley in Game 1 of the 1988 World Series. Most fans remember a gimpy Gibby, Vin Scully’s excellent description (“Talk about a roll of the dice.”) and the drama that followed.

Someone, however, missed that drama. L.A. fans — unlike fans in Chicago — have the reputation of arriving late and leaving early, as if the game is just another stop on their busy SoCal social schedule. To their credit, most fans remained at Dodger Stadium to see if their club could erase a one-run deficit against the game’s best closer.

At 3:53 in this highlight (sorry, MLBAM’s ridiculous restrictions on video continue), you can see a pair of tail lights under the pavilion roof as right fielder Jose Canseco stops between the 370 and 360 signs in right field. Those lights belong to the sucker or suckers who immediately rued the decision to beat traffic and listen to the rest of the game on the radio.

“Hey, you went to the game last night. That was the best. Where were you sitting?”

“In my car. I wanted to beat the traffic out of the stadium”

“They had a man on and Gibson (Kirk) at the plate.”

“But traffic…”

“Idiot.”

Using Gibson’s homer as inspiration, a Dodgers team that didn’t have much offense or talent as the A’s, used pitching, defense, hustle and grit to take the series in five. If you squint, you could substitute NBA MVP Derrick Rose for the whole Dodgers pitching staff — in the fact that like a pitcher, Rose has the ball in his hands and he controls the tempo of the game — the Bulls have plenty of defense, hustle and grit.

Gibson’s (Taj) putback slam will never have the historical impact of Gibson’s (Kirk’s) homer. Some could see it as just another blow to the already dead high horse the Heat rode in on. But Gibson’s (Taj) dunk punctuated the message the Bulls were trying to send to the Heat in Game 1, and to NBA fans who didn’t give them much of a chance: “We’ll be here ’til the end. Don’t go anywhere. You may miss something good.”

The Devil Is In The Details. Ricky Davis, Too.

Simmons: “I hate adjusted plus-minus. I just think it’s stupid. Is this even a stat you guys are messing around with, do you take it seriously, where do you stand?”

Morey: “Well, I think it’s something to look at. I always think of, you know, all these things are just different views, nothing perfect. There’s never going to be any sort of analysis that will isolate how good a player is.”

The B.S. Report Podcast Bill Simmons – The Sports Guy – Page 2 – ESPN.

I continue to marvel at how people think that just because you use a stat for an analysis that it’s somehow proclaiming that is the end-all, be-all. Rest assured, there are guys who take that approach (Winston), but for the most part, any numbers guy is going to tell you that A. you can’t just look at one measure, and B. you can’t just look at the numbers and make conclusions. What’s interesting is that conversely, most “WATCH THE GAMES!” fools will not tell you the same. They won’t say that “well, you should look at the numbers to see if your perceptions are accurate.”

An example: I tend to be pretty unimpressed with Eric Gordon. I think he’s an undersized dude that launches too many 18 footers, and is basically Ben Gordon before he started thinking he was the best and only offensive option on the floor and started hijacking possessions like they were lost tourists.

But then I look at his numbers. And he doesn’t take a lot of 16-23 footers. He just doesn’t. He’s 20th among shooting guards playing 30+ minutes a game per 40 in attempts from there. And the natural thing would be to say, “Well, Matt, it’s pretty clear you suck at watching basketball.” Which is probably true. But it stuns me that people think they’re so good that they don’t need any other information to inform them. If you’re not a professional scout, it’s pretty likely you’re missing some stuff.

Another example, that presents more of the nebulous nature of this stuff: Tyrus Thomas (who we’ll talk about in a post later). I’m talking to Ziller and defending Taj Gibson, who I think does exactly what Vinny Del Negro wants him to do. If you think that’s the problem, that’s fine, but I can’t fault a coach for playing the guy who does what he’s supposed to versus the guy who randomly goes rogue in search of the weakside block, mopes, and in general is a pain to deal with. Just can’t do it. But Ziller points out that his defensive rating is off the charts every year since he entered the league. In short, the Bulls play better defense when he’s on the floor, and that’s just kind of it. He’s got the blocks, he’s got the steals, which aren’t indicative of good defense, necessarily, but when paired with his defensive rating, it’s really difficult to argue with. He’s a big, aggressive defender that blocks a lot of shots and when he’s on the floor, the defense gives up fewer points. I don’t know how to argue with that, even though I’ve watched Thomas get completely lost on plays, thoroughly give up on possessions, freelance way too much, and of course, he was surrounded by good defensive players on a good defensive team.

So which is it? Is Tyrus Thomas an awesome defensive player that just wasn’t getting playing time? Or a headcase that was covered by the Bulls’ defense and Gibson deserved time? That opinion’s going to fluctuate, from person to person, and it’s likely that Thomas’ performance in Charlotte will end up impacting the answer, when it shouldn’t.

The central point here is something Morey talks about later, which is that the teams at least very rarely use these tools to determine whether a player is good or not. They’re descriptors. And people that know what they’re doing use them that way. For example, saying, Player A’s PER is better than Player B’s PER, so Player A is a better player than Player B is both false and short-sighted. But, if you’re examining what player is the weakest of your starting five, and one player has a significantly sub-15 PER, that’s at least going to point you in the right direction. And that’s if it’s a writer, not a team. A team’s looking at lineups, potential compatability, situational stats, etc.

Long story short, the polarization of this issue muddles the value on both sides. If I tell a stat guy, “But I’ve seen him play! He doesn’t defend well!” they respond with an insinuation that I’m pulling the “WATCH THE GAMES!” card that’s thrown out there with no further thought to the implications. If I use numbers to prove a point, I get drowned with “WATCH THE GAMES!”

Hopefully, the Sloan Conference will help provide context, as Morey states in the podcast. Not that I get to go. Sigh.

God Sends The Bulls A Flood Warning, A Rowboat, And A Helicopter. They Run Back Inside Their House.

3. Chicago Bulls 85 – Oklahoma City Thunder 98

Date: 1/4/10

CHI at-rim: (24 – 53), 45.3 percent, 29 missed

The Bulls missed more shots at the rim than the normal team attempts on any given night. Just stunning. Granted, when you take a league-high 53 shots at the basket, you’re gonna miss your fair share. The Bulls were assisted on only 9 of their 24 field goals there so most of them likely came off of penetration and offensive rebounds. The Thunder only blocked 9 of the 29 misses which leaves 20 that were straight up errant. As I noted earlier this year when I profiled the Thunder, they allow a ton of shots at the basket but teams find little success in actually converting the chip-ins. This game serves as a microcosm of the Thunder squad.

via Hoopdata – The Missed Bucket List: The 5 Worst Performances At the Rim.

HoopData runs down the worst at-rim performances of the season. And the Bulls are popular attendees.

Can you really be successful if you don’t convert at the rim? Should the Bulls consider that before they go trading for a wing?

You can’t really look at Noah and believe he’s going to evolve into someone you can give the ball to and expect him to score consistently. That’s no knock on Noah. He’s doing everything else so well this season, if he had low-post back-to-basket moves he’d be a top flight player in this league. But Brad Miller’s the other heavy-rotation big and he loathes the paint and loves the top of the key, while Taj Gibson’s too measley to make an impact (and he’s inefficient).

The Bulls need a substantial makeover, and it’s going to take more than just one big free agent to fix it if they want to contend for a title… whenever the Lakers get done pwning everyone.

Podcast Paroxysm 12.09.09: What’s The Point Of The Bulls?

In this episode Matt from Blogabull.com stops by to talk about Bulls’ fans overall skepticism and exactly how hopeless this franchise is. So basically, it’s the hap-hap-happiest podcast you’ve ever seen in your life! This was recorded right after the Nets’ loss so you can really feel the anger and disappointment fester. Such beautiful moments.

Oh, and check us on iTunes, sweetheart. You’ll never love anyone like you love us.