web analytics
<
Tag Archive - The Lost Season

The Lost Season: Richard Dumas, 92-93

Photo from pinaryoldas via Flickr

With the threat of a shortened or even cancelled season upon us, there is very little we can do to restore a shred of basketball into our lives. What we can do, though, is reminisce over other “lost” seasons. Seasons which saw players or teams achieve extraordinary things that go beyond titles or awards, only to fade back into the background one year later. Here we will bring the tale of these lost seasons, the ones that touched us on a personal level, the ones we will never forget, though history itself might.

Previously on The Lost Season: Boris Diaw, 05-06, Bobby Simmons, 04-05, Seattle Supersonics, 04-05, Spencer Haywood, 69-70, and Tracy McGrady, 02-03. 

This edition is about Richard Dumas.  

The amygdala

The amygdala is a small, almond-shaped structure within the brain. Researchers have observed its role in processing and storing memory of emotional reactions. The amygdalae influence how resonant a memory will be depending on the event’s emotional impact.

So when our eyes light up as we discuss the moments when basketball made us believe in love and magic, that’s the right amygdala lighting up, rediscovering every detail of the event as though it were the first time. But it won’t be the first time. It’ll be the hundredth, maybe thousandth time. Some memories we’ll never let go of.

As fans, it’s the gift that lays the foundation for our zeal.

For Richard Dumas, it was the demon he couldn’t outrun and couldn’t confront alone. It was the demon that chased him out of a potentially dominant career in basketball.

The right amygdala is important. Keep this in mind.

Perhaps Richard Dumas needs a reintroduction.

It’s been more than 18 years since his immortal Game 5 performance in the 1993 NBA Finals. In the game’s defining play, Michael Jordan drives left and runs into traffic. As he attempts to get his shot off over an outstretched Oliver Miller, Dumas swipes at the ball, knocking it out of Jordan’s hands and into Danny Majerle’s. He pushes the ball up court and throws a chest pass to a furiously sprinting Dumas for an uncontested, game-clinching dunk. For one series — and it was a great series to choose — Richard Dumas became one of the Phoenix Suns’ most valuable players.

His own words:

“My greatest moment in basketball? That’s easy. Game 5 of the Finals,” Dumas recalls. “I blocked Michael Jordan’s shot and then took it to the other end and got a dunk. Jordan said I fouled him. There was no foul.”

via Reflections of ‘the best’ | Bill Haisten, Tulsa World (8/18/03)

Along with Wayman Tisdale and Blake Griffin, he is considered to be one of the best (if not the best) basketball talents the state of Oklahoma has produced. Then why is the utterance of his name always followed by a “what happened to that guy?”

The answer lies in one simple and terribly complicated word — Drugs.

“From junior high on, I don’t think Richard ever played a game when he wasn’t under the influence of something,” said Suns coach Paul Westphal. “He thought playing high made him better, and that he couldn’t play unless he used something.”

via Suns’ Dumas drug-free and looking unstoppable |  Terry Pluto, Knight-Ridder (3/1/93)

When substance abuse plays just as large of a role as basketball in your adolescent development, you’re asking for a future duel between a love and an uncontrollable compulsion. And when you’re forced to face it alone at such a young age, the compulsions will always win.

A unique compromise

Several of SI’s panelists answered this week’s question — who is this season’s most surprising rookie? – with a question of their own: “That Richard Dumas guy,” they asked. “Is he a rookie?”

via Inside the NBA | Jack McCallum, Sports Illustrated (3/8/93)

Dumas wasn’t a typical rookie. He was old for his class, left college early (on drug violations) and fled to Israel to play basketball professionally. He was drafted in the second round in 1991 not for a lack of talent, but because there were already serious doubts about his sobriety. Typical rookies, whether they play or not, find their way onto the team’s bench. Dumas was suspended for the entire 91-92 season for failure to pass a mandatory drug test.

But when he was able to step foot on court as a Sun for the first time in December of ’92, his transition to higher level basketball was seamless. Among peers and superiors, he fit right in.

Watching old game footage, it struck me how Dumas had the skill set of a perfect “stretch-4″ in today’s game. He had the body of a prototypical wing — 6’8″ with a 7’2″wingspan, with long legs and fantastic explosiveness off one or two feet, but the power and mannerisms of a modern power forward. If a current-day NBA comparison had to be made, it’d be a rich man’s (and we’re talking in the billions here) Hakim Warrick. But Warrick could only dream of having Dumas’ hands and basketball IQ.

And yet, it would be criminal to label Dumas a “tweener.”  He was incredibly agile; quick enough to guard either wing position. His complete lack of a three-point shot might’ve been a worry for any other team, but the Suns had an interesting dynamic with Charles Barkley and Dumas, essentially running two power forwards in the starting lineup. Dumas’ allergies behind the arc were masked by Chuck’s growing fascination with the line. That isn’t to say Dumas had no perimeter skills. His jumper from 20 feet and in was accurate in spot up and standstill positions (his jumper off the dribble was still a work in progress). Watching Dumas play is like entering one of Derrick Williams’ dream sequences — a dream where Williams is fast enough to keep up with point guards, let alone opposing small forwards; where possessing the skills of multiple positions isn’t considered a stigma. Williams will face questions about his position for as long as he’s in Minnesota. Dumas, due to talent and a bit of luck landing in the perfect situation, was able to thrive in his rookie season as a true hybrid forward.

“You don’t know what I’m going to do. Because I don’t.”

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25qWrha3crU&t=5m39s]

If the play at 5:39 looks familiar, maybe it should. Track the motion, the gait, the strides. The play itself is nothing too impressive, though I found myself watching it repeatedly. Dumas catches the ball at the top of the key, puts his head down, and takes a few dribbles before going up for a layup. This isn’t a good example of his athleticism (he is a far more powerful leaper than the clip indicates), or his ball handling skills. Watch it again at the 5:39 mark. There is patience in his movements, as if he’s finding the perfect angle of attack. The move — it’s Amar’e Stoudemire, isn’t it?  There’s are shades of Kevin Garnett in the move’s deceptive power in both stride and elevation (or maybe it’s the lank), as he makes Scottie Pippen look like a fool. That would become a motif during the entire ’93 Finals.

Richard Dumas is bemused when he hears the description of himself as Julius Erving with a jump shot. “I really don’t think about it,” the Phoenix Suns’ rookie forward said. “It’s nice to have people think of my ability that way. But I just go out there. I have my own style of play. It’s the type of style where you don’t know what I’m going to do. Because I don’t.”

via NOTEBOOK; Suns Rookie Dumas Turns It Up and Around | David Aldridge, Washington Post (6/11/93)

It was John Lucas II, Dumas’ former mentor and rehabilitation coach, that called him “Dr. J with a jump shot.” Lucas wasn’t shy with handing out superlatives, but he wasn’t the only one voicing positive sentiments. After Dumas dropped 20 points in Game 1 of the ’93 Finals, Pippen noted that Dumas’ talent had surprised him. High praise from one of the best defenders in NBA history.

Dumas mentions his offensive unpredictability, and to a degree, it’s true. Watching a game, it’s clear that most of Dumas’ skills were at rudimentary levels. In the post, where he was extremely effective against Pippen, it wasn’t the footwork or the spin moves that edged his opponent, it was the crafty angles of his floaters and hooks. He was a basketball natural, but not in the same vein as someone like Tracy McGrady. He wasn’t impossibly graceful, nor did he possess a refined offensive game. But he knew how to score, and he knew how to score decisively in spite of his still-fledgling skills. There wasn’t an area on the court that Dumas favored over another, which forced defenders to guard him honestly.

But if there was anything that that proved exceptional right from the beginning, it’s his hands. Oh my. His hands. They’re enormous, and they simply did not fail him. Playing with Barkley and Kevin Johnson meant not operating with the ball in your hands, but it also meant having to anticipate some ridiculous passes when you’re open. Dumas was excellent on cuts, and in the sparingly-run pick and roll. In an offense that featured him more prominently, Dumas would’ve been a consistent weapon in the two man game.

When you’re able to catch anything that comes your way, scoring is essentially a given as long as you know where to be. Dumas knew the game, and he knew his team. And he gladly racked up the opportunities that lay hidden behind the more impressive résumés on the roster.

Unfinished work kept in the cellar

Dumas wasn’t without weakness. He wasn’t a good defender, especially when guarding the wings. A proper defensive stance was neglected for the most part, so most side-steps eluded him. Gambling on defense was an all-too-common occurrence given Dumas’ superior length and size. And while it was effective for the most part (he averaged 1.8 steals a game), it wasn’t a stretch to call him a liability against more experienced scorers.

It didn’t happen often, but Dumas struggled when he was asked to create his own shot. His jump shot’s stylistic doppelganger today would be Udonis Haslem’s — not exactly someone you think of when you think of shooting off the dribble. Both have an extremely high release point, but there is a slight stagger before and during the release, which not only slows down the shot, but makes it fairly inconsistent under duress.

Dumas also didn’t show much in terms of advanced ball-handling or passing ability, though both made cameos in transition plays. In his one real season as an NBA player, Dumas seemed fixed on offering just a glimpse of his real abilities as a player. Almost two decades later, those who remember his game are still smitten.

When Dumas throws a no-look pass to a trailing Ainge on the break, what does that mean? When he escapes the clutches of his defender by going behind the back, was just a spur-of-the-moment type of maneuver? Or was it an assertion of better times ahead?

Who was Richard Dumas, the player?

And how does one cope knowing that the questions one has will never be answered?

Where risk and reward converge

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IURqTyBHAwY]

The past is never too far behind.

[John] Lucas knows that one slip-up can be a disaster, how being a recovering addict means every moment is like leading by one, the other team with the ball.

via Lucas and the Separation of Life, Basketball | Michael Wilbon, Washington Post (5/20/93)

Three months after Dumas’ incredible Finals performance, he once again found himself suspended from the league for failure to comply with his rehabilitation guidelines. Current Suns chairman Jerry Colangelo (and president/part-owner at the time) saw his patience wear out completely. For Colangelo, it was a failed experiment — it was grounds for severance.

Harvey Araton of the New York Times rebuked Colangelo’s stance on the matter, implicating substance abuse as a serious affliction:

To embrace Colangelo’s thinking is to define Dumas’s setback as nothing more than capricious binging. It is to reduce a human being to a bottom-line investment turned sour, and to dismiss a painful struggle that often moved Dumas to telephone his counselors in Houston last season at all hours from hotels and cities laden with what Lucas calls “triggers.”

via Sports of The Times; Getting In Touch With Reality | Harvey Araton, New York Times (9/28/93)

There is no perfect cure for drug addiction. Rehab tapers a patient off the substance and provides a positive environment that keeps the body in a state that can best ward off relapse, but it isn’t the end.

Remember the right amygdala? Here’s where it comes into view. The triggers that John Lucas II mention in Araton’s article could’ve been the sight of others using drugs at clubs, or even overhearing a conversation about drugs. Such events can induce a “euphoric recall,” resurfacing the notion of getting high. That’s when the amygdala (which, as you can recall, stores emotionally resonant memories) is activated. The craving returns, and the uphill battle — even after months of rehab — continues. In an instant, positive progress can dissipate completely. All of this can happen, and the scary thing is the drug doesn’t even have to be physically present.

Scientists have linked the amygdala to fear, and the use of rewards as motivation. From the Hannah Storm interview video above, it’s clear that by the time Dumas recognized his future in basketball, drugs became the ultimate motivator and the answer that would assuage his fears. Upon entering the NBA in ’92, Dumas was withdrawn. Dumas isolated himself from much of the team, blocking off a support system that could’ve been there during a time of need. Unfortunately, this would serve as the death knell to any prosperity that might have come in the NBA.

From a retrospective interview with Dumas on Suns.com:

Suns.com: Did you have people that you could go to after that season that could help you?

Dumas: The only people I ever knew was my family back home, so I wasn’t with anybody in Phoenix but Oliver Miller. Me and him hung out sometimes. Other than that, I never really messed with anybody. I think it was a lack of maturity. I took care of myself all that time and trying so hard to get there that I felt like I was on top of the world. I think it was lack of maturity.

via Richard Dumas on ’93 | Suns.com (6/13/03)

After his season-long suspension in 93-94, Dumas went on to play 15 games for the Suns as a late-season injury replacement in 94-95. The following year, he joined the Philadelphia 76ers and reunited with Lucas, who served as the head coach at the time. But he only played 39 games before trouble reared its head once more. That was the final strike. He was 26, and he never stepped foot in an NBA game again.

Coda

Suns.com: At this point in your life, do you believe all of your demons are behind you?

Dumas: It’s going good, but I keep all that to myself. It’s easier showing people than trying to tell them. That’s what I’m trying to do right now.

via Richard Dumas on ’93 | Suns.com (6/13/03)

Dumas could’ve been an all-star. He could’ve been rich beyond belief. He could’ve.  But none of it was thrown away. Addiction is too horrifying, too complicated, too powerful to use such an offhanded statement. Entering drug rehab is admitting a lack of control, but leaving rehab doesn’t mean regaining control forever. Life after rehab is resuming life as a “recovering addict.” That title remains for the rest of a lifetime.

Dumas’ NBA career may not have materialized how it could have, but the struggle for a championship seems irrelevant in the face of a greater struggle over one’s life. Dumas may have taken the long route in recovery and he may have burned a few bridges in the process, but he’s found stability in his life as a father and an aspiring youth basketball coach. The stories published in the 10-year anniversary of his Finals performance reflect the same hope and perspective he had in the Hannah Storm interview in 1993. So much can happen in 10 years, and yet so little can change. In this case, that’s a positive.

We recall the 71 total games of Dumas’ 92-93 season because it’s the closest we’ll ever get to Richard Dumas, the actualized player. We may never know Richard personally, but in that one season, the person and the player weren’t so far apart. Seeing as Dumas spent most of his life struggling to hold onto his self, 71 games of purity is all we can reasonably ask for.

All non-hyperlinked sources were retrived from subscription-based news databases. 

The Lost Season: The New York Knicks, November 2010-February 2011

Photo from pratanti via Flickr

With the threat of a shortened or even cancelled season upon us, there is very little we can do to restore a shred of basketball into our lives. What we can do, though, is reminisce over other “lost” seasons. Seasons which saw players or teams achieve extraordinary things that go beyond titles or awards, only to fade back into the background one year later. Here we will bring the tale of these lost seasons, the ones that touched us on a personal level, the ones we will never forget, though history itself might.

Previously on The Lost Season: Boris Diaw, 05-06, Bobby Simmons, 04-05, Seattle Supersonics, 04-05, Spencer Haywood 69-70, and Tracy McGrady, 02-03. 

This edition focuses on the short-lived version of the New York Knicks, that spanned from the summer of 2010 to the trade deadline of 2011.

In previous Lost Seasons, we had players or teams that rose above the expected and the known to the realms of the magnificent, shortly tantalizing our imaginations with potential for varying levels of greatness, only to regress back shortly thereafter.

This is going to be different.

This squad was not a great squad. It was arguably not even a good squad. It displayed no meteoric rise, because it had no past, and its demise saw no tragic fall, because its future was abruptly pulled out beneath it. This was a squad hastily put together and hastily disassembled, just another phase in a never ending building process. A squad held together by poorly fitting stopgaps and inadequate patchwork, with a long term plan centered around hoping for a long term plan, and a short term plan centered around just plain hoping.

And yet, for 54 games before the inevitable clearing of the cupboard, this unintentional mess of a team somehow did… something. Probably. What that was, exactly, will probably remain a footnote in the history of a powerhouse-turned-laughingstock-turned-hopeful-powerhouse. Nothing more, nothing less. After all, transitional periods rarely get their own nostalgic retrospectives.

This transitional period does.

Irregular Building

NBA all-stars stand out above their brethren in many respects. They are, by definition, the very best at their craft. Consequently, they are usually the most marketed and most generously compensated practitioners of their profession. When you are the best, and the people who pay you know you’re the best, you have quite a lot of leverage.

This is why all-stars rarely switch teams in free agency. The current NBA system – or rather, what was current until 2 months ago – was designed with handicaps to help teams keep their key players as opposed to just watching them leave. As such, staying put usually results in a financial boon that even the most well paid NBA players find hard to ignore. There are exceptions, of course – if a free agent asks to leave, sign-and-trades enabling them to get their max money and their old teams to get compensation are frequently agreed upon, and some are just plain content with taking a pay cut to get out of their current situations. But more often than not, an all-star will stay with the club whose jerseys he made marketable, and if he wants out, he’ll do so by demanding a trade and keeping his max money.

Or so said the logic before the Summer of 2010.

July of last year saw no less than 10 current NBA all-stars enter free agency. Many of them indeed stayed put – with Dirk Nowitzki and Paul Pierce there was never really any doubt that this will be the case, while Ray Allen, Joe Johnson and Dwyane Wade did so after sagas of varying length. But no less than 5 players with all-star appearances to their name decided to change the city in which they work their craft (if you want to reduce this to 3 and exclude David Lee and Carlos Boozer, by all means, go ahead).

Teams generally aren’t built this way. It’s odd, it’s unnatural. Building blocks don’t just appear, they are drafted and nurtured and groomed. And so it was from the very get go that the 2010-2011New York Knicks were awkward. Bring in a franchise player via the seldom used route of free agency – especially if the player is one with injury concerns, has never been an all-star without the steady guiding hand of Steve Nash, and the franchise is the league’s marquee squad – and you’re bound to raise more than a few eyebrows.

But Amar’e Stoudemire was hardly the only part of New York that was abnormally assembled. After years of clearing cap space and shooting for Lebron, very few Knicks remained on the roster – of projected rotation players, only youngsters Toney Douglas, Danilo Gallinari, Wilson Chandler and Bill Walker were holdovers from previous years, as was the dead weight contract of Eddy Curry. The rest of the rotation came from wherever it could be scraped: Raymond Felton was the second “big” free agency acquisition, except he was only signed for two years, so he wouldn’t ruin the chances at yet another delusional free agency run in 2012; Landry Fields and Andy Rautins were brought in from the depths of anonymity via the second round of the draft; the star of the 09-10 horror show, the aforementioned Lee, chose the Bay Area as his new home, and the Knicks were compensated for his decision with the Energizer bunny that is Ronny Turiaf, the intriguingly disastrous Anthony Randolph, and an injured Kelenna Auzubuike; Timofey Mozgov was imported from Russia; the entire ordeal was a who’s who of “What? How?”.

This random collection of NBA players was as problematic as it was peculiar. The shooting guard position was in such dire straits that I actually predicted Bill Walker would take over it, and meant it said when I said it. The center position was manned only by the energetic yet limited Turiaf and the unknown Mozgov. Stoudemire had no experience as the only focal point of a team made mostly of role players. Worse, he had questionable knees and no backup to speak of. And the team as a whole had nothing resembling a good defender. Behind the angry headlines reserved for the Miami project that was being assembled at the same time, the summer’s main headlines spoke of New York being back – but back to where, nobody really knew.

Amidst the Uncertainty

Coach Mike D’Antoni, starting the 3rd year of his New York tenure but only the first year that mattered, was spared a major headache when Landry Fields burst onto the scene in summer league, and maintained his strong play in training camp. The unknown rookie who drew boos from Knick fans at the draft (is there any other sort of rookie?) provided surprisingly stellar play, new NBA 3-point range, and a knack for rebounding that proved indispensable on a team of such limited size and defensive ability, pretty much sealing the hole that was the shooting guard position.

But despite Fields’ rapid ascension from potential rookie sleeper to token starter to legitimate NBA player, the Knicks struggled out of the gate. Amar’e seemed to wilt without Steve Nash, recording a whopping 25 turnovers in his first 4 games as a Knicks, struggling to hit shots anywhere near his normal efficiency. Gallinari’s shot came and went as it pleased, as he alternated between all-around offensive weapon and a downright liability. The lack of a starting caliber center proved even worse than imagined – though he was named starter on opening night, Mozgov proved to be completely incapable of adjusting to NBA speed, fouling whenever possible, giving nothing of the supposed offensive polish he brought with him. Sadly, beyond the 25-ish minutes a night that Turiaf was capable of providing, there were no alternatives. D’Antoni was forced to yank Mozgov from the rotation entirely, find out he needs him, bring him back in, find out he can’t produce, and repeat the whole ordeal again and again.

But more than anything, the D’Antoni show relies on point guard play. While Raymond Felton was clearly an upgrade in every which way after years of various Duhons and Houses and Nate Robinsons, he was also being asked to play a different role than those long-gone Knickerbockers – that of a team’s second best player. And Felton, finally free of the reigns of Larry Brown, couldn’t seem to figure out if the freedom he had been given was good or bad. He found open teammates at an alarming rate, scored the ball better than ever, and showed that the improved shooting touch from his final Bobcat season wasn’t a fluke; but at the same time, the constant green light sent him into rushed shots and crowded areas of the floor. The pick and roll, specifically – a D’Antoni staple, a Larry Brown non-entity – baffled Felton, as he constantly missed a rolling Stoudemire or an available crease for a drive. After starting the season 3-2, the Knicks quickly lost 6 straight, and tensions in the Big Apple were once again abound.

Luckily, 11 games was exactly the amount of time needed before the Knicks got an important boost from what is, every single season, an underrated X factor for all 30 teams – the schedule.

The Lottery Feast

Between November 17th and December 12th, the Knicks played 14 games. In 13 of them, they managed to score more points than the other teams. While only 3 of those games saw the Knicks play opponents approaching respectability, the effect was profound. The team developed confidence, no longer a disjointed group that came together by happenstance. Beating lottery teams may not be championship material, but the Knicks were never supposed to be that. The first step was always creating a winning environment from the ashes of Gardens past, and beating up on the likes of the Kings and the Bobcats and the Raptors did just that.

The media, as is often the case with the Knicks, went crazy. The fact that the 13-1 stretch happened to coincide with major winning streaks for both the Miami Heat and the Boston Celtics, the East’s two presumed powerhouses, served as extra fuel. Suddenly, the East had three big teams – because, in case you haven’t heard yet, the Knicks are back!!! Rational observers continuously pointed out how the Knicks’ near unbeatable run was more the result of good luck and scheduling quirks than a cosmic power deciding to redirect the spotlight New York’s way, and were subsequently ignored. The Garden’s menacing glow was restored to the once tired venue. Basketball’s Mecca? Perhaps that was going a bit far, but after years of being basketball’s De Moines, everything was a welcome development.

Stoudemire, who in a very short time developed such a comfort with being the first, second and third options on his team that he was now thriving instead of faltering, started hearing M-V-P chants from the Garden faithful. Similar voices from media members followed shortly. While the entire premise of Stoudemire as an MVP was off base at best – his numbers were more or less identical to his Suns’ days except for the higher usage rate, and he showed no improvement defensively on a team that desperately needed him to – his play was nonetheless impressive.

With the masterful Nash replaced by the improving yet flawed Felton, expectations dictated a much harder time for Amar’e scoring. The effect would be especially prevalent in the pick and roll, where Nash was seemingly omniscient as to whether Amar’e was diving to the basket or popping outside for midrange jumpers. And indeed, Stoudemire’s offense became much more isolation oriented – and while his efficiency saw dropped accordingly (his TS% more than a slight one – 61.5% in his final season in Phoenix, while he never climbed above 59.3% in a single month as a Knick), the effect wasn’t nearly as severe as one would expect.

Synergy numbers include the games Amar’e played alongside Carmelo Anthony, so they are far from perfect as a descriptive tool, but just to get a grip on things – in Phoenix, 19.2% of Amar’e’s possessions were post-ups, 17.8% as the roll man in pick and rolls, and only 14.8% in isolations. In New York, those numbers were 12%, 9.6%, and a frightening 32.3%, respectively. The pick and roll devil was still among the best at the craft, but it was no longer his primary source of scoring.

Most Improved Ensemble

While Stoudemire got the headlines and the bright lights, his rise was hardly the most impressive on the team, mostly since it was more of a stagnation under harder terms. The major leaps in production came from other Knicks, each more joyous than the other.

Fields’ emergence, already extensively covered on this very cyberspace, was the draft equivalent of a godsend. He made threes for an offense that was hypothetically built around shooters it didn’t have. He was the team’s second best rebounder on a per game basis, and its best defender. His +/- numbers were off the charts. For the first two months of the season, he was widely regarded as the 3rd best rookie in the league behind Blake Griffin and John Wall. Unlike Stoudemire’s MVP “campaign”, this was not a result of the market he played in, but of plain old, down-to-earth fantastic basketball.

If the shooting guard spot was a concern that was eased, the small forward position went from a strength to an even greater strength. Gallo’s shooting was still far too inconsistent for a player billed first and foremost as a sniper, but he developed a mean streak getting to the foul line, averaging 6 freebies a night on 89% shooting, including nights of 16 for 17 and 13 for 13. Meanwhile, he continued to display a solid passing game for a forward, and his inconsistency behind the arc did nothing to alleviate opponents’ concerns about leaving him there. As a scorer, as a decoy, as the passer, and as the guy who ruins the defense’s rotations, Gallo made the offense run smoothly like his hair gel did to his locks.

If Gallo improved a single facet of his offensive game to complement existing attributes, Wilson Chandler took the entire ensemble and upped it one notch. The former tweener flipped the script on his unusual 6’8”, 220 frame, using it for versatile play on both ends of the floor. Chandler filled in everywhere from the 2 to the 4 while doing a good job defensively on a wide array of opponents. Furthermore, he started making baskets at an alarming rate, from all around the court. He shot around 80% at the rim, flaunted a newly developed 3 point shot, and destroyed JaVale McGee, violently throwing himself into Most Improved Player discussions.

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnAdWDvwHEk]

But the biggest story, by far, was at point guard, where Raymond Felton was finally getting it. After a first month in which Felton seemed uneasy with how little his coach was meddling with his game, the entire ordeal came together, and it was magnificent. Suddenly, Raymond Felton was everything a point guard needed to be. He would get the ball off a rebound, and start a run down the court that combined the joy of a frolicking deer and the force of a boulder chasing Indiana Jones. The seemingly bulky frame did nothing to hinder the agility and purposiveness with which New York fast breaks were now run. Felton would get to the rim, stop for PUJITs, find teammates either cutting to the basket or spotting up in the corner. It was Raymond unleashed, finally in his true form, after years of potential being held back by a Charlotte Bobcats uniform. Felton became a legitimate all-star candidate – after all, who among East guards could compete with 18 and 9 a night with decent if unspectacular shooting numbers? Wade, Rondo, and? Exactly.

Rivalry Renewed

It was December 15th, in the Garden, on the heels of this 14 game stretch that the Knicks met the Boston Celtics. While the presentation of the match as the return of a long-dormant rivalry may have been overblown, it was impossible to overhype the actual game. Stoudemire was a beast, going off for 39 and 10 on one of the best frontcourt defenders ever. Felton flanked him with 26 and 14. Gallinari threw in 20, Chandler 18 and 12. But though New York were ahead most of the game, the mighty Celtics would not relent. Rajon Rondo controlled every aspect of the half court offense with 14 assists of his own, Ray Allen did his Ray-Allen-doesn’t-miss-shots routine, and above all, there was Paul Pierce.

With the game tied at 116, the ball naturally in Pierce’s hands, the same hands that had already scored 30 points in the match, Kevin Garnett came to set a screen. Pierce saw that the Knicks decided to switch, took Amar’e into the hoop. Amar’e lost balance just long enough to enable Pierce’s trademark step back, and the wide open jumper went in. Down went the Knicks’ winning streak. Down went Nate Robinson.

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIoi31IqcII]

As if to tease, within the 0.4 seconds that remained, Amar’e made a three pointer to win the game, but replays clearly showed he released the ball after time expired. But while the Knicks lost the match, they won the PR war. The Garden rocked so hard that night, and the Knicks played so well against such stiff competition, that nothing else was needed. The team of miscreants somehow connected with the city, with the fans, with the media, and with everybody else at home.

The Boston game ended the concept of large Knicks win streaks for good – they would no longer win more than 3 straight games before this core would eventually be broken up – and as January crept by, slowly but surely, the main cast of the New York resurgence started regressing to the mean. Stoudemire and Felton collapsed under the heavy minutes they were playing, their shooting percentages plummeting seemingly by the game, respective MVP and all-star talk going down the drain. Chandler’s extraterrestrial field goal percentage at the rim went back down to human-range numbers, as did his improved 3 point stroke. Ronny Turiaf’s bouncy brand of energy continued to be hilarious, but inadequate as a full-time center.

But even as the steady stream of wins stopped flowing and the Knicks were relegated to keeping their heads 2-3 games above .500, the team never lost its charm. Be it the random yet all-encompassing power of Toney Douglas going for 30in a November win against Chicago, or the shame in handing an overtime loss to Cleveland in December, the Knicks were fast, they were explosive, and they were naïve in allowing almost every opponent to match those very qualities. The defensive ineptitude was too strong a hindrance to allow true dominance, and true dominance wasn’t available on the roster anyway. But the attempted reincarnation of those D’Antoni Suns team with a team so inherently flawed created a rare vibe, one that was strong enough to resonate despite the best efforts of the sickening overhyping from every corner and the hoards of bandwagon Knick fans who described themselves as lifers but couldn’t recognize Jamal Crawford on the street.

Melo and Out

While the Knicks were more or less losing one game for every win in delightful fashion, the franchise was involved in a very different kind of match: one behind the scenes, against the Denver Nuggets and New Jersey Nets, for Carmelo Anthony. New York had already long before won Melo’s heart and signature, now they just needed a third side to play ball with. As the weeks drew on and the team’s bottom line win total failed match the sheer fun that was watching the team play basketball, upper management became more and more impatient. Eventually, the methodical, calculated hand of general manager Donnie Walsh couldn’t match the rash impulse of owner James Dolan. Melo had finally arrived, but at very grave a cost.

Three of New York’s most important players – Felton, Gallinari, and Chandler – together with the lovably useless Mozgov were sent to Denver, who packaged veteran point guard Chauncey Billups together with the high scoring Anthony. More minor parts were swerved around, but aside for admitting their own mistake with Randolph (who was now Minnesota bound), they were inconsequential to the Knicks from start to finish. As Melo took to the MSG parquet as a home player for the first time, the speakers loudly proclaiming “I’m coming home”, a new era for the Knicks had begun, sealing forever the fate of the team that tantalized fans for almost 4 months without actually being much above average.

Only time will tell if New York made the right move. Maybe Chris Paul or Deron Williams will join in 2012, as promised. Maybe Melo and Amar’e will learn to co-exist, and to play defense. After all, if you get the best player in the trade, you do the trade – and Melo is far better than Felton, Gallinari and Chandler, no matter how you twist the picture. But even though the Knicks might be better off, we were robbed. Because this was a team that should have grown together, should have learned actual basketball while under the same roof, and shouldn’t have dissipated behind the caprices of this owner or that superstar. This was a team that brought back basketball to New York City. The city kindly said thank you, and asked for more.

Perhaps its for the best. I doubt that having Carmelo Anthony and Amar’e Stoudemire on the same team will create disappointment entertainment-wise, and though the Felton-Chandler-Gallo-Amar’e core only existed for 54 games, it may have already ran its course after that 14 week run in December. We can never truly know in sports. Sometimes there is a future, sometimes its best to bail out early, conserving the memories. After all, regardless of how far the new-new-Knicks go, those will always remain.

The Lost Season: Spencer Haywood, 1969-70

Photo by generalstussner on Flickr

With the threat of a shortened or even cancelled season upon us, there is very little we can do to restore a shred of basketball into our lives. What we can do, though, is reminisce over other “lost” seasons. Seasons which saw players or teams achieve extraordinary things that go beyond titles or awards, only to fade back into the background one year later. Here we will bring the tale of these lost seasons, the ones that touched us on a personal level, the ones we will never forget, though history itself might.

Previously on The Lost Season: Boris Diaw, 05-06, Bobby Simmons, 04-05, and the Seattle Supersonics, 04-05.

This edition is a history lesson painstakingly assembled and taught by Emile Avanessian, author of the terrific blog, Hardwood Hype. It’s on Spencer Haywood and his remarkable 96-70 ABA season. Enjoy.

Be it Dr. J’s prime, or the early days of Moses Malone, George Gervin and David Thompson, the ABA is synonymous with unseen greatness. Thanks to stories from those fortunate enough to witness the feats firsthand, and the pixelated time capsule that is YouTube, we’re able to cobble together a picture, incomplete though it may be, of the incredible play that permeated the moneyball circuit. It’s far from perfect, but it’s what we’ve got.

The limited resources with which we are working, to say nothing of the limited media resources dedicated to professional basketball 35+ years ago, present certain obstacles. Chief among these is the fact that memories of ABA-era hoops tend to be visceral, rather than statistical. We are thus left to sort though nostalgic hyperbole (Julius was doing 720s from the top of the key!!), without much knowledge of actual events. While these stories occupy a really cool place in basketball lore, modern day observers are concerned as much with the “how” as they are with the “what.” Over beers I like hearing stories of how Santa Claus dunked on a unicorn, but it doesn’t add to my understanding of basketball history.

History books tend to focus on the stories of those that won — I understand this. Unfortunately, in doing so, we relegate significant chunks of history to the back burner. Mainstream knowledge of the ABA extends not far beyond Erving, Gervin, Thompson and maybe, maybe Dan Issel. And even with these guys, the vast majority of descriptions are qualitative. Think about it- how many times have you heard an off-the-cuff citation of an ABA statistic?

Who were the top three scorers (in terms of average) in ABA history? And for a single season? Who posted the highest single-season PER in league history? Who was Red Robbins? One man is responsible for four of the top nine rebounding seasons in ABA history- name him. Which player posted the top two assist averages in ABA history? Julius Erving won an ABA record three MVP awards — who was the only other multiple winner?

Despite having the top basketball talent of the late 1960s and (especially) early 1970s, the ABA’s defeat at the hands of the NBA in the battle for control of pro basketball has resulted in numerous great seasons and careers slipping through history’s cracks. This does a disservice to the best players of the era, particularly those whose greatness unfolded in some of pro hoops’ lower profile outposts. Which brings us to one such falling tree in pro basketball’s uninhabited forest — Spencer Haywood in his 1969-70 rookie season.

After a year of junior college ball (at Trinidad JC in Colorado) and another at the University of Detroit — during which he averaged 32.2 points and 22.1 rebounds per game — citing a need to provide for his mother and nine siblings, Haywood was granted basketball’s first-ever “hardship” exemption. Despite protests from the NCAA, most NBA owners and some ABA owners, he was allowed to forgo his remaining eligibility and sign a three-year, $450,000 contract to join the ABA’s Denver Rockets (who became the Denver Nuggets following the 1973-74 season).

The previous spring, following a 44-34 regular season that saw them finish third in the Western Division, the Rockets pushed the 60-win, Rick Barry-led, eventual champion Oakland Oaks to seven games in the postseason’s opening round. They were now looking to the undergraduate phenom to help them over the hump. In response, Haywood, a former All-American and Olympic gold medalist (Mexico City, 1968) authored one of the best campaigns in ABA history, and a rookie season for the ages.

The Rockets stumbled out of the gate in 1969-70, starting the season just 9-19. This resulted in the dismissal of coach John McClendon, who was replaced by Duke alum and veteran of the NIBL’s Denver-Chicago Truckers, Joe Belmont. The team responded fantastically to the change, winning 42 of its last 56 games, including 15 straight at one point, to finish the season with a 51-33 mark — good enough for first place in the Western Division.

While the change on the bench clearly had a positive impact, the key to the turnaround was Haywood. Little is available in the way of ABA highlights of Haywood, though footage of him in subsequent seasons with the Seattle Supersonics (holy alliteration, Batman!) shows a powerful and athletic player whose ability to post up, put the ball on the floor and hit a jump shot, to say nothing of his awesome rebounding ability, compare favorably to those of any modern day big man.

Haywood hit the ground sprinting with the Rockets, scoring 30 points in his regular season debut and putting up 28-30+ on a nightly basis, beasting on the glass and changing games in the paint on defense. He also won the All-Star Game MVP, with a 23-point, 19-rebound 7-blocked shot (Tracked as a stat in the All-Star Game, but not in games that counted. Oh, that wacky ABA!) performance for the West.

For all of his gaudy numbers, however, Haywood was more consistent than spectacular in his first 3+ months. In the season’s final two months, he ratcheted his game to an absurd level. On February 6, 1970, he put up his first 40-point game as a pro, posting 40 on the road against the Los Angeles Stars. Nearly a month passed before he hit for 40 again, doing so, again, in L.A. with 43 points in a March 4 loss.

This jumpstarted one of the greatest dozen-day runs by a big man in the last four decades. Three days later, Haywood equaled his season high of 43 in Washington, though 45 from Rick Barry helped the Capitols (formerly the Oakland Oaks) secure a 144-128 win. The following night, in a double-overtime win against the New Orleans (whose leading scorer, apropos of nothing, was Steve “Snapper” Jones), Haywood played all 58 minutes and scored 46 points. He followed this up with 47 two days later against the Dallas Chaparrals, and 48 against the Miami Floridians five days after that.

After plummeting to the pedestrian depths of 28-35 a night for a couple of weeks, Haywood continued his onslaught against the L.A. Stars with 41 points in a 119-98 win on March 31. He’d would go on another awesome run to close out his legendary rookie campaign, with a 40 and 26 against Dallas on April 8, 44 against Miami two days later and a 59-point explosion against the Stars (for those keeping score, that’s 45.8 per in his last four against the Stars) in the regular season finale.

In case you lost count, that’s 10 40-point performances in 57 days. Not bad, y’know, if you’re into that sort of thing.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzXRBTpEJ7k]
After the season, Haywood was named First Team All-ABA and voted ABA Rookie of the Year and league MVP, becoming the youngest ever recipient of the award at age 21. That he didn’t miss a game while leading the league in scoring average, total points, rebounding average, offensive, defensive and total rebounds, PER, Win Shares, Win Shares/48 and minutes played (3,808, or 45.3 per game) certainly speaks to Haywood’s greatness as a rookie. However, a quick peek behind the numbers reveals the extent to which Spencer Haywood dominated the regular season:
  • Prior to his 2,519 in 1969-70, only Wilt Chamberlain had scored 2,500+ points as a rookie. No one has done it since.
  • His 30.0 scoring average ranks fifth for a single season is ABA history and was 2.5 per game clear of the nearest competition, Bob Verga of the Carolina Cougars.
  • Haywood made 986 field goals in 1969-70. Only the aforementioned Verga was within 220 of this total, and he fell 119 short, despite just 14 fewer attempts.
  • His offensive rebound total of 533 was 101 (or 23.4%) better than that of the second-place finisher, Miami’s Donald Sidle. Meanwhile, only Mel Daniels of the Indiana Pacers was within 305 of Haywood’s 1,637 total rebounds… and he fell 175 boards short.
  • His 986 field goals made, 1,637 rebounds, and 19.5 rebound per game average are the all-time single-season ABA records.
  • Haywood averaged just under 10 turnovers per 100 possessions (9.9)- the fourth lowest rate in the ABA that season.
  • He posted a PER of 28.0, the third highest mark in league history and almost 30% clear of second place, Miami’s Donnie Freeman. His Win Share total of 17.1 was similarly in a league of its own, topping the Pacers’ Roger Brown’s second place total of 13.3 by some 29%.
  • Haywood was also absurdly efficient, managing all of this with a Usage Rate (available for the ABA well before it was for the NBA) of just 24.9. His ratio of PER to Usage Rate (I wrote about it here; judge the merits of the metric for yourself) was 1.125. Only once in the past 35 years (Charles Barkley in 1989-90) has a player with a 25+ PER topped this number.
Needless to say, the Rockets rolled into the 1970 playoffs with lofty expectations. In the first round, they met a familiar foe in Rick Barry and his defending champion Capitols/ex-Oaks. Denver won the first two games of the series at home, with Washington returning the favor in D.C. The teams also split the next two, with each recording a home victory. Game 7 went down in front of a crowd of 9,893 at the Denver Coliseum. The Rockets won the game in a route, 143-119, securing the franchise’s first playoff series win, led by Larry Jones (no slouch himself, averaging 24.9- 5.2- 5.7 with a 21.1 PER in the regular season) and Byron Beck who logged 27 and 25 points, respectively. Beck added 11 rebounds, while Haywood grabbed 19.

Sadly, the series came to an ugly end. With the game out of hand, Haywood dished out a love tap to Rick Barry after Barry had taken a hard intentional foul on Rockets’ guard Jeff Congdon. Barry and Haywood proceeded to lob, respectively, a ball and a punch at one another’s heads. Haywood was ejected, though this hardly put an end to the violence. In what can only be described as a prequel to Kermit Washington’s ill-fated blow to Rudy T’s head nearly seven years later, Rocket guard Lonnie Wright then clocked Barry with a blind-side punch, after which a number of fans rushed the floor — with one taking a shot at Barry, as he was on the floor getting attention from a trainer.

In the second round, the Rockets met up with Haywood’s regular season whipping boys, the L.A. Stars. The Rockets won the series opener- the first nationally televised pro basketball to ever take place in Denver — at home by 10 points, further cementing the notion that the heavy favorites would walk away with the series.

After that, however, the Finals-bound Stars, behind the excellent play of George Stone and Mack Calvin (23+ per game in the postseason, up from 16 and 16.8, respectively, in the regular season) and 17-15 from Craig Raymond, won four straight to complete the “gentleman’s sweep.” In the nip-and-tuck series finale (the second nationally televised game from Denver), the Stars’ took a 109-107 lead with 16 seconds left, and wound up winning the game with that score when Congdon missed a potential game-tying jumper.

Haywood’s dominant play carried over into the postseason. In 12 games, he averaged 36.7 points (with 20 more made field goals than any other player) and 19.8 rebounds, with a 26.6 PER. Despite its disappointing conclusion, Haywood’s spectacular rookie season instilled some serious optimism within the Rockets’ fans. Sadly, this optimism was short-lived.

Heading into the 1970-71 season, Haywood took part in a pair of preseason exhibition games — scoring 40+ points in each — before leaving the team over a contract dispute. Upset that a significant chunk of his salary was deferred, Haywood held out in hopes that the Rockets would agree to restructure his contract. The team refused to acquiesce to his demands, itself holding out in the hope that he would return. With most of the 1970-71 season in the books, and in the face of several lawsuits filed by the Rockets, Haywood forced a move to the NBA’s Seattle Supersonics, with whom he played 33 games in the spring of 1971.

Sadly, the marriage between pro basketball’s original underclassman and the Denver Rockets, seemingly consummated in heaven, unraveled in very short order. An ABA title eluded the team, while after an acrimonious split, while Haywood spent the dozen-year balance of his career as something of an NBA nomad. While he would never again reach those heights, in one lost season for the ages, Spencer Haywood earned his spot atop the world of professional basketball.

P.S.- the answers to the impromptu quiz?

Top three career scoring averages in ABA history?  

  • Rick Barry (30.5 points per game)
  •  Julius Erving (28.7)
  •  John Brisker (26.1, and owner of the craziest-ever disappearance from pro basketball)
Top three for a single season?
  • Charlie Scott (34.6 in 1971-72)
  • Julius Erving (31.9 in 1972-73)
  • Rick Barry (31.5 in 1971-72)
The highest single-season PER in league history?
  • Connie Hawkins, who posted a 28.8 PER for the 1967-68 Pittsburgh Pipers.
Who was Red Robbins?
We just learned that Connie Hawkins recorded the highest-ever PER in league history. Julius Erving in 1975-76 (28.7) and Spencer Haywood in 1969-70 round out the top three. Artis Gilmore’s 1971-72 sandwiched in between another pair of Dr. J efforts round out the top six. Seventh is a 25.7 in 1967-68, was turned in by the New Orleans Buccaneers star rookie, Austin “Red” Robbins, from the University of Tennessee.
Which player posted the top two assist averages in ABA history?
  • Bill Melchionni of the New York Nets produced the top two assist averages in ABA history in 1970-71 (8.3 per game) and 1971-72 (8.4).
  • A few things worth noting:
  1. No one in the history of the run-and-gun ABA ever averaged more than 8.4 assists per game for a season.
  2. And prior to this week, I (and probably you) had no idea who the hell Bill Melchionni was.
Emile Avanessian is the author of Hardwood Hype. Follow him on Twitter @hardwoodhype

The Lost Season: The Seattle Supersonics, 04-05

With the threat of a shortened or even cancelled season upon us, there is very little we can do to restore a shred of basketball into our lives. What we can do, though, is reminisce over other “lost” seasons. Seasons which saw players or teams achieve extraordinary things that go beyond titles or awards, only to fade back into the background one year later. Here we will bring the tale of these lost seasons, the ones that touched us on a personal level, the ones we will never forget, though history itself might.

Previously on The Lost Season: Boris Diaw, 05-06 and Bobby Simmons, 04-05. Today we will conjure the 2004-2005 Seattle Supersonics, with a special guest appearance by the venerable Beckley Mason, Sonics fan, of HoopSpeak.com. 

If you were to ask a million people why they love sports, summed up the answers in a convenient graphic manner, and carefully studied the results, there would be several traits making multiple appearances. The solidarity that unites people from different backgrounds uniting for nothing more than the colors of an arbitrarily painted shirt. The fine line between the emotional highs of victory and lows of defeat. The way Ryan Anderson’s goatee creeps around his unsuspecting mouth, surrounding it like moths worshiping a flame, silently whispering “take this three pointer, Ryan. Take it. It wants it.”

One of the many, many reasons we love sports is unpredictability. Every night, two groups of human beings take to a floor made of some sort of substance, with absolutely no knowledge of what will take place until the final buzzer/whistle/out/whatever ends curling.

This is, of course, hogwash. We can’t deal with sports without the necessary ground rules. Chemistry matters. Selfishness leads to losing. Chemistry matters. Hard work leads to winning. Chemistry matters. I said it 3 times already, you know what we’re going to be focusing on.

Chemistry Matters

As you read this, you’re probably moping around your home, wishing the lockout would end already. Of the many issues that are pitting millionaires against billionaires in a fight designed to hurt the broke – revenue sharing, BRI splits and hard caps – one issue is especially relevant to our nostalgic view. That of the guaranteed contract. Specifically, of what happens one year before it is signed.

The dreaded contract year. Shudder.

The ideal NBA player is one that always gives 110% for the good of the team. But we know better. Caring is easy on paper, but is much harder when you need to do so for 82 games a year, plus the playoffs, through pain in your knees and the back spasms. If you’re an athlete at heart, winning is the only compensation you need. If you’re human, though, you probably want the money. And when the money will be there regardless of effort, effort has a tendency to slip.

Contract years are the opposite. The money isn’t there, so one cares too much. Of course, you’re not playing for your teammates’ money – you’re playing for your own. Which makes every player his own top priority. Teamwork and winning take secondary seats to stats and highlights. In a career that usually manages3 to 5major paychecks, you can’t let your chances slip.

So what happens when you have a team with a coach and 9 – count ‘em, 9 – players with expiring  contracts, including your only all-star? NBA law says you shrivel up into a disgusting heap of one-on-one, isolation, stat-grabbing, egotistical Maggetteness.

The 2004-2005 Sonics would have been placed in NBA jail.

9 Expiring Contracts

Back in 2004-2005, contract seasons may have been even a greater epidemic than today. Just a year earlier, Erick Dampier had 12-points-10-rebounds-ed his way into a ridiculous deal with the Dallas Mavericks. Just a year later, Larry Hughes would sign a 72 million deal with the poor unsuspecting Cavs, after his only good NBA season to date – one that saw him miss the entire playoffs with injury, of course – just happened to coincide with the end of his Washington Wizards deal. The league hadn’t stumbled upon the Durant-Rose golden era of stars that always try hard no matter what the circumstances. And the Seattle Supersonics – a 37 win team whose biggest additions were the immortal Danny Fortson for Calvin Booth trade, and the return of second year player Nick Collison, after injuries robbed him of his entire rookie season and much before he became a blogosphere deity – were going to be living proof of just how bad contract years can be.

No less than 9 players on the Supersonics had expiring contracts that year: face of the franchise, Ray Allen; the starting frontcourt of Reggie Evans and Jerome James (I know, I know); 6th man Antonio Daniels (don’t you miss Antonio Daniels? I miss Antonio Daniels); off-the-bench gunner FlipMurray; sharpshooter Vladimir Radmanovic; bench contributor Damien Wilkins; and the seldom used, yet fondly remembered, Vitaly Potapenko (!!!) and Mateen Cleaves (!!!). Last but not least, coach Nate McMillan was on the last year of his deal as well.

By all accounts, this was not a good roster. Ray Allen, in his pre-Boston days, was still a vicious all around scorer, but a bad defender and was generally believed to be a bit off of his supposed superstar status; Rashard Lewis had somewhat stagnated, and while he was certainly a very good player, placing him as a second option was somewhat of a stretch; Luke Ridnour had shown flashes in his rookie season, but with Brent Barry’s departure to San Antonio, he would now be expected to perform as a full-time starter as opposed to a 16-minutes-a-game hopeful; and I just told you what the starting frontcourt was.

Expectations pessimistically predicted a season of every single player gunning for his own shots, a team falling apart, Ray Allen hanging his head in shame and preferring to use the Cleveland Cavaliers’ ample cap space to team with Lebron James rather than staying, and the entire franchise falling apart. Each player needing to prove how much he deserves that next deal, bickering over touches and minutes, pulling the team apart.

Instead, the Sonics went on their quest for a new contract in a very different manner: they created synergy.

Methodical, Calculated, Deadly

Opening night saw the Sonics obliterated by the Clippers in Los Angeles, 114-84, seemingly a sign of things to come. Nobody but Allen, Lewis and Radmanovic scored 20, 24 and 20, respectively, but nobody else on the team scored more than 6 points, and the entire Clipper lineup scored in double figures, including a ridiculous 30 points for Bobby Simmons, in the first game of his only good season (Danny covered this extensively yesterday). The 03-04 Sonics had finished 27th out of 29 teams in defensive efficiency, and did nothing to re-instill confidence in their defensive abilities against the perennially bad Clippers.

Except that the Sonics rebounded perfectly, countering the humiliating Clipper loss by running off a 9 game winning streak, including an impressive 19 point shellacking of the eventual champion Spurs. Another loss, to the Celtics, was countered with another 4 game rebound winning streak. The pattern repeated itself with a loss to the Blazers, and another 4 game streak, with prestigious victories over the Spurs and Mavs. Suddenly, this was a 17-3 squad, a force to be reckoned with.

The Sonics still weren’t a good defensive team. But they didn’t need to be one. Using what is now commonly recognized as your typical Nate McMillan game plan, the Sonics defied all common logic. Instead of running down the court at each chance, letting Ridnour or Daniels lead the break as two deadly shooters in Allen and Lewis flanked the wings, trying to outscore their opponents, Seattledid the opposite. McMillan knew his team couldn’t guard anybody, so he limited opponent’s chances by making sure the game went by too slowly for them to get the ball. Seattle’s pace was a meager 87.9 possessions per game, perfectly masking their 27th placed defensive efficiency.

Of course, being a terrible defensive team that plays at a slow pace can only take you so far without your offense picking up the slack. And my oh my, was there slack picking in Seattle that year.

Allen was his usual deadly self, clocking in at 23.9 points a night, but you knew that, already. It was the rest of the roster that made the jump. Rashard Lewis took his game to a new level, breaking the 20 points per game barrier for the first time of his career, knocking down 3s, driving to the rim, emerging as an offensive savant and as a first time all-star. Radmanovic actually regressed after a breakout 03-04 campaign, but was still dangerous enough as an offensive combo forward to give some more scoring punch, mainly from the outside, either next to Lewis or instead of him; Ridnour ran the team with resolve rarely seen from a second year player; Daniels fit perfectly as a 3rd guard, alternating between handling the ball and scoring off of it. All seamlessly disguised in a seemingly harmless low-pace bundle, one that perfectly masked the true offensive juggernaut.

It’s not that the Sonics completely abandoned the fast break ordeal – defensive rebounds being converted into full court passes to a leaking Allen or Lewis, or even a big who recognized a chance for cherry picking, were commonly spotted – but it was an opportunistic brand of transition play, not a strategic one. Unlike the Seven Seconds or Less Suns, which broke onto the scene the same year, the idea was to kill your victim with slow, dictated, measured blows, not with rapid attacks of sheer force. It was still basketball poetry, just a different kind. One more carefully crafted, its beauty laying in the system that created it more than just the mind-blowing final results.

Frontcourt By Committee

Of course, the problem with lowering the amount of possessions in a game is that you limit not only how much your opponents touches the ball, but also how many chances your top-notch offense has. This is where a previously unmentioned entity enters the game – the frontcourt.

Seattle’s frontcourt was something of a wasteland for basketball players. No player who was designated exclusively as a big man played more than half a game. Often Radmanovic and Lewis would play at the 4, either next to the other, or alongside the occasionally effective Wilkins. Jerome James started at center in all 80 games he played, but clocked in at only 16 minutes a night, and while this was before he became an Isiah-made punchline, his skill set still included very little beyond being tall and blocking shots. Reggie Evans was a liability everywhere except on the boards, which combined with his career-long issues with stamina to limit him to 23.6 minutes a night. Danny Fortson had always been a per minute monster – he has career averages of 14.7 and 13 per 36 minutes, right in line with the 15.9 and 12 he had in 04-05 – but he’s also one of the most frequent foulers in NBA history, and managed to register an astonishing 4.3 fouls in 16.9 minutes every game. Nick Collison was a de facto rookie coming off major injuries, with no proof whatsoever that he can be effective in the NBA. Concerns outweighed the advantages by a considerable ratio.

But whenever a single offensive possession happened to go awry? That was the frontcourt’s moment to shine. Fortson and Evans would grab absolutely everything, from offensive rebounds to loose balls to opponent’s limbs to Chris Kaman’s private parts. James and Collison, limited as they were, could make the garbage baskets that never made highlight reels but counted for the same amount of points. Seattle ranked as the second best offensive rebounding team in the league, and that surely wasn’t on Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis. With a style that was designed to lower the number of possessions for both teams, every one of those boards was yet another 24 seconds during which opponents couldn’t exploit Seattle’s horrible defense.

With the exception of Fortson’s hair, there was nothing great about Seattle’s frontcourt. There was probably nothing that was even good. But Seattle didn’t need good. It needed grit. It needed the creation of fear. It needed hustle and heart and all those things that you see on Tony Allen T-shirts. Seattle was a team based mainly on its backcourt’s ability to control the tempo and put the ball in the basket, and the frontcourt’s ability to get out of the way, and help where it can. Despite the many limitations, they got the job done more often than not.

One More Jerome James Up Their Sleeves

Seattle ranked 2nd in offensive efficiency and 27th in defensive efficiency, to the naked eye a minor improvement from the 3rd and 27th place ranks of 03-04. But that offensive efficiency mark of 112.2 was a full 5 points higher than the year before, and would have led the league if not for Steve Nash’s arrival in Phoenix. Behind the newfound firepower, Seattle won their division, and finished with a shocking 52-30 record and a 3rd seed in in the playoffs.

Still, against the Sacramento Kings in the first round of the playoffs, it wasn’t clear if the charade could go on. True, the Kings were employing very little of a frontcourt themselves, with the Webber/Divac tandem gone and with Brad Miller barely returning from a fractured fibula, but the Kings still had a certain glow around them, that unwillingness to let go of the glory days even though we all should know better.

Jerome James knew better. Against the likes of Brian Skinner and an old Greg Ostertag, James drew a shocking 17-15-5 performance out of nowhere, giving the Sonics just enough beyond Allen’s mandatory 28 and 10 to grab the win. Game 2 saw a similar scenario – Allen 26, Rashard Lewis nonexistent (12 points, 3 for 12 shooting), and Jerome James with 19 and 9, only missing 2 of his 11 shot attempts.

The Kings managed to salvage Game 3, but the damage was done. Jerome James may have not been the most talented basketball player, but characters his size employ copious amounts of inertia. James finished the series with averages of 17.2 points, 9.4 boards, and 2.2 blocks a night, averages which landed him a 5 year, 30 million deal from Isiah Thomas that we will collectively make fun for all of eternity. Combined with the Kings’ last fumes proving futile, and with Ray Allen refusing to take his foot off their throats (with a ridiculous 45 point night in Game 4 providing the cherry to the sundae that was his series), Seattle was poised to meet the mighty Spurs.

San Antonio manhandled the Sonics in the first two games, winning by a combined 39 points as James turned back into a pumpkin, Allen struggled with Bruce Bowen and the defensive scheme behind him, and Duncan, Parker and Ginobili proved unguardable for the defensively questionable squad. But after scraping out a 92-91 win in Game 3, one which saw James’ short lived return to competence (15 points without a miss) and Vitaly Potapenko somehow successfully guarding Tim Duncan on the final shot of the game, and a heroic Game 4 win without Lewis, in which Luke Ridnour went bananas and Ray Allen finally broke free, it seemed like this would be a series.

Unfortunately for Seattle, this happened:

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VV6ibmaUFc]

As has happened many times before, and as would happen many times again, Manu Ginobili – still with long hair, bald spot barely visible – just wouldn’t let San Antonio lose. Seattle hung until the very end in Game 6, game tied with seconds to go, but Ginobili found Duncanfor a 4 footer that Timmy made thousands of times throughout his career, and Ray’s desperation attempt at the buzzer was no good.

Epilogue – By Beckley Mason

As everyone knows now, this was the last time the Sonics would have anything resembling a quality team. But even in this last, unpredictably successful year, the team didn’t really connect withSeattlelike it did in the mid 90s. Maybe that’s just how it felt from the other side of the country, where I was a freshman in college, and for the first time couldn’t watch the local broadcasts. I think I saw the Sonics on TV only once or twice before the playoffs.

When I realized not only was this relatively untalented bunch in the playoffs, but a 3 Seed, I almost couldn’t believe it. Even against the Kings it felt like we were playing with found money. As Noam notes above, our frontline basically had no skills other than possession retention. Our offense revolved around Allen in a way not unlike Dallas’s Dirk-centric sets. For some reason, after years of the fiery and excitable Gary Payton as the face of the franchise, it was hard to completely embrace Allen in the same way, even though he was unarguably the superior player at the time.

When I came home from college I got to attend game 4 of the Spurs series, in which the Sonics tied the eventual champs 2-2. What I remember most from their performance in the playoffs is that Ray Allen was incredibly good and just smoked Bruce Bowen, who was then regarded as the games best perimeter defender. He was really all there was to appreciate from an aesthetic standpoint that season. When he has a bust in the Hall of Fame, we’ll remember him as a deadly shooter, but back in 2004-5 he could do everything. 

Even with the series tied 2-2, no one really believed we could beat the mighty Spurs. We screamed, the decibel level spiked to “jet engine,” and the Key Arena once again gave me goosebumps. ButSeattlefans new better than to expect greatness from Danny Fortson. After the systematic destruction of games 5 and 6, it confirmed what we already knew: this wasn’t a 50 win team.

In 2005-6 the magic evaporated (along with Lewis and Radmanovic’s game) and Chris Wilcox and Earl Watson became our third and fourth highest scorers. Then Allen got hurt and the wheels came off. The wheels were then reaffixed to the trucks that moved everything, our records, the jerseys in the rafters, the championship banner, to Oklahoma.

Looking back, I wonder if I downplay the excitement and hope that surrounded the 2004-5 season. After all, we won 52 games and a playoff series. But today it just seems like a fateful step to the team leaving. I look at Danny Fortson and Ronald Murray and instead of plucky bench players, I see the erosion of quality players that was punctuated when future Hall of Famer Ray Allen was traded for Jeff Green. But that’s not really how it felt then. Then it was a reemergence of a proud franchise and a basketball crazy city. We had no idea this imperfect, contract year-fueled team that masterfully combined brutish boarding with elegant offense would be the city’s last good team.

The Lost Season: Bobby Simmons, 04-05

 

With the threat of a shortened or even cancelled season upon us, there is very little we can do to restore a shred of basketball into our lives. What we can do, though, is reminisce over other “lost” seasons. Seasons which saw players or teams achieve extraordinary things that go beyond titles or awards, only to fade back into the background one year later. Here we will bring the tale of these lost seasons, the ones that touched us on a personal level, the ones we will never forget, though history itself might.

The first edition was Noam Schiller’s documentation of Boris Diaw’s 05-06 season. Read it here. This is about Bobby Simmons. 

At the center of the picture above is a young mountain goat peering down at the world at an immeasurable height. Things look different from that high up; positively foreign. We at ground level face the depths of sea below and the towering mountains above — a constant check and balance for our egos and a reminder of our insignificance in a broader scope. But atop a mountain looking down at one blurred, obscured mass of everything, life compels you to let out a heaving sigh of freedom. When you’re seemingly on top of everything, it’s hard to imagine being back at ground level ever again. This is a mountain goat, though. It was born with the necessary tools to scale slopes. These immeasurable heights are where mountain goats make their permanent residence. If only some of us were so lucky.

Bobby Simmons was arguably the second most important player for the Los Angeles Clippers in 2004-05. In his second season as a Clipper, he eclipsed every single one of his per-game statistics, becoming a dependable soldier in an ever-improving (and ever-changing) army. It was never supposed to happen, but a bit of luck and a snowball of circumstance brought together Simmons’ unbelievable season.

Recap: A Summer of Hope, and the Big (Plan) C

The city of Los Angeles held its collective breath on July 16, 2004.

Kobe Bryant was a free agent. The Los Angeles Lakers had just recently lost to the Detroit Pistons in the 2004 NBA Finals. Phil Jackson was stepping away from the game, and Shaq was traded to Miami for Brian Grant, Caron Butler, and Lamar Odom. A dynasty had just collapsed, and amid the wreckage, Bryant had a decision to make.

He could resign with the Lakers. They were devoted to him since day one. But the team that stood before him was a band of strangers, and with so much uncertainty regarding the player and coaching changes, perhaps it would be best to bolt for a team with more of an identity. He could sign with the Clippers. After all, according to Hoopshype’s Gery Woelfel, he was much more familiar with the Clippers, having good relations with both their players and staff. Technically, he wasn’t going anywhere. He’d be walking storming the halls of Staples Center regardless. But on July 16, he solidified the message. He really wasn’t going anywhere. More specifically, he wasn’t going to the Clippers.

Behind the Kobe ruckus, the Phoenix Suns put six years and $50 million on the table for restricted free agent Quentin Richardson, who had a breakout season with the Clippers in 03-04. It was the Clippers’ move.

Two weeks later, they made their decision. They didn’t match the contract. Instead, they took advantage of a New Jersey Nets team desperately looking to cut costs. The Clippers acquired versatile swingman Kerry Kittles for a future second round pick. The team was young enough. It needed veteran experience, and more importantly, playoff experience. Plus, the Clippers were worried about Richardson’s back injury sustained at the end of the 03-04 season, forcing him to miss 17 games. Kittles on the other hand, played all 82.

Of course, Quentin Richardson’s back was fine in Phoenix, where he played 79 games in 04-05. Kerry Kittles only managed to play 11 games in the season, the final games of his NBA career. He would eventually cave to a degenerative disk in his back. Oh, the tragic irony.

Kittles didn’t play in the Clippers’ season opener. But Bobby Simmons did. He dropped 30 points, six rebounds, and six assists, shooting 86.7% against the Seattle Supersonics. And that’s where this wild story begins.

Sights Unseen

When I first decided to write about Simmons, my initial thought was to start researching with a YouTube mixtape or two. A “Bobby Simmons mixtape” search on YouTube yields exactly one relevant result, and it’s a mix of his mediocre years as a Net. Somehow, his seasons as an albatross were more worthy of two-and-a-half minutes than the season that won him the Most Improved Player award.

After hours of clicking next, I found a 04-05 Clippers season recap mix. Simmons had one play in the 3:27 mix. A layup. His jersey number also made four appearances. (Maybe.)

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5d6AxAH0yw]

Disgusted at myself at this point, I stumbled upon this video of a Clippers-Lakers showdown from the 04-05 season. Hidden behind some masterful offensive displays from Kobe, a billion Mikki Moore dunks, and Chris Kaman doing his best Magic Johnson impression (at 2:12), Simmons manages to grace the screen for a grand total of four offensive plays (all in the fourth quarter):

  •  (7:53) Baseline jumpshot (2 pts)
  • (8:18) Fast break and-one opportunity (3 pts)
  • (8:36) Baseline jumpshot (2 pts)
  • (9:26) Baseline three-pointer (3pts)
  • And for an added bonus, starting at 8:45, there are two consecutive plays where Simmons gets schooled by Kobe.

So there you have it. Four plays in an 11 minute video. In the infinite reaches of the internet, Bobby Simmons’ best season as a basketball player can be seen for a few fleeting moments. It’s depressing, really. I mean, YouTube has more video coverage of the signing of the Declaration of Independence – and that happened in 1776.

The Player 

Simmons finished with 22 points and eight rebounds.

“He’s one guy,” Clipper Coach Mike Dunleavy said, “that if you can get him some clean looks, you can be pretty sure the ball is going into the hole.”

via Little Things Big for Clippers | Los Angeles Times (12/30/04)

Before Bobby Simmons was the Most Improved Player of 2005, before his lunch date with Bill Simmons, and before his five year, $47 million contract, he was just another player. That is to say, Bobby Simmons was a player before he was some other team’s burden.

At the height of his abilities, he was the prototypical 3. Simmons was not very quick, and he wasn’t very athletic, but he did what he could to maximize his time on the court. He was a good rebounder for his size, and knew how to use his strength and his seven-foot wingspan to find openings. While he wasn’t known as an offensive threat at DePaul, on the Clippers he became a fantastic off-the-ball scorer. His off-the-dribble game wasn’t as outstanding, but he did show some success, even if it was more out of necessity than anything else.

With his feet set, Simmons was automatic from pretty much everywhere. The 46.6% he shot in 04-05 would be the highest field goal percentage in his career, and on some nights, his offensive efficiency was shocking. Much of his damage came from the baseline, where his 20-footer was deadly when left unguarded. While he wouldn’t become a prolific three-point shooter until after his stint with the Clippers, Simmons was still a high percentage shooter from long distance. His 43.5% from three would be the second highest in his career.

Defensively, Simmons wasn’t a stopper by any means, but he was competent, which was enough. With good physicality and long arms, he made up for his athletic limitations and played sound defense, and did a good job denying entry into the paint.

He wasn’t a star, but he was a perfectly complementary scoring option at the wing, and a neutral-to-plus defender. Of Clippers players who received consistent playing time, Simmons’ net plus-minus was second only to Elton Brand’s. The Clippers were a band of fantastic athletes, but what they lacked was the type of shot creation that someone like Kobe or even Kerry Kittles would’ve provided. Maggette had become one of the go-to scorers, but his jumper wasn’t as reliable as his forays to the hoop. Simmons provided offensive balance and spacing that admirably filled a void.

A Mountain, A Myth, A Mistake

* Simmons lost the entire 06-07 season to an ankle injury.Â

As evidenced from this sweet graph I made, Simmons’ offensive production — and by extension, his career — resembles a mountain. It took years for Simmons to climb the valley and reach the peak of his career. But Simmons isn’t a mountain goat. And he wasn’t meant to find home at the top.

Simmons’ apex in 04-05 is so dramatically better than any other stage of his career, it makes a person wonder if it happened at all. Sure, the dropoff from 04-05 to 05-06 wasn’t as sizable as the ascent from Simmons’ first year as a Clipper to his second, but there was a dip in every major statistic in his first year with Milwaukee, including a drop in PER from 16.1 to 13.8. Simmons would only hold an above average PER for that one season. So, again: did this actually happen?

[flash http://vimeo.com/26792365 w=500 h=400]

Maybe somewhere along the upward trek, the air got too thin. Somewhere along the way, the mountain became an escalator, that led to a travelling ram, which brought him into the arms of a yeti which placed him on a lever that pushed him into a bubble that took him up, up, up! And then some time the following year, the bubble burst. Maybe it was one big Simpsons reenactment. Maybe Simmons’ season was just one big altitude-induced hallucination. But if he was hallucinating, then so were we.

What makes Simmons’ career arc so unbelievable is just how sudden everything occurred. In an instant, his numbers skyrocketed, and in the next, they were already in the midst of freefall. And yet somehow, wedged in between those two infinitesimal moments, Simmons found himself nearly $50 million richer. This isn’t to say Milwaukee made a bad decision in offering such a juicy contract. They found a need and addressed it. But offering close to $10 million annually for a player with so little context and so little history — that was worrisome. And had they known of the chain of events that brought Simmons to prominence, maybe they wouldn’t have been so eager to pull the trigger. But Simmons’ stats were seductive, and Milwaukee was smitten. Sometimes it’s as simple as that.

A Dubious Place in History

Simmons’ rise to temporary prominence came at an awkward time for the Clippers. They were in a state of flux, leaving behind their youth movement in Odom, Darius Miles, and Richardson for a more solid core around Elton Brand. Simmons’ success played a key role in the Clippers’ improvement in the standings at 37-45, but it didn’t match the 01-02 season (39-43) where the Clippers were on the outside looking in as the ninth seed. Simmons’ prosperity also came a year too early, as the 05-06 Clippers became the most successful iteration in the franchise’s modern history. While Simmons would never see that same level of team success for the rest of his career (unless you count the two games he played for the Spurs last year), he amassed a fortune as an individual, which is probably a fair trade-off.

Ultimately, YouTube doesn’t lie. As unlikely as 04-05 Simmons was, he holds no real relevance in Clipper lore. He proved himself an adequate two-way player for a season, but he was little more than a stopgap for a brighter tomorrow. Today, his glory days don’t have the same effect on teams as they used to. His lucrative contract has run out, and he’s back to toiling at the end of the depth charts. In fact, the biggest favor his contract has done for him (other than give him tens of millions of dollars) was giving him a confounding role of NBA All-Star in the terrible 2010 movie Just Wright. (In 2010, Simmons played 23 games and averaged 5.3 points.)

Mountain goats are naturally equipped to scale great heights, but they aren’t above error. Accidents happen, and some find themselves slipping and plummeting to their doom. But if a mountain goat slips off a mountain and nobody is there to witness it fall, does it actually happen? Simmons’ best season as an NBA player was spent on an irrelevant team. His immediate decline occurred on equally irrelevant teams. But for 75 games in 2004 and 2005, Bobby Simmons was a rising NBA player. For that season, he showed the league that he might be worth an investment. One day, history will wash this fact away. But if Simmons leaves any legacy, let it be this: He was the product of a perfect storm — a Plan C that worked better than anyone could have expected.

The Lost Season: Boris Diaw, 05-06

[flash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRJNUueNoao&feature=BFa&list=PL2A8E6EC888408C7A&index=33]

With the threat of a shortened or even cancelled season upon us, there is very little we can do other than watch U19 tournaments or read books to restore a shred of basketball into our lives. What we can do, though, is reminisce over other “lost” seasons. Seasons which saw players or teams achieve extraordinary things that go beyond titles or awards, only to fade back into the background one year later. Here we will bring the tale of these lost seasons, the ones that touched us on a personal level, the ones we will never forget, though history itself might. we start with the story of Boris Diaw, and his magical 2005-2006 showing.

Steve Nash is a 2 time MVP, one of the greatest point guards ever, and the operating force on what most people would concur were the funnest offenses of all time. And yet somehow, though if you ask him he’s certain to tell you he doesn’t want to, he may be even better as a martyr.

Everybody and everything has taken a shot at Steve Nash throughout his unique NBA career. Mark Cuban passing up on re-signing him because Erick Dampier was just too attractive to gloss over. Joe Johnson breaking his face in the 2005 playoffs. Amar’e Stoudemire’s microfracture surgery in 2006. Tony Parker’s head, Robert Horry’s hip, and Stu Jackson’s gavel in 2007. Duncan’s 3 pointer in 2008. Shaq’s primadonna routine to go with Terry Porter’s Terry Porter routine in 2009. Kobe Bryant airballing a shot straight to Ron Artest’s hands in 2010. Hedo Turkoglu. Vince Carter. 3 different all-star players – Johnson, Stoudemire, and Shawn Marion – all separately deciding that for whatever reason, getting the ball wherever they want it and whenever they want it just wasn’t fun. Robert Sarver selling away draft picks, players, and childrens’ souls. The list goes on and on.

But through all the dirty blows, the infuriating stupidity, and yes – the bad luck – nobody did more to harm Steve Nash’s NBA career than Boris Diaw.

The Arrival

July of 2005. The Phoenix Suns are coming off a 62 win season, one that netted Mike D’Antoni a Coach of the Year award, Steve Nash his first MVP, and brought back joyous, offensive minded basketball to the forefront of the league. Momentum is at its peak, legions of fans have gathered behind them, and yet – the San Antonio Spurs knocked them out of the playoffs in 5 games, and still loom in the background. To deal with this robotic behemoth, sharpshooter Quentin Richardson is sent to New York for Kurt Thomas, giving Phoenix a defensive big man who can match up with Finals MVP Tim Duncan. A promising line-up of Nash, Johnson, Marion, Stoudemire and Thomas – 3 all-stars, a defensive anchor, and an up-and-coming, all-around 24 year old in Johnson, who is coming off a season of 17 points per game with 47% shooting from 3 – completes a picture as bright as the Arizona sun.

Only Johnson wants out.

With the bright lights promising roster opportunity to be the number 1 option on a terrible team proving too tempting to resist, Joe asks the Phoenix Suns not to match the 5 year, 72 million offer the Atlanta Hawks offered him in restricted free agency. Phoenix is almost saved by Atlanta’s minority owner Steve Belkin, but a judge steps in, sending Johnson in a sign-and-trade deal to Lotteryville, Georgia. The Suns save face with two future first round picks (which would eventually become Rajon Rondo, sold off to Boston, and Robin Lopez), and a French guard from the end of the bench named Boris Diaw.

The Preamble

Over his first two NBA seasons, Boris Diaw neglected to show any indication that he was, indeed, an NBA player. Fitting perfectly with the profile of the early 2000s international draftee, Diaw was nabbed with the 21st pick of the 2003 draft with a rare combination of natural size and European-honed skill. Diaw was supposed to be a 6’9” guard who could handle the ball, set up his teammates, rebound when asked, and be back in time for tea.

Instead, he took the international draftee stigma one step further and was awful. Shots were missed. Turnovers were turned over. Instead of providing the passing-shooting-guard to Jason Terry’s shooting-point-guard, Diaw played a bench role, and played it miserably. 25 minutes a game in his rookie year became 18 the next, and when Phoenix asked for the disappointing Frenchman as a throw in in the Joe Johnson trade, the Hawks were more than happy to abide.

Phoenix had supposedly liked Diaw ever since the 2003 draft, and were intending to use him as part of an ensemble cast to replace Johnson. The newly signed Raja Bell would fill in the starting 2 shooter/perimeter stopper role. Leandro Barbosa, then still on the upward curve of his career arc, would be the team’s secondary ball handler. Jim Jackson and James Jones had the alliteration corner all covered. And Diaw? Diaw would hopefully give them a little bit of everything in as many minutes as he would be able to play without becoming a liability. For the Mike D’Antoni definition of depth, this was enough.

And then Amare (pre-apostrophe! Man, those were the days) had microfracture surgery.

The Breakthrough

Amare’s injury changed everything. From a team with hopeful depth in the backcourt, no depth in the frontcourt, and a 3 star launching pad that rivaled any trio in the league outside of San Antonio, the Suns were diminished to “Steve Nash runs the show, Shawn Marion does everything else, and dear lord that’s all we have”. When a murderer’s row of an early schedule sent the Suns stumbling to a 4-5 start to their season, it seemed as if the magical Seven Seconds or Less campaign was a distant memory.

But as all this was happening, something else, something bigger had just taken place.

Boris Diaw decided that he’s a passing savant.

It started with a 5 assist performance against the Lakers in the second game of the season. Then it was 6 against Utah. Then, out of absolutely nowhere, an 11-9-11 implosion in a loss to the still-good-but-no-longer-great Sacramento Kings. 6 the next game. Then 5. Then 7. The sort of assists that just didn’t belong at the fingertips of a 6’9” player, not in their sheer volume, and especially not in their quality. On a team with only one creator – even a historically great one like Steve Nash – playing Diaw just enough for him not to become a liability was both no longer a limitation, and no longer an option.

On November 23rd, one night after defeating the Toronto Raptors to get their record back to .500, the Phoenix Suns faced the Houston Rockets. Houston was in a moribund state, without star Tracy McGrady, starting the likes of Luther Head, Ryan Bowen, David Wesley and Juwan Howard next to Yao Ming. The Suns, on the other hand, were starting Boris Diaw.

Phoenix won 100-88, the second in a 9 game win streak. Boris Diaw had 17 points, 10 rebounds, and 6 assists.

Starting Small Forward, Backup Point Guard, Backup Center

Diaw’s elite passing game was his newfound claim to fame, but even in its brilliance, this was hardly the work of a one-trick pony. During his inaugural month of Sundom, Diaw indeed averaged a whopping 5.8 assists in just under 29 minutes per game, but his impact was felt virtually everywhere. Those assists came with 6.3 rebounds, 10.5 points on 53% shooting, and solid defensive work. More importantly, the Steve Nash Magic Show had given Diaw a nasty streak that he never displayed off the bench in Atlanta, aggressively looking to score and distribute instead of lurking in the background, hoping he isn’t subbed back out for the likes of Dion Glover.

As the games drew on by, fluke talk was dying out and sheer amazement was emboldening its stand. But Diaw wasn’t done. On a team with so little depth everywhere, and specifically in the frontcourt, a 6’9” player who does virtually everything couldn’t be laid to waste solely in the backcourt.

When he was given the starting job for good that night against Houston, Diaw was registered as a small forward, a minor shift from his previous shooting guard billing. But as Diaw’s game grew stronger, Phoenix’s desperate need for size grew as well. The shift to backup power forward – those 8 or so minutes in which Marion was catching his breath – was seamless. Then came yet another bump, this time as Kurt Thomas’ backup at the 5. One has to imagine that even D’Antoni himself had to be skeptical as to how far this could be stretched, and yet, there Diaw was, manning the pivot, and there were the Suns, winning basketball games.

Prior to the 2003 draft, Diaw was projected as an outlier at shooting guard. Now he was an outlier on virtually every level, bordering on ridiculous. The man legitimately played 5 positions, starting smack dab in the middle at the 3, sprinkling in some 1, seasoning with 5, spending time in between when necessary, his long reach giving other starters a hand both as Nash’s secondary ball handler and as Thomas’ paint dwelling companion.

February 2006. The Suns are 36-17, coming off a win against the Paul-Pierce-and-garbage Boston Celtics, when it is announced that Kurt Thomas has been diagnosed with a stress fracture in his foot. Normally, one would have to plug his backup center into the starting line-up. Except the Suns’ backup center already started at small forward. Not anymore.

When Kurt Thomas was ruled out and Boris Diaw officially became a starting NBA center, the Suns were riding a 5 game winning streak. They extended it to 11, finishing the season with a Kurt-less 18-11 run, and grabbing the second seed in the Western Conference playoffs. Steve Nash, still the architect, still the master, wins his second straight MVP award (to the chagrin of many, and we’re not having this discussion here). Diaw, who finished the season averaging 13.3 points on 56.4% true shooting, 6.9 boards, and 6.2 assists a night, wins the NBA’s Most Improved Player award, in one of the easiest votes that the ridiculous award has ever had (with apologies to David West, who had an incredible breakout campaign, and teamed up with a rookie Chris Paul and fellow waiver wire pickup Diaw to single-handedly win me my fantasy league).

But in the playoffs, you need to have size, right? Diaw just can’t be a playoff center, right? Right?

The Peak

In the first round, the Suns faced a Lakers squad with very little frontcourt strength. Lamar Odom was never truly an inside presence, Kwame Brown was starting at center and still every bit the laughing stock. But Phil Jackson saw a weakness, and exploited it. Kwame and Lamar routinely got the ball against Phoenix’s 6’9” and 6’7” starting big men, and with Kobe Bryant at his peak, it was very nearly enough. The Suns had to become just the 9thteam to come back from a 3-1 playoff series deficit, and withstand a 50 point game from Bryant in an overtime Game 6, just to get to the next round. Yet another 7 game series against a Los Angeles squad followed, this time against the one hit wonder Elton Brand-Sam Cassell Clipper team, and again, the Suns prevailed, barely.

In both series, the Suns – and Diaw as their center – were severely outrebounded. Diaw posted 5.8 boards a night in the playoffs, understandable for a former small forward but disappointing for a center, and while his scoring increased and his passing remained every bit as crisp, the Suns were exhausted and outmatched entering their Western Conference Finals match-up with the Dallas Mavericks. Heck, they needed the Daniel Ewing debacle to take place, and a miraculous resurgence from February free agent pick up Tim Thomas, just to get past the Clippers. Tim Thomas! THE CLIPPERS!

May 24th. The 2006 conference Finals tip off in a raucous American Airlines Arena in Dallas, the result of the Mavericks somehow being the conference’s 4thseed with it’s second best record. The Mavs have just defeated the defending champs, with the deciding Game 7 taking place in San Antonio. Dirk is at what was then the top of his game. Avery Johnson is still a coaching mastermind. Josh Howard is still relevant.

Steve Nash was his usual brilliant self, dominating the game from start to finish, going off for 27 points and 16 assists, including one of the ballsiest 3 pointers ever seen in the playoffs, down 7, with 2:14 left on the game clock, 19 left on the shot clock, and absolutely nobody set to take the rebound. But we’ve seen Steve Nash do these things on this stage before.

Boris Diaw, however, had done something he was not supposed to do. Guarded by a combination of the lumbering Erick Dampier, the too slow Dirk, and the comatose Keith Van Horn, Diaw obliterated all that was in his path. Off pick and rolls, in isolations, from the elbow, from the post. Nobody on earth could stop Boris Diaw that night. With 5 seconds left in the game and the Suns down 1, Diaw received an inbounds pass from Tim Thomas in the right block, his back to the basket, Jerry Stackhouse all over him. Diaw power dribbled to the middle, spun towards the baseline, sent Stackhouse flying in the air, and calmly netted the 6 foot jumper to seal the deal. Those were his 33rd and 34th points of the night, to go with 6 rebounds and a surprisingly meager 2 assists (though with Nash getting 16, they were hard to come by).

5 games later, the shorthanded Suns eventually saw their demise at the hands of the Mavericks, but Boris Diaw had cemented his status as a force to be reckoned with. 24.2 points on 52% shooting (76% from the line), to go with 8.5 boards and 1.7 blocks a night left basketball fans wondering whether Diaw could actually play center on a regularly sized team, on a regular basis. His assists had suffered throughout the series – just 3.2 a game to go with 3.3 turnovers – but that was what we already knew Diaw could do. It was the rest that he had to prove, and he had. Diaw was given a 5 year, 45 million contract extension before he could even taste free agency. For the Diaw we saw against Dallas, this was an absolute steal.

The Downfall

The 2006-2007 Suns campaign once again projected to be a promising one. Amare was back. Kurt Thomas was healthy. The Nash/Marion/Diaw nucleus remained, bolstered by Bell and Barbosa. And indeed, the campaign was a relative success, with a hard fought and controversial exit at the hands of the same old Spurs, in a de-facto NBA Finals that just happened to be a second round series.

But Diaw was never the same. With Stoudemire back on board, he struggled in a dimished role as the 3rdoffensive option. His production dropped in almost every way possible, and his mood soured. The fragile child from his first two NBA seasons emerged once again, and whether this was the result of guaranteed money or a supposed lack of trust from the coaching staff was irrelevant. One year later, he was traded to Charlotte, where doing-it-all was replaced with lethargy and munchies. Athleticism turned into girth, the player who played all 5 positions became a slow-footed power forward, and short of a desperate run to a 7thseed in 2010 and a bunch of fat jokes on online chats during the 2010 World Championships, Boris Diaw never got anywhere ever again.

It’s easy to dismiss Diaw’s 05-06 campaign as a flash in a pan that was later converted for the making of pastries (do you even use a pan to make pastries? The metaphor worked too well to check), yet another one of Steve Nash/D’Antoni ball’s many creations. Let us not forget, says this theory, as Diaw was doing his thing, Tim Thomas was playing himself into a 4 year 24 million contract just mere feet away. But that would be selling Diaw short. So much of what Diaw did was independent of Nash and the mustachioed mastermind. Diaw was handling the ball when Nash wasn’t, creating for his teammates while the immortal Canadian was lying down near the bench or spotting up in the corner. Diaw was just as instrumental to the success of the Suns’ offense as they were to his.

Where Transcendence Lies

In a game where size plays such a huge factor in everything that occurs, that size often leads us to very direct definitions. Big men do this, little men do that. Put all these roles together and you got yourself a team. When boundaries are crossed, we feel that evil is afoot, and our standards are raised impossibly high. Andrea Bargnani may not be a star, but if he were 6 inches shorter, his style of play would be understandable. Once he broke out of the predetermined mold, he is deemed incompetent until he achieves success.

As the game evolved, however, we’ve seen those boundaries crossed more and more, and that same success has started to arive as well. And when the supposedly impure hybrid becomes an unmitigated winner, we praise them. Michael Jordan was a guard who took the above-the-rim game up a notch, and when it left him, he mastered the post. Dirk Nowitzki led a fringe contender to a championship by being an unstoppable scorer from absolutely everywhere, though traditionally his range would end at around 15 feet and his jumpers would only fall when flat-footed.

Amazing plays are amazing plays, no matter who they come from. It’s what makes us love basketball. Blake Griffin hanging in the air long enough to complete an entire game of Monopoly set on a Russian man’s scalp, or Jason Terry inexplicably succeeding at throwing an orange ball into a round hoop from 30 feet away with a 6’8”, 270 pounder draped all over him in the waning moments of a Finals game, make our jaws drop in awe and our hearts bless Dr. Naismith again and again.

But true greatness lies in these hybrids. My personal basketball fetish is the passing big man. I cheer and I yell and the endorphins flow like crazy when I see a superhuman dunk or a fadeaway taken at a 45 degree angle, but nothing compares to seeing a guy like Al Horford or Pau Gasol place a perfectly constructed bounce pass right in the grasp of a moving target. For others, it’s the diminutive Derrick Rose driving into the paint, where giants roam and pain is guaranteed, only to flip the ball to the edge of the backboard, where it gains a spin that leads it straight into the hoop.

Just as Larry Bird and Magic Johnson were two of the greatest players of all time as one-in-a-generation-that-just-happened-to-be-two-in-the-same-generation passers and team players working within bodies that were built for other skills, just as Lebron James separates himself from today’s field with his elite ability to see the game and find his teammates while working from Karl Malone’s body, so was Boris Diaw.

Obviously, Diaw was not at the level of these legends – he was more of a Lamar Odom, falling just barely short of physical specimen, but with skills that ranged all over the basketball map, skills that promised the world, leaving us yearning for so much more. While the Larrys and the Magics and the Lebrons have transcendence oozing from every pore, the Borises and Lamars are transcendent for their uniqueness, perhaps resonating with us in an even greater way, until they inevitably disappoint.

There will never be another Boris Diaw. That is why it pains us so that we got to see the original and only version show its true form for just a 7 month period. And as we watch the diminished shell of what was once greatness labor around in a Charlotte uniform (or wherever, post-lockout), and we see a rare glimpse of what was with a nice alley-oop to Bismack Biyombo (hopefully) or brilliantly finding a wide open Tyrus Thomas for a clanged 20 footer (hopefully not), we must remember that this was the true Boris Diaw. The one who let Steve Nash down, the one who let us all down, but not before taking to a basketball court and tantalizing our minds with things that shouldn’t be possible.